Is Digital Tomosynthesis on Par With Computed Tomography for the Detection and Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules?

Chest digital tomosynthesis (DT) has potential advantages compared to computed tomography (CT) such as radiation dose reduction. However, the role of DT in pulmonary nodule management remains investigative. We compared DT against CT for pulmonary nodule detection and size measurement. A clinical population comprising 54 nodules from 30 patients and a screening population comprising 42 nodules from 52 patients were included. Scans were independently read by two radiologists. Agreement in nodule measurements between readers and between modalities was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis using a 95% level of significance. The DT true positive fraction for the two readers was 0.44 and 0.39 in the clinical population, and 0.10 and 0.05 in the screening population. No significant inter-modality bias was observed between DT and CT measurements of nodule size, but the range of variation between modalities was approximately 30%. Inter-reader DT measurements also showed no significant bias, with a range of variation of approximately 15%. We conclude that DT has poor nodule detection sensitivity compared to CT. However, DT showed good measurement reproducibility and may be useful for monitoring growth of existing pulmonary nodules.

Screen-detected subsolid pulmonary nodules: long-term follow-up and application of the PanCan lung cancer risk prediction model.

OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term follow-up of subsolid nodules (SSNs) detected in participants of a prospective low-dose CT lung cancer screening cohort, and to investigate the utility of the PanCan model in stratifying risk in baseline SSNs. METHODS: Participants underwent a baseline scan, two annual incidence scans and further follow-up scans for the detected nodules. All SSNs underwent a minimum of 2 years of follow-up (unless resolved or resected). Risk of malignancy was estimated using the PanCan model; discrimination [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC)] and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test) were assessed. The Mann-Whitney U-Wilcoxon test was used to compare estimated risk between groups. RESULTS: 70 SSNs were detected in 41 (16.0%) out of 256 total participants. Median follow-up period was 25.5 months (range 2.0-74.0 months). 29 (41.4%) SSNs were transient. Five (7.1%) SSNs were resected, all found to be Stage I lung adenocarcinoma, including one SSN stable in size for 3.0 years before growth was detected. The PanCan model had good discrimination for the 52 baseline SSNs (AUC = 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.76-1); the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was non-significant (p = 0.27). Estimated risk was significantly higher in the baseline SSNs found to be cancer vs those not found to be cancer after 2-6 years of follow-up (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings support a long-term follow-up approach for screen-detected SSNs for 3 years or longer. The PanCan model appeared discriminatory and well calibrated in this cohort. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The PanCan model may have utility in identifying low-risk SSNs which could be followed with less frequent CT scans.

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of Aspergillus infection.

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is a new diagnostic tool for the evaluation of pulmonary lesions inaccessible by conventional bronchoscopy. Most often, ENB is used for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but can be used to evaluate fungal conditions and other diseases. We present the case of a 44-year-old woman who was diagnosed with Aspergillus via ENB.

Mediastinal abscess after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a case report and literature review.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique that allows lung cancer nodal staging and biopsy of parabronchial and paratracheal tissue. Its simplicity, high diagnostic yield, ability to diagnose both benign and malignant conditions, and exceedingly low complication rate has resulted in rapid widespread adoption by surgeons and physicians. EBUS-TBNA-related complications, however, do occur and need to be considered when assessing the risk-benefit profile of performing the procedure, and if the patient represents with unexpected symptoms after the procedure. We describe a 64-year-old woman who presented with a mediastinal abscess 5 days after EBUS-TBNA. This case demonstrates the importance of considering EBUS-TBNA-related complications to guide relevant imaging decisions and antibiotic choices. We review the published literature regarding infective complications of EBUS-TBNA and propose possible pathophysiologies. These complications are likely to increase in frequency as the technique is more widely adopted.

The science behind the 7th edition Tumour, Node, Metastasis staging system for lung cancer.

The Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) system for classifying lung cancer is the cornerstone of modern lung cancer treatment and underpins comparative research; yet is continuously evolving through updated revisions. The recently published Union for International Cancer Control 7th Edition TNM Classification for lung cancer addresses many of its predecessor's shortcomings and has been subject to rigorous evidence-based methodology. It is based on a retrospective analysis of over 80 000 lung cancer patients treated between 1990 and 2000 carried out by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. The dataset was truly international and included patients treated by all modalities. Extensive internal and external validation of the findings has ensured that the recommendations are robust and generalizable. For the first time, a single classification system has been shown to be applicable not only to non-small cell lung cancer, but also to be of prognostic significance in small cell lung cancer and bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumours. We review the history of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system, the changes in the most recent 7th edition and the strength of the scientific basis motivating these changes. Limitations of the current staging edition are explored, post-publication independent validation studies are reviewed, and the future of TNM staging for lung cancer is discussed.