RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Measurement of digital perfusion, sometimes coupled with a cold challenge, has been widely used as an objective outcome in trials evaluating drug therapies in Raynaud's Phenomenon (RP), in addition to patient-reported outcomes or to establish the proof-of-concept in preliminary studies. However, whether digital perfusion is a valid surrogate for clinical outcomes in RP trials has never been explored. The principal aim of this study was to evaluate the potential surrogacy of digital perfusion, by combining individual-level and trial-level data. METHODS: We used individual data from a series of n-of-1 trials, and trial data from a network meta-analysis. We estimated individual-level surrogacy through coefficients of determination between digital perfusion and clinical outcomes (R2ind). We further calculated the coefficients of determination between treatment effect on the clinical outcomes and on digital perfusion, at the individual level (R2TEInd) and at the trial level (R2trial), using non-weighted linear regression, with their 95% CI calculated through bootstrapping. RESULTS: Results from 33 patients and 24 trials were included in the final analysis. At the individual level, there was no correlation between digital perfusion and clinical outcomes at rest and in response to various cooling tests (the highest R2ind was 0.03 [-0.07; 0.09]), and R2TEinf was also very low 0.07 [0; 0.29]. At the trial level, the highest value of R2trial was 0.1 [0; 0.477]. CONCLUSIONS: Digital perfusion, at rest or in response to a cold challenge, and whatever the method used, does not fulfill the criteria of a valid surrogate for existing patient-reported outcomes in RP trials.
RESUMEN
Optimal therapeutic management is a major determinant of patient prognosis and healthcare costs. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) represent an opportunity to enhance therapeutic management in complex chronic diseases, such as lung transplantation (LT). The objective of this study was to assess the preferences of LT patients and healthcare professionals regarding ICTs in LT therapeutic management. A cross-sectional opinion survey was conducted among lung transplant patients and healthcare professionals from the French lung transplantation centers. Five ICTs were defined (SMS, email, phone, internet, and smartphone application) in addition to face-to-face communication. An unsupervised approach by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) identified lung transplant patient profiles according to their preferences for ICTs. Fifty-three lung transplant patients and 15 healthcare professionals of the French LT centers were included. Both expected ICTs for treatment management and communication. Phone call, face-to-face, and emails were the most preferred communication tools for treatment changes and initiation. PCA identified four ICTs-related profiles ("no ICT", "email", "SMS", and "oral communication"). "Email" and "oral communication" profiles are mainly concerned with treatment changes and transmission of new prescriptions. The "SMS" profile expected reminders for healthcare appointments and optimizing therapeutic management. This study provides practical guidance to enhance LT therapeutic management by ICT intervention. The type of ICT used should take into account patient profiles to improve adherence and thereby the prognosis. A combination of strategies including information, education by a multidisciplinary team, and reminders is a promising approach to ensure an optimal management of our patients.
RESUMEN
The management of immunosuppressors in solid organ transplantation requires pharmacological therapeutic monitoring with regular adaptation of the dosage to the residual level. An obvious cause of these fluctuations is drug interactions, particularly for mTOR inhibitors and anti-calcineurin drugs, which are highly metabolized by cytochromes P450. A 72-year-old lung transplanted man, treated by tacrolimus and everolimus in the long term, had his residual immunosuppressor levels unbalanced by the introduction of sotorasib, which is used for metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. This imbalance is explained by the fact that sotorasib is an inducer of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor of PGP, but the strength of the interaction has never been studied. This will have required a threefold increase in dosages and weekly monitoring before satisfactory residual levels were achieved.
