Low absolute risk of thrombotic and cardiovascular events in outpatient pregnant women with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy may contribute to an excess risk of thrombotic or cardiovascular events. COVID-19 increases the risk of these events, although the risk is relatively limited among outpatients. We sought to determine whether outpatient pregnant women with COVID-19 are at a high risk for cardiovascular or thrombotic events. MATERIALS & METHODS: We analyzed pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 from the multicenter CORONA-VTE-Network registry. The main study outcomes were a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombotic events, and a composite of adjudicated cardiovascular events. Events were assessed 90 days after the COVID-19 diagnosis and reported for non-pregnant women ≤45 years, and for men ≤45 years, as points of reference. RESULTS: Among 6585 outpatients, 169 were pregnant at diagnosis. By 90-day follow-up, two pregnant women during the third trimester had lower extremity venous thrombosis, one deep and one superficial vein thrombosis. The cumulative incidence of thrombotic events was 1.20 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.0 to 2.84 %). Respective rates were 0.47 % (95 % CI: 0.14 % to 0.79 %) among non-pregnant women, and 0.49 % (95 % CI: 0.06 % to 0.91 %) among men ≤45 years. No non-thrombotic cardiovascular events occurred in pregnant women. The rates of cardiovascular events were 0.53 % (95 % CI: 0.18 to 0.87) among non-pregnant women, and 0.68 % (95 % CI: 0.18 to 1.18) in men aged ≤45 years. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombotic and cardiovascular events are rare among outpatients with COVID-19. Although a higher event rate among outpatient pregnant women cannot be excluded, the absolute event rates are low and do not warrant population-wide cardiovascular interventions to optimize outcomes.

Catheter-based therapy for high-risk or intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: death and re-hospitalization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Catheter-based therapies (CBTs) have been developed as a treatment option in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). There remains a paucity of data to inform decision-making in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE. The aim of this study was to characterize in-hospital and readmission outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE treated with vs. without CBT in a large retrospective registry. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE were identified using the 2017-20 National Readmission Database. In-hospital outcomes included death and bleeding and 30- and 90-day readmission outcomes including all-cause, venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related and bleeding-related readmissions. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between CBT and no CBT. RESULTS: A total of 14 903 [2076 (13.9%) with CBT] and 42 829 [8824 (20.6%) with CBT] patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk PE were included, respectively. Prior to IPTW, patients with CBT were younger and less likely to have cancer and cardiac arrest, receive systemic thrombolysis, or be on mechanical ventilation. In the IPTW logistic regression model, CBT was associated with lower odds of in-hospital death in high-risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.87] and intermediate-risk PE (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.83). Patients with high-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83] and VTE (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.63) readmission. Patients with intermediate-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.79) and VTE (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.76) readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high-risk or intermediate-risk PE, CBT was associated with lower in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mildly to moderately reduced ejection fraction after permanent pacemaker implantation.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with mildly to moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who require permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation do not have a concurrent indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, the risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in this population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the risk of VT/VF after PPM implantation in patients with mildly to moderately reduced LVEF. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 243 patients with LVEF between 35% and 49% who underwent PPM placement and did not meet indications for an ICD. The primary end point was occurrence of sustained VT/VF. Competing risks regression was performed to calculate subhazard ratios for the primary end point. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 27 months; 73% of patients were male, average age was 79 ± 10 years, average LVEF was 42% ± 4%, and 70% were New York Heart Association class II or above. Most PPMs were implanted for sick sinus syndrome (34%) or atrioventricular block (50%). Of 243 total patients, 11 (4.5%) met the primary end point of VT/VF. Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) was associated with significantly higher rates of VT/VF, with a subhazard ratio of 5.4 (95% CI, 1.5-20.1; P = .01). Of patients with multivessel CAD, 8 of 82 (9.8%) patients met the primary end point for an annualized risk of 4.3% per year. CONCLUSION: Patients with mildly to moderately reduced LVEF and multivessel CAD undergoing PPM implantation are at increased risk for the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Patients in this population may benefit from additional risk stratification for VT/VF and consideration for upfront ICD implantation.

