Image-guided percutaneous ablation of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

PURPOSE: Disease control and survival following percutaneous ablation of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) was studied retrospectively. METHODS: Six patients underwent 16 image-guided ablation procedures to treat 35 liver tumors from 2015 to 2022 (17 microwave ablation, 9 irreversible electroporation, 8 cryoablation, and 1 radiofrequency ablation). Technical success, local progression, intrahepatic progression, distant progression, overall survival, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Four of six (67%) patients were treatment naïve prior to ablation. The mean length of imaging follow-up from first ablation procedure was 43.0 ± 31.2 months. Thirty-three of 35 (94.3%) ablated tumors did not progress locally. Three of 6 patients (50%) had new intrahepatic progression and underwent repeat ablation or systemic treatment. No extrahepatic progression was observed. One patient died from EHE 2.7 years after initial diagnosis. No severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ablation is feasible, often in a staged fashion, and may provide favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with hepatic EHE.

Motorized template for MRI-guided focal cryoablation of prostate cancer.

MR-guided focal cryoablation of prostate cancer has often been selected as a minimally-invasive treatment option. Placing multiple cryo-needles accurately to form an ablation volume that adequately covers the target volume is crucial for better oncological/functional outcomes. This paper presents an MRI-compatible system combining a motorized tilting grid template with insertion depth sensing capabilities, enabling the physician to precisely place the cryo-needles into the desired location. In vivo animal study in a swine model (3 animals) was performed to test the device performance including targeting accuracy and the procedure workflow. The study showed that the insertion depth feedback improved the 3D targeting accuracy when compared to the conventional insertion technique (7.4 mm vs. 11.2 mm, p=0.04). All three cases achieved full iceball coverage without repositioning the cryo-needles. The results demonstrate the advantages of the motorized tilting mechanism and real-time insertion depth feedback, as well as the feasibility of the proposed workflow for MRI-guided focal cryoablation of prostate cancer.

PET/CT Fluoroscopy during PET/CT-Guided Interventions: Initial Experience.

This study assessed the feasibility and functionality of the use of a high-speed image fusion technology to generate and display positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopic images during PET/CT-guided tumor ablation procedures. Thirteen patients underwent 14 PET/CT-guided ablations for the treatment of 20 tumors. A Food and Drug Administration-cleared multimodal image fusion platform received images pushed from a scanner, followed by near-real-time, nonrigid image registration. The most recent intraprocedural PET dataset was fused to each single-rotation CT fluoroscopy dataset as it arrived, and the fused images were displayed on an in-room monitor. PET/CT fluoroscopic images were generated and displayed in all procedures and enabled more confident targeting in 3 procedures. The mean lag time from CT fluoroscopic image acquisition to the in-room display of the fused PET/CT fluoroscopic image was 21 seconds ± 8. The registration accuracy was visually satisfactory in 13 of 14 procedures. In conclusion, PET/CT fluoroscopy was feasible and may have the potential to facilitate PET/CT-guided procedures.

Tumor and Ablation Margin Visibility during Cryoablation of Musculoskeletal Tumors: Comparing Intraprocedural PET/CT Images with CT-Only Images.

PURPOSE: To compare tumor and ice-ball margin visibility on intraprocedural positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and CT-only images and report technical success, local tumor progression, and adverse event rates for PET/CT-guided cryoablation procedures for musculoskeletal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant and institutional review board-approved retrospective study evaluated 20 PET/CT-guided cryoablation procedures performed with palliative and/or curative intent to treat 15 musculoskeletal tumors in 15 patients from 2012 to 2021. Cryoablation was performed using general anesthesia and PET/CT guidance. Procedural images were reviewed to determine the following: (a) whether the tumor borders could be fully assessed on PET/CT or CT-only images; and (b) whether tumor ice-ball margins could be fully assessed on PET/CT or CT-only images. The ability to visualize tumor borders and ice-ball margins on PET/CT images was compared with that on CT-only images. RESULTS: Tumor borders were fully assessable for 100% (20 of 20; 95% CI, 0.83-1) of procedures on PET/CT versus 20% (4 of 20; 95 CI, 0.057-0.44) of procedures on CT only (P < .001). The tumor ice-ball margin was fully assessable in 80% (16 of 20; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94) of procedures using PET/CT versus 5% (1 of 20; 95% CI, 0.0013-0.25) of procedures using CT only (P < .001). Primary technical success was achieved in 75% (15 of 20; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91) of procedures. There was local tumor progression in 23% (3/13; 95% CI, 0.050-0.54) of the treated tumors with at least 6 months of follow-up. There were 3 adverse events (1 Grade 3, 1 Grade 2, and 1 Grade 1). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT-guided cryoablation of musculoskeletal tumors can provide superior intraprocedural visualization of the tumor and ice-ball margins compared with that provided by CT alone. Further studies are warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of this approach.

Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Image-Guided Thermal Ablation of Juxtacardiac Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) for juxtacardiac lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This bi-institutional retrospective cohort study included 23 consecutive patients (13 [57%] male; mean age, 55 years ± 18) with 30 juxtacardiac lung tumors located ≤10 mm from the pericardium treated in 28 IGTA sessions (25 sessions of cryoablation and 3 sessions of microwave ablation) between April 2008 and August 2022. The primary outcome was any adverse cardiac event within 90 days after ablation. Secondary outcomes included noncardiac adverse events, local tumor progression-free survival (LT-PFS), and the cumulative incidence of local tumor progression with death as a competing risk. Two tumors treated without curative intent or follow-up imaging were considered in the safety analysis but not in the progression analysis. RESULTS: The median imaging follow-up duration was 22 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10-53 months). Primary technical success was achieved in 25 (89%) ablations. No adverse cardiac events attributable to IGTA occurred. One patient experienced a phrenic nerve injury. The median LT-PFS duration was 59 months (IQR, 32-73 months). At 1, 3, and 5 years, LT-PFS was 90% (95% CI, 78%-100%), 74% (CI, 53%-100%), and 45% (CI, 20%-97%), respectively, and the cumulative incidence of local tumor progression was 4.3% (CI, 0.29%-19%), 11% (CI, 1.6%-30%), and 26% (CI, 3.3%-58%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IGTA is safe and effective for lung tumors located ≤10 mm from the pericardium. No adverse cardiac events were not observed within 90 days after ablation.

Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Contributions to Patient Dose and Personnel Exposure to Radiation during PET/CT-Guided Tumor Ablations.

This study sought to quantify the positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) components of patient radiation doses and personnel exposure to radiations during PET/CT-guided tumor ablations and assess the utility of a rolling lead shield for operator protection. Two operators performed 21 PET/CT-guided ablations behind a customized, 25-mm-thick lead shield with midchest-to-midthigh coverage. The mean patient radiation dose per procedure was 3.90 mSv ± 1.13 (11.3%) from PET and 30.51 mSv ± 19.05 (88.7%) from CT. The mean primary and secondary operator exposure outside neck-level thyroid shields was 0.05 and 0.02 mSv per procedure, respectively. The radiation exposure levels behind the rolling lead shield, inside the primary operator's thyroid shield, and on the other personnel were below the measurable threshold cumulatively over 21 procedures. The mean PET exposure level at continuous close proximity to patients was 0.02 mSv per procedure. The PET radiation doses to the patients and personnel were small. Thus, the rolling lead shield provided limited benefit.

Comparison of Percutaneous Image-Guided Microwave Ablation and Cryoablation for Sarcoma Lung Metastases: A 10-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND. To our knowledge, outcomes between percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation of sarcoma lung metastases have not been compared. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare technical success, complications, local tumor control, and overall survival (OS) after MWA versus cryoablation of sarcoma lung metastases. METHODS. This retrospective cohort study included 27 patients (16 women, 11 men; median age, 64 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, 0-2) who, from 2009 to 2021, underwent 39 percutaneous CT-guided ablation sessions (21 MWA and 18 cryoablation sessions; one to four sessions per patient) to treat 65 sarcoma lung metastases (median number of tumors per patient, one [range, one to 12]; median tumor diameter, 11.0 mm [range, 5-33 mm]; 25% of tumors were nonperipheral). We compared complications according to ablation modality by use of generalized estimating equations. We evaluated ablation modality, tumor size, and location (peripheral vs nonperipheral) in relation to local tumor progression by use of proportional Cox hazard models, with death as the competing risk. We estimated OS using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS. Primary technical success was 97% for both modalities. Median follow-up was 23 months (range, one to 102 months; interquartile range, 12-44 months). A total of seven of 61 tumors (11%) showed local progression. Estimated 1-year and 2-year local control rates were, for tumors 1 cm or smaller, 97% and 95% after MWA versus 99% and 98% after cryoablation, and for tumors larger than 1 cm, 74% and 62% after MWA versus 86% and 79% after cryoablation. Tumor size of 1 cm or smaller was associated with a decreased cumulative incidence of local progression (p = .048); ablation modality and tumor location were not associated with progression (p = .86 and p = .54, respectively). Complications (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade, ≤ 3) occurred in 17 of 39 sessions (44%), prompting chest tube placement in nine (23%). There were no CTCAE grade 4 or 5 complications. OS at 1, 2, and 3 years was 100%, 89%, and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSION. High primary technical success, local control, and OS support the use of MWA and cryoablation for treating sarcoma lung metastases. Ablation modality and tumor location did not affect local progression. The rate of local tumor progression was low, especially for small tumors. No life-threatening complications occurred. CLINICAL IMPACT. Percutaneous MWA and cryoablation are both suited for the treatment of sarcoma lung metastases, especially for tumors 1 cm or smaller, whether peripheral or nonperipheral. Complications, if they occur, are not life-threatening.

Outcomes Following Percutaneous Microwave and Cryoablation of Lung Metastases from Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Bi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report outcomes following percutaneous microwave and cryoablation of lung metastases from adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This bi-institutional retrospective cohort study included 10 patients (6 females, median age 59 years [range 28-81]) who underwent 32 percutaneous ablation sessions (21 cryoablation, 11 microwave) of 60 lung metastases (median 3.5 tumors per patient [range 1-16]) from 2007 to 2019. Median tumor diameter was 16 mm [range 7-40], significantly larger for cryoablation (22 mm, p = 0.002). A median of two tumors were treated per session [range 1-7]. Technical success, local control, complications, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: Primary technical success was achieved for 55/60 tumors (91.7%). Median follow-up was 40.6 months (clinical) and 32.5 months (imaging, per tumor). Local control at 1, 2, and 3 years was 94.7%, 80.8%, and 76.4%, respectively, and did not differ between ablation modalities. Five of fifteen recurrent tumors underwent repeat ablation, and secondary technical success was achieved in four (80%). Assisted local tumor control at 1, 2, and 3 years was 96.2%, 89.8%, and 84.9%, respectively. Complications occurred following 24/32 sessions (75.0%) and 57.2% Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) lower than grade 3. Of 13 pneumothoraces, 7 required chest tube placements. Hemoptysis occurred after 7/21 cryoablation sessions, and bronchopleural fistula developed more frequently with microwave (p = 0.037). Median length of hospital stay was 1 day [range 0-10], and median overall survival was 81.5 months (IQR 40.4-93.1). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous computed tomography-guided microwave and cryoablation can treat lung metastases from ACC of the head and neck. Complications are common but manageable, with full recovery expected.

F-18 FDG perfusion PET: intraprocedural assessment of the liver tumor ablation margin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided liver tumor microwave ablation procedures for assessing the ablation margin and correlating minimum margin measurements with local progression. METHODS: This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study included 20 adult patients (11 M, 9 F; mean age 65) undergoing FDG PET/CT-guided liver microwave ablation to treat 31 FDG-avid tumors. Intraprocedural FDG perfusion PET was performed to assess the ablation margin. Intraprocedural decisions regarding overlapping ablations were recorded. Two readers retrospectively interpreted intraprocedural perfusion PET and postprocedural contrast-enhanced MRI. Assessability of the ablation margin and minimum margin measurements were recorded. Imaging follow-up for local progression ranged from 30 to 574 days (mean 310). Regression modeling of minimum margin measurements was performed. Hazard ratios were calculated to correlate an ablation margin threshold of 5 mm with outcomes. RESULTS: Intraprocedural perfusion PET prompted additional overlapping ablations of two tumors, neither of which progressed. Incomplete ablation or local progression occurred in 8/31 (26%) tumors. With repeat ablation, secondary efficacy was 26 (84%) of 31. Both study readers deemed ablation margins fully assessable more often using perfusion PET than MRI (OR 69.7; CI 6.0, 806.6; p = 0.001). Minimum ablation margins ≥ 5 mm on perfusion PET correlated with a low risk of incomplete ablation/local progression by both study readers (HR 0.08 and 0.02, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural FDG perfusion PET consistently enabled complete liver tumor microwave ablation margin assessments, and the perfusion PET minimum ablation margin measurements correlated well with local outcomes. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02018107).

Liver tumor F-18 FDG-PET before and immediately after microwave ablation enables imaging and quantification of tumor tissue contraction.

PURPOSE: Poor liver tumor visibility after microwave ablation (MWA) limits direct tumor ablation margin assessments using contrast-enhanced CT or ultrasound (US). Positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/CT may offer improved intraprocedural assessment of liver tumor ablation margins versus current imaging techniques, as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-avid tumors remain visible on PET immediately following ablation. The purpose of this study was to assess intraprocedural 18F-FDG PET scans before and immediately after PET/CT-guided MWA for visualization and quantification of metabolic liver tumor tissue contraction resulting from MWA. METHODS: This retrospective study, conducted at a large academic medical center after Institutional Review Board approval, included 36 patients (20 men; mean age 63 [range 37-85]) who underwent PET/CT-guided MWA of 42 18F-FDG-avid liver tumors from May 2013 to March 2018. Tumor metabolic diameters (short/long axes) were measured for each tumor on pre- and post-ablation PET images. Tumor metabolic volumes were calculated using tumor diameter measurements and compared with automated volumes using an SUV threshold algorithm. A two-tailed paired t test was used for the analyses. RESULTS: Comparing intraprocedural pre- and post-ablation PET images, mean metabolic tumor short- and long-axis diameters decreased from 21.4 to 14.9 mm [- 29%, p < 0.001, standard deviation (SD) 18%] and from 24.0 to 18.0 mm (- 24%, p < 0.001, SD 16%), respectively. The mean calculated tumor metabolic volume decreased from 10.5 to 4.6 mm3 (- 55%, p < 0.001, SD 26%). The mean automated tumor metabolic volume decreased from 10.6 to 5.8 mm3 (- 45%, p < 0.001, SD 30%). CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural PET images of 18F-FDG-avid liver tumors allow visualization and quantification of MWA-induced metabolic tumor tissue contraction during 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided procedures. The ability to visualize contracted tumor immediately post-MWA may facilitate emerging intraprocedural PET and PET/CT imaging techniques that address a clinical gap in directly assessing the ablation margin.

Percutaneous CT- and MRI-guided Cryoablation of cT1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Intermediate- to Long-term Outcomes in 307 Patients.

Background Percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains underused, partially because of heterogeneous and limited long-term outcomes data assessing recent cryoablation methods. Purpose To report intermediate- to long-term outcomes of image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of cT1 RCC and to compare outcomes for CT versus MRI guidance. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective single-institution study assessed patients who underwent percutaneous cryoablation for solitary pathology-proven cT1 RCC between August 2000 and July 2017. Tumors (cT1a, n = 282; cT1b, n = 25; size range, 0.6-6.5 cm; median size, 2.5 cm) underwent cryoablation with CT (n = 155) or MRI (n = 152) guidance. Primary end points of overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), imaging-confirmed disease-free survival (DFS), and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were calculated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Secondary end points of technique efficacy and adverse event rate were also calculated. Primary and secondary end points for CT and MRI guidance were compared by using univariable regression analysis. Results A total of 307 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 192 men) were evaluated. Median clinical follow-up lasted 95 months (range, 8-219 months), and median imaging follow-up lasted 41 months (range, 0-189 months). Survival metrics at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, included OS of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88%, 94%), 86% (95% CI: 82%, 90%), 78% (95% CI: 73%, 84%), and 76% (95% CI: 69%, 83%); DSS of 99.6% (95% CI: 99%, 100%), 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%), 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%), and 99% (95% CI: 98%, 100%); DFS of 94% (95% CI: 92%, 97%), 91% (95% CI: 88%, 96%), 88% (95% CI: 83%, 93%), and 88% (95% CI: 83%, 93%); and LPFS of 97% (95% CI: 94%, 99%), 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%), 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%), and 95% (95% CI: 93%, 98%). Survival did not significantly differ between CT and MRI guidance, with univariable Cox regression analysis hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.67; P = .92) for OS, 0.63 (95% CI: 0.26, 1.52; P = .30) for DFS, and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.26, 2.74; P = .77) for LPFS. Primary and secondary technique efficacy were 96% and 99%, respectively. Overall adverse event rate was 14% (43 of 307), including 11 grade 3 events and three grade 4 events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Conclusion Percutaneous CT- and MRI-guided cryoablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma had similar excellent intermediate- and long-term outcomes. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades in this issue.

Liver Tumor Ablation Procedure Duration and Estimated Patient Radiation Dose: Comparing Positron Emission Tomography/CT and CT Guidance.

PURPOSE: To compare procedure duration and patient radiation dose in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT-guided liver tumor ablation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, case-control study, 275 patients underwent 368 image-guided ablation procedures to treat 537 tumors. Radiologists used PET/CT guidance for 117 procedures and CT guidance for 251 procedures. PET/CT-guided procedures were performed by one radiologist (C: P.B.S.). All 3 radiologists (A: J.G.S., B: a radiologist who is not an author on this article, and C: P.B.S.) performed CT-guided procedures. Potential confounders included patient demographics, clinical and tumor characteristics, and procedural variables. RESULTS: The mean duration and estimated patient radiation dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 21.5 ± 4.9 minutes longer and 0.7 ± 2.8 mSv higher than CT-guided procedures performed by all radiologists in an unadjusted comparison. Adjusting for confounding, mean duration and estimated dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 28.3 ± 3.8 minutes longer (P < .0001) and 6.2 ± 2.9 mSv higher (P = .03) than CT-guided procedures performed by the same radiologist. Comparing CT-guided procedures performed by all 3 radiologists, adjusted mean durations and estimated patient doses of procedures by the least experienced radiologist, radiologist A, and the second most experienced radiologist, radiologist B, were 24.2 ± 5.1 (P < .0001) and 18.1 ± 8.9 (P = .04) minutes longer and 13.1 ± 3.7 (P < .001) and 14.5 ± 6.4 (P = .02) mSv higher, respectively, than procedures performed by the most experienced radiologist, radiologist C. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT-guided liver ablations had a slightly longer duration with slightly higher estimated patient radiation dose than similar CT-guided liver ablations. Procedure duration and patient dose do not appear to be major impediments to the emerging field of PET/CT-guided tumor ablation.

Intraprocedural Ablation Margin Assessment by Using Ammonia Perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided Liver Tumor Ablation: A Pilot Study.

Purpose To prospectively determine whether nitrogen 13 (13N) ammonia perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) during fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT)-guided liver tumor ablation can be used to intraprocedurally assess ablation margins. Materials and Methods Eight patients (five women and three men; age range, 36-74 years; mean age, 57 years) were enrolled in this pilot study and underwent FDG PET/CT-guided microwave ablation of 11 FDG-avid liver metastases (mean diameter, 22 mm; range, 11-34 mm). All procedures were performed between March 2014 and December 2016. Complete ablation margin visibility and minimum ablation margin thickness were assessed by using intraprocedural 13N-ammonia perfusion PET compared with 24-hour postprocedural MR imaging by two independent blinded radiologists. Local tumor progression for each ablated tumor was assessed at follow-up imaging for 3-38 months (median, 17.6 months). Descriptive analysis was performed. Results Eleven of 11 (100%) ablation margins were fully assessable by using intraprocedural perfusion PET by both readers; six of eleven (55%) margins were fully assessable by both readers at postprocedural 24-hour MR imaging. By using perfusion PET, one tumor that had been judged by both readers to have a minimum margin of 0 mm progressed locally. No tumors judged to have a minimum margin greater than 0 mm at perfusion PET progressed locally. Conclusion 13N-ammonia perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided liver tumor ablations can potentially be used to intraprocedurally assess the entire ablation margin, including the minimum margin. © RSNA, 2018.

Hepatobiliary phase MRI: impact on planning image-guided liver tumor ablations.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of hepatobiliary phase images obtained during intravenous gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MRI in the planning of image-guided liver tumor ablations. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 34 patients (21 men, 13 women, ages 25-80) who underwent 36 liver MRI examinations with gadoxetate disodium within 12 weeks prior to image-guided thermal ablation of 62 liver tumors during 36 procedures. Visibility of bile ducts, subdivided by branch order, on hepatobiliary phase images was compared to standard MRI sequence images by an attending abdominal radiologist and fellow. Interventional decision making (whether or not to ablate and technical plan) using hepatobiliary phase images was compared with standard MRI sequences by the ablationists. The technical success and adverse events of ablation procedures were noted. RESULTS: Bile duct visibility was significantly increased by at least one branch order in 18/36 (50%) examinations (p < 0.0001). Interventional decisions were significantly impacted in 15 (41.7%) of 36 ablation procedures (p < 0.0001), including changes to the technical plan in six (16.7%) of these procedures (p = 0.005). Technical success was achieved for 60/62 (97%) of tumors. Mild (grade 1) adverse events occurred in 4/36 (11%) procedures; no biliary complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Use of hepatobiliary phase images obtained during gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MRI impacted both when and how to perform image-guided liver tumor ablations in our practice.

Hepatic Microwave Ablation Zone Size: Correlation with Total Energy, Net Energy, and Manufacturer-Provided Chart Predictions.

PURPOSE: To determine whether total energy (TE) reaching the microwave (MW) applicator or net energy (NE) exiting the applicator (after correcting for reflectivity) correlates better with hepatic MW ablation zone dimensions than manufacturer-provided chart predictions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-applicator, nonoverlapping ablations of 93 liver tumors (0.7-5.9 cm) were performed in 52 adult patients. TE and NE were recorded for each ablation. Long axis diameter (LAD), short axis diameter (SAD), and volume (V) of each ablation zone were measured on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography after the procedure and retrospectively compared with TE; NE; and manufacturer-provided chart predictions of LAD, SAD, and V using correlation and regression analyses. RESULTS: For treated tumors, mean (± SD) TE and NE were 49.8 kJ (± 22.7) and 36.4 kJ (± 19.4). Mean LAD, SAD, and V were 5.8 cm (± 1.3), 3.7 cm (± 0.8), and 44.1 cm(3) (± 25.4). Correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval) with LAD, SAD, and V were 0.46 (0.28, 0.61), 0.52 (0.36, 0.66), and 0.52 (0.36, 0.66) for TE; 0.42 (0.24, 0.58), 0.55 (0.39, 0.68), and 0.53 (0.36, 0.66) for NE; and 0.51 (0.34, 0.65), 0.63 (0.49, 0.74), and 0.60 (0.45, 0.73) for chart predictions. Using regression analysis and controlling for TE, SAD was 0.34 cm larger in patients with cirrhosis than in patients without cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting for reflectivity did not substantially improve correlation of energy values with MW ablation zone size parameters and did not outperform manufacturer-provided chart predictions. Correlations were moderate and variable using all methods. The results suggest a disproportionate influence of tissue factors on MW ablation results.

Wall suction-assisted image-guided therapeutic paracentesis: a safe and less expensive alternative to evacuated bottles.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and cost savings of using wall suction and plastic canisters instead of evacuated bottles, currently in short supply, to drain, and collect large amounts of fluid during image-guided paracentesis procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a hospital-based practice, 551 image-guided paracenteses were performed in 191 consecutive patients over a 10-month period, using wall suction to facilitate drainage. Total volume of fluid removed and complications were recorded. Complications were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The pressure generated from the wall suction at our institution was measured using a manometer and compared to that of an empty evacuated bottle. Cost savings per procedure were estimated by calculating the difference in the price of supplies used to collect the average volume of fluid removed per procedure for each method. RESULTS: The mean volume of fluid removed per procedure was 3541 mL. Four (0.72%) complications occurred in 551 procedures. One grade I complication consisted of a prolonged puncture site leak of ascites. Three Grade III complications included infection, hypotension, and atrial fibrillation. All four complications appeared unrelated to the use of wall suction and were treated successfully. Maximum pressure generated from the wall suction at our institution was less than the initial pressure generated from an empty evacuated bottle. Estimated cost savings per procedure was $33.92. CONCLUSION: The use of wall suction and plastic canisters to drain and collect fluid during image-guided therapeutic paracenteses is a safe alternative to using evacuated glass bottles and reduces per-procedure costs.

Radiation dose during CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: Effect of a dose reduction protocol.

PURPOSE: To estimate and compare the radiation dose using a standard protocol and that of a dose reduction protocol in patients undergoing CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of 97 CT-guided cryoablation procedures to treat a solitary renal tumor in each of 97 patients (64 M, 33 F; range 31-84 yrs) was performed. Fifty patients were treated using a standard dose protocol (kVp=120, mean mAs=180, monitoring scans every 3 min during freezes), and an additional 47 patients were treated using a dose reduction protocol (kVp=100, mean mAs=100, monitoring scans less frequently than every 3 min during freezes). Multiple Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney (rank-sum) tests were used to compare dose-length product (DLP) between the two groups. Fisher's exact test was used to compare technique effectiveness at 12 months post ablation between the two groups. RESULTS: Median DLP for the standard protocol group was 4833.5 mGy*cm (range, 1667-8267 mGy*cm); median DLP for the dose reduction group was 2648 mGy*cm (range, 850-7169 mGy*cm), significantly less than that of the standard protocol group (p<0.01). The technique effectiveness for the dose reduction group was not significantly different from that of the standard protocol group at 12 month follow up (p=0.434). CONCLUSION: The radiation dose during percutaneous CT-guided cryoablation of renal tumors was substantial in both the standard and the dose reduction groups; however, it was significantly lower with the protocol change that reduced dose parameters and decreased the number of CT scans.