Metronomic oral cyclosphosphamide as third-line systemic treatment or beyond in patients with inoperable locoregionally advanced recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

There is no standard third-line or further systemic treatment for patients with inoperable locoregionally advanced recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide provides an acceptable and cheap option for these heavily pretreated patients who had limited choices. We conducted a prospective phase II single-arm open-label study of metronomic oral cyclophosphamide. Patients with locoregionally advanced recurrent inoperable (rT3/T4, rN2-N3b) or metastatic (rM1) NPC who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (0-2) and had progressed after at least 2 lines of palliative systemic chemotherapy were eligible. They received oral cyclophosphamide between 50 and 150 mg once daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), biochemical response (two consecutive declines of plasma EBV DNA after treatment), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles were evaluated. A total of 56 patients were recruited. Thirty-three, 13, 6, 3, and 1 patients received cyclophosphamide as 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th line of therapy respectively. After a median follow-up of 9.95 months (range 1.76-59.51 months), the ORR was 8.9% and the DCR was 57.1%. The median PFS and OS were 4.47 and 9.20 months, respectively. Those with PS 1 had longer median PFS (5.49 months) compared to those with PS 2 (3.75 months, P = .011). Besides, those who had locoregionally recurrent disease had better PFS (8.97 months, 95% CI, 0.53-17.41 months) compared to those who had distant metastases (4.14 months, 95% CI, 2.53-5.75 months, P = .020). Multivariable analysis revealed that PS 1 (vs 2) (P = .020) and locoregional recurrence (vs metastasis) (P = .029) were the only significant independent prognostic factors of PFS. Around 16 (28.6%) patients developed grade ≥3 adverse events, including malaise (5.4%), hematological (8.9%), gastrointestinal (3.6%), feverish (3.6%), and hemorrhagic (1.8%) events. The median cost of the whole drug treatment was 51.65 US dollars (USD) (range 4.15-142.75 USD) (1 USD = 7.8 HK dollars [HKD]). Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide is an acceptable third-line or beyond systemic therapy for locoregionally advanced recurrent or metastatic NPC with acceptable toxicity and limited financial burden.

Efficacy and safety of afatinib in Chinese patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously responsive to first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy: comparison with historical cohort using erlotinib.

BACKGROUND: Afaitnib has shown anti-tumor activity against metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC after prior failure to first generation EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy. We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of afatinib in Chinese patients who previously failed first-generation TKI and chemotherapy under a compassionate use program (CUP) and compared to the erlotinib cohort. METHODS: Patients who suffered from metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC previously responsive to first-generation TKI and chemotherapy received afatinib until progression, loss of clinical benefits or intolerable toxicity. Treatment response, survival and safety were evaluated and compared to the erlotinib cohort. RESULTS: Twenty-five and 28 patients received afatinib and erlotinib respectively. More patients in the afatinib group had worse performance status (ECOG 2) than the erlotinib group (p = 0.008). After a median follow-up of 12.1 months, afatinib demonstrated comparable objective response rate (ORR) (20.0% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.17) but significantly higher disease control rate (DCR) (68.0% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.04) compared to erlotinib. Median progression-free survival (PFS) (4.1 months [95% CI, 2.7-5.5 months] vs. 3.3 months [95% CI, 2.2-4.3 months], p = 0.97) and overall survival (OS) were not different between the two groups (10.3 months [95% CI, 7.5-13.0 months] vs. 10.8 months [95% CI, 7.4-14.2 months], p = 0.51). Multivariate analyses revealed that age ≤ 70 years and time to progression (TTP) ≥ 18 months for the 1st TKI therapy were prognostic of PFS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.008 respectively). Afatinib caused less rash (60.0% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.04) but more diarrhea (60.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) compared to erlotinib. CONCLUSION: Afatinib produced encouraging clinical efficacy as 2nd TKI therapy with manageable safety profiles in our Chinese patients after failure to another TKI and systemic chemotherapy. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02625168) on 3rd December 2015.

Prognostic Significance of Standardized Uptake Value of Lymph Nodes on Survival for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous studies showed that the tumor size and its metabolic activity are predictors of treatment outcome. We investigated whether there are new metabolic prognostic factors of survival for stage III NSCLC after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 57 consecutive patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for their stage IIIA (n=22) and stage IIIB (n=35) (AJCC 7th edition) unresectable NSCLC were identified. A total of 43 (75.4%) patients had positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (PET-CT) scan performed at diagnosis that were subsequently reviewed and analyzed. Prognosticators of progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The median PFS, DMFS, and OS were 14.1, 12.6, and 37.8 months, respectively, after a median follow-up of 41.5 months. PFS advantage was demonstrated in stage IIIA versus stage IIIB (median 38.6 vs. 13.5 mo, P=0.020), N-stage N0-N2 versus N3 (median 16.7 vs. 8.1 mo, P<0.001), planning target volume (PTV) <500 versus ≥500 cm (median 23.6 vs. 11.3 mo, P=0.008), and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) nodes <8 versus ≥8 (median 16.1 vs. 10.7 mo, P=0.048). DMFS advantage was noted in those with PTV<500 versus PTV≥500 cm (median 13.0 vs. 11.3 mo, P=0.045) and SUVmax nodes <8 versus ≥8 (median 13.5 vs. 8.0 mo, P=0.050). OS advantage was revealed in stage IIIA versus stage IIIB (median 56.5 vs. 22.7 mo, P=0.013) and SUVmax nodes <8 versus ≥8 (42.3 vs. 12.8 mo, P=0.009). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SUVmax nodes <8 was the only prognostic factor of PFS, DMFS, and OS. Metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis were not prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: SUVmax nodes <8 was the only prognostic factor of PFS, DMFS, and OS in our study. PET-CT scan at the time of diagnosis is useful in stratifying patients into favorable and unfavorable groups in stage III NSCLC treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Association of exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutation patterns with treatment outcome after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether there were differential survival outcomes to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer harboring different subtypes of exon 19 and exon 21 mutations on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHODS: Of 452 patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer, 192 patients (42.5%) harbored EGFR mutation and 170 (37.5%) received TKI as first-line treatment. EGFR mutation analysis was performed by direct sequencing. Survival and response outcome were compared among different subtypes of exon 19 and exon 21 EGFR mutations in these 170 patients. RESULTS: Patients harboring exon 19 18-nucleotide deletion (delL747_P753insS) had the shortest median progression-free survival (PFS) (6.5 months), followed by those with 15-nucleotide deletion (delE746_A750) (12.4 months) and mixed insertion/substitution mutations (22.3 months; p = 0.012). However, patients who had exon 19 deletions starting on codon E746 had better median PFS (14.2 months) than those starting on L747 (6.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.445; 95% confidence interval [0.219-0.903]; p = 0.021). Besides, exon 21 L858R derived a longer median PFS than L861R/L861Q (11.4 months versus 2.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.298; 95% confidence interval [0.090-0.980]; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Different subtypes of EGFR exon 19 and 21 mutations exhibited differential survival to first-line TKI therapy. Detailed sequence evaluation of exon 19 deletions may provide important prognostic information on survival outcome after TKI.