In-Hospital and readmission outcomes of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and atrial fibrillation: insights from the National Readmissions Database.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding. However, the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with AF and MPN compared with the general population with AF is unclear. Additionally, traditional risk scores (CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED) for risk/benefit estimation of thromboprophylaxis in AF do not account for MPN status. Therefore, we aimed to investigate bleeding and thrombosis risk in patients with MPN hospitalized for AF. METHODS: We utilized the National Readmission Database (NRD) to identify patients with AF with and without MPN. Primary bleeding and thrombosis outcomes were in-hospital or 30-day readmission for bleeding or thrombosis, respectively. We propensity score (PS) matched patients with and without MPN. Risk of primary outcomes in MPN was assessed in PS matched cohort using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve used to evaluate predictive ability of CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED of primary thrombosis and bleeding outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: 24,185 patients without MPN were matched with 1,617 patients with MPN and variables were balanced between groups. Patients with MPN were at increased risk of meeting the thrombosis (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.23-3.21) but not bleeding (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63-1.19) primary outcomes. In MPN, CHA2DS2-VASC predicted thrombosis (C-statistic 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.78) but HAS-BLED was a poor predictor of bleeding (C-statistic 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.64). CONCLUSION: In patients with AF, MPN was associated with increased risk of bleeding and thrombosis. HAS-BLED scores did not accurately predict bleeding in MPN. Further investigation is needed to refine risk scores in MPN.

Catheter-based therapy for intermediate or high-risk pulmonary embolism is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with cancer: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common complication among patients with cancer and is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. Catheter-based therapies (CBT), including catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy, have been developed and are used in patients with intermediate or high-risk PE. However, there is a paucity of data on outcomes in patients with cancer as most clinical studies exclude this group of patients. AIMS: To characterize outcomes of patients with cancer admitted with intermediate or high-risk PE treated with CBT compared with no CBT. METHODS: Patients with an admission diagnosis of intermediate or high-risk PE and a history of cancer from October 2015 to December 2018 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital death or cardiac arrest (CA) and major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without CBT. Variables that remained unbalanced after IPTW were adjusted using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2084 unweighted admissions (10,420 weighted) for intermediate or high-risk PE and cancer were included, of which 136 (6.5%) were treated with CBT. After IPTW, CBT was associated with lower death or CA (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.46-0.64) but higher major bleeding (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.65). After stratifying by PE risk type, patients treated with CBT had lower risk of death or CA in both intermediate (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.75) and high-risk PE (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.53). However, patients with CBT were associated with increased risk of major bleeding in intermediate-risk PE (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.67-2.69) but not in those with high-risk PE (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with cancer hospitalized with intermediate or high-risk PE, treatment with CBT was associated with lower risk of in-hospital death or CA but higher risk of bleeding. Prospective studies and inclusion of patients with cancer in randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Acute myocardial infarction in von Willebrand disease: characteristics and outcomes.

Background: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. As treatments have improved prognosis of VWD, age-related diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), have become more prevalent. The treatment of AMI includes antithrombotic therapies, which increase the risk of bleeding. Current guidelines suggest weighing risks/benefits of antithrombotic therapy in patients with VWD. However, data to inform these discussions are lacking. Objective: To characterize outcomes of patients with VWD after AMI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Readmissions Database of patients with and without VWD admitted with AMI in 2017 and 2018. Primary outcomes were 90-day any-cause, bleeding-related, and arterial thrombosis-related readmissions. Case-control matching was performed for age, sex (male or female), ST-elevation myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Time-to-event analysis was performed after matching using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 136 patients with VWD were matched with 3400 controls without VWD. At 90 days, there were no differences in all-cause (10.7% vs 11.5%; P = 1.00), arterial thrombosis (1.9% vs 3.1%; P = .77), and bleeding (1.9% vs 0.4%; P = .083) readmission in patients with VWD. VWD was associated with increased risk of 90-day bleeding (hazard ratio [HR], 4.75; 95% CI, 1.05-21.66) but not all-cause (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.50-1.67) or arterial thrombosis (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-2.19) readmission. Conclusion: Among patients admitted with AMI, VWD was associated with higher risk of 90-day readmission for bleeding but not any-cause and arterial thrombosis-related readmissions. Further studies are needed to balance bleeding and thrombotic risks post-AMI in patients with VWD.

Outcomes of Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Admitted With Myocardial Infarction: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.

Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms with a high risk of thrombosis, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, outcomes after AMI have not been thoroughly characterized. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize outcomes after AMI in patients with MPNs compared with patients without MPNs. Methods: Patients with a primary admission of AMI from January 2006 to December 2018 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital death or cardiac arrest (CA) and major bleeding. Propensity score weighting was used to compare outcomes between MPN and non-MPN groups. Results: A total of 1,644,304 unweighted admissions for AMI were included; of these admissions, 5,374 (0.3%) were patients with MPNs. After propensity score weighting, patients with MPNs had a lower risk of in-hospital death or CA (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.82-0.84) but a higher risk of major bleeding (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.28-1.30) compared with non-MPN patients. There was a decreasing temporal rate of in-hospital death or CA and bleeding in patients without MPNs (Ptrend < 0.001 for both). However, there was an increasing temporal rate of in-hospital death or CA (Ptrend < 0.001) and a stable rate of major bleeding (Ptrend = 0.48) in patients with MPNs. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with AMI, patients with MPNs have a lower risk of in-hospital death or CA compared with patients without MPNs, although they have a higher risk of bleeding. More investigation is needed in order to improve post-AMI bleeding outcomes in patients with MPN.

Interventional Cardio-Oncology: Unique Challenges and Considerations in a High-Risk Population.

OPINION STATEMENT: Patients with cancer are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) including atherosclerotic heart disease (AHD), valvular heart disease (VHD), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Advances in percutaneous catheter-based treatments, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AHD, percutaneous valve replacement or repair for VHD, and ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAODs) for AF, have provided patients with CVD significant benefit in the recent decades. However, trials and registries investigating outcomes of these procedures often exclude patients with cancer. As a result, patients with cancer are less likely to undergo these therapies despite their benefits. Despite the inclusion of cancer patients in randomized clinical trial data, studies suggest that cancer patients derive similar benefits of percutaneous therapies for CVD compared with patients without cancer. Therefore, percutaneous interventions for CVD should not be withheld in patients with cancer, as they may still benefit from these procedures.

Major cardiovascular events after COVID-19, event rates post-vaccination, antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapy, and temporal trends: Rationale and methodology of the CORONA-VTE-Network study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with excess risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events in the early post-infection period and during convalescence. Despite the progress in our understanding of cardiovascular complications, uncertainty persists with respect to more recent event rates, temporal trends, association between vaccination status and outcomes, and findings within vulnerable subgroups such as older adults (aged 65 years or older), or those undergoing hemodialysis. Sex-informed findings, including results among pregnant and breastfeeding women, as well as adjusted comparisons between male and female adults are similarly understudied. METHODS: Adult patients, aged ≥18 years, with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 who received inpatient or outpatient care at the participating centers of the registry are eligible for inclusion. A total of 10,000 patients have been included in this multicenter study, with Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) serving as the coordinating center. Other sites include Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, University of Virginia Medical Center, University of Colorado Health System, and Thomas Jefferson University Health System. Data elements will be ascertained manually for accuracy. The two main outcomes are 1) a composite of venous or arterial thrombotic events, and 2) a composite of major cardiovascular events, defined as venous or arterial thrombosis, myocarditis or heart failure with inpatient treatment, new atrial fibrillation/flutter, or cardiovascular death. Clinical outcomes are adjudicated by independent physicians. Vaccination status and time of inclusion in the study will be ascertained for subgroup-specific analyses. Outcomes are pre-specified to be reported separately for hospitalized patients versus those who were initially receiving outpatient care. Outcomes will be reported at 30-day and 90-day follow-up. Data cleaning at the sites and the data coordinating center and outcomes adjudication process are in-progress. CONCLUSIONS: The CORONA-VTE-Network study will share contemporary information related to rates of cardiovascular and thrombotic events in patients with COVID-19 overall, as well as within key subgroups, including by time of inclusion, vaccination status, patients undergoing hemodialysis, the elderly, and sex-informed analyses such as comparison of women and men, or among pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Risk Factors for Death or Cardiovascular Events after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, data on long-term outcomes of patients with MPN who have had ACS and risk factors for all-cause death or CV events post-ACS hospitalization are lacking. We conducted a single-center study of 41 consecutive patients with MPN with ACS hospitalization after MPN diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 80 months after ACS hospitalization, 31 (76%) experienced death or a CV event (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or heart failure hospitalization). After multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, index ACS within 12 months of MPN diagnosis (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.44-10.19), WBC ≥ 20 K/µL (HR 9.10, 95% CI 2.71-30.52), JAK2 mutation (HR 3.71, 95% CI 1.22-11.22), and prior CVD (HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.12-6.08) were associated with increased death or CV events. Further studies are warranted to improve cardiovascular outcomes in this patient population.

Off-Target Effects of Cancer Therapy on Development of Therapy-Induced Arrhythmia: A Review.

BACKGROUND: Advances in cancer therapeutics have improved overall survival and prognosis in this patient population; however, this has come at the expense of cardiotoxicity including arrhythmia. SUMMARY: Cancer and its therapies are associated with cardiotoxicity via several mechanisms including inflammation, cardiomyopathy, and off-target effects. Among cancer therapies, anthracyclines and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are particularly known for their pro-arrhythmia effects. In addition to cardiomyopathy, anthracyclines may be pro-arrhythmogenic via reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and altered calcium handling. TKIs may mediate their cardiotoxicity via inhibition of off-target tyrosine kinases. Ibrutinib-mediated inhibition of CSK may be responsible for the increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Further investigation is warranted to further elucidate the mechanisms behind arrhythmias in cancer therapies. KEY MESSAGES: Arrhythmias are a common cardiotoxicity of cancer therapies. Cancer therapies may induce arrhythmias via off-target effects. Understanding the mechanisms underlying arrhythmogenesis associated with cancer therapies may help design cancer therapies that can avoid these toxicities.

Predictors of increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF), have increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with adverse CV outcomes including arterial thrombosis, heart failure (HF), and CV death and coexists with MPN. Traditional risk scores (CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED) for estimating risks/benefits of anticoagulation to prevent thrombotic events in AF do not include MPN status. Therefore, we aimed to investigate CV outcomes in patients with MPN and AF and evaluate the predictive ability of traditional risk scores. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with MPN and AF. Primary outcome was composite of CV death and arterial thromboembolism; secondary outcomes were bleeding requiring emergency department visit or hospitalization, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause death. Multivariable competing-risk and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate risk of outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve used to evaluate predictive ability of CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED of composite outcome and bleeding, respectively. RESULTS: A total 142 patients was included (62 ET, 54 PV, 26 MF). Composite outcome, bleeding, HF hospitalization and all-cause death occurred in 39 %, 30 %, 34 %, and 48 %, of patients respectively. After multivariable modeling, MF was associated with increased risk of composite outcome (SHR 2.70, 95 % CI 1.38-5.27) and all-cause mortality (HR 9.77, 95 % CI 4.88-19.54) but not bleeding (SHR 1.19, 95 % CI 0.51-2.80) or HF admissions (SHR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.19-1.72). CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED were poor predictors of composite outcome (C-statistic 0.52, 95 % CI 0.43-0.62) and bleeding (C-statistic 0.49, 95 % CI 0.40-0.58), respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with MPN and AF, MF is associated with increased risk of CV death and arterial thrombosis and traditional risk scores do not accurately predict outcomes in this patient population. Further investigation is needed to refine risk scores in this patient population.

Pulmonary hypertension is associated with poor cardiovascular and hematologic outcomes in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and cardiovascular disease.

Cardiovascular events and hematologic progression to myelofibrosis or leukemia are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is also associated with MPN and cardiovascular disease (CVD), though its prognostic significance in MPN is not well characterized. Our primary objective was to investigate the effect of PH, defined as right-ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) ≥ 50 mmHg on echocardiogram or mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 20 on right heart catheterization, on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and hematologic progression in patients with MPN and CVD (atrial fibrillation, heart failure hospitalization, and myocardial infarction after MPN diagnosis). Of the 197 patients included (86 ET, 80 PV, 31 PMF), 92 (47%) had PH and 98 (50%) were male. All-cause mortality (58 vs 37%, p = 0.004), cardiovascular death (35 vs 9%, p < 0.0001), and hematologic progression (23 vs 11%, p = 0.037) occurred more frequently in patients with PH. Multivariable competing-risk and proportional hazards regression showed that PH was associated with increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.80, 95% CI 1.10-2.93), CV death (adjusted subdistribution HR 3.71, 95% CI 1.58-8.73), and hematologic progression (adjusted subdistribution HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.21-3.27).

In-Hospital and readmission outcomes of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and heart failure: Insights from the National Readmissions Database.

Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are chronic leukemias associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Prior studies suggest patients with MPN are at increased risk of HF. Additionally, pre-clinical murine models harboring the JAK2 mutation, the most common driver mutation in MPNs, have shown accelerated adverse cardiac remodeling in myocardial infarction and pressure overload HF models. However, clinical outcomes, including in-hospital and readmission outcomes, of patients with MPN admitted for HF have not been well characterized. Methods: Patients hospitalized for HF with and without MPN were identified using the 2017 and 2018 National Readmission Database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match 1 MPN with 10 non-MPN controls. Outcomes were in-hospital death, 90-day CV-related, HF-related, and all-cause readmissions. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate risk of in-hospital death and 90-day readmission outcomes, respectively. Results: After PSM, 4,626 patients with MPN were matched with 46,260 without. Patients with MPN were associated with increased risk of in-hospital death (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.35), 90-day CV-related (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.18) and all-cause (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.31) but not HF-related (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 - 1.14) readmissions. Conclusion: Among patients hospitalized for HF, MPN was associated with increased risk of in-hospital death, and 90-day CV-related readmissions (driven primarily by thrombotic readmissions). Further investigation is needed in order to improve outcomes in patients with MPN and HF.

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and COVID-19 have increased rates of arterial thrombosis.

Background: Both coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with systemic inflammation and risk of thrombosis. Risk of thrombosis in patients with COVID with and without MPNs has not been extensively studied. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 44 patients with MPNs and 1114 patients without MPNs positive for SARS-COV-2. Outcomes were arterial thrombosis (AT), venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding, and death. Time-to-event analysis was performed using competing risk regression model and Cox proportional hazards. Results: AT occurred more frequently in patients with MPN (7% vs. 1%, p = 0.03). Rates of VTE (7% vs. 5%, p = 0.73), bleeding (7% vs. 2%, p = 0.06), and death (9% vs. 6%, p = 0.32) were similar. MPN patients were older and had more cardiovascular comorbidities. After time-to-event competing-risk regression adjusting for age, MPN patients had higher risk of AT (subdivision hazards ratio 3.95, 95% CI 1.09-14.39) but not VTE, bleeding, or death. Conclusions: Among patients with COVID-19, MPN patients had higher risk of arterial thrombosis but not VTE, bleeding, and death compared with non-MPN patients. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings given the limited sample size.

Cardiovascular Disease in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are associated with increased risk for thrombotic complications. These conditions most commonly involve somatic mutations in genes that lead to constitutive activation of the Janus-associated kinase signaling pathway (eg, Janus kinase 2, calreticulin, myeloproliferative leukemia protein). Acquired gain-of-function mutations in these genes, particularly Janus kinase 2, can cause a spectrum of disorders, ranging from clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, a recently recognized age-related promoter of cardiovascular disease, to frank hematologic malignancy. Beyond thrombosis, patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms can develop other cardiovascular conditions, including heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. The authors review the pathophysiologic mechanisms of cardiovascular complications of myeloproliferative neoplasms, which involve inflammation, prothrombotic and profibrotic factors (including transforming growth factor-beta and lysyl oxidase), and abnormal function of circulating clones of mutated leukocytes and platelets from affected individuals. Anti-inflammatory therapies may provide cardiovascular benefit in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, a hypothesis that requires rigorous evaluation in clinical trials.