Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
medRxiv ; 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766175

RESUMEN

Importance: Many patients will develop more than one skin cancer, however most research to date has examined only case status. Objective: Describe the frequency and timing of the treatment of multiple skin cancers in individual patients over time. Design: Longitudinal claims and electronic health record-based cohort study. Setting: Vanderbilt University Medical Center database called the Synthetic Derivative, VA, Medicare, Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, IBM Marketscan. Participants: All patients with a Current Procedural Terminology code for the surgical management of a skin cancer in each of five cohorts. Exposures: None. Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of CPT codes for skin cancer treatment in each individual occurring on the same day as an ICD code for skin cancer over time. Results: Our cohort included 5,508,374 patients and 13,102,123 total skin cancers treated. Conclusions and Relevance: Nearly half of patients treated for skin cancer were treated for more than one skin cancer. Patients who have not developed a second skin cancer by 2 years after the first are unlikely to develop multiple skin cancers within the following 5 years. Better data formatting will allow for improved granularity in identifying individuals at high risk for multiple skin cancers and those unlikely to benefit from continued annual surveillance. Resource planning should take into account not just the number of skin cancer cases, but the individual burden of disease.

2.
Cancer Med ; 12(17): 17740-17752, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37551136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about long-term treatment-related symptoms in older breast cancer survivors. We characterized long-term patient-reported symptoms and examined factors associated with the presence and severity of symptoms, and symptom interference with daily activities. METHODS: Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) Medicare linkage data was used to identify breast cancer patients age 65 and older with local/regional stage disease diagnosed between 2012-2013. Symptom burden was assessed using breast-specific items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™). Demographic and clinical data also were collected. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between symptom burden and respondent sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Of 4448 eligible patients, 1594 (response-rate 35.8%) completed questionnaires. Of these, 1245 eligible respondents were included in the analysis based on self-reported data. Median time from diagnosis to survey completion was 68 months (IQR: 62-73). Most frequently reported symptoms were fatigue/lack of energy (76.8%), aching muscles (72.1%) and aching joints (72.5%). Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with higher symptom burden. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had higher risk of numbness/tingling (OR: 3.16; 95% CI: 2.36-4.24), hair loss (OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 2.05-3.60), and fatigue/lack of energy (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.29-2.52). Similarly, patients who received chemotherapy were more likely to report the majority of symptoms as moderate to severe and as interfering with daily activities. CONCLUSION: Receipt of chemotherapy is associated with significant symptom burden more than 5 years after breast cancer treatment. Long-term chemotherapy impact should be discussed with patients in a shared-decision making process and approaches to symptom management during survivorship care are needed.

3.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 37(5): 1563-1572, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33404712

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We describe large-scale demographic, initial treatment, and outcomes data for pediatric grade II gliomas included in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. METHODS: Our cohort included cases less than 21 years of age with pathology-confirmed disease. Logistic regressions were used to evaluate the use of chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT). Overall survival (OS) rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test. RESULTS: We identified 803 cases with astrocytoma (56.2%), oligodendroglioma (26.0%), and mixed glioma/glioma NOS (17.8%) histologies. Most cases underwent surgical resection (n = 661). Whereas cases 16 to 21 years of age were more likely than cases 0 to 5 years to receive RT (OR = 7.38, 95% CI 3.58-15.21, p < 0.001), they were less likely to receive CT (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.52, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS rates for all cases, cases that underwent surgical resection, and cases managed with biopsy were 87.5%, 92.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In one of the largest series of pediatric grade II gliomas, astrocytoma was the most common histology. Patterns of care and OS outcomes were similar to grade I gliomas, with surgical resection being the most common initial treatment and associated with a favorable rate of OS. Younger patients were more likely to receive post-operative CT and the use of RT increased with age.


Asunto(s)
Astrocitoma , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Oligodendroglioma , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Glioma/diagnóstico , Glioma/terapia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier
4.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 67(11): e28685, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32881378

RESUMEN

In the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma (EWS), delays in local therapy are known to adversely impact overall survival (OS). However, the role of treatment center volume in EWS outcomes, and the interaction between center volume and local therapy timing with definitive radiotherapy, remains unknown. Using the National Cancer Database, we demonstrate that treatment at the lowest EWS volume centers is associated with reduced OS, explained partly by higher rates of delayed local therapy. Treatment at the highest volume centers results in improved OS, but appears independent of radiotherapy timing. Future efforts to improve care for EWS patients across treatment centers are imperative.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/normas , Radioterapia/mortalidad , Sarcoma de Ewing/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/radioterapia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Sarcoma de Ewing/patología , Sarcoma de Ewing/radioterapia , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(7): 3351-3359, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31760519

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although rates of hospice use have increased over time, insurance plan- and racial/ethnic-based disparities in rates have been reported in the USA. We hypothesized that increased rates of hospice use would reduce or eliminate insurance plan-based disparities and that racial/ethnic disparities would be eliminated in managed care (MC) insurance plans. METHODS: We studied the use of hospice care in the final 30 days of life among 40,184 elderly Texas Medicare beneficiaries who died from primary breast, colorectal, lung, pancreas, or prostate cancer between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2013, using statewide Medicare claims linked to cancer registry data. Rates of hospice use were computed by race/ethnicity and insurance plan (MC or fee-for-service (FFS)). We used logistic regression to account for the impact of confounding factors. RESULTS: Rates of hospice use increased significantly over time, from 68.9% in 2007 to 76.1% in 2013. By 2013, differences in hospice use rates between MC and FFS plans had been reduced from 10% to < 5%. However, after accounting for insurance plan and confounding factors, racial/ethnic minority beneficiaries' hospice use was significantly lower than non-Hispanic white beneficiaries' (p < 0.0001). This disparity was observed among both FFS and MC beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: Hospice use in the final 30 days of life has increased among elderly cancer patients in Texas, virtually eliminating the difference between FFS and MC insurance plans. Despite these positive trends, racial/ethnic-based disparities persist. These disparities are not explained by confounding factors. Future research should address social and behavioral influences on end-of-life decisions.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/normas , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/métodos , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Texas , Estados Unidos
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 104(1): 127-136, 2019 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30593906

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the relationship between survival and time to local therapy after initiation of up-front chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with localized Ewing sarcoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with localized Ewing sarcoma treated with primary chemotherapy and subsequent local therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for patients initiating local therapy 6 to 15 weeks and ≥16 weeks after chemotherapy initiation. Multivariable binomial logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with prolonged time to local therapy. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The final cohort included 1318 patients. A higher proportion of patients initiating local therapy 6 to 15 weeks after chemotherapy initiation versus ≥16 weeks after chemotherapy initiation were ≤21 years old (79.5% vs 72.0%; P = .004). Age >21 years (P < .001; hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.12), tumor size >8 cm (P = .016), and time to local therapy ≥16 weeks (P = .005; hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.80) were associated with reduced OS; after review of margin status, negative margins were associated with improved OS compared with gross disease (P = .029). Patients initiating local therapy at 6 to 15 weeks versus ≥16 weeks had a 5-year OS of 78.7% versus 70.4% and a 10-year OS of 70.3% versus 57.1%, respectively (P < .001). The difference in OS according to time to local therapy was particularly more important in patients receiving radiation therapy alone. Age >21 years and treatment by radiation therapy alone were associated with delayed time (>16 weeks) to local therapy, whereas private insurance and income >$48,000 were less likely to be associated with delayed local therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed time to local therapy ≥16 weeks after chemotherapy initiation was independently associated with worse survival in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Sarcoma de Ewing/mortalidad , Sarcoma de Ewing/terapia , Factores de Edad , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Seguro de Salud , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Radioterapia , Análisis de Regresión , Sarcoma de Ewing/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Joven
7.
J Glob Oncol ; 4: 1-9, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30241162

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify rates of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) after breast conservation surgery (BCS) in women with stage I or II invasive breast cancer treated in Puerto Rico and to examine the sociodemographic and health services characteristics associated with variations in receipt of RT. METHODS: The Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2008 and 2012 in Puerto Rico. Claims codes identified the type of surgery and the use of RT. Logistic regression models were used to examine the independent association between sociodemographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: Among women who received BCS as their primary definitive treatment, 64% received adjuvant RT. Significant predictors of RT after BCS included enrollment in Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.13; P ≤ .01) and dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.27; P < .01). In addition, it was found that RT was more likely to have been received in certain geographic locations, including the Metro-North (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.48 to 3.28; P < .01), North (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.64; P < .01), West (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 2.61 to 6.25; P < .01), and Southwest (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.70 to 4.59; P < .01). Furthermore, patients with tumor size > 2.0 cm and ≤ 5.0 cm (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.93; P = .02) and those with tumor size > 5.0 cm (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.92; P = .03) were found to be significantly less likely to receive RT. CONCLUSION: Underuse of RT after BCS was identified in Puerto Rico. Patients enrolled in Medicare and those who were dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare were more likely to receive RT after BCS compared with patients with Medicaid alone. There were geographic variations in the receipt of RT on the island.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puerto Rico , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Joven
8.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(6): 645-651, 2017 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068172

RESUMEN

Purpose The Affordable Care Act expanded access to health insurance in the United States, but concerns have arisen about access to specialized cancer care within narrow provider networks. To characterize the scope and potential impact of this problem, we assessed rates of inclusion of Commission on Cancer (CoC) -accredited hospitals and National Cancer Institute (NCI) -designated cancer centers within federal exchange networks. Methods We downloaded publicly available machine-readable network data and public use files for individual federal exchange plans from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the 2016 enrollment year. We linked this information to National Provider Identifier data, identified a set of distinct provider networks, and assessed the rates of inclusion of CoC-accredited hospitals and NCI-designated centers. We measured variation in these rates according to geography, plan type, and metal level. Results Of 4,058 unique individual plans, network data were available for 3,637 (90%); hospital information was available for 3,531 (87%). Provider lists for these plans reduced into 295 unique networks for analysis. Ninety-five percent of networks included at least one CoC-accredited hospital, but just 41% of networks included NCI-designated centers. States and counties each varied substantially in the proportion of networks listed that included NCI-designated centers (range, 0% to 100%). The proportion of networks that included NCI-designated centers also varied by plan type (range, 31% for health maintenance organizations to 49% for preferred provider organizations; P = .04) but not by metal level. Conclusion A large majority of federal exchange networks contain CoC-accredited hospitals, but most do not contain NCI-designated cancer centers. These results will inform policy regarding access to cancer care, and they reinforce the importance of promoting access to clinical trials and specialized care through community sites.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/estadística & datos numéricos , Acreditación , Instituciones Oncológicas/normas , Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Estados Unidos
9.
Cancer ; 123(2): 283-293, 2017 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27662641

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a technologically advanced and resource-intensive method of delivering radiation therapy (RT) and is used to minimize toxicity for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Dependence on feeding tubes is a significant marker of toxicity of RT. The objective of this analysis was to compare the placement and duration of feeding tube use among patients with HNC from 1999 through 2011. METHODS: The cohort, demographics, and cancer-related variables were determined using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, and claims data were used to analyze treatment details. RESULTS: In total, 2993 patients were identified. At a median follow-up of 47 months, 54.4% of patients had ever had a feeding tube placed. The median duration from feeding tube placement to removal was 277 days. On zero-inflated negative binomial regression, patients who received IMRT and 3-dimensional RT (3DRT) (non-IMRT) had similar rates of feeding tube placement (odds ratio, 1.10; P = .35); however, patients who received 3DRT had a feeding tube in place 1.18 times longer than those who received IMRT (P = .03). The difference was only observed among patients who received definitive RT; patients who underwent surgery and also received adjuvant RT had no statistically significant difference in feeding tube placement or duration. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HNC who received definitive IMRT had a significantly shorter duration of feeding tube placement than those who received 3DRT. These data suggest that there may be significant quality-of-life benefits to IMRT with respect to long-term swallowing function in patients with HNC. Cancer 2017;123:283-293. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos
10.
Med Care ; 53(7): 591-8, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26067883

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate end-of-life care for Medicaid, Medicare, and dually eligible beneficiaries dying of cancer in Texas. METHODS: We analyzed the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR)-Medicaid and TCR-Medicare linked databases' claims data for 69,572 patients dying of cancer in Texas from 2000 to 2008. We conducted regression models in adjusted analyses of cancer-directed and acute care and total costs of care (in 2014 dollars) in the last 30 days of life. RESULTS: Medicaid patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Medicaid patients were more likely to have >1 emergency room (ER) [odds ratio (OR)=5.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.76-5.84], and were less likely to enroll in hospice (OR=0.59; 95% CI, 0.55-0.63) than Medicare patients. Dual eligibles were more likely to have >1 ER visit than Medicare-only beneficiaries (OR=1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33). Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to experience >1 ER visit and >1 hospitalization than whites. Costs were higher for nonwhite Medicare, Medicaid, and dually eligible patients compared with white Medicare enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in acute care utilization and costs by race and payer suggest efforts are needed to address palliative care coordination at the end of life for Medicaid and dually eligible beneficiaries and minority patients dying of cancer.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Medicaid/economía , Medicare/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/etnología , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Texas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
11.
Radiother Oncol ; 115(2): 257-63, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26013292

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Prompt staging and treatment are crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We determined if predictors of treatment delay after diagnosis were associated with prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medicare claims from 28,732 patients diagnosed with NSCLC in 2004-2007 were used to establish the diagnosis-to-treatment interval (ideally ⩽35days) and identify staging studies during that interval. Factors associated with delay were identified with multivariate logistic regression, and associations between delay and survival by stage were tested with Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Median diagnosis-to-treatment interval was 27days. Receipt of PET was associated with delays (57.4% of patients with PET delayed [n=6646/11,583] versus 22.8% of those without [n=3908/17,149]; adjusted OR=4.48, 95% CI 4.23-4.74, p<0.001). Median diagnosis-to-PET interval was 15days; PET-to-clinic, 5days; and clinic-to-treatment, 12days. Diagnosis-to-treatment intervals <35days were associated with improved survival for patients with localized disease and those with distant disease surviving ⩾1year but not for patients with distant disease surviving <1year. CONCLUSION: Delays between diagnosing and treating NSCLC are common and associated with use of PET for staging. Reducing time to treatment may improve survival for patients with manageable disease at diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
12.
Cancer ; 121(11): 1882-90, 2015 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25711974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minority patients with breast cancer are at risk for undertreatment of cancer-related pain. The authors evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of an automated pain intervention for improving pain and symptom management of underserved African American and Latina women with breast cancer. METHODS: Sixty low-income African American and Latina women with breast cancer and cancer-related pain were enrolled in a pilot study of an automated, telephone-based, interactive voice response (IVR) intervention. Women in the intervention group were called twice weekly by the IVR system and asked to rate the intensity of their pain and other symptoms. The patients' oncologists received e-mail alerts if the reported symptoms were moderate to severe. The patients also reported barriers to pain management and received education regarding any reported obstacles. RESULTS: The proportion of women in both groups reporting moderate to severe pain decreased during the study, but the decrease was significantly greater for the intervention group. The IVR intervention also was associated with improvements in other cancer-related symptoms, including sleep disturbance and drowsiness. Although patient adherence to the IVR call schedule was good, the oncologists who were treating the patients rated the intervention as only somewhat useful for improving symptom management. CONCLUSIONS: The IVR intervention reduced pain and symptom severity for underserved minority women with breast cancer. Additional research on technological approaches to symptom management is needed.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/etnología , Automatización/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Pobreza , Telemedicina/métodos , Poblaciones Vulnerables
13.
J Oncol Pract ; 10(4): e269-76, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24756144

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We sought to analyze trends in radiation therapy (RT) technology use and costs in the last 30 days of life for patients dying as a result of cancer. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare and Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare databases to analyze claims data for 13,488 patients dying as a result of lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, melanoma, and pancreas cancers from 2000 to 2009. Logistic regression modeling was used to conduct adjusted analyses regarding influence of demographic, clinical, and health services variables on receipt of types of RT. Costs were calculated in 2009 US dollars. RESULTS: The proportion of patients treated with two-dimensional RT decreased from 74.9% of those receiving RT in the last 30 days of life in 2000 to 32.7% in 2009 (P < .001). Those receiving three-dimensional RT increased from 27.2% in 2000 to 58.5% in 2009 (P < .001). The proportion of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the last 30 days of life increased from 0% in 2000 to 6.2% in 2009 (P < .001), and those undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery increased from 0% in 2000 to 5.0% in 2009 (P < .001). The adjusted mean costs of per-patient RT services delivered in the last 30 days of life were higher in the years 2007 to 2009. CONCLUSION: Among patients receiving RT in the last month of life, there was a shift away from the simplest technique toward more advanced RT technologies. Studies are needed to ascertain whether these technology shifts improve palliative outcomes and quality of life for patients dying as a result of cancer who receive RT services.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Radioterapia/economía , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Cancer ; 120(5): 702-10, 2014 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24421077

