Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 13(5): 3266-3278, 2023 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37179940

RESUMEN

Background: To investigate the deformity and asymmetry of the shoulder and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled 223 AIS patients with a right thoracic curve or left thoracolumbar/lumbar curve who underwent spine radiographs at the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University between November 2020 and December 2021. The following parameters were measured: Cobb angle, clavicular angle, glenoid obliquity angle, acromioclavicular joint deviation, femoral neck-shaft projection angle, iliac obliquity angle, acetabular obliquity angle, coronal trunk deviation distance, and spinal deformity deviation distance. The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for inter-group comparisons, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for intra-group left and right sides comparisons. Results: Shoulder and pelvic imbalances were found in 134 and 120 patients, respectively, and there were 87, 109, and 27 cases of mild, moderate, and severe scoliosis, respectively. Compared with mild scoliosis patients, the difference in the acromioclavicular joint offset on bilateral sides was significantly increased in moderate and severe scoliosis [11.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.14 for mild, 0.13-0.17 for moderate, and 0.15-0.27 for severe scoliosis, P=0.004], and the difference in the femoral neck-shaft projection angle on bilateral sides was significantly enhanced with scoliosis aggravation (14.14, 95% CI: 2.34-3.41 for mild, 3.00-3.94 for moderate, and 3.57-6.43 for severe scoliosis, P=0.001). The acromioclavicular joint offset was significantly larger on the left than that on the right in patients with a thoracic curve or double curves (thoracic curve -2.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.69 for the left and 0.50-0.63 for the right, P=0.006; double curve -3.27, 95% CI: 0.60-0.77 for the left and 0.48-0.65 for the right, P=0.001). The femoral neck-shaft projection angle was significantly larger on the left than right in patients with a thoracic curve (-4.46, 95% CI: 133.78-136.20 for the left and 131.62-134.01 for the right, P<0.001), but larger on the right than left in patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar curve (thoracolumbar -2.98, 95% CI: 133.75-136.70 for the left and 135.13-137.82 for the right, P=0.003; lumbar -3.24, 131.97-134.56 for the left and 133.76-136.26 for the right, P=0.001). Conclusions: In AIS patients, shoulder imbalance has a greater impact on coronal balance and spinal scoliosis above the lumbar segment, whereas pelvic imbalance has a greater impact on sagittal balance and spinal scoliosis below the thoracic segment.

2.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 979816, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36340704

RESUMEN

Background: The relationship of trunk balance with head posture and plantar pressure is unknown in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Objective: To investigate the relationship of trunk balance with head posture and plantar pressure by analyzing the imaging data of patients with AIS. Materials and methods: This retrospective study was performed on 80 AIS patients who had whole spine frontal and lateral radiographs, and the imaging parameters were measured and analyzed. Results: The coronal trunk imbalance rate was 67.5%, the trunk offset direction was towards left in 65 cases and right in 15 cases, and the head offset direction was towards left in 66 cases and right in 14 cases. The sagittal trunk imbalance rate was 57.25%. The distance of apical vertebrae and head offset in the coronal trunk balance group was significantly (P < 0.05) smaller than that in the imbalance group. The apical vertebrae offset distance and head offset distance were positively correlated with the tilt angle of trunk (r = 0.484 and 0.642, respectively, P < 0.05). The difference in the percentage of pressure load on the left and right foot was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in the coronal imbalance group than that in the balance group.The center of pressure (COP) sway area was significantly (P < 0.05) larger in the overall trunk imbalance group (both coronal and sagittal imbalance) than in the balanced group. Conclusion: Most AIS patients have trunk imbalance which is severer on the coronal than on the sagittal plane. AIS patients with trunk imbalance show more significant local deformities, greater head offset, greater COP sway area, and decreased head and standing stability.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...