Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Physiol (Oxf) ; : e14217, 2024 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39152636

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a metabolic disorder with limited treatment options. The thyroid hormone receptor (THR)-ß agonist resmetirom/MGL-3196 (MGL) increases liver fat oxidation and has been approved for treating adult MASH. However, over 60% of patients receiving MGL treatment do not achieve MASH resolution. Therefore, we investigated the potential for combination therapy of MGL with the mitochondrial uncoupler BAM15 to improve fatty liver disease outcomes in the GAN mouse model of MASH. METHODS: C57BL/6J male mice were fed GAN diet for 38 weeks before stratification and randomization to treatments including MGL, BAM15, MGL + BAM15, or no drug control for 8 weeks. Treatments were admixed in diet and mice were pair-fed to control for drug intake. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by body weight, body composition, energy expenditure, glucose tolerance, tissue lipid content, and histological analyses. RESULTS: MGL + BAM15 treatment resulted in better efficacy versus GAN control mice than either monotherapy in the context of energy expenditure, liver fat loss, glucose control, and fatty liver disease activity score. Improvements in ALT, liver mass, and plasma cholesterol were primarily driven by MGL, while improvements in body fat were primarily driven by BAM15. No treatments altered liver fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: MGL + BAM15 treatment had overall better efficacy to improve metabolic outcomes in mice fed GAN diet than either monotherapy alone. These data warrant further investigation into combination therapies of THR-ß agonists and mitochondrial uncouplers for the potential treatment of disorders related to fatty liver, obesity, and insulin resistance.

2.
JMIR Form Res ; 8: e50557, 2024 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869926

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity continues to be a risk for college students in the United States. It is associated with numerous problems, such as chronic health conditions, increased stress and anxiety, and a lower grade point average. After COVID-19, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits were extended to college-aged students; however, there were some barriers to participation, which persisted such as lack of perceived food insecurity risk, lack of knowledge regarding the SNAP application process, the complexity of determining eligibility, and stigma associated with needing social assistance. A technology-enhanced tool was developed to address these barriers to SNAP enrollment and encourage at-risk college students to apply for SNAP. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the usability and acceptability of a web-based SNAP screening tool designed for college-aged students. METHODS: College students aged 18-25 years were recruited to participate in 2 rounds of usability testing during fall 2022. Participants tested the prototype of a web-based SNAP screener tool using a standardized think-aloud method. The usability and acceptability of the tool were assessed using a semistructured interview and a 10-item validated System Usability Scale questionnaire. Audio recordings and field notes were systematically reviewed by extracting and sorting feedback as positive or negative comments. System Usability Scale questionnaire data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and sign test. RESULTS: A total of 12 students (mean age 21.8, SD 2.8 years; n=6, 50% undergraduate; n=11, 92% female; n=7, 58% Hispanic or Black or African American; n=9, 78% low or very low food security) participated in both rounds of user testing. Round 1 testing highlighted overall positive experiences with the tool, with most participants (10/12) stating that the website fulfills its primary objective as a support tool to encourage college students to apply for SNAP. However, issues related to user interface design, navigation, and wording of some questions in the screening tool were noted. Key changes after round 1 reflected these concerns, including improved design of response buttons and tool logo and improved clarity of screening questions. The overall system usability showed slight, but not statistically significant, improvement between round 1 and round 2 (91.25 vs 92.50; P=.10, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Overall usability findings suggest that this web-based tool was highly usable and acceptable to urban college students and could be an effective and appealing approach as a support tool to introduce college students to the SNAP application process. The findings from this study will inform further development of the tool, which could eventually be disseminated publicly among various college campuses.

3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751323

RESUMEN

In 2023, Martinez et al. examined trends in the inclusion, conceptualization, operationalization and analysis of race and ethnicity among studies published in US epidemiology journals. Based on a random sample of papers (N=1,050) published from 1995-2018, the authors describe the treatment of race, ethnicity, and ethnorace in the analytic sample (N=414, 39% of baseline sample) over time. Between 32% and 19% of studies in each time stratum lacked race data; 61% to 34% lacked ethnicity data. The review supplies stark evidence of the routine omission and variability of measures of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research. Informed by public health critical race praxis (PHCRP), this commentary discusses the implications of four problems the findings suggest pervade epidemiology: 1) a general lack of clarity about what race and ethnicity are; 2) the limited use of critical race or other theory; 3) an ironic lack of rigor in measuring race and ethnicity; and, 4) the ordinariness of racism and white supremacy in epidemiology. The identified practices reflect neither current publication guidelines nor the state of the knowledge on race, ethnicity and racism; therefore, we conclude by offering recommendations to move epidemiology toward more rigorous research in an increasingly diverse society.

4.
Clin Sci (Lond) ; 138(4): 173-187, 2024 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315575

RESUMEN

Semaglutide is an anti-diabetes and weight loss drug that decreases food intake, slows gastric emptying, and increases insulin secretion. Patients begin treatment with low-dose semaglutide and increase dosage over time as efficacy plateaus. With increasing dosage, there is also greater incidence of gastrointestinal side effects. One reason for the plateau in semaglutide efficacy despite continued low food intake is due to compensatory actions whereby the body becomes more metabolically efficient to defend against further weight loss. Mitochondrial uncoupler drugs decrease metabolic efficiency, therefore we sought to investigate the combination therapy of semaglutide with the mitochondrial uncoupler BAM15 in diet-induced obese mice. Mice were fed high-fat western diet (WD) and stratified into six treatment groups including WD control, BAM15, low-dose semaglutide without or with BAM15, and high-dose semaglutide without or with BAM15. Combining BAM15 with either semaglutide dose decreased body fat and liver triglycerides, which was not achieved by any monotherapy, while high-dose semaglutide with BAM15 had the greatest effect on glucose homeostasis. This study demonstrates a novel approach to improve weight loss without loss of lean mass and improve glucose control by simultaneously targeting energy intake and energy efficiency. Such a combination may decrease the need for semaglutide dose escalation and hence minimize potential gastrointestinal side effects.


Asunto(s)
Ingestión de Energía , Pérdida de Peso , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Ratones Obesos , Dieta Alta en Grasa/efectos adversos , Tejido Adiposo
6.
Front Neuroimaging ; 3: 1341732, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379832

RESUMEN

Introduction: Protocols for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are generally categorized as "excitatory" or "inhibitory" based on their ability to produce short-term modulation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in peripheral muscles, when applied to motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal stimulation are widely considered excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, on this basis. However, it is poorly understood whether such polarity-dependent changes apply for neural signals generated during task performance, at rest, or in response to sensory stimulation. Methods: To characterize such changes, we measured spontaneous and movement-related neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and after high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-TDCS) of the left motor cortex (M1), while participants performed simple finger movements with the left and right hands. Results: Anodal HD-TDCS (excitatory) decreased the movement-related cortical fields (MRCF) localized to left M1 during contralateral right finger movements while cathodal HD-TDCS (inhibitory), increased them. In contrast, oscillatory signatures of voluntary motor output were not differentially affected by the two stimulation protocols, and tended to decrease in magnitude over the course of the experiment regardless. Spontaneous resting state oscillations were not affected either. Discussion: MRCFs are thought to reflect reafferent proprioceptive input to motor cortex following movements. Thus, these results suggest that processing of incoming sensory information may be affected by TDCS in a polarity-dependent manner that is opposite that seen for MEPs-increases in cortical excitability as defined by MEPs may correspond to reduced responses to afferent input, and vice-versa.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA