Catheter ablation of parahisian premature ventricular complexes in patients with and without cardiac scar.

BACKGROUND: Ablation of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) originating from the parahisian area is challenging. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) scar may influence procedural outcomes; the impact of cardiac scar on parahisian PVCs has not been described. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the incidence and significance of LGE-CMR scarring in patients undergoing ablation for parahisian PVCs. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent preprocedure LGE-CMR imaging and ablation of parahisian PVCs were included. Acute and long-term outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (male, n = 37; age, 66 ± 10 years; ejection fraction, 50% ± 12%; preprocedure PVC burden, 21% ± 12%). Intramural LGE-CMR scar was present in 33 of 48 (69%) patients. Cryoablation was used in 9 patients; ablation in multiple chambers was required in 28 (58%) patients. The PVC site of origin (SOO) was intramural (n = 25 patients), left ventricular (n = 5), and right ventricular (n = 18). Patients with LGE-CMR scar were more likely to have intramural PVCs (64% vs 27%; P < .04) and to require ablation in multiple cardiac chambers (58% vs 13%; P < .02). Patients with intramural scar required longer duration of ablation delivery (31 ± 20 minutes vs 17 ± 8 minutes; P < .02). Acute procedural success was 69%; PVC burden on follow-up was 6% ± 9% and similar for those with and without scar. CONCLUSION: Ablation of parahisian PVCs often requires mapping and ablation of multiple cardiac chambers, with an intramural SOO identified in most patients. An intramural scar was associated with an intramural SOO of the PVCs requiring more extensive ablation procedures, with similar long-term outcomes compared with those without scar.

Clinical outcomes of patients referred for left atrial appendage exclusion who did and did not undergo the procedure.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) is an effective alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Not all patients considered for LAAE undergo the procedure because of ineligibility, anatomic or medical constraints, and preference of the patient. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report on the management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary LAAE clinic, including all who subsequently did and did not undergo LAAE. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from all patients referred to the comprehensive multidisciplinary LAAE clinic at the University of Michigan between 2016 and 2022. A consecutive 301 patients (age, 75 ± 8 years; 106 women) with atrial fibrillation were evaluated. LAAE was performed in 168 patients (56%) with use of the Watchman device in 146 (49%) and surgically in 22 (7%). LAAE was not performed in 133 patients (44%, no-LAAE group) because of ineligibility in 62 (21%), anatomic constraints in 23 (7%), and preference of the patient in 48 (36%). The CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.6; P = .002) and HAS-BLED score (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 1.1; P < .001) were higher in the LAAE groups. RESULTS: Anticoagulant therapy was discontinued in 137 of 146 (94%) and 61 of 133 (61%) in the Watchman and no-LAAE groups, respectively (P < .001). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.0 years), in the LAAE (n = 168) and no-LAAE (n = 133) groups, respectively, 39 (23%) vs 29 (22%) deaths, 13 (8%) vs 5 (4%) thromboembolic events, and 24 (14%) vs 23 (17%) bleeding complications occurred. Continued long-term anticoagulation was not a predictor of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: After a comprehensive evaluation in a multidisciplinary clinic, ∼50% of the patients referred for LAAE did not proceed with LAAE and resumed anticoagulation.

