Postoperative prognostic nutrition index predicts survival in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma after surgical resection.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection (SR) is the main treatment for small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), but it increases metabolic demand, systemic inflammation, and digestive dysfunction, resulting in major impacts on the postoperative outcomes of patients. This study, we aimed to investigate the role of the postoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a surrogate marker of inflammation and nutrition, in patients with SBA after resection. METHODS: From June 2014 to March 2022, 44 consecutive patients who underwent SR for SBA in Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Factors associated with survival including PNI were analyzed. RESULTS: PNI decreased in patients after SR for SBA (median change: -1.82), particularly in those who underwent Whipple operation or developed postoperative pancreatic fistula. Postoperative PNI < 45.2 best predicted overall survival (OS) (AUROC: 0.826, p = 0.001). Patients with lower postoperative PNI had significantly worse OS compared to those higher postoperative values (median OS: 19.3 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). Low postoperative PNI (hazard ratio [HR]: 11.404, p = 0.002), tumoral lymphovascular invasion (HR: 8.023, p = 0.012), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.055, p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for OS. Postoperative PNI also significantly predicted recurrence-free survival independent of lymphovascular invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 6.705, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: PNI commonly decreases in patients with SBA who undergo Whipple surgery or develop postoperative pancreatic fistula. Postoperative PNI independently predicts survival and may serve as a clinical marker to optimize patient outcomes.

Increased Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Patients With Nontyphoidal Salmonella Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the known association between microorganisms and development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the role of nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) in IBD is not adequately addressed. We aimed at elucidating the relationship between NTS infection and the risk of IBD. METHODS: Based on the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, this retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with NTS infection (exposure group; n = 4651) and those without NTS infection (comparator group; n = 4651) who were propensity score matched (1:1) by demographic data, medications, comorbidities, and index date. All patients were followed until IBD onset, individual mortality, or December 31, 2018. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses were used for cross-validation. RESULTS: The NTS group demonstrated an increased risk of IBD compared with the non-NTS groups (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.12; 95% CI, 1.62-2.78) with a higher risk of developing ulcerative colitis in the former (aHR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.69-3.04). Nevertheless, the small sample size may contribute to lack of significant difference in Crohn's disease. Consistent findings were noted after excluding IBD diagnosed within 6 months of NTS infection (aHR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.71-3.03), excluding those with enteritis/colitis before index date (aHR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.28-2.68), excluding those using antibiotics for 1 month in the year before IBD onset (aHR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.34-2.45), inverse probability of treatment weighting (aHR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.31-2.04), and inclusion of individuals regardless of age (n = 10 431; aHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.53-2.19). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NTS were associated with an increased risk of developing IBD, especially ulcerative colitis.

Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study. METHODS: In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.

Feasibility estimation of injected hydrodissection before definitive radiotherapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is often not diagnosed until an advanced stage, and so most patients are not eligible for resection. For patients who are inoperable, definitive radiotherapy is crucial for local disease control. However, the pancreas is located close to other vulnerable gastrointestinal organs, making it challenging to deliver an adequate radiation dose. The surgical insertion of spacers or injection of fluids such as hydrogel before radiotherapy has been proposed, however, no study has discussed which patients are suitable for the procedure. METHODS: In this study, we reviewed 50 consecutive patients who received definitive radiotherapy at our institute to determine how many could have benefitted from hydrodissection to separate the pancreatic tumor from the adjacent gastrointestinal tract. By hypothetically injecting a substance using either computed tomography (CT)-guided or endoscopic methods, we aimed to increase the distance between the pancreatic tumor and surrounding hollow organs, as this would reduce the radiation dose delivered to the organs at risk. RESULTS: An interventional radiologist considered that hydrodissection was feasible in 23 (46%) patients with a CT-guided injection, while a gastroenterologist considered that hydrodissection was feasible in 31 (62%) patients with an endoscopic injection. Overall, we found 14 (28%) discrepancies among the 50 patients reviewed. Except for 1 patient who had no available trajectory with a CT-guided approach but in whom hydrodissection was considered feasible with an endoscopic injection, the other 13 patients had different interpretations of whether direct invasion was present in the CT images. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that about half of the patients could have benefited from hydrodissection before radiotherapy. This finding could allow for a higher radiation dose and potentially better disease control.