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a technologically advanced, and more expensive, method of delivering radiation therapy with a goal of minimizing toxicity. It has been widely adopted for head and neck cancers; however, its comparative impact on cancer control and survival remains unknown. The goal of this analysis was to compare the cause-specific survival (CSS) for patients with head and neck cancers treated with IMRT versus non-IMRT from 1999 to 2007. METHODS: CSS was determined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database and analyzed regarding treatment details, including the use of IMRT versus non-IMRT, using claims data. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by the frailty model with a propensity score matching cohort and instrumental variable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3172 patients were identified. With a median follow-up of 40 months, patients treated with IMRT had a statistically significant improvement in CSS compared with those treated with non-IMRT (84.1% versus 66.0%; P < .001). When each anatomic subsite was analyzed separately, all respective subgroups of patients treated with IMRT had better CSS than those treated with non-IMRT. In multivariable survival analyses, patients treated with IMRT were associated with better CSS (HR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.59 to 0.90 for propensity score matching; HR = 0.60, 95% confidence interval = 0.41 to 0.88 for instrumental variable analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with head and neck cancers who were treated with IMRT experienced significant improvements in CSS compared with patients treated with non-IMRT techniques. This suggests there may be benefits to IMRT in cancer outcomes, in addition to toxicity reduction, for this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare , Puntaje de Propensión , Programa de VERF , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(1): 80-7, 2013 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23169520

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our goal was to evaluate use and associated costs of radiation therapy (RT) in the last month of life among those dying of cancer. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) -Medicare linked databases to analyze claims data for 202,299 patients dying as a result of lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, and pancreas cancers from 2000 to 2007. Logistic regression modeling was used to conduct adjusted analyses of potential impacts of demographic, health services, and treatment-related variables on receipt of RT and treatment with greater than 10 days of RT. Costs were calculated in 2009 dollars. RESULTS: Among the 15,287 patients (7.6%) who received RT in the last month of life, its use was associated with nonclinical factors such as race, gender, income, and hospice care. Of these patients, 2,721 (17.8%) received more than 10 days of treatment. Nonclinical factors that were associated with greater likelihood of receiving more than 10 days of RT in the last 30 days of life included: non-Hispanic white race, no receipt of hospice care, and treatment in a freestanding, versus a hospital-associated facility. Hospice care was associated with 32% decrease in total costs of care in the last month of life among those receiving RT. CONCLUSION: Although utilization of RT overall was low, almost one in five of patients who received RT in their final 30 days of life spent more than 10 of those days receiving treatment. More research is needed into physician decision making regarding use of RT for patients with end-stage cancer.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Radioterapia/economía , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Cancer ; 119(5): 1089-97, 2013 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23132206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to investigate utilization trends for advanced radiation therapy (RT) technologies, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), in the last year of life among patients diagnosed with metastatic cancer. METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked databases to analyze claims data in the last 12 months of life for 64,525 patients diagnosed with metastatic breast, colorectal, lung, pancreas, and prostate cancers from 2000 to 2007. Logistic regression modeling was conducted to analyze potential demographic, health services, and treatment-related variables' influences on receipt of advanced RT. RESULTS: Among the 19,161 (29.7%) patients who received radiation therapy, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients who received the simplest radiation technique (ie, 2D-radiation therapy) (P < .0001), and significant increases in the proportions of patients receiving more advanced radiation techniques (ie, IMRT, and SRS; P < .0001 for all curves); although the rates for use of IMRT and SRS in 2007 remained under 5%. On multivariate analyses, receipt of RT varied significantly by non-clinical characteristics such as race, marital status, neighborhood income, and SEER region. Patients who received hospice care in the last year of life were more likely to receive radiation therapy (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.30-1.40) but less likely to be treated with IMRT (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.62-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Although the proportion of patients receiving RT in the last year of life for metastatic cancer did not change for most of the past decade, we observed significant trends toward more advanced radiation techniques.


Asunto(s)
Metástasis de la Neoplasia/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Radiocirugia/tendencias , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/tendencias , Programa de VERF , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Cancer ; 119(7): 1428-36, 2013 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting (N/V) during chemotherapy can have profound clinical and economic consequences. Effective antiemetic agents are available for prophylaxis, but barriers may prevent their use. For this population-based study, the authors assessed the rates of antiemetic prophylaxis use, and predictors of such use, among patients who were receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for lung cancer between 2001 and 2007. METHODS: The authors searched the Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare-linked database for individuals aged >65 years who received platinum-based chemotherapy within 12 months after a first diagnosis of lung cancer from 2001 to 2007; and all patients had continuous Medicare Part A and Part B coverage for the same period. Adherence to recommended regimens for N/V prophylaxis (established by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network) was scored as a binary variable (adherent vs nonadherent) and was calculated as the percentages of treated patients receiving each recommended agent within 1 day of beginning chemotherapy. Logistic regression with stepwise selection was used to examine whether patient characteristics influenced adherence. RESULTS: Of 4566 selected patients, adherence rates for the receipt of serotonin antagonists (eg, ondansetron) with dexamethasone were 60% to 90% regardless of whether the chemotherapy agent was considered moderately or highly emetogenic. The receipt of substance-P antagonists was much less common (<10%) during any period. On multivariate logistic regression modeling, variables that predicted adherence were older age, white race, higher median income, and concurrent radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended use of antiemetics for prophylaxis, especially substance-P antagonists, during chemotherapy for lung cancer is suboptimal. Factors that were correlated with adherence suggest socioeconomic barriers in the community.


