Change in exercise capacity measured by Cardio-pulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) in Danish people with cystic fibrosis after initiation of treatment with Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor and Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor.

BACKGROUND: Since 2015, when the first cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators were approved for people with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for F508del-CFTR, studies have shown improved lung function after initiation of the treatment and patients experience improved physical capacity. The aim of this study was to investigate change in exercise capacity after initiation of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor and Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor treatment (LUM/IVA, TEZ/IVA). METHODS: We performed a single group prospective observational cohort study with follow-up at six and 12 months. The study examined change in exercise capacity in people with CF initiating treatment with LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA, measured by cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Inclusion criteria were people with CF homozygous for F508del-CFTR aged 12 years or older eligible for LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA treatment from June 2017 until June 2019. Primary outcomes were change in VO2peak and maximal workload. Secondary outcomes were change in muscle strength, muscle power and body composition in a subgroup of the study population. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients were included in the analysis. The mean change in VO2peak and VO2peak divided by body weight from baseline to 12-months follow-up was 145.7 (91.2;200.2) ml/min and 1.07 (95% CI 0.19;1.95) ml/min/kg, respectively. The mean change in maximal workload between baseline and 12 months was 14.2 Watt (95% CI 9.1;19.2). All improvements in exercise capacity were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in this study improved their exercise capacity by a statistically significant increase in VO2peak and maximal workload 12 months after initiation of treatment with LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA.

Glucometabolic changes influence hospitalization and outcome in patients with COVID-19: An observational cohort study.

AIMS: The aim was to report the prevalence of diabetes status in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and assess the association between the glucometabolic status at admission and 90-day mortality. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were included in the study. All participants included had an HbA1c measurement 60 days prior to or within 7 days after admission. We studied the association between diabetes status, the glycemic gap (difference between admission and habitual status), admission plasma-glucose, and mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Of 674 patients included, 114 (17%) had normal glucose level, 287 (43%) had pre-diabetes, 74 (11%) had new-onset, and 199 (30%) had diagnosed diabetes. No association between diabetes status, plasma-glucose at admission, and mortality was found. Compared to the 2nd quartile (reference) of glycemic-gap, those with the highest glycemic gap had increased mortality (3rd (HR 2.38 [1.29-4.38], p = 0.005) and 4th quartile (HR 2.48 [1.37-4.52], p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Abnormal glucose metabolism was highly prevalent among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Diabetes status per se or admission plasma-glucose was not associated with a poorer outcome. However, a high glycemic gap was associated with increased risk of mortality, suggesting that, irrespective of diabetes status, glycemic stress serves as an important prognostic marker for mortality.

[Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in an otherwise healthy person].

This is a case report of a young healthcare worker with a mild case of COVID-19 during the first wave in 2020 with no initial triggering of antibody response. The second episode of symptomatic infection of the patient with symptoms of moderate COVID-19, occurred eight months later in the beginning of the second surge in Denmark. It is the first reported case of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in Denmark, and it illustrates the possibility of reinfection with a more severe course of COVID-19 after an initial natural infection also among young immunocompetent individuals.

Therapeutic vaccination using cationic liposome-adjuvanted HIV type 1 peptides representing HLA-supertype-restricted subdominant T cell epitopes: safety, immunogenicity, and feasibility in Guinea-Bissau.

We have designed a therapeutic HIV-1 vaccine concept based on peptides together with the adjuvant CAF01. Peptides represented 15 HLA-supertype-restricted subdominant and conserved CD8 T cell epitopes and three CD4 T-helper cell epitopes. In this phase I clinical trial, safety and immunogenicity were assessed in untreated HIV-1-infected individuals in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa. Twenty-three HIV-1-infected individuals were randomized to receive placebo (n=5) or vaccine (n=18). Safety was appraised by clinical follow-up combined with monitoring of biochemistry, hematology, CD4 T cell counts, and HIV-1 viral loads. T cell immunogenicity was monitored longitudinally by interferon (IFN)-γ ELISpot. New vaccine-specific T cell responses were induced in 6/14 vaccinees for whom ELISpot data were valid. CD4 T cell counts and viral loads were stable. The study shows that therapeutic immunization is feasible and safe in Guinea-Bissau and that it is possible to redirect T cell immunity with CAF01-adjuvanted HIV-1 peptide vaccine during untreated HIV-1 infection in some patients. However, relatively few preexisting and vaccine-induced HIV-1 T cell responses to CD8 T cell epitopes were detected against HIV-1 using IFN-γ ELISpot in this chronically infected African population.

Determinants of vitamin a deficiency in children between 6 months and 2 years of age in Guinea-Bissau.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies Guinea-Bissau as having severe vitamin A deficiency (VAD). To date, no national survey has been conducted. We assessed vitamin A status among children in rural Guinea-Bissau to assess status and identify risk factors for VAD. METHODS: In a vitamin A supplementation trial in rural Guinea-Bissau, children aged 6 months to 2 years who were missing one or more vaccines were enrolled, vaccinated and randomized to vitamin A or placebo. Provided consent, a dried blood spot (DBS) sample was obtained from a subgroup of participants prior to supplementation. Vitamin A status and current infection was assessed by an ELISA measuring retinol-binding protein (RBP) and C-reactive protein (CRP). VAD was defined as RBP concentrations equivalent to plasma retinol <0.7 µmol/L; infection was defined as CRP >5 ml/L. In Poisson regression models providing prevalence ratios (PR), we investigated putative risk factors for VAD including sex, age, child factors, maternal factors, season (rainy: June-November; dry: December-May), geography, and use of health services. RESULTS: Based on DBS from 1102 children, the VAD prevalence was 65.7% (95% confidence interval 62.9-68.5), 11% higher than the WHO estimate of 54.7% (9.9-93.0). If children with infection were excluded, the prevalence was 60.2% (56.7-63.7). In the age group 9-11 months, there was no difference in prevalence of VAD among children who had received previous vaccines in a timely fashion and those who had not. Controlled for infection and other determinants of VAD, the prevalence of VAD was 1.64 (1.49-1.81) times higher in the rainy season compared to the dry, and varied up to 2-fold between ethnic groups and regions. Compared with having an inactivated vaccine as the most recent vaccine, having a live vaccine as the most recent vaccination was associated with lower prevalence of VAD (PR=0.84 (0.74-0.96)). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of VAD was high in rural Guinea-Bissau. VAD varied significantly with season, ethnicity, region, and vaccination status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00514891.

Assessment of HIV-1 patient recruitability in the Republic of Guinea-Bissau using African versus North American hematology and biochemistry reference intervals.

Hematology and biochemistry reference intervals have been derived from healthy, HIV-negative populations to guide clinical trials worldwide. However, it is less clear how such values may be applied to clinical trials involving HIV-infected individuals. We show that contradictory interpretations about patient recruitability are reached when applying African versus North American reference intervals to an HIV-1 cohort in Guinea-Bissau. These observations underscore the need to question non-African guidelines in the context of HIV intervention clinical trials in Africa.