Extracellular Vesicular Analysis of Glypican 1 mRNA and Protein for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Detecting pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in its early stages and predicting late-stage patient prognosis undergoing chemotherapy is challenging. This work shows that the activation of specific oncogenes leads to elevated expression of mRNAs and their corresponding proteins in extracellular vesicles (EVs) circulating in blood. Utilizing an immune lipoplex nanoparticle (ILN) biochip assay, these findings demonstrate that glypican 1 (GPC1) mRNA expression in the exosomes-rich (Exo) EV subpopulation and GPC1 membrane protein (mProtein) expression in the microvesicles-rich (MV) EV subpopulation, particularly the tumor associated microvesicles (tMV), served as a viable biomarker for PDAC. A combined analysis effectively discriminated early-stage PDAC patients from benign pancreatic diseases and healthy donors in sizable clinical from multiple hospitals. Furthermore, among late-stage PDAC patients undergoing chemotherapy, lower GPC1 tMV-mProtein and Exo-mRNA expression before treatment correlated significantly with prolonged overall survival. These findings underscore the potential of vesicular GPC1 expression for early PDAC screenings and chemotherapy prognosis.

Systemic treatments in pancreatic cancer: Taiwan pancreas society recommendation.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Over the past decade, significant therapeutic advancements have improved the survival rates of patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the primary factors contributing to these positive outcomes is the evolution of chemotherapy, from monotherapy to doublet or triplet regimens, and the integration of multimodal approaches. Additionally, targeted agents tailored to patients with specific genetic alterations and the development of cell therapies show promise in benefiting certain subpopulations. This article focuses on examining pivotal studies that explore the role of chemotherapy in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, maintenance, and salvage settings; highlights interesting findings related to cell therapy; and provides an overview of ongoing trials concerning metastatic settings. This review primarily aimed to offer recommendations based on therapeutic evidence, recent advancements in new treatment combinations, and the most innovative approaches. A unique aspect of this review is the inclusion of published papers on clinical trials and real-world data in Taiwan, thus adding a valuable perspective to the overall analysis.

Negative effects on medical students' scores for clinical performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has heavily impacted medical clinical education in Taiwan. Medical curricula have been altered to minimize exposure and limit transmission. This study investigated the effect of COVID-19 on Taiwanese medical students' clinical performance using online standardized evaluation systems and explored the factors influencing medical education during the pandemic. METHODS: Medical students were scored from 0 to 100 based on their clinical performance from 1/1/2018 to 6/31/2021. The students were placed into pre-COVID-19 (before 2/1/2020) and midst-COVID-19 (on and after 2/1/2020) groups. Each group was further categorized into COVID-19-affected specialties (pulmonary, infectious, and emergency medicine) and other specialties. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to compare and examine the effects of relevant variables on student performance. RESULTS: In total, 16,944 clinical scores were obtained for COVID-19-affected specialties and other specialties. For the COVID-19-affected specialties, the midst-COVID-19 score (88.513.52) was significantly lower than the pre-COVID-19 score (90.143.55) (P<0.0001). For the other specialties, the midst-COVID-19 score (88.323.68) was also significantly lower than the pre-COVID-19 score (90.063.58) (P<0.0001). There were 1,322 students (837 males and 485 females). Male students had significantly lower scores than female students (89.333.68 vs. 89.993.66, P=0.0017). GEE analysis revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic (unstandardized beta coefficient=-1.99, standard error [SE]=0.13, P<0.0001), COVID-19-affected specialties (B=0.26, SE=0.11, P=0.0184), female students (B=1.10, SE=0.20, P<0.0001), and female attending physicians (B=-0.19, SE=0.08, P=0.0145) were independently associated with students' scores. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 negatively impacted medical students' clinical performance, regardless of their specialty. Female students outperformed male students, irrespective of the pandemic.