Posterior left atrial isolation is associated with a lower incidence of atrial tachycardia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Patients may develop atrial tachycardia (AT) after left atrial (LA) ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: The population consisted of 101 consecutive patients (age = 64.3 ± 8.7 years, 70 males (69%), LA = 4.6 ± 0.8 cm, ejection fraction = 48.5 ± 16%) undergoing their initial procedure for persistent AF. After pulmonary vein isolation, patients either underwent posterior LA isolation (n = 50; study group) or linear ablation at the LA roof with verification of conduction block (n = 51; control group). RESULTS: A repeat procedure was performed in 17 (34%) and 28 (55%) patients in the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Patients in the study group were less likely to develop AT (9/50 [18%] vs. 18/51 [35%]; p = 0.02), roof-dependent (1/50 [2%] vs. 8/51 [16%]; p = 0.008), and multi-loop AT (6/50 [12%] vs. 14/51 [27%]; p = 0.03) as compared to controls. Among various factors, only posterior LA isolation was associated with a lower likelihood of AT recurrence and roof tachycardia at redo procedure (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.00, p = 0.05, and OR, 0.1, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.96; p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, posterior LA isolation is associated with a lower risk of a redo procedure, roof-dependent macro-reentry, and post-ablation AT in general as compared to controls who only received roof ablation. Posterior LA isolation also obviates the need for pacing maneuvers, and may be a more definitive endpoint than linear ablation at the LA roof.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplakin (DSP) pathogenic variants are rare causes of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and often involve the right and left ventricles. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablations may be required in these patients, but procedural characteristics have not been reported. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors sought to report a multicenter experience of VT ablation in patients with DSP pathogenic variants. METHODS: VT ablations performed in patients with known DSP pathogenic variants were analyzed across 6 centers in 3 countries. Patient characteristics and acute and long-term procedural outcomes were reported. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (13 men, median age 43 years [Q1-Q3: 41.5-53.0 years], left ventricular ejection fraction 43.0% [Q1-Q3: 41.5%-53.0%], 11 previous failed ablations) were referred for VT ablation procedures. All patients had symptomatic VTs, with ICD therapy in 19 patients. Epicardial procedures were performed in 16 of the 20 patients. VT target sites were located in the right ventricular (RV) endocardium (n = 11), the RV epicardium (n = 4), the left ventricular (LV) endocardium (n = 2) and the LV epicardium (n = 7). In 3 patients, the VT target sites were in close proximity to coronary arteries, limiting ablation. During follow-up, VTs recurred in 11 patients, and repeated ablations were performed in 9 patients. Allowing for multiple procedures, 19 of the 20 patients remained free of VT recurrence after a median follow-up of 18 months [Q1-Q3: 5-60 months]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DSP cardiomyopathy often have biventricular involvement, and ablation procedures often require ablation in both ventricles and the epicardium. Recurrences are not uncommon, and the pathologic substrate can be located in close proximity to epicardial coronary arteries, limiting the success rate of ablations.

Role of dofetilide in patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness of dofetilide in reducing the burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). BACKGROUND: Prior small sample studies show that dofetilide has benefit in reducing VA. However, large sample investigations with long-term follow-up are lacking. METHODS: Two hundred seventeen consecutive patients admitted between January 2015 and December 2021 for dofetilide initiation for control of VA were assessed. Dofetilide was successfully started in 176 patients (81%) and had to be discontinued in the remaining 41 patients (19%). Dofetilide was initiated for control of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 136 patients (77%), whereas 40 (23%) patients were initiated on dofetilide for reducing the burden of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 24 ± 7 months. In total, among the 136 VT patients, 33 (24%) died, 11 (8%) received a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and 3 (2%) received a heart transplant during follow-up. Dofetilide was discontinued in 117 (86%) patients due to lack of sustained effectiveness during follow-up. Dofetilide use was associated with similar odds of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality/LVAD/heart transplant (OR: 0.97, 0.55-4.23) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) compared to those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Dofetilide did not reduce PVC burden during follow-up in the 40 patients with PVCs (mean baseline PVC burden: 15%, at 1-year follow-up: 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Dofetilide use was less effective in reducing VA burden in our cohort of patients. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Pleomorphism of premature ventricular complexes originating from papillary muscles and their myocardial connections.

BACKGROUND: Patients with arrhythmias originating from papillary muscles (PAPs) often have pleomorphic ventricular arrhythmias (PVAs) that can result in failed ablations. The mechanism of PVAs is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and mechanisms of PVAs and the impact on outcomes in patients with focal left ventricular PAP ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). METHODS: The sites of origin (SOOs) of VAs in 43 consecutive patients referred for ablation of focal left ventricular PAP VAs were determined by activation and pacemapping. SOOs were classified as (1) unifocal generating a single VA morphology; (2) unifocal from a deeper-seated origin generating multiple VA morphologies; (3) unifocal located on a PAP branching site; (4) multifocal from a single or multiple PAPs generating multiple VA morphologies; and (5) multifocal from a PAP and a different anatomic source. RESULTS: Most patients had multiple morphologies (n = 34 [79%]) and multiple mechanisms (79%) generating the different VA morphologies. Most of the patients with PVAs had multiple SOOs from a single or different PAPs (n = 23 [68%]), followed by patients with SOOs from PAP and non-PAP sites (n = 19 [56%]). In 13 patients (38%), single SOOs accounted for the observed PVAs. The frequent observation (n = 20) of changing QRS morphologies after radiofrequency energy delivery targeting a single VA suggests the presence of a deeper focus with changing sites of preferential conduction. CONCLUSION: VA pleomorphism in patients with PAP arrhythmias is most often due to premature ventricular complexes originating from different SOOs. The second most common cause is preferential conduction from a single SOO via PAP branching sites.

Comparison of strategies for catheter ablation of left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia.

AIMS: Traditional ablation strategies including targeting the earliest Purkinje potential (PP) during left posterior fascicular (LPF) ventricular tachycardia (VT) or linear ablation at the middle segment of LPF during sinus rhythm are commonly used for the treatment of LPF-VT. Catheter ablation for LPF-VT targeting fragmented antegrade Purkinje (FAP) potential during sinus rhythm is a novel approach. We aimed to compare safety and efficacy of different ablation strategies (FAP ablation vs. traditional ablation) for the treatment of LPF-VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with electrocardiographically documented LPF-VT referred for catheter ablation received either FAP ablation approach or traditional ablation approach. Electrophysiological characteristics, procedural complications, and long-term clinical outcome were assessed. A total of 189 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for LPF-VT were included. Fragmented antegrade Purkinje ablation was attempted in 95 patients, and traditional ablation was attempted in 94 patients. Acute ablation success with elimination of LPF-VT was achieved in all patients. Left posterior fascicular block occurred in 11 of 95 (11.6%) patients in the FAP group compared with 75 of 94 (79.8%) patients in the traditional group (P < 0.001). Fragmented antegrade Purkinje ablation was associated with significant shorter procedure time (94 ± 26 vs. 117 ± 23 min, P = 0.03) and fewer radiofrequency energy applications (4.1 ± 2.4 vs. 6.3 ± 3.5, P = 0.003) compared with the traditional group. One complete atrioventricular block and one left bundle branch block were seen in the traditional group. Over mean follow-up of 65 months, 89 (93.7%) patients in the FAP group and 81 (86.2%) patients in the traditional group remained free of recurrent VT off antiarrhythmic drugs (P = 0.157). CONCLUSION: Left posterior fascicular-ventricular tachycardia ablation utilizing FAP and traditional ablation approaches resulted in similar acute and long-term procedural outcomes. Serious His-Purkinje injury did occur infrequently during traditional ablation. The use of FAP ablation approach was associated with shorter procedure time and fewer radiofrequency energy applications, especially for non-inducible patients.

Long-term outcomes of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and negative programmed ventricular stimulation followed with implantable loop recorders: Impact of delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Programed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a risk stratification tool in patients at risk for adverse arrhythmia outcomes. Patients with negative PVS may yet be at risk for adverse arrhythmia-related events, particularly in the presence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (VA). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes of real-world patients with symptomatic VA without indication for device therapy and negative PVS, and to examine the role of cardiac scaring on arrhythmia recurrence. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic VA, and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR), and negative PVS testing were included. All patients underwent placement of implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Survival analysis was performed to investigate the impact of LGE-CMR findings on survival free from adverse arrhythmic events. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included (age 60 ± 14 years, women n = 36 (46%), ejection fraction 57 ± 9%, cardiomyopathy n = 26 (33%), mitral valve prolapse [MVP] n = 9 (12%), positive LGE-CMR scar n = 49 (62%), history of syncope n = 23 (29%)) including patients with primarily premature ventricular contractions (n = 21) or nonsustained VA (n = 57). Patients were followed for 1.6 ± 1.5 years during which 14 patients (18%) experienced VA requiring treatment (n = 14) or syncope due to bradycardia (n = 2). Four/9 patients (44%) with MVP experienced VA (n = 3) or syncope (n = 1). Baseline characteristics between those with and without adverse events were similar (p > 0.05); however, the presence of cardiac scar on LGE-CMR was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio: 5.6 95% confidence interval: [1.2-27], p = 0.03, log-rank p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort with long-term follow-up, adverse arrhythmic outcomes occurred in 18% of patients with symptomatic VA despite negative PVS, and this risk was significantly greater in patients with positive DE-CMR scar. Long term-monitoring, including the use of ICM, may be appropriate in these patients.

Gender and race-related disparities in the management of ventricular arrhythmias.

Modern studies have revealed gender and race-related disparities in the management and outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias, but few studies have focused on outcomes for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). The aim of this article is to review relevant studies and identify outcome differences in the management of VA among Black and female patients. We found that female patients typically present younger for VA, are more likely to have recurrent VA after catheter ablation, are less likely to be prescribed antiarrhythmic medication, and are less likely to receive primary prevention ICD placement as compared to male patients. Additionally, female patients appear to derive similar overall mortality benefit from primary prevention ICD placement as compared to male patients, but they may have an increased risk of acute post-procedural complications. We also found that Black patients presenting with VA are less likely to undergo catheter ablation, receive appropriate primary prevention ICD placement, and have significantly higher risk-adjusted 1-year mortality rates after hospital discharge as compared to White patients. Black female patients appear to have the worst outcomes out of any demographic subgroup.

