Enabling faster subcutaneous delivery of larger volume, high viscosity fluids.

OBJECTIVES: Many current subcutaneous (SC) biologic therapies may require >1 mL volume or have increased viscosity, necessitating new delivery system approaches. This study evaluated 2-mL large-volume autoinjector (LVAI) delivery performance across varying solution viscosities and design inputs to assess the design space and identify configurations that produce practical injection times. METHODS: Investigational LVAI delivery duration and volume, depot location, and tissue effects were examined in both air and in vivo models across various pre-filled syringe (PFS) cannula types (27 G Ultra-thin wall [UTW], 27 G special thin wall [STW], or 29 G thin-wall [TW]), drive spring forces (SFLOW or SFHIGH), and Newtonian solutions (2.3-50 centipoise [cP]). RESULTS: Within each design configuration, increasing PFS internal diameters and spring forces reduced delivery times, while increasing viscosity increased times. The 27 G UTW PFS/SFHIGH combination achieved shorter delivery times across all injection conditions, with 2 mL in vivo durations <15 seconds at ≤31 cP and routinely <20 seconds at 39 and 51 cP, with nominal and transitory tissue effects. CONCLUSION: PFS cannula and spring force combinations can be tailored to achieve various injection durations across viscosities, while UTW PFS enables faster rates to potentially better accommodate human factors during LVAI injection, especially at high viscosity.

Onclarity Performance in Human Papillomavirus DNA Detection in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Cervical Samples.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of HPV infection is usually performed from cervical liquid-based cytology specimens (LBC), but these often contain a large amount of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, most of which might cause transient infections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of BD Onclarity HPV test genotyping method on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cervical specimens compared with genotyping results from LBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from women surgically treated for cervical intraepithelial lesions (CINs) at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, from September 2012 to June 2013 were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology of the European Institute of Oncology. The FFPE and LBC specimens were genotyped using the same extended genotyping Onclarity assay. RESULTS: We collected 99 samples (26 CIN 1, 30 CIN 2, and 43 CIN 3+), but 15 were excluded from the analysis: these 84 samples show an overall agreement of 89% for HPV status between FFPE Onclarity samples versus LBC samples. The FFPE and LBC samples showed identical genotype in 75% samples, compatible genotype (at least 1 of the genotypes detected in LBC sample was found in the tissue sample) in 14% specimens, and discrepant genotype in 11% samples. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate a very good concordance between HPV genotypes found in cytological and tissue samples, suggesting that the Onclarity method could also be used to detect HPV in tissue samples and that the HPV genotype detected in FFPE samples is one of the HPV detected in cytological samples, supporting the thesis that one lesion is caused by one HPV genotype.

Analytical and Clinical Sample Performance Characteristics of the Onclarity Assay for the Detection of Human Papillomavirus.

The objective of this study was to determine the result reproducibility and performance of the BD Onclarity human papillomavirus (HPV) assay (Onclarity) on the BD Viper LT platform using both contrived and clinical specimens. Reproducibility was assessed in BD SurePath liquid-based cytology (LBC) medium (SurePath) using contrived panels (HPV genotype 16 [HPV16] positive, HPV18 positive, or HPV45 positive) or clinical specimens (HPV16, -18, -31, -33/58, -45, or -52 positive or HPV negative). In addition, specimens from 3,879 individuals from the Onclarity trial were aliquoted prior to or following cytology processing and tested for HPV. Finally, specimens were collected using either the Cervex-Brush or Cytobrush (or Cytobrush/spatula) for comparison of HPV results. Contrived specimens showed >95% concordance with the expected results, and pooled clinical specimens had standard deviations and coefficients of variation ranging from 0.87 to 1.86 and 2.9% to 5.6%, respectively. For precytology and postcytology aliquot analyses, specimens showed >98.0% overall agreement and mean differences in cycle threshold (CT ) scores for HPV ranging from -0.07 to 0.31. Positivity rates were close between the Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush/spatula for all age groups tested. Onclarity results are reproducible and reliable, regardless of sample collection before or after cytology aliquoting. Onclarity performs well regardless of the method of specimen collection (Cervex-Brush or Cytobrush/spatula) for cervical cancer screening.