Botulinum Toxin for the Management of Pelvic Floor Tension Myalgia and Persistent Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain. DATA SOURCES: The ClinicalTrials.gov , PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to November 2022 by two independent assessors (B.L.K. and F.G.L.). Identified studies were screened by title and abstract and included after full-text review. Data extraction was subsequently performed and recorded in Microsoft Excel. METHODS: This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines after registration in PROSPERO (CRD42022289132). All randomized studies, prospective studies with more than five participants, and retrospective studies with more than 10 participants published in English or French and assessing the use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain in women were included. Meta-analyses were performed on randomized data. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Of 4,722 articles identified, 24 satisfied inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials totaling 329 participants demonstrated no differences in patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures, including pain, dyspareunia, sexual function, and vaginal manometry. Mean duration of follow-up was 6 months. A qualitative analysis of 14 prospective and four retrospective studies including 804 participants is supportive of botulinum toxin; however, the quality of data is low, and there is marked heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION: Meta-analyses of randomized data do not support the use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain. Failure of these data to confirm the findings of nonrandomized prospective studies that suggest a treatment benefit may be attributable to the absence of placebo control and confounding outcomes obtained from an active comparator group. Further randomized controlled trials with true placebo are strongly recommended. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022289132.

Vaginal epithelial histology before and after fractional CO2 laser in postmenopausal women: a double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal vaginal symptoms affect over 60% of women and may substantially impact a woman's quality of life. Since 2012, fractional CO2 laser has been suggested as a treatment for this indication. Structural assessment of vaginal epithelium using microscopic biopsy examination has been used as a primary outcome measure and surrogate determinant of success of vaginal laser in previous clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the effects of laser compared with sham treatment on human vaginal epithelium from postmenopausal women using microscopic examination of tissue biopsies. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center double-blind, sham-controlled randomized controlled trial was performed in a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. A total of 49 postmenopausal women who were symptomatic of at least 1 vaginal symptom (vaginal dryness, burning, itching; dyspareunia; or dryness) were randomized to either laser or sham treatment. For this nested histologic study, participants had a pre- and post-treatment vaginal wall biopsy collected. Biopsy samples were analyzed by 3 independent specialist gynecologic pathologists and categorized as Type 1 (well-estrogenized), 2 (poorly estrogenized), or 3 (combination) mucosae. Other outcomes assessed included symptom severity (visual analog scale for symptoms including most bothersome symptom, and Vulvovaginal Symptom Questionnaire) and Vaginal Health Index. Prespecified secondary analyses of data were performed. Categorical data were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test (or Fisher exact test if <5 in any category) or related-samples McNemar test for paired nonparametric data. Nonparametric, continuous variables were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test or Mann-Whitney U test, and parametric variables with t test or 1-way analysis of variance as appropriate. All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in microscopic features of vaginal epithelium following laser or sham treatment (P=.20). Further subgroup analyses of age, menopause type, duration of reproductive life, time since menopause and BMI, still demonstrated no significant difference between laser and sham groups in histological category of vaginal epithelium. Microscopic features at pre-treatment vaginal biopsy were Type 1 in 27% (13/49). There was no significant difference in VAS score for overall vaginal symptom between those classified as Type 1 vs. Type 2/3 (VAS score overall: Type 1 vs. Type 2/3, (48.1 [95% CI 27.0, 69.2] vs. 61.5 [95% CI 49.8, 73.3]; P=.166). CONCLUSION: Data from this double-blind, sham-controlled randomized controlled trial demonstrate that fractional CO2 laser and sham treatment have a comparable histologic effect on vaginal tissue that is not significantly different. Fractional CO2 laser is not significantly different from sham treatment and should not be recommended for clinical use for postmenopausal vaginal symptoms.

Immediate versus delayed urinary catheter removal following non-hysterectomy benign gynaecological laparoscopy: a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of urinary retention and postoperative urinary tract infection between women with immediate versus women with delayed removal of indwelling catheter following benign non-hysterectomy gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. DESIGN: This randomised clinical trial was conducted between February 2012 and December 2019, with follow-up to 6 weeks. SETTING: Two university-affiliated teaching hospitals in Sydney, Australia. POPULATION: Study participants were 693 women aged 18 years or over, undergoing non-hysterectomy laparoscopy for benign gynaecological conditions, excluding pelvic floor or concomitant bowel surgery. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-five participants were randomised to immediate removal of urinary catheter and 338 participants were randomised to delayed removal of urinary catheter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Secondary outcomes included hospital readmission, analgesia requirements, duration of hospitalisation and validated bladder function questionnaires. RESULTS: Urinary retention was higher after immediate compared with delayed removal of the urinary catheter (8.2% vs 4.2%, RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.0, p = 0.04). Although urinary tract infection was 7.2% following delayed removal of the urinary catheter and 4.7% following immediate removal of the urinary catheter, the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of urinary retention with the immediate compared with the delayed removal of the urinary catheter following benign non-hysterectomy gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. The difference in urinary tract infection was not significant. There is 1/12 risk of re-catheterisation after immediate urinary catheter removal. It is important to ensure that patients report normal voiding and emptying prior to discharge, to reduce the need for readmission for the management of urinary retention.

Effect of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser vs Sham Treatment on Symptom Severity in Women With Postmenopausal Vaginal Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Postmenopausal vaginal symptoms are common and frequently detrimental to a woman's quality of life. Fractional carbon dioxide vaginal laser is increasingly offered as a treatment, but the efficacy remains unproven. Objective: To determine the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser for treatment of vaginal symptoms associated with menopause. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial with 12-month follow-up was undertaken at a single tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Enrollment commenced on September 19, 2016, with final follow-up on June 30, 2020. Participants were postmenopausal women with vaginal symptoms substantive enough to seek medical treatment. Of 232 participants approached, 85 were randomized. Interventions: Three treatments using a fractional microablative carbon dioxide laser system performed 4 to 8 weeks apart, with 43 women randomized to the laser group and 42 to the sham group. Main Outcomes and Measures: The co-primary outcomes were symptom severity assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS; range, 0-100; 0 indicates no symptoms and 100 indicates the most severe symptoms) and the Vulvovaginal Symptom Questionnaire (VSQ; range, 0-20; 0 indicates no symptoms and 20 indicates the most severe symptoms) at 12 months. The minimal clinically important difference was specified as a 50% decrease in both VAS and VSQ severity scores. There were 5 prespecified secondary outcomes, including quality of life (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life), the Vaginal Health Index Score (range, 5-25; higher scores indicate better health), and vaginal histology (premenopausal or postmenopausal status). Results: Of 85 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [8] years), 78 (91.7%) completed the 12-month follow-up. From baseline to 12 months, there was no significant difference between the carbon dioxide laser group and the sham group in change in symptom severity (VAS score for overall vaginal symptoms: -17.2 vs -26.6; difference, 9.4 [95% CI, -28.6 to 47.5]; VAS score for the most severe symptom: -24.5 vs -20.4; difference -4.1 [95% CI, -32.5 to 24.3]; VSQ score: -3.1 vs -1.6; difference, -1.5 [95% CI, -5.9 to 3.0]). There were no significant differences between the laser and sham group in the mean quality of life score (6.3 vs 1.4; difference, 4.8 [95% CI, -3.9 to 13.5]) and Vaginal Health Index Score (0.9 vs 1.3; difference, -0.4 [95% CI, -4.3 to 3.6]) or in histological comparisons between laser and sham treatment groups. There were 16 adverse events in the laser group and 17 in the sham group, including vaginal pain/discomfort (44% vs 68%), spotting, discharge, and lower urinary tract symptoms. No severe adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among women with postmenopausal vaginal symptoms, treatment with fractional carbon dioxide laser vs sham treatment did not significantly improve vaginal symptoms after 12 months. Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12616001403426.