RESUMEN
Interventions using the "Four Immeasurables Meditations" (FIM) are effective for various outcomes; however, whether increased meditation practice in these interventions leads to better results has not been well investigated. This systematic review included 22 FIM interventions that reported associations between the amount of meditation practice and its outcomes. Despite the heterogeneity in intervention components and outcome variables, there were generally few significant associations between amount of meditation practice and its outcomes. Specifically, only five studies reported that more than half of the calculated results were significant. In comparison with correlations between total amount of practice and overall outcomes, the short-term influence of meditation practice was evaluated in fewer studies; however, it had a better association with outcomes. More studies are required that address the underlying mechanisms that elucidate how meditation practice leads to outcome changes in daily life. In this study, two promising mechanisms with initial evidence were discussed. This review also summarized common methodological issues including a lack of experimental manipulation and inaccurate measuring of meditation practice.
RESUMEN
While it has been suggested that loving-kindness meditation (LKM) is an effective practice for promoting positive emotions, the empirical evidence in the literature remains unclear. Here, we provide a systematic review of 24 empirical studies (N = 1759) on LKM with self-reported positive emotions. The effect of LKM on positive emotions was estimated with meta-analysis, and the influence of variations across LKM interventions was further explored with subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The meta-analysis showed that (1) medium effect sizes for LKM interventions on daily positive emotions in both wait-list controlled RCTs and non-RCT studies; and (2) small to large effect sizes for the on-going practice of LKM on immediate positive emotions across different comparisons. Further analysis showed that (1) interventions focused on loving-kindness had medium effect size, but interventions focused on compassion showed small effect sizes; (2) the length of interventions and the time spent on meditation did not influence the effect sizes, but the studies without didactic components in interventions had small effect sizes. A few individual studies reported that the nature of positive emotions and individual differences also influenced the results. In sum, LKM practice and interventions are effective in enhancing positive emotions, but more studies are needed to identify the active components of the interventions, to compare different psychological operations, and to explore the applicability in clinical populations.
RESUMEN
To investigate the relationship between personality, club-drug use and high-risk drug-related behaviour, 360 club-drug users and 303 non-drug users in Hong Kong were assessed on measures of two impulsivity dimensions, reward drive and rash impulsivity, and a related trait of punishment sensitivity. The most frequently used drugs were ketamine, ecstasy, and cannabis, with the majority of participants using two or more drugs on any one occasion. Club-drug users were more rash-impulsive and reward-driven, and less punishment-sensitive than non-drug users (p<0.001). Rash impulsivity, but not reward drive or punishment sensitivity, was significantly (p<0.001) associated with risky drug-related behaviour. There was no association between any personality traits and preferred drug. These findings suggest that, while those who use club drugs are generally more impulsive and less punishment-sensitive, some discrete facets of impulsivity are associated with differing patterns of drug-use behaviour.
Asunto(s)
Pueblo Asiatico/psicología , Drogas Ilícitas , Conducta Impulsiva/etnología , Medio Social , Facilitación Social , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas/etnología , Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas/psicología , Comparación Transcultural , Estudios Transversales , Impulso (Psicología) , Conducta Exploratoria , Femenino , Hong Kong , Humanos , Conducta Impulsiva/psicología , Ketamina , Masculino , Abuso de Marihuana/etnología , Abuso de Marihuana/psicología , Metanfetamina , N-Metil-3,4-metilenodioxianfetamina , Inventario de Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Castigo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Recompensa , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to analyse the influence of family concern about appearance on self-concept deficits in patients under treatment for eating disorders, and to identify predictors of eating attitudes and behaviours in control and clinical groups. METHOD: The participants were 123 women with diagnoses of DSM-IV-TR eating disorders and 124 female university students. All completed the eating attitudes test (EAT-40), the body dissatisfaction of the eating disorders inventory (EDI-BD), the Rosenberg self-esteem (RSE), the fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and the family concern about appearance scale (FCAS). Patients were administered with these instruments at admission and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: ANOVAs indicated that family concern about appearance had no influence on the evolution of self-concept deficits during treatment. Multiple regression analyses showed that the best predictor of eating attitudes in controls was FCAS score, while among patients the best predictor of how the disorder will evolve after 12 months of treatment was EAT-40 at admission. CONCLUSION: Families may transmit eating concerns, but this is not enough for the emergence of an eating disorder.