Pediatric anesthetic for tracheobronchial foreign body extraction: A survey of practice in France.

BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration is a classic pediatric emergency, and its associated morbidity particularly depends on the anesthetic management, which differs according to the center and the practitioner. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the different anesthetic practices for tracheobronchial foreign body extraction. METHODS: A survey was sent via email to the member physicians of the Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF). The survey included 28 questions about the organizational and anesthetic management of an evolving clinical case. RESULTS: A total of 151 physicians responded to the survey. Only 13.2% of the respondents reported that their institution had a management protocol, and 21.7% required a computerized tomography scan before the procedure was performed for children who were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic during the night. There were 56.3% of the respondents who reported that extraction with a rigid bronchoscope is the only procedure usually performed in their institution. Regarding rigid bronchoscopy, 47.0% used combined intravenous-inhalation anesthesia. The objective was to maintain the child on spontaneous ventilation for 63.6% of the respondents, but anesthesia management differed according to the physician's experience. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the diversity of practices concerning anesthetic for tracheobronchial foreign body extraction and found reveal differences in practice according to physician experience.

Sevoflurane for procedural sedation in critically ill patients: A pharmacokinetic comparative study between burn and non-burn patients.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has anti-inflammatory proprieties and short lasting effects making it of interest for procedural sedation in critically ill patients. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane and metabolites in severely ill burn patients and controls. The secondary objective was to assess potential kidney injury. METHODS: Prospective interventional study in a burn and a surgical intensive care unit; 24 mechanically ventilated critically ill patients (12 burns, 12 controls) were included. The sevoflurane was administered with an expired fraction target of 2% during short-term procedural sedation. Plasma concentrations of sevoflurane, hexafluoroisopropanolol (HFIP) and free fluoride ions were recorded at different times. Kinetic Pro (Wgroupe, France) was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Kidney injury was assessed with neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). RESULTS: The mean total burn surface area was 36±11%. The average plasma concentration of sevoflurane was 70.4±37.5mg·L-1 in burns and 57.2±28.1mg·L-1 in controls at the end of the procedure (P=0.58). The volume of distribution was higher (46.8±7.2 vs 22.2±2.50L, P<0.001), and the drug half-life longer in burns (1.19±0.28h vs 0.65±0.04h, P<0.0001). Free metabolite HFIP was higher in burns. Plasma fluoride was not different between burns and controls. NGAL did not rise after procedures. CONCLUSION: We observed an increased volume of distribution, slower elimination rate, and altered metabolism of sevoflurane in burn patients compared to controls. Repeated use for procedural sedation in burn patients needs further evaluation. No renal toxicity was detected. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02048683.