Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 29(6): 1380-7, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25397801

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare long-term survival and clinical outcomes of endosseous implants with different surface characteristics in patients with sinus elevation procedures, autologous bone grafting, and delayed implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Implant survival, peri-implant soft tissue conditions, marginal bone level, intrasinus apical bone level, and sinus health were studied in patients subjected to autologous bone graft and delayed placement of implants with turned or oxidized surfaces. After a minimum of 5 years of functional loading, all patients were clinically examined regarding gingival pocket depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BoP). The marginal bone level (MBL) was measured in intraoral radiographs. Cone beam computed tomography was used to evaluate the apical bone level (ABL) of the implants and intrasinus conditions. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received sinus elevation and a total of 92 dental implants. Thirteen patients received 47 implants with a turned surface, and 15 patients received 45 implants with an oxidized surface. Mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 5 to 19 years). No significant difference was found between the two implant surfaces in terms of PD, BoP, MBL, or ABL. Four patients (14%) exhibited radiographic signs of sinus pathology, with opacification, polyp-like structures, and thickening of the sinus membrane. Radiographic signs of sinus pathology were not correlated to implant survival or to the investigated parameters. CONCLUSION: Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with intraorally harvested bone and delayed placement of either turned or oxidized implants results in equally high long-term survival rates, stable marginal and apical bone levels, and good peri-implant soft tissue health.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Implantes Dentales , Diseño de Prótesis Dental , Elevación del Piso del Seno Maxilar/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Autoinjertos/trasplante , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia Gingival/clasificación , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucosa Nasal/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Bolsa Periodontal/clasificación , Propiedades de Superficie , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Angle Orthod ; 80(6): 1116-21, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20677963

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study was performed to test the hypothesis that an orthodontic oral appliance (OA) that is designed to work against the backwardly directed forces on the upper incisors may counteract the reduction in overjet from these devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with normal bites, good oral health, and milder sleep apnea were randomized to treatment with either OAs or orthodontic OAs. Bite changes were evaluated on plaster casts and radiographs and by questionnaires after a mean of 2.4 years in 19 frequent users. RESULTS: Four of nine patients in the orthodontic OA group increased their overjet by > or =0.4 mm, while none of the 10 patients in the OA group experienced that effect. CONCLUSION: Only the orthodontic OA increases the overjet; this design may therefore be beneficial to patients at risk of negative effects on their bite during OA treatment.


Asunto(s)
Ferulas Oclusales/efectos adversos , Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico , Aparatos Ortodóncicos , Sobremordida/etiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Cefalometría , Femenino , Humanos , Incisivo/fisiopatología , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Ronquido/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Angle Orthod ; 74(5): 610-7, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15529494

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to develop a method that optimizes the reliability of longitudinal radiographic evaluation of small and fast-growing animals, such as the rabbit. Because the use of conventional cephalometric methods, including superimposition of serial radiographs, is more problematic in small animals than in humans, two titanium-alloy screws were placed 10 mm apart in the sagittal crest of the parietal bone in 10 growing New Zealand white rabbits. The anterior screw served as holder for a steel pin that, in turn, secured the fixation of the rabbit's head to a specially designed cephalostat. A lateral cephalogram of each animal was exposed on four occasions at one-month intervals. Computer-aided superimpositions were made of all four cephalograms from each animal using the screws in the calvarium as reference structures. To evaluate the method, the superimpositions were repeated after three to eight weeks, and the superimposition reproducibility was calculated. From the results, it can be concluded that the method allows congruent positioning of the animal skull relative to the film-focus assembly at repeated radiographic examinations. Furthermore, it introduces readily identified reference structures in the animal skull that can be used at high-precision superimposition of serial radiographs.


Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Cefalometría/métodos , Desarrollo Maxilofacial/fisiología , Titanio , Animales , Cefalometría/instrumentación , Aleaciones Dentales/química , Huesos Faciales/crecimiento & desarrollo , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Maxilar/patología , Maxilar/cirugía , Oseointegración , Hueso Parietal/patología , Hueso Parietal/cirugía , Conejos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Propiedades de Superficie , Factores de Tiempo , Titanio/química
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...