Anatomical location of leadless pacemaker and the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if the location of implantation of the leadless pacemaker (LP) makes a difference in the incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PICM based on the location of implantation of LP. METHODS: A total of 358 consecutive patients [women: 171 (48%), mean age: 73 ± 15 years] with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) > 50%, who received an LP (Micra) between January 2017 and June 2022, formed the study cohort. Micra-AV and Micra-VR were implanted in 122 (34%) and 236 (66%) patients, respectively. Fluoroscopically, the location of implantation of LP in the interventricular septum (IS) was divided into two equal halves (apex/apical septum [AS] and mid/high septum [HS]). During follow-up, PICM was defined as an EF drop of ≥10%. RESULTS: LP was implanted in 109 (34%) and 249 (66%) patients at AS and HS locations, respectively. During a mean 18 ± 8 months follow-up, 28 patients (7.8%) developed PICM. Among the 249 patients with HS placement of LP, 10 (4%) developed PICM, whereas among the 109 patients with AS placement of LP, 18 (16.5%) developed PICM (p = .002). AS location was associated with a higher risk of PICM compared to HS locations (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.42, p < .001). CONCLUSION: AS location of LP was associated with a higher risk of PICM compared to HS placement. Larger randomized studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Catheter ablation of intramural outflow tract premature ventricular complexes: a multicentre study.

AIMS: Ablation of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias may be limited by a deep intramural location of the arrhythmogenic source. This study evaluates the acute and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing ablation of intramural outflow tract premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter series included patients with structurally normal heart or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and intramural outflow tract PVCs defined by: (a) ≥ 2 of the following criteria: (1) earliest endocardial or epicardial activation < 20ms pre-QRS; (2) Similar activation in different chambers; (3) no/transient PVC suppression with ablation at earliest endocardial/epicardial site; or (b) earliest ventricular activation recorded in a septal coronary vein. Ninety-two patients were included, with a mean PVC burden of 21.5±10.9%. Twenty-six patients had had previous ablations. All PVCs had inferior axis, with LBBB pattern in 68%. In 29 patients (32%) direct mapping of the intramural septum was performed using an insulated wire or multielectrode catheter, and in 13 of these cases the earliest activation was recorded within a septal vein. Most patients required special ablation techniques (one or more), including sequential unipolar ablation in 73%, low-ionic irrigation in 26%, bipolar ablation in 15% and ethanol ablation in 1%. Acute PVC suppression was achieved in 75% of patients. Following the procedure, the PVC burden was reduced to 5.8±8.4%. The mean follow-up was 15±14 months and 16 patients underwent a repeat ablation. CONCLUSION: Ablation of intramural PVCs is challenging; acute arrhythmia elimination is achieved in 3/4 patients, and non-conventional approaches are often necessary for success.

Mitral Annular Substrate and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse With Mitral Annular Disjunction.

BACKGROUND: In patients with bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP), mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death via incompletely understood mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the substrate for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with bileaflet MVP and MAD as well as outcomes of catheter ablation with an emphasis on sustained, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS: A total of 18 consecutive patients (11 women, mean age 54 ± 15 years) with bileaflet MVP and MAD underwent catheter ablation for VT, and/or premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Eight patients had a prior cardiac arrest. RESULTS: PVCs were targeted for ablation in all 18 patients (symptomatic PVCs n = 15, PVC-induced ventricular fibrillation n = 3). Sustained monomorphic VT was targeted in 7 of 18 patients. Electroanatomic mapping showed low voltage in the area of the mitral annulus corresponding to VT target sites in 6 of 7 patients with sustained VT. Four of 7 patients had low voltage in the areas of MAD. Six of 7 patients with VT were rendered noninducible post-ablation. The PVC burden was reduced from 11.0% ± 10.4% to 4.0% ± 5.5% (P = 0.004). Over a mean follow-up of 33.9 ± 43.4 months, no VTs recurred. There were no major complications. No repeat ablations for VT occurred. Five of 18 patients required repeat ablation for PVCs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bileaflet MVP and MAD undergoing catheter ablation, the mitral valve annulus often contains low-voltage areas harboring the substrate for monomorphic VT and PVCs. Ablation in these patients was safe and improved arrhythmia control.