Comparison of Efficacy of Baricitinib and Dupilumab in the Treatment of Chinese Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients with insufficient response or intolerance to topical medication remains clinical challenges, and there is a paucity of head-to-head trials comparing the efficacy of novel biological agents such as JAK inhibitor and antibody. METHODS: To compare the efficacy of selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor baricitinib and interleukin-4 monoclonal antibody dupilumab in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe AD, a retrospective cohort study method was adopted. Clinical data from June 2020 to April 2022 were systematically reviewed. Eligible patients who received baricitinib or dupilumab were screened according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) moderate-to-severe AD: baseline investigator global assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3, baseline eczema area and severity index (EASI) score ≥ 16; (3) poor response or intolerance to at least one topical drug in the past 6 months; (4) no topical glucocorticoids were used in the past 2 weeks and no systematic treatment was given in the past 4 weeks. Patients of the baricitinib group were treated with oral baricitinib in doses of 2 mg per day for 16 weeks, and patients of the dupilumab group were treated with standardized use of dupilumab for 16 weeks, with the initial 600 mg subcutaneous injection and the following 300 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks. The clinical efficacy score indexes including the IGA score, EASI score, and Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score. These scores at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after the start of treatment were collected. RESULTS: A total of 54/45 patients treated with baricitinib/dupilumab were included. There was no significant difference in the decrease of all scores between the two groups at the 4th week (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the EASI score and Itch NRS score (p > 0.05), but the IGA score of the baricitinib group was lower at the 16th week (Z = 4.284, p < 0.001). Within the first 4 weeks, the Itch NRS score of the baricitinib group decreased rapidly, but with the prolongