Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nature ; 627(8004): 612-619, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480877

RESUMEN

Less than 30% of people in Africa received a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine even 18 months after vaccine development1. Here, motivated by the observation that residents of remote, rural areas of Sierra Leone faced severe access difficulties2, we conducted an intervention with last-mile delivery of doses and health professionals to the most inaccessible areas, along with community mobilization. A cluster randomized controlled trial in 150 communities showed that this intervention with mobile vaccination teams increased the immunization rate by about 26 percentage points within 48-72 h. Moreover, auxiliary populations visited our community vaccination points, which more than doubled the number of inoculations administered. The additional people vaccinated per intervention site translated to an implementation cost of US $33 per person vaccinated. Transportation to reach remote villages accounted for a large share of total intervention costs. Therefore, bundling multiple maternal and child health interventions in the same visit would further reduce costs per person treated. Current research on vaccine delivery maintains a large focus on individual behavioural issues such as hesitancy. Our study demonstrates that prioritizing mobile services to overcome access difficulties faced by remote populations in developing countries can generate increased returns in terms of uptake of health services3.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Vacunación Masiva , Unidades Móviles de Salud , Servicios de Salud Rural , Cobertura de Vacunación , Niño , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/economía , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Unidades Móviles de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Sierra Leona , Transportes/economía , Cobertura de Vacunación/economía , Cobertura de Vacunación/métodos , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Vacunación Masiva/métodos , Vacunación Masiva/organización & administración , Femenino , Adulto , Madres
2.
Nat Med ; 27(8): 1385-1394, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34272499

RESUMEN

Widespread acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial for achieving sufficient immunization coverage to end the global pandemic, yet few studies have investigated COVID-19 vaccination attitudes in lower-income countries, where large-scale vaccination is just beginning. We analyze COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across 15 survey samples covering 10 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Africa and South America, Russia (an upper-middle-income country) and the United States, including a total of 44,260 individuals. We find considerably higher willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine in our LMIC samples (mean 80.3%; median 78%; range 30.1 percentage points) compared with the United States (mean 64.6%) and Russia (mean 30.4%). Vaccine acceptance in LMICs is primarily explained by an interest in personal protection against COVID-19, while concern about side effects is the most common reason for hesitancy. Health workers are the most trusted sources of guidance about COVID-19 vaccines. Evidence from this sample of LMICs suggests that prioritizing vaccine distribution to the Global South should yield high returns in advancing global immunization coverage. Vaccination campaigns should focus on translating the high levels of stated acceptance into actual uptake. Messages highlighting vaccine efficacy and safety, delivered by healthcare workers, could be effective for addressing any remaining hesitancy in the analyzed LMICs.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , COVID-19/virología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Int J Neurosci ; 123(1): 38-41, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22947232

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of skin biopsy in the assessment of patients with suspeted small fiber neuropathy (SFN). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with sensory symptoms or findings restricted to small nerve fibers and normal nerve conduction studies (NCS) seen in a subspecialty neuromuscular private practice. RESULTS: Assessments were made on 145 patients. Skin biopsy was abnormal in at least one site in 86 patients (59%). There was no significant difference between patients with normal or abnormal skin biopsies with respect to age, gender, or duration of symptoms. Compared to patients with normal skin biopsies, patients with confirmed SFN were significantly more likely to have pain and were more than twice as likely to respond to standard neuropathic pain medications. CONCLUSIONS: Skin biopsy is useful in the diagnosis and management of patients with otherwise unexplained sensory symptoms or findings.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia/métodos , Fibras Nerviosas/patología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/fisiopatología , Piel/patología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Piel/inervación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA