Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gut Microbes ; 16(1): 2392876, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39172643

RESUMEN

Fecal filtrate transfer (FFT) is emerging as a safer alternative to traditional fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) - particularly in the context of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a severe gastrointestinal condition affecting preterm infants. Using a preterm piglet model, FFT has demonstrated superiority over FMT in safety and NEC prevention. Since FFT is virtually devoid of bacteria, prokaryotic viruses (bacteriophages) are assumed to mediate the beneficial effects. However, this assumption remains unproven. To address this gap, we separated virus-like particles (30 kDa to 0.45 µm) of donor feces from the residual postbiotic fluid. We then compared clinical and gut microbiota responses to these fractions with the parent FFT solution after transferring them to NEC-susceptible preterm piglets. Virome transfer was equally effective as FFT in reducing the severity of NEC-like pathology. The bacterial compositional data corroborated clinical findings as virome transfer reduced the relative abundance of several NEC-associated pathogens e.g. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Clostridium perfringens. Virome transfer diversified gut viral communities with concomitant constraining effects on the bacterial composition. Unexpectedly, virome transfer, but not residual postbiotic fluid, led to earlier diarrhea. While diarrhea may be a minor concern in human infants, future work should identify ways of eliminating this side effect without losing treatment efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Enterocolitis Necrotizante , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Heces , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/prevención & control , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/terapia , Animales , Heces/virología , Heces/microbiología , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Porcinos , Humanos , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias/genética , Animales Recién Nacidos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Viroma , Clostridium perfringens , Bacteriófagos/genética , Bacteriófagos/fisiología , Diarrea/terapia , Diarrea/virología , Diarrea/prevención & control , Diarrea/microbiología
2.
Viruses ; 15(10)2023 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37896828

RESUMEN

Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities, like in the mammalian gut, have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of the basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study, we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the extracted viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4, c2, Φ6, Φ29, Φx174, and Φ2972), filtered, and quantified using spot and plaque assays to estimate the loss in recovery. The enveloped Φ6 phage is especially severely affected by the choice of filter, but also tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample-dependent manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriófagos , Caudovirales , Microbiota , Virus , Animales , Bacteriófago phi X 174 , Mamíferos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA