Using social interaction models for genetic analysis of skin damage in gilts.

BACKGROUND: Skin damage is a trait of economic and welfare importance that results from social interactions between animals. These interactions may produce wound signs on the gilt's skin as a result of damage behavior (i.e., fighting), biting syndromes (i.e., tail, vulva, or ear biting), and swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome. Although current selection for traits that are affected by social interactions primarily focuses on improving direct genetic effects, combined selection on direct and social genetic effects could increase genetic gain and avoid a negative response to selection in cases of competitive behavior. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate variance components for combined skin damage (CSD), with or without accounting for social genetic effects, (2) investigate the impact of including genomic information on the prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion of CSD estimated breeding values, and (3) perform a single-step genome-wide association study (ssGWAS) of CSD under a classical and a social interaction model. RESULTS: Our results show that CSD is heritable and affected by social genetic effects. Modeling CSD with social interaction models increased the total heritable variance relative to the phenotypic variance by three-fold compared to the classical model. Including genomic information increased the prediction accuracy of direct, social, and total estimated breeding values for purebred sires by at least 21.2%. Bias and dispersion of estimated breeding values were reduced by including genomic information in classical and social interaction models but remained present. The ssGWAS did not identify any single nucleotide polymorphism that was significantly associated with social or direct genetic effects for CSD. CONCLUSIONS: Combined skin damage is heritable, and genetic selection against this trait will increase the welfare of animals in the long term. Combined skin damage is affected by social genetic effects, and modeling this trait with a social interaction model increases the potential for genetic improvement. Including genomic information increases the prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values and reduces their bias and dispersion, although some biases persist. The results of the genome-wide association study indicate that CSD has a polygenic architecture and no major quantitative trait locus was detected.

Dimensionality of genomic information and its impact on genome-wide associations and variant selection for genomic prediction: a simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Identifying true positive variants in genome-wide associations (GWA) depends on several factors, including the number of genotyped individuals. The limited dimensionality of genomic information may give insights into the optimal number of individuals to be used in GWA. This study investigated different discovery set sizes based on the number of largest eigenvalues explaining a certain proportion of variance in the genomic relationship matrix (G). In addition, we investigated the impact on the prediction accuracy by adding variants, which were selected based on different set sizes, to the regular single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips used for genomic prediction. METHODS: We simulated sequence data that included 500k SNPs with 200 or 2000 quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN). A regular 50k panel included one in every ten simulated SNPs. Effective population size (Ne) was set to 20 or 200. GWA were performed using a number of genotyped animals equivalent to the number of largest eigenvalues of G (EIG) explaining 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95, 98, and 99% of the variance. In addition, the largest discovery set consisted of 30k genotyped animals. Limited or extensive phenotypic information was mimicked by changing the trait heritability. Significant and large-effect size SNPs were added to the 50k panel and used for single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP). RESULTS: Using a number of genotyped animals corresponding to at least EIG98 allowed the identification of QTN with the largest effect sizes when Ne was large. Populations with smaller Ne required more than EIG98. Furthermore, including genotyped animals with a higher reliability (i.e., a higher trait heritability) improved the identification of the most informative QTN. Prediction accuracy was highest when the significant or the large-effect SNPs representing twice the number of simulated QTN were added to the 50k panel. CONCLUSIONS: Accurately identifying causative variants from sequence data depends on the effective population size and, therefore, on the dimensionality of genomic information. This dimensionality can help identify the most suitable sample size for GWA and could be considered for variant selection, especially when resources are restricted. Even when variants are accurately identified, their inclusion in prediction models has limited benefits.

The genetic basis of swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome and its genetic association with post-weaning skin damage and production traits.

The swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome (SINS) is a syndrome visually characterized by the presence of inflamed and necrotic skin at extreme body parts, such as the teats, tail, ears, and claw coronary bands. This syndrome is associated with several environmental causes, but knowledge of the role of genetics is still limited. Moreover, piglets affected by SINS are believed to be phenotypically more susceptible to chewing and biting behaviors from pen mates, which could cause a chronic reduction in their welfare throughout the production process. Our objectives were to 1) investigate the genetic basis of SINS expressed on piglets' different body parts and 2) estimate SINS genetic relationship with post-weaning skin damage and pre and post-weaning production traits. A total of 5,960 two to three-day-old piglets were scored for SINS on the teats, claws, tails, and ears as a binary phenotype. Later, those binary records were combined into a trait defined as TOTAL_SINS. For TOTAL_SINS, animals presenting no signs of SINS were scored as 1, whereas animals showing at least one affected part were scored as 2. Apart from SINS traits, piglets had their birth weight (BW) and weaning weight (WW) recorded, and up to 4,132 piglets were later evaluated for combined skin damage (CSD), carcass backfat (BF), and loin depth (LOD). In the first set of analyses, the heritability of SINS on different body parts was estimated with single-trait animal-maternal models, and pairwise genetic correlations between body parts were obtained from two-trait models. Later, we used four three-trait animal models with TOTAL_SINS, CSD, and an alternative production trait (i.e., BW, WW, LOD, BF) to access trait heritabilities and genetic correlations between SINS and production traits. The maternal effect was included in the BW, WW, and TOTAL_SINS models. The direct heritability of SINS on different body parts ranged from 0.08 to 0.34, indicating that reducing SINS incidence through genetic selection is feasible. The direct genetic correlation between TOTAL_SINS and pre-weaning growth traits (BW and WW) was favorable and negative (from -0.40 to -0.30), indicating that selection for animals genetically less prone to present signs of SINS will positively affect the piglet's genetics for heavier weight at birth and weaning. The genetic correlations between TOTAL_SINS and BF and between TOTAL_SINS and LOD were weak or not significant (-0.16 to 0.05). However, the selection against SINS was shown to be genetically correlated with CSD, with estimates ranging from 0.19 to 0.50. That means that piglets genetically less likely to present SINS signs are also more unlikely to suffer CSD after weaning, having a long-term increase in their welfare throughout the production system.

The swine inflammation and necrosis syndrome (SINS) is visually characterized by the presence of inflamed and necrotic skin at extreme body parts, such as the teats, tail, ears, and claw coronary bands. Piglets affected by this syndrome are considered phenotypically more susceptible to chewing and biting behaviors from pen mates. However, the genetic relationship between SINS and post-weaning skin damage is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the genetic basis of SINS expressed on piglets' different body parts and to estimate the SINS genetic relationship with skin damage and pre and post-weaning production traits. We showed that SINS on different body parts is heritable and that the direct selection against a combined score of SINS in different body parts (TOTAL_SINS) will favor the piglet's genetics for heavier weight at birth and weaning. However, TOTAL_SINS is not significantly correlated with carcass backfat thickness and loin depth at the piglet genetic level. The direct selection against SINS is genetically correlated with skin damage after weaning, meaning that piglets genetically more prone to present signs of SINS are more likely to receive skin damage later in life.

Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.

