RESUMEN
Background: The number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) is not considered in the nodal status (N classification) of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in the current 8thEdition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. The aim of this study was to find out the optimal cut-off point based on the number of MLNs and establish a modified AJCC staging system for ICC according to the new N category. Methods: A total of 675 ICC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The optimal cut-off value of MLNs affecting survival was determined by X-tile software. The relative discriminative power was assessed by Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results: The proposed new nodal category subdivided patients into three groups (N0, no MLN; N1, 1-3 MLNs; and N2, ≥ 4 MLNs) with significantly different overall survival (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the new nodal category was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001). Both the C-index and AIC for our modified staging system were better than those for the 8th AJCC edition (0.574 [95% confidence interval 0.533-0.615] versus 0.570 [95% confidence interval 0.527-0.613], and 853.30 versus 854.21, respectively). Conclusion: The modified AJCC staging system based on the number of MLNs may prove to be a useful alternative for predicting survival of ICC patients in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are more sensitive to postanaesthesia respiratory depression. Whether different anaesthetic regimens (intravenous-based or inhalational-based general anaesthesia) affect the postanaesthesia respiratory depression is controversial. Although desflurane has been reported that presents favourable rapid recovery profile in special patients including whom with OSA, the strong clinical evidence of the benefit on postanaesthesia respiratory depression is far from being revealed. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by investigating the postanaesthesia respiratory depression in postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) in patients with OSA after major abdominal surgery, followed by desflurane-based anaesthesia compared with propofol-based anaesthesia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eight hundred and fifty-four patients with OSA scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery will be randomly 1:1 assigned to desflurane-based (n=427) or propofol-based anaesthesia (n=427) using a computer-generated randomisation scheme with permuted block size maintained by a centralised randomisation centre. Patients will be assessed before and a consecutive 3 days after their surgery according to the standardised tasks. Demographic data as well as surgical and anaesthesia information will be collected for the duration of the procedure. Incidence of postanaesthesia respiratory depression in PACU as well as anaesthesia recovery, emergence delirium, postoperative nausea and vomiting, rescue analgesia, duration of PACU and hospital stay, and any other adverse events will be assessed at the given study time point. Investigators performing postoperative follow-up are not involved in both anaesthesia implementation and postoperative care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol has been approved by the ethics board at Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University (XAHLL2019003). The results of this study will be published in a peer-review journal and presented at national conferences as poster or oral presentations. Participants wishing to know the results of this study will be contacted directly on data publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000031087.