Asunto(s)
Antieméticos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Masculino , Náusea/prevención & control , Ondansetrón/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de la Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Factores Socioeconómicos , Vómitos/prevención & control
18.
Head Neck ; 35(11): 1599-605, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23150453

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Jaw complications, including osteoradionecrosis, are significant sequelae of radiation therapy (RT) for oral cancers. This study identifies the impact of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics on the development of jaw complications in patients treated with RT. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify patients treated with RT for oral cancers from 1999 to 2007. Jaw complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases 9th revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes and/or related procedures using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and ICD-9 codes. RESULTS: A total of 1848 patients were identified. With a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 297 patients (16.1%) developed jaw complications: 226 patients had a diagnosis, 41 patients had a procedure, and 30 patients had both. On multivariate analysis, female sex, lack of chemotherapy use, and fewer comorbidities were associated with a statistically significant increase in jaw complications. CONCLUSIONS: Even with modern techniques, jaw complications are a notable and potentially devastating side effect of RT for oral cancers.


Asunto(s)
Maxilares/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Boca/radioterapia , Osteorradionecrosis/epidemiología , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Boca/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Osteorradionecrosis/diagnóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos
19.
J Clin Oncol ; 29(21): 2859-65, 2011 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21690477

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We compared risk factors for high disease- and treatment-related symptom burden over 15 weeks of therapy in medically underserved patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and in patients treated at a tertiary cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We monitored symptom severity weekly during chemotherapy. Patients were recruited from a tertiary cancer center (n=101) and three public hospitals treating the medically underserved (n=80). We used a composite symptom-severity score and group-based trajectory analysis to form two groups: one with consistently more severe symptoms and another with less severe symptoms. We examined predictors of group membership. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the sample (n=126) reported low symptom-severity levels that decreased during therapy; 30% (n=55) had consistently severe symptoms throughout the study. In multivariate analysis, patients with good performance status being treated in public hospitals were significantly more likely than patients treated at the tertiary cancer center to be in the high-symptom group (odds ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.1 to 14.6; P = .001) and to report significantly higher symptom interference (P = .001). Other univariate predictors of high-symptom group membership included variables associated with being medically underserved (eg, having less education, being single, and being nonwhite). No group differences by ethnicity were observed in the public hospitals. Medically underserved patients were less likely to receive adequate pain management. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced lung cancer and good performance status treated at public hospitals were more likely than those treated at a tertiary cancer center to experience substantial symptoms during chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hospitales Públicos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Área sin Atención Médica , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
20.
Cancer ; 117(5): 1070-9, 2011 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20960510

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The growing diversity of the population of the United States and the high burden of cancer-related symptoms reflect the need for caregiver research within underserved groups. In this longitudinal study, the authors assessed changes in symptom severity in caregivers and underserved minority patients diagnosed with advanced solid tumors who were being treated at public hospitals. METHODS: A total of 85 matched patient-caregiver dyads completed the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory 3 times during 20 weeks of chemotherapy. At each time point, symptom severity and interference with daily activities were assessed. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to classify caregivers into high-symptom or low-symptom burden groups. RESULTS: Sadness and distress were more prevalent among caregivers (P = .005). Symptom burden remained stable among caregivers in the high-symptom group (40%), whereas the low-symptom group (60%) demonstrated a statistically significant decrease over time. Multivariate analysis found being a family-member caregiver (adjusted odds ratio [ADJ-OR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4-11.6) and caring for a highly symptomatic patient (ADJ-OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.5-41.4), rather than race, ethnicity, or sociodemographic characteristics, were significant predictors of the caregiver's membership in the high-symptom burden group. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of the caregivers in the current study were found to be at an increased risk for moderate to severe sadness and distress, which remained severe throughout the patient's treatment course at public hospitals. To the authors' knowledge, this study marks the first time that the concept of symptom burden has been used to measure caregiver burden, and the first time that symptom burden has been measured and documented in dyads of caregivers and underserved minority patients. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Costo de Enfermedad , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias/terapia , Adaptación Psicológica/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Área sin Atención Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/psicología , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...