The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers.

PURPOSE: The development of blood biomarkers that reflect Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology (phosphorylated tau and amyloid-ß) has offered potential as scalable tests for dementia differential diagnosis and early detection. In 2019, the Geneva AD Biomarker Roadmap Initiative included blood biomarkers in the systematic validation of AD biomarkers. METHODS: A panel of experts convened in November 2019 at a two-day workshop in Geneva. The level of maturity (fully achieved, partly achieved, preliminary evidence, not achieved, unsuccessful) of blood biomarkers was assessed based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology and discussed fully during the workshop which also evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. RESULTS: Plasma p-tau has shown analytical validity (phase 2 primary aim 1) and first evidence of clinical validity (phase 3 primary aim 1), whereas the maturity level for Aß remains to be partially achieved. Full and partial achievement has been assigned to p-tau and Aß, respectively, in their associations to ante-mortem measures (phase 2 secondary aim 2). However, only preliminary evidence exists for the influence of covariates, assay comparison and cut-off criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relative infancy of blood biomarkers, in comparison to CSF biomarkers, much has already been achieved for phases 1 through 3 - with p-tau having greater success in detecting AD and predicting disease progression. However, sufficient data about the effect of covariates on the biomarker measurement is lacking. No phase 4 (real-world performance) or phase 5 (assessment of impact/cost) aim has been tested, thus not achieved.

2020 update on the clinical validity of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid, tau, and phospho-tau as biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in the context of a structured 5-phase development framework.

PURPOSE: In the last decade, the research community has focused on defining reliable biomarkers for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. In 2017, the Geneva AD Biomarker Roadmap Initiative adapted a framework for the systematic validation of oncological biomarkers to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers-encompassing the 42 amino-acid isoform of amyloid-ß (Aß42), phosphorylated-tau (P-tau), and Total-tau (T-tau)-with the aim to accelerate their development and clinical implementation. The aim of this work is to update the current validation status of CSF AD biomarkers based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology. METHODS: A panel of experts in AD biomarkers convened in November 2019 at a 2-day workshop in Geneva. The level of maturity (fully achieved, partly achieved, preliminary evidence, not achieved, unsuccessful) of CSF AD biomarkers was assessed based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology before the meeting and presented and discussed during the workshop. RESULTS: By comparison to the previous 2017 Geneva Roadmap meeting, the primary advances in CSF AD biomarkers have been in the area of a unified protocol for CSF sampling, handling and storage, the introduction of certified reference methods and materials for Aß42, and the introduction of fully automated assays. Additional advances have occurred in the form of defining thresholds for biomarker positivity and assessing the impact of covariates on their discriminatory ability. CONCLUSIONS: Though much has been achieved for phases one through three, much work remains in phases four (real world performance) and five (assessment of impact/cost). To a large degree, this will depend on the availability of disease-modifying treatments for AD, given these will make accurate and generally available diagnostic tools key to initiate therapy.

Longitudinal changes of tau PET imaging in relation to hypometabolism in prodromal and Alzheimer's disease dementia.

The development of tau-specific positron emission tomography (PET) tracers allows imaging in vivo the regional load of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other tauopathies. Eighteen patients with baseline investigations enroled in a 17-month follow-up study, including 16 with AD (10 had mild cognitive impairment and a positive amyloid PET scan, that is, prodromal AD, and six had AD dementia) and two with corticobasal syndrome. All patients underwent PET scans with [18F]THK5317 (tau deposition) and [18F]FDG (glucose metabolism) at baseline and follow-up, neuropsychological assessment at baseline and follow-up and a scan with [11C]PIB (amyloid-ß deposition) at baseline only. At a group level, patients with AD (prodromal or dementia) showed unchanged [18F]THK5317 retention over time, in contrast to significant decreases in [18F]FDG uptake in temporoparietal areas. The pattern of changes in [18F]THK5317 retention was heterogeneous across all patients, with qualitative differences both between the two AD groups (prodromal and dementia) and among individual patients. High [18F]THK5317 retention was significantly associated over time with low episodic memory encoding scores, while low [18F]FDG uptake was significantly associated over time with both low global cognition and episodic memory encoding scores. Both patients with corticobasal syndrome had a negative [11C]PIB scan, high [18F]THK5317 retention with a different regional distribution from that in AD, and a homogeneous pattern of increased [18F]THK5317 retention in the basal ganglia over time. These findings highlight the heterogeneous propagation of tau pathology among patients with symptomatic AD, in contrast to the homogeneous changes seen in glucose metabolism, which better tracked clinical progression.

How can we improve transfer of outcomes from randomized clinical trials to clinical practice with disease-modifying drugs in Alzheimer's disease?

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for putative disease-modifying drugs in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are using cognitive outcomes, such as the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale--cognitive subscale, activities of daily living scales, such as the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living, and time from mild cognitive impairment to AD dementia. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to build clinically relevant outcomes for future use in clinical practice into RCT designs and help third-party payers to measure benefit. METHODS: We used a literature review for analysis. RESULTS: The Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) appears to be the most reliable primary outcome for RCT at different stages of AD, with the Relevant Outcome Scale for Alzheimer's Disease (ROSA) as a suitable alternative. The importance of current AD biomarkers vis-à- vis determination of efficacy of disease-modifying drugs has yet to be established; however, it is likely that at least one amyloid-specific test will be required prior to treatment with a drug acting predominantly on ß-amyloid (Aß42). Furthermore, serial MRI may be required to monitor adverse side effects associated with such drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Global clinical scales such as CDR-SB and ROSA should be considered for use with treatments aiming at slowing disease progression.

Diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease: past, present and future ethical issues.

There is great interest in the ethical issues associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias given the prevalence of AD and the evolving neuroscience landscape in matters of diagnoses and therapeutics. Much of the ethics discussion arises in the tension between the principle of not doing harm (principle of non-maleficence) in this vulnerable population and the development of effective treatments (principle of beneficence). Autonomy and capacity issues are also numerous, wide-ranging, and concern (1) day to day affairs such as driving safely and spending money wisely, (2) life-time events such as designating a legal representative in case of incapacity, making a will, (3) consenting to treatment and diagnostic procedures, (4) participating in research. The latter issue is particularly thorny and illustrates well the complexity of tackling concerns related to capacity. The impetus to protect AD patients has partly led to ethics regulation and policies making research on inapt patients more difficult because of stringent requirements for signed informed consent or for showing the value of the research to this specific patient population. New issues are arising that relate to earlier diagnosis using biomarkers and (possibly soon) the use of drugs that modify disease progression. We here summarize and discuss the different ethical issues associated with AD from a historical perspective, with emphasis on diagnostic and treatments issues.