A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of functional capacity, a predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality, is essential to improving surgical planning and outcomes. We assessed if all 12 items of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) were equally important in reflecting exercise capacity. METHODS: In this secondary cross-sectional analysis of the international, multicentre Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study, we assessed cardiopulmonary exercise testing and DASI data from 1455 participants. Multivariable regression analyses were used to revise the DASI model in predicting an anaerobic threshold (AT) >11 ml kg-1 min-1 and peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) >16 ml kg-1 min-1, cut-points that represent a reduced risk of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Five questions were identified to have dominance in predicting AT>11 ml kg-1 min-1 and VO2 peak>16 ml.kg-1min-1. These items were included in the M-DASI-5Q and retained utility in predicting AT>11 ml.kg-1.min-1 (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic [AUROC]-AT: M-DASI-5Q=0.67 vs original 12-question DASI=0.66) and VO2 peak (AUROC-VO2 peak: M-DASI-5Q 0.73 vs original 12-question DASI 0.71). Conversely, in a sensitivity analysis we removed one potentially sensitive question related to the ability to have sexual relations, and the ability of the remaining four questions (M-DASI-4Q) to predict an adequate functional threshold remained no worse than the original 12-question DASI model. Adding a dynamic component to the M-DASI-4Q by assessing the chronotropic response to exercise improved its ability to discriminate between those with VO2 peak>16 ml.kg-1.min-1 and VO2 peak<16 ml.kg-1.min-1. CONCLUSIONS: The M-DASI provides a simple screening tool for further preoperative evaluation, including with cardiopulmonary exercise testing, to guide perioperative management.

A cross-sectional survey of Australian anesthetists' and surgeons' perceptions of preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Preoperative fitness training has been listed as a top ten research priority in anesthesia. We aimed to capture the current practice patterns and perspectives of anesthetists and colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand regarding preoperative risk stratification and prehabilitation to provide a basis for implementation research. METHODS: During 2016, we separately surveyed fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) and members of the Colorectal Society of Surgeons in Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ). Our outcome measures investigated the responders' demographics, practice patterns, and perspectives. Practice patterns examined preoperative assessment and prehabilitation utilizing exercise, hematinic, and nutrition optimization. RESULTS: We received 155 responses from anesthetists and 71 responses from colorectal surgeons. We found that both specialty groups recognized that functional capacity was linked to postoperative outcome; however, fewer agreed that robust evidence exists for prehabilitation. Prehabilitation in routine practice remains low, with significant potential for expansion. The majority of anesthetists do not believe their patients are adequately risk stratified before surgery, and most of their colorectal colleagues are amenable to delaying surgery for at least an additional two weeks. Two-thirds of anesthetists did not use cardiopulmonary exercise testing as they lacked access. Hematinic and nutritional assessment and optimization is less frequently performed by anesthetists compared with their colorectal colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: An unrecognized potential window for prehabilitation exists in the two to four weeks following cancer diagnosis. Early referral, larger multi-centre studies focusing on long-term outcomes, and further implementation research are required.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le conditionnement physique préopératoire a été cité dans les dix priorités de recherche les plus importantes en anesthésie. Notre objectif était de déterminer quels étaient les habitudes actuelles de pratique ainsi que les perspectives des anesthésistes et des chirurgiens colorectaux en Australie et en Nouvelle-Zélande concernant la stratification préopératoire du risque et la préhabilitation afin de proposer un point de départ pour la recherche sur sa mise en œuvre. MéTHODE: Au cours de l'année 2016, nous avons soumis un questionnaire séparé aux membres du Collège australien et néozélandais des anesthésistes (ANZCA - Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists) et aux membres de la Société colorectale des chirurgiens australiens et néozélandais (CSSANZ - Colorectal Society of Surgeons in Australia and New Zealand). Nos critères d'évaluation portaient sur les données démographiques, les habitudes de pratique et les perspectives des répondants. Les questions sur les habitudes de pratique touchaient à l'évaluation préopératoire et la préhabilitation fondée sur l'exercice physique et l'optimisation antianémique et nutritionnelle. RéSULTATS: Nous avons reçu 155 réponses d'anesthésistes et 71 réponses de chirurgiens colorectaux. Notre questionnaire a révélé que les deux spécialités reconnaissaient que la capacité fonctionnelle est liée au pronostic postopératoire; toutefois, moins de répondants étaient d'avis qu'il existe des données probantes fiables concernant la préhabilitation. Dans la pratique de routine, la préhabilitation demeure peu courante mais a le potentiel de prendre plus d'ampleur. La plupart des anesthésistes estiment que leurs patients ne sont pas stratifiés adéquatement en fonction de leur risque avant leur chirurgie, et la plupart de leurs collègues colorectaux sont ouverts à l'idée de retarder la chirurgie d'au moins deux semaines supplémentaires. Deux tiers des anesthésiologistes n'ont pas eu recours à un test d'effort cardiopulmonaire par manque d'accès à ce type d'examen. L'évaluation et l'optimisation antianémique et nutritionnelle sont moins fréquemment réalisées par les anesthésistes comparativement à leurs collègues colorectaux. CONCLUSION: Il existe une fenêtre potentielle mais non reconnue pour la mise en œuvre d'une préhabilitation au cours des deux à quatre semaines suivant l'annonce d'un diagnostic de cancer. Une prise en charge précoce par des spécialistes, des études multicentriques plus importantes s'intéressant aux pronostics à long terme et des travaux de recherche supplémentaires sur la mise en œuvre sont nécessaires.

Comparison of Duke Activity Status Index with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), a patient-administered questionnaire, is used to quantify functional capacity in patients undergoing cancer surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed whether the DASI was accurate in predicting peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) that was objectively measured using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in 43 consecutive patients scheduled for elective major cancer surgery at a tertiary cancer centre. The primary outcome measured the limits of agreement between DASI-predicted pVO2 and actual measured pVO2. RESULTS: The study population was elderly (median 63 years, interquartile range 18), 58% were male, with the majority having intraabdominal cancer surgery. Although the DASI scores were statistically related to the measured pVO2 (N = 43, adjusted R2 = 0.20, p = 0.002), both the bias (8 ml kg- 1 min- 1) and 95% limits of agreement (19.5 to - 3.4 ml kg- 1 min- 1) between the predicted and measured pVO2 were large. Using some of the individual components, recalibrating the intercept and regression coefficient of the total DASI score did not substantially improve its ability to predict the measured pVO2. CONCLUSION: In summary, both the limits of agreement and bias between the measured and DASI-predicted pVO2 were substantial. The DASI-predicted pVO2 based on patient's assessment of their functional status could not be considered a reliable surrogate of measured pVO2 during CPET for the population of patients pending major cancer surgery and cannot, therefore, be used as a triage tool for referral to CPET centres for objective risk assessment.

Case report: Iatrogenic brachial artery dissection with complete anterograde occlusion during elective arterial line placement.

INTRODUCTION: Brachial arterial catheters provide a more accurate reflection of central aortic arterial pressure compared to their radial counterparts. Although brachial arterial line complications are uncommon, we report a case of a rare iatrogenic brachial artery dissection with complete anterograde occlusion from elective arterial line placement. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 41-year-old female presented for a right upper and middle lobe resection of a large neuroendocrine lung cancer. A brachial arterial line was inserted for continuous blood pressure monitoring using clinical landmarks. Six hours postoperatively the left hand was noted to be pale, cool and pulseless with complete paraesthesia. Thrombus was initially suspected on computed tomography angiography. Upon return to theatre, extensive dissection of the posterior brachial arterial wall was identified. CONCLUSION: We review our diagnostic pathway and treatment of this rare complication. Recommendations to minimise the risks of complications from brachial arterial line insertion are also overviewed. We recommend the routine utilization of ultrasound-guided technique and regular post-insertion neurovascular monitoring for the prevention and early recognition of complications from brachial artery catheter insertion.

Multimodal Prehabilitation Programs as a Bundle of Care in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation reflects a proactive process of preoperative optimization undertaken between cancer diagnosis and definitive surgical treatment, with the intent of improving physiological capacity to withstand the major insult of surgery. Prehabilitation before GI cancer surgery is currently not widely adopted, and most research has focused on unimodal interventions such as exercise therapy, nutritional supplementation, and hematinic optimization. A review of the existing literature was undertaken to investigate the impact of multimodal prehabilitation programs as a "bundle of care." DATA SOURCE: A systematic literature search was performed utilizing Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases. STUDY SELECTION: The quality of studies was assessed by using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias (randomized trials) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale (cohort studies). INTERVENTION: Studies were chosen that involved pre-operative optimization of patients before GI cancer surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome measured was the impact of prehabilitation programs on preoperative fitness and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 544 studies identified, 20 were included in the qualitative analysis. Two trials investigated the impact of multimodal prehabilitation (exercise, nutritional supplementation, anxiety management). Trials exploring prehabilitation with unimodal interventions included impact of exercise therapy (7 trials), impact of preoperative iron replacement (5 trials), nutritional optimization (5 trials), and impact of preoperative smoking cessation (2 trials). Compliance within the identified studies was variable (range: 16%-100%). LIMITATIONS: There is a lack of adequately powered trials that utilize objective risk stratification and uniform end points. As such, a meta-analysis was not performed because of the heterogeneity in study design. CONCLUSION: Although small studies are supportive of multimodal interventions, there are insufficient data to make a conclusion about the integration of prehabilitation in GI cancer surgery as a bundle of care. Larger, prospective trials, utilizing uniform objective risk stratification and structured interventions, with predefined clinical and health economic end points, are required before definitive value can be assigned to prehabilitation programs.