How do we expand the lung donor pool?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung transplantation activity continues to be limited by the availability of timely quality donor lungs. It is apparent though that progress has been made. The steady evolution of clinical practice, combined with painstaking scientific discovery and innovation are described. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been successful studies reporting innovations in the wider use and broader consideration of donation after circulatory death donor lungs, including an increasing number of transplants from each of the controlled, uncontrolled and medically assisted dying donor descriptive categories. Donors beyond age 70 years are providing better than expected long-term outcomes. Hepatitis C PCR positive donor lungs can be safely used if treated postoperatively with appropriate antivirals. Donor lung perfusion at a constant 10 degrees appears capable of significantly improving donor logistics and ex-vivo lung perfusion offers the potential of an ever-increasing number of novel donor management roles. Bioartificial and xenografts remain distant possibilities only at present. SUMMARY: Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust and combined with clinical, scientific and engineering innovations, the realizable lung donor pool is proving to be larger than previously thought.

COVID-19 infection is mild and has minimal impact on lung function in well vaccinated and widely treated lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has become a common infection affecting lung transplant recipients (LTR), who are at high risk for poor outcomes. Outcomes early in the pandemic were poor, but since the rollout of vaccination and novel COVID-19 treatments, outcomes of LTR have not been well described. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on the clinical course and lung function trajectory in an Australian cohort of LTR. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from LTR with confirmed COVID-19 managed at Alfred Health, between August 2020 and December 2022. Baseline demographics, COVID-19 disease details (including severity) and spirometry pre- and postinfection have been analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 279 LTR were included. The cohort was comorbid, but well vaccinated, with 275/279 (98.6%) having ≥2 COVID-19 vaccines at symptom onset. Severe disease occurred in only 17 cases (6%) and overall mortality was very low (4%). Prompt treatment with antivirals, particularly remdesevir (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.81, p = 0.02) and vaccination (OR 0.24, CI 0.08-0.81, p = 0.01), was protective. There was not a clinically significant drop in lung function post-COVID-19 with the median absolute decline in forced expiratory volume (FEV1) being 40 ml (IQR 5-120 ml, p < 0.001), with a decline of >10% occurring in only 42 patients (17%). After multivariate adjustment, only rejection before COVID-19 was significantly associated with FEV1 decline afterward (OR 3.74, 1.12-11.86, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In our highly COVID-19 vaccinated, promptly treated LTR, the majority of COVID-19 infections were mild and did not result in a clinically significant decline in lung function.

Utility of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant in predicting outcomes before and after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing donor use and achieving maximal survival following lung transplantation (LTx) require a pretransplant assessment that identifies clinical, physiological, and psychosocial patient factors associated with both poor and optimal post-LTx survival. We examined the utility of a psychosocial tool, the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT), to identify patient suitability for LTx, as well as its association with clinical outcomes before and after LTx. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study analyzing LTx assessment clinical variables (age, gender, diagnosis, functional capacity, nutrition, renal function), with a particular focus on the utility of the SIPAT score, to predict patient suitability for LTx. The same variables were analyzed against LTx waitlist mortality, as well as post-LTx survival. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period dating from December 2012, 914 patients (male 54.4%, mean age 55.2 years) underwent LTx assessment. Patients declined for LTx (n = 152, 16.6%) were older and had reduced functional capacity, nutritional markers, and renal function but had a higher SIPAT score. Once listed for LTx, a higher SIPAT score was not associated with waitlist mortality or reduced post-LTx survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SIPAT tool measures psychosocial suitability for transplantation that can be incorporated into a standardized assessment of LTx suitability. While patients with higher SIPAT score were more likely to be declined for LTx, the SIPAT score did not predict outcome in transplanted patients. A subgroup of patients with high SIPAT scores were successfully transplanted, suggesting that unfavorable psychosocial variables are potentially modifiable with a well-resourced multidisciplinary LTx team.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction is associated with an increased number of non-HLA antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of adverse outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Multiple factors, such as infection, alloimmunity, and autoimmunity, may lead to CLAD. Here, we aim to examine the role of non-human leukocytes antigen (HLA) antibodies in CLAD in a large retrospective cohort. METHODS: We analyzed non-HLA antibodies in the pre- and post-transplant sera of 226 (100 CLAD, 126 stable) lung transplant recipients from 5 centers, and we used a separate cohort to confirm our findings. RESULTS: A panel of 18 non-HLA antibodies was selected for analysis based on their significantly higher positive rates in CLAD vs stable groups. The panel-18 non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) may be positive pre- or post-transplant; the risk for CLAD is higher in the latter. The presence of both non-HLA antibody and HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) was associated with an augmented risk of CLAD (HR=25.09 [5.52-14.04], p < 0.001), which was higher than that for single-positive patients. In the independent confirmatory cohort of 61 (20 CLAD, 41 stable) lung transplant recipients, the risk for CLAD remained elevated in double-positive patients (HR=10.67 [0.98-115.68], p = 0.052). After adjusting for nonstandard immunosuppression, patients with double-positive DSA/Non-HLA antibodies had an elevated risk for graft loss (HR=2.53 [1.29-4.96], p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Circulating non-HLA antibodies (n > 3) were independently associated with a higher risk for CLAD. Furthermore, when non-HLA antibodies and DSA were detected concomitantly, the risk for CLAD and graft loss was significantly increased. These results show that humoral immunity to HLA and non-HLA antigens may contribute to CLAD development.

Oscillometry in Stable Single and Double Lung Allograft Recipients Transplanted for Interstitial Lung Disease: Results of a Multi-Center Australian Study.

Peak spirometry after single lung transplantation (SLTx) for interstitial lung disease (ILD) is lower than after double lung transplantation (DLTx), however the pathophysiologic mechanisms are unclear. We aim to assess respiratory mechanics in SLTx and DLTx for ILD using oscillometry. Spirometry and oscillometry (tremoflo® C-100) were performed in stable SLTx and DLTx recipients in a multi-center study. Resistance (R5, R5-19) and reactance (X5) were compared between LTx recipient groups, matched by age and gender. A model of respiratory impedance using ILD and DLTx data was performed. In total, 45 stable LTx recipients were recruited (SLTx n = 23, DLTx n = 22; males: 87.0% vs. 77.3%; median age 63.0 vs. 63.0 years). Spirometry was significantly lower after SLTx compared with DLTx: %-predicted mean (SD) FEV1 [70.0 (14.5) vs. 93.5 (26.0)%]; FVC [70.5 (16.8) vs. 90.7 (12.8)%], p < 0.01. R5 and R5-19 were similar between groups (p = 0.94 and p = 0.11, respectively) yet X5 was significantly worse after SLTx: median (IQR) X5 [-1.88 (-2.89 to -1.39) vs. -1.22 (-1.87 to -0.86)] cmH2O.s/L], p < 0.01. R5 and X5 measurements from the model were congruent with measurements in SLTx recipients. The similarities in resistance, yet differences in spirometry and reactance between both transplant groups suggest the important contribution of elastic properties to the pathophysiology. Oscillometry may provide further insight into the physiological changes occurring post-LTx.

Comparison of human leukocyte antigen immunologic risk stratification methods in lung transplantation.

Outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx) remain poor, despite advances in sequencing technology and development of algorithms defining immunologic compatibility. Presently, there is no consensus regarding the best approach to define human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility in LTx. In this study, we compared 5 different HLA compatibility tools in a high-resolution HLA-typed, clinically characterized cohort, to determine which approach predicts outcomes after LTx. In this retrospective single-center study, 277 donor-recipient transplant pairs were HLA-typed using next generation sequencing. HLA compatibility was defined using HLAMatchmaker, HLA epitope mismatch algorithm (HLA-EMMA), predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE), electrostatic mismatch score (EMS), and amino acid mismatches (AAMMs). Associations with HLA mismatching and survival, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) were calculated using adjusted Cox proportional modeling. Lower HLA class II mismatching was associated with improved survival as defined by HLAMatchmaker (P < .01), HLA-EMMA (P < .05), PIRCHE (P < .05), EMS (P < .001), and AAMM (P < .01). All approaches demonstrated that HLA-DRB1345 matching was associated with freedom from restrictive allograft syndrome and HLA-DQ matching with reduced DSA development. Reducing the level of HLA mismatching, in T cell or B cell epitopes, electrostatic differences, or amino acid, can improve outcomes after LTx and potentially guide immunosuppression strategies.

Cytomegalovirus Immunity Assays Predict Viremia but not Replication Within the Lung Allograft.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Current guidelines use pretransplant donor and recipient CMV serostatus to predict the risk of subsequent CMV replication and length of antiviral prophylaxis. Immunological monitoring may better inform the risk of CMV infection in patients, thereby allowing for improved tailoring of antiviral prophylaxis. In this study, we compared 2 commercially available assays, the QuantiFERON-CMV (QFN-CMV) and T-Track-CMV (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay), to predict the risk of CMV disease in lung transplant recipients. Methods: We performed CMV immunity assays on 32 lung transplant recipients at risk of CMV disease as defined by serostatus (CMV-seropositive recipients, n = 26; or CMV-seronegative lung transplant recipient receiving a CMV-seropositive donor organ, n = 6). QFN-CMV and T-Track were performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and episodes of CMV replication in both serum and bronchoalveolar lavage were found to be correlated to the CMV immune assays. The predictive ability of the assays was determined using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: There was a degree of concordance between tests, with 44% of recipients positive for both tests and 28% negative for both tests; however, test results were discordant in 28% of cases. A negative result in either the QFN-CMV (P < 0.01) or T-Track (P < 0.05) assays was obtained in a significantly higher number of recipients who experienced CMV replication in the blood. Using these assays together gave higher predictability of CMV replication, with only 1 recipient experiencing CMV replication in the blood who obtained a positive test result for both assays. Neither assay was able to predict recipients who experienced CMV replication in the lung allograft. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that CMV immunity assays can predict viremia; however, the lack of association with allograft infection suggests that CMV-specific T-cell immunity in the circulation is not associated with the control of CMV replication within the transplanted lung allograft.

Airway oscillometry parameters in baseline lung allograft dysfunction: Associations from a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD), the failure to achieve ≥80%-predicted spirometry after lung transplant (LTx), is associated with impaired survival. Physiologic abnormalities in BLAD are poorly understood. Airway oscillometry measures respiratory system mechanics and may provide insight into understanding the mechanisms of BLAD. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe and measure the association between airway oscillometry parameters [Reactance (Xrs5, Ax), Resistance (Rrs5, Rrs5-19)] (1) stable LTx recipients, comparing those with normal spirometry and those with BLAD; and (2) in recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), comparing those with normal baseline spirometry and those with BLAD. METHODS: A multi-center cross-sectional study was performed including bilateral LTx between January 2020 and June 2021. Participants performed concurrent airway oscillometry and spirometry. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to measure the association between oscillometry parameters and BLAD. RESULTS: A total of 404 LTx recipients performed oscillometry and 253 were included for analysis. Stable allograft function was confirmed in 149 (50.2%) recipients (92 (61.7%) achieving normal spirometry and 57 (38.3%) with BLAD). Among stable LTx recipients, lower Xrs5 Z-Score (aOR 0.50 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p = 0.001) was independently associated with BLAD. CLAD was present in 104 (35.0%) recipients. Among recipients with CLAD, lower Xrs5 Z-Score (aOR 0.73 95% CI 0.56-0.95, p = 0.02) was associated with BLAD. CONCLUSIONS: Oscillometry provides novel physiologic insights into mechanisms of BLAD. The independent association between Xrs5 and BLAD, in both stable recipients and those with CLAD suggests that respiratory mechanics, in particular abnormal elastance, is an important physiologic feature. Further longitudinal studies are needed to understand the trajectory of oscillometry parameters in relation to allograft outcomes.

Major technological advances will enhance Australian donor-recipient matching and improve transplant outcomes.

In recent times, numerous and significant technological and supportive changes have taken place in Australian transplantation. These changes are often deployed without the wider clinical community having a full understanding of what has brought about these changes and the impacts they have. Here, we aim to clarify the reasoning behind these changes and shed light on potential future endeavours to improve patient outcomes.

Determining Clinical Thresholds for Donor HLA Eplet Compatibility to Predict Best Outcomes Following Lung Transplantation.

Currently, the assessment of immunological risk in lung transplantation (LTx) does not completely consider HLA compatibility at the molecular level. We have previously demonstrated the association of HLA eplets in predicting chronic lung allograft dysfunction following LTx; however, the associations between HLA eplet mismatch (epMM) loads and overall survival are unknown. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, 277 LTx donor-recipient pairs were high resolution HLA typed and analyzed for HLA epMMs using HLAMatchmaker (version 3.1). LTx pairs were also assessed for the presence of the previously described risk epitope mismatches DQ2-DQA1*05 and DQ7-DQA1*05. Results: HLA class I epMMs were not associated with deleterious outcomes; however, lower HLA class II (≤19), DQA1 (≤2), and combined HLA class I and II (≤29) epMM demonstrated an association with increased time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction and improved overall survival. The presence of a risk epitope mismatch was not associated with worse clinical outcomes. Conclusions: HLA epMM can risk-stratify LTx recipients and potentially guide donor-recipient matching and immunosuppression strategies.

A prediction model to determine the untapped lung donor pool outside of the DonateLife network in Victoria.

Lung transplantation is limited by a lack of suitable lung donors. In Australia, the national donation organisation (DonateLife) has taken a major role in optimising organ donor identification. However, the potential outside the DonateLife network hospitals remains uncertain. We aimed to create a prediction model for lung donation within the DonateLife network and estimate the untapped lung donors outside of the DonateLife network. We reviewed all deaths in the state of Victoria's intensive care units using a prospectively collected population-based intensive care unit database linked to organ donation records. A logistic regression model derived using patient-level data was developed to characterise the lung donors within DonateLife network hospitals. Consequently, we estimated the expected number of lung donors in Victorian hospitals outside the DonateLife network and compared the actual number. Between 2014 and 2018, 291 lung donations occurred from 8043 intensive care unit deaths in DonateLife hospitals, while only three lung donations occurred from 1373 ICU deaths in non-DonateLife hospitals. Age, sex, postoperative admission, sepsis, neurological disease, trauma, chronic respiratory disease, lung oxygenation and serum creatinine were factors independently associated with lung donation. A highly discriminatory prediction model with area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.91 was developed and accurately estimated the number of lung donors. Applying the model to non-DonateLife hospital data predicted only an additional five lung donors. This prediction model revealed few additional lung donor opportunities outside the DonateLife network, and the necessity of alternative and novel strategies for lung donation. A donor prediction model could provide a useful benchmarking tool to explore organ donation potential across different jurisdictions, hospitals and transplanting centres.

Donation After Circulatory Death in lung transplantation.

The continuing shortage of pulmonary grafts from donors after brain death has led to a resurgence of interest in lung transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD). Most lungs from donors after withdrawal from life-sustaining therapy can be recovered rapidly and transplanted directly without ex-vivo assessment in case functional warm ischemic time is limited to 30 to 60 min. The potential of the DCD lung pool is still underutilized and should be maximized in countries with existing legislation. Countries lacking a DCD pathway should be encouraged to develop national ethical, professional, and legal frameworks to address public and professional concerns.

The clinical utility and thresholds of virtual and Halifaster flow crossmatches in lung transplantation.