The objectives of this study were to 1) investigate the predictability and bias of genomic breeding values (GEBV) of purebred (PB) sires for CB performance when CB genotypes imputed from a low-density panel are available, 2) assess if the availability of those CB genotypes can be used to partially offset CB phenotypic recording, and 3) investigate the impact of including imputed CB genotypes in genomic analyses when using the algorithm for proven and young (APY). Two pig populations with up to 207,375 PB and 32,893 CB phenotypic records per trait and 138,026 PB and 32,893 CB genotypes were evaluated. PB sires were genotyped for a 50K panel, whereas CB animals were genotyped for a low-density panel of 600 SNP and imputed to 50K. The predictability and bias of GEBV of PB sires for backfat thickness (BFX) and average daily gain recorded (ADGX) recorded on CB animals were assessed when CB genotypes were available or not in the analyses. In the first set of analyses, direct inverses of the genomic relationship matrix (G) were used with phenotypic datasets truncated at different time points. In the next step, we evaluated the APY algorithm with core compositions differing in the CB genotype contributions. After that, the performance of core compositions was compared with an analysis using a random PB core from a purely PB genomic set. The number of rounds to convergence was recorded for all APY analyses. With the direct inverse of G in the first set of analyses, adding CB genotypes imputed from a low-density panel (600 SNP) did not improve predictability or reduce the bias of PB sires' GEBV for CB performance, even for sires with fewer CB progeny phenotypes in the analysis. That indicates that the inclusion of CB genotypes primarily used for inferring pedigree in commercial farms is of no benefit to offset CB phenotyping. When CB genotypes were incorporated into APY, a random core composition or a core with no CB genotypes reduced bias and the number of rounds to convergence but did not affect predictability. Still, a PB random core composition from a genomic set with only PB genotypes resulted in the highest predictability and the smallest number of rounds to convergence, although bias increased. Genotyping CB individuals for low-density panels is a valuable identification tool for linking CB phenotypes to pedigree; however, the inclusion of those CB genotypes imputed from a low-density panel (600 SNP) might not benefit genomic predictions for PB individuals or offset CB phenotyping for the evaluated CB performance traits. Further studies will help understand the usefulness of those imputed CB genotypes for traits with lower PB-CB genetic correlations and traits not recorded in the PB environment, such as mortality and disease traits.

Crossbred (CB) genotypes primarily used for inferring pedigree in commercial farms can be potentially used for genomic prediction and partially offset CB phenotyping. We investigated the predictability and bias of genomic breeding values (GEBV) of purebred (PB) sires for CB performance when CB genotypes are available, assessed if the availability of those CB genotypes can be used to partially offset CB phenotypic recording, and investigated the impact of including CB genotypes in genomic analyses when using the algorithm for proven and young (APY). The predictability and bias of GEBV of PB sires for two CB traits were assessed when CB genotypes were available or not in the analyses. Later, the performance of different APY core compositions accounting for CB genotypes was compared with a random core from a purely PB genomic set. Adding CB genotypes did not improve predictability or reduce the bias of PB sires' GEBV for CB performance, indicating that the inclusion of CB genotypes imputed from a low-density (600 SNP) panel is of no benefit to offset CB phenotyping. With APY, a random core composition from a genomic set with only PB genotypes resulted in the highest predictability and the smallest number of rounds to convergence, although bias increased.

Investigating pig survival in different production phases using genomic models.

Pig survival is an economically important trait with relevant social welfare implications, thus standing out as an important selection criterion for the current pig farming system. We aimed to estimate (co)variance components for survival in different production phases in a crossbred pig population as well as to investigate the benefit of including genomic information through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) on the prediction accuracy of survival traits compared with results from traditional BLUP. Individual survival records on, at most, 64,894 crossbred piglets were evaluated under two multi-trait threshold models. The first model included farrowing, lactation, and combined postweaning survival, whereas the second model included nursery and finishing survival. Direct and maternal breeding values were estimated using BLUP and ssGBLUP methods. Furthermore, prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion were accessed using the linear regression validation method. Direct heritability estimates for survival in all studied phases were low (from 0.02 to 0.08). Survival in preweaning phases (farrowing and lactation) was controlled by the dam and piglet additive genetic effects, although the maternal side was more important. Postweaning phases (nursery, finishing, and the combination of both) showed the same or higher direct heritabilities compared with preweaning phases. The genetic correlations between survival traits within preweaning and postweaning phases were favorable and strong, but correlations between preweaning and postweaning phases were moderate. The prediction accuracy of survival traits was low, although it increased by including genomic information through ssGBLUP compared with the prediction accuracy from BLUP. Direct and maternal breeding values were similarly accurate with BLUP, but direct breeding values benefited more from genomic information. Overall, a slight increase in bias was observed when genomic information was included, whereas dispersion of breeding values was greatly reduced. Combined postweaning survival presented higher direct heritability than in the preweaning phases and the highest prediction accuracy among all evaluated production phases, therefore standing out as a candidate trait for improving survival. Survival is a complex trait with low heritability; however, important genetic gains can still be obtained, especially under a genomic prediction framework.