RESUMEN
In the battlefield, the majority of casualties die within ten minutes of the trauma. Most injuries result from an explosion and haemorrhage plays a central role. To improve survival rates, the French Army Health Service has developed a chain of survival from the battlefield to France based on prehospital combat casualty care, forward medical support during the first hour and damage control surgery.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia , Medicina Militar , Personal Militar , Guerra , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Francia , Humanos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To improve the mortality rate on the battlefield, and especially the potentially survivable pre-Medical Treatment Facility deaths, Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) is now considered as a reference for management of combat casualty from the point of injury to the first medical treatment facility. TCCC comprises of a set of trauma management guidelines designed for use on the battlefield. The French Military Health Service also standardised a dedicated training programme, entitled "Sauvetage au Combat" (SC) ("forward combat casualty care"), with the characteristic of forward medicalisation on the battlefield, the medical team being projected as close as possible to the casualty at the point of injury. The aim of our article is to describe the process and the result of the SC training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records from the French Military Health Service Academy - École du Val-de-Grâce administration, head of the SC teaching programme, defining its guidelines, and supporting its structure and its execution, were examined and analyzed, since the standardisation of the SC training programme in 2008. The total number of trainees was listed following the different courses (SC1, SC2, SC3). RESULTS: At the end of 2013, every deployed combatant underwent SC1 courses (confidential data), 785 health-qualified combatants were graduated for SC2 courses and 672 Role 1 physician-nurse pairs for SC3 courses. CONCLUSION: The SC concept and programmes were defined in France in 2007 and are now completely integrated into the predeployment training of all combatants but also of French Military Health Service providers. Finally, SC teaching programmes enhance the importance of teamwork in forward combat medicalisation settings.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Medicina Militar/educación , Personal Militar , Guerra , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Francia , Agencias Gubernamentales , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We compared the subjective quality of pulmonary auscultation between 2 acoustic stethoscopes (Holtex Ideal® and Littmann Cardiology III®) and an electronic stethoscope (Littmann 3200®) in the operating room. METHODS: A prospective double-blind randomized study with an evaluation during mechanical ventilation was performed in 100 patients. After each examination, the listeners using a numeric scale (0-10) rated the quality of auscultation. Auscultation quality was compared in patients among stethoscopes with a multilevel mixed-effects linear regression with random intercept (operator effect), adjusted on significant factors in univariate analysis. A significant difference was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred comparative evaluations of pulmonary auscultation were performed. The quality of auscultation was rated 8.2 ± 1.6 for the electronic stethoscope, 7.4 ± 1.8 for the Littmann Cardiology III, and 4.6 ± 1.8 for the Holtex Ideal. Compared with Holtex Ideal, auscultation quality was significantly higher with other stethoscopes (P < 0.0001). Compared with Littmann Cardiology III, auscultation quality was significantly higher with Littmann 3200 electronic stethoscope (ß = 0.9 [95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.3]). CONCLUSIONS: An electronic stethoscope can provide a better quality of pulmonary auscultation than acoustic stethoscopes in the operating room, yet with a magnitude of improvement marginally higher than that provided with a high performance acoustic stethoscope. Whether this can translate into a clinically relevant benefit requires further studies.
Asunto(s)
Auscultación/instrumentación , Pulmón/fisiología , Quirófanos , Estetoscopios , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Electrónica , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosAsunto(s)
Errores de Medicación , Fenilefrina/envenenamiento , Vasoconstrictores/envenenamiento , Adulto , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Humanos , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Neostigmina/administración & dosificación , Taquicardia/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study performed in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery was to assess the impact of changes in practice on both the incidence of postoperative myocardial ischemia (PMI) detected by serial measurements of troponin Ic and long-term cardiac outcome. METHODS: During a 3-yr period, troponin Ic was measured on the first 3 days after major orthopedic surgery in a multidisciplinary hospital. After 16 months of study, postoperative care was improved. Cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cardiac failure were considered major adverse cardiac events and were recorded during the hospital stay and the first postoperative year. The incidences of PMI and major adverse cardiac events were used as result indicators for quality of care and compared before (P1) and after (P2) quality enhancement. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-eight surgical procedures were included (P1, 123; P2, 255). Incidences of PMI and major adverse cardiac events were 8.9 versus 3.9% (P=0.04) and 8.1 versus 1.9% (P=0.004) for P1 and P2, respectively. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for baseline data, independent factors associated with the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event were phase P1 (hazard ratio=4.5; 97.8% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-17.4) and PMI (Hazard ratio=6.4; 97.8% CI, 1.6-26.4). CONCLUSIONS: Our postoperative care policy after major orthopedic surgery strongly correlated with both short-term cardiac outcome (i.e., PMI with troponin Ic release) and long-term cardiac outcome. Thus, in a given surgical population, variation of incidence of troponin Ic elevations could be used as a result indicator for postoperative care policy.