Disturbances in slow-wave sleep are induced by models of bilateral inflammation, neuropathic, and postoperative pain, but not osteoarthritic pain in rats.

Preclinical assessment of pain has typically relied on measuring animal responses to evoked stimulation. Because of inherent limitations of these assays, there is a need to develop measures of animal pain/discomfort that are objective, not experimentally evoked, and mimic the human condition. Patients with chronic pain manifest a variety of co-morbidities, one of which is disturbances in sleep. We used electroencephalography to objectively assess 4 rat models of pain (inflammatory/complete Freund's adjuvant [CFA], neuropathic/chronic constriction injury [CCI], postoperative/skin incision, osteoarthritis/monosodium iodoacetate [MIA]) for the occurrence of sleep disturbances. Four different measures of slow-wave sleep (SWS) were examined: amplitude of 1- to 4-Hz waves, total time spent in SWS, time spent in SWS-1, and time spent in SWS-2. Bilateral injuries were more likely to induce a sleep disturbance than unilateral injuries in the CFA, CCI, and skin incision assays. Sleep disturbances occurred in the deeper stage of SWS, as the amplitude of 1- to 4-Hz waves and time spent in SWS-2 were significantly decreased in all models except the osteoarthritis model. Sleep disturbances lasted for approximately 3 to 14days, depending on the model, and were resolved despite continued hypersensitivity to evoked stimulation. Morphine, gabapentin, diclofenac, and ABT-102 (TRPV1 antagonist) all improved sleep in the bilateral CFA assay at doses that did not significantly alter SWS in uninjured rats. Preclinical assessment of compounds should follow the path of clinical studies and take into account diverse aspects of the "pain condition." This would include evaluating nociceptive thresholds as well as other endpoints, such as cognition and sleep, that may be affected by the pathological state.

Rats housed on corncob bedding show less slow-wave sleep.

Despite the reported advantages of corncob bedding, questions have emerged about how comfortable animals find this type of bedding as a resting surface. In this study, encephalography (EEG) was used to compare the effects of corncob and aspen-chip bedding on rat slow-wave sleep (SWS). According to a facility-wide initiative, rats that were weaned on aspen-chip bedding were switched to corncob bedding in home cages and EEG recording chambers. Spontaneous EEG recordings obtained for 5 wk after the switch to corncob bedding demonstrated that rats spent significantly less time in SWS as compared with levels measured on aspen chips just prior to the bedding switch. SWS remained low even after a 5-wk acclimation period to the corncob bedding. We then acutely switched back to aspen-chip bedding in EEG recording chambers. Acute reinstatement of aspen-chip bedding during EEG recording was associated with an average 22% increase in time spent in SWS, with overall levels of SWS comparable to the levels measured on aspen chips prior to the change to corncob bedding. Aspen-chip bedding subsequently was reinstated in both home cages and EEG recording chambers, and SWS baseline levels were restored. These data raise important concerns about the effects of corncob bedding on rodents used in research.