Immune sensitization, defined as the presence of alloreactive donor-specific antibodies (DSA), is associated with increased wait-times and inferior transplant outcomes. Identifying pretransplant DSA with a physical cell-based assay is critical in defining immunological risk. However, improved solid phase antibody detection has provided the potential to forgo this physical assay. Here, we evaluated the association between DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and the recently introduced Halifaster Flow cytometry crossmatch (FXM) to determine if MFI could predict the outcome of FXM and whether a virtual crossmatch (VXM) would provide an accurate risk assessment. Sera from 134 waitlisted lung patients was retrospectively assessed by Halifaster FXM against lymphocytes preparations from 32 donors, resulting in 265 FXMs. HLA typing was performed to 2-field allelic level and Luminex single antigen beads (SAB) used to identify DSA. The association between FXM and Luminex MFI was calculated using ROC analysis. MFI threshold accuracy was confirmed using a separate validation cohort (174 recipient sera and 34 donors), whereby both VXM and FXMs were compared. From the 265 FXM performed, 48 (18%) T-cell (TFXM) and 56 (21%) B-cell (BFXM) were positive. In the evaluation cohort, MFI thresholds of 2000 for HLA-A, B, DRB1, and > 4000 for DQB1, were predictive of a positive FXM. The validation cohort of 233 paired FXM and VXM confirmed these MFI thresholds for both TFXM and BFXM with an accuracy of 91.4% and 89.3%, respectively. A positive VXM, defined with HLA-specific MFI thresholds predicts Halifaster FXM reactivity, and can potentially expedite organ allocation, by minimizing the need for the more time-consuming FXM.

An Audit of Lung Donor Pool: Optimal Current Donation Strategies and the Potential of Novel Time-Extended Donation After Circulatory Death Donation.

BACKGROUND: In Australia, increased organ donation and subsequent lung transplantation (LTx) rates have followed enhanced donor identification, referral and management, as well as the introduction of a donation after circulatory death (DCD) pathway. However, the number of patients waiting for LTx still continues to exceed the number of lung donors and the search for further suitable donors is critical. METHODS: All 2014-2018 Victorian DonateLife hospital deaths after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were analysed retrospectively to quantify unrecognised lung donors using current criteria, as well as novel time-extended (90 mins-24 hrs post-withdrawal) DCD lung donors. RESULTS: Using standard lung donor eligibility criteria, we identified 473 potential lung donors and a further 122 time-extended DCD potential lung donors among 3,538 patients meeting general eligibility criteria. Detailed review of end-of-life discussions with patient families and the reasons why they were not offered donation revealed several categories of additional lung donors-traditional lung donors missed in current practice (n=2); hepatitis C infected lung donors potentially treatable with direct-acting antivirals (n=14), time-extended DCD lung donors (n=60); donor lungs potentially suitable for transplant with use of ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) (n=7). CONCLUSION: While the number of lung donor opportunities missed under existing DonateLife donor identification and management processes was limited, a time-extended DCD lung donation pathway could substantially expand the lung donor pool. The use of hepatitis C infected donors, and the possibility of EVLP to solve donor graft assessment or logistic issues, could also provide small additional lung donor opportunities.

An Intention-to-treat View of Lung Transplantation for Interstitial Lung Disease: Successful Strategies to Minimize Waiting List and Posttransplant Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Access to lung transplantation (LTx) and rates of waiting list and posttransplant mortality for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remain problematic. We evaluated the outcomes of ILD patients listed for LTx at our institution. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2018, adult patients with ILD were listed and transplanted from a donor-pool that included extended criteria and donation after circulatory-determined death donors. Patients were categorized as experiencing 1 of 4 competing events: transplant, waitlist death, delisting, or alive on waitlist. Multivariable competing risk regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of waitlist death/delisting. Posttransplant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Among 187 patients listed, 82% (153 of 187) underwent LTx (median time-to-transplant, 2.0 mo), whereas 16% (30 of 187) died or were delisted (median time-to-event, 1.6 mo). At 90 d, 6 mo, and 12 mo after listing, 51%, 63%, and 78% of patients had been transplanted, whereas 10%, 14%, and 16% had died or were delisted. Multivariable predictors of waitlist death/delisting were: blood group O compared to A (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 6.43, P < 0.001), shorter height (per 1 cm, SHR: 1.11, P < 0.001), hospitalization at listing (SHR: 3.98, P = 0.002), and reduced 6-min-walk test distance (per 50 m, SHR: 1.28, P = 0.001). Among LTx recipients, 24% (36 of 153) underwent single LTx. Donor lungs were 58% (88 of 153) extended-criteria, inclusive of 24% (37 of 153) circulatory-determined death. Ninety-day and 1-, 3-, and 5-y retransplant free survival were 97% ± 1%, 92% ± 2%, 81% ± 4%, and 69% ± 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILD require a rapid transit to LTx after listing. Despite this, the vast majority of ILD patients in this study reached LTx with excellent early and midterm outcomes.

Mitral Valve Regurgitation After Lung Transplantation: Aetiology, Management and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Problematic mitral regurgitation (MR) may develop following lung transplantation (LTx). There is limited information on the management of MR in LTx patients, as such we sought to evaluate our centre's experience. METHODS: From 2000 to 2019, 1,054 patients underwent LTx at our centre (896 bilateral, 158 single). We identified patients in whom significant MR developed at any point post-LTx. The aetiology of MR, management and outcome were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Eight (8) patients developed severe MR post-LTx, six following bilateral LTx and two following single LTx. Lung transplantation indications included interstitial lung disease (n=5), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=2) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (n=1). Severe MR occurred intraoperatively (n=1), postoperative day 1 (n=1) with the remaining six cases between 80 and 263 days post-LTx. The aetiology was noted to be due to severe left ventricular dysfunction following unmasking of a chronically pulmonary hypertension-related under-preloaded left ventricle in one case, and in the remaining seven patients causes included myxomatous degeneration, ischaemic MR, and functional MR due to annular dilatation. In the patient with intraoperative severe MR, the MR became mild with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and in the remaining seven patients a variety of procedures were used, including mitral valve repair, valve replacement and transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. All patients survived the mitral procedure. Two (2) deaths occurred at 12.9 years (stroke) and 5 years (cancer) from mitral valve surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Development of significant mitral valve regurgitation is a rare but morbid complication after lung transplantation. This may represent the progressive natural history of pre-existing degenerative mitral valve disease and rarely, early after transplantation may be related to changes in ventricular geometry. Management of severe MR can follow the same management approach as in the non-transplant community, with the expectation of similarly good results.

Improving the predictability of time to death in controlled donation after circulatory death lung donors.

Although the use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has increased lung transplant activity, 25-40% of intended DCD donors do not convert to actual donation because of no progression to asystole in the required time frame after withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support (WCRS). No studies have specifically focussed on DCD lung donor progression. This retrospective study reviewed intended DCD lung donors to make a prediction model of the likelihood of progression to death using logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART). Between 2014 and 2018, 159 of 334 referred DCD donors were accepted, with 100 progressing to transplant, while 59 (37%) did not progress. In logistic regression, a length of ICU stay ≤ 5 days, severe infra-tentorial brain damage on imaging and use of vasopressin were related with the progression to actual donation. CART modelling of the likelihood of death within 90-minute post-WCRS provided prediction with a sensitivity of 1.00 and positive predictive value of 0.56 in the validation data set. In the nonprogressed DCD group, 26 died within 6 h post-WCRS. Referral received early after ICU admission, with nonspontaneous ventilatory mode, deep coma and severe infra-tentorial damage were relevant predictors. The CART model is useful to exclude DCD donor candidates with low probability of progression.

Outcomes Following ATG Therapy for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major factor limiting survival post lung transplantation (LTx) with limited effective therapeutic options. We report our 12-y experience of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as second-line CLAD therapy. METHODS: Clinical and lung function data were collected on LTx patients receiving ATG. Rate of FEV1 decline (mL/d) was calculated before and after ATG. Partial response to ATG was defined by rate of FEV1 decline improving 20%. Complete response was defined by an absolute improvement or stability in baseline FEV1. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients received ATG for CLAD. Of these, 5 patients who had a clinical diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and were treated with plasmapheresis before or after ATG were excluded from analysis. Sixteen (23%) were complete responders, 29 (40%) were partial responders, and 26 (37%) did not respond. Those with CLAD stage 2 or 3 and younger age were more likely to respond. Partial responders had a 65% lower risk of death or retransplant (HR, 0.35; P = 0.003), whereas complete responders reduced their risk by 70% (HR, 0.30; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: ATG appears to stabilize or attenuate lung function decline in CLAD, which may lead to improved retransplant-free survival. Although certain predictors of response have been identified in this large single-center review, these findings need to be confirmed by a multicenter randomized-controlled trial to determine predictors of response to ATG for CLAD.

Common Criteria for Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Have No Significant Impact on Posttransplant Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although it is intense in health care resources, by facilitating assessment and reconditioning, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has the potential to expand the donor pool and improve lung transplant outcomes. However, inclusion criteria used in EVLP trials have not been validated. METHODS: This retrospective study from 2014 to 2018 reviewed our local state-based donation organization donor records as well as subsequent recipient outcomes to explore the relation between EVLP indications used in clinical trials and recipient outcomes. The primary outcome was primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 24 hours, with 30-day mortality and posttransplant survival time as secondary outcomes, compared with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: From 705 lung donor referrals, 304 lung transplantations were performed (use rate of 42%); 212 of recipients (70%) met at least 1 of the commonly cited EVLP initiation criteria. There was no significant difference in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 or 30-day mortality between recipients with or without an EVLP indication (10.2% versus 7.8%, P = .51; and 2.4% versus 0%, P = .14, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed no significant relationship between commonly cited EVLP criteria and primary graft dysfunction grade 3 or survival time. Recipient outcomes were significantly associated with recipient diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: At least 1 commonly cited criterion for EVLP initiation was present in 70% of the transplanted donors, and yet it did not predict clinical results; acceptable outcomes were seen in both subgroups. To discover the true utility of EVLP beyond good clinical management and focus EVLP on otherwise unacceptable lungs, a reconsideration of EVLP inclusion criteria is required.

A Retrospective Review of Declined Lung Donors: Estimating the Potential of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Even in the extended-criteria era, the reasons for declining lung donors are not always clear. Furthermore, it has not been determined how many actual declined lungs would be retrieved by ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) beyond that already achieved in centers with an existing high utilization rate. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed all lung donor referrals between 2014 and 2018, including detailed formal referrals and preliminary notifications. This study categorized reasons for lung donor non-acceptance and estimated how many declined grafts could have been theoretically retrievable by using EVLP. RESULTS: In total, 966 lung donor candidates were referred, including 313 transplanted donors, 336 declined donors after detailed referrals (group A) and 258 preliminary declined. In group A, the primary reasons for refusal were lung quality issues (49%), general medical issues (25%), and organization issues (26%), combined with secondary reasons in many cases. Main lung quality issues were an extensive smoking history, abnormal chest radiography, and underlying lung disease. Although 73 declined lung donors had indications for EVLP, the retrievable lungs decreased to only 30 cases after considering the details of all clinical contraindications and organizational issues. Nevertheless, 59 intended donation after circulatory death donors did not progress to death after withdrawal of cardiorespiratory support in the required timeframe, and EVLP may have an emerging additional role here. CONCLUSIONS: Based on commonly cited criteria for EVLP indication, the number of EVLP retrievable lung donors represented only a small portion of declined donor lungs referred to our center from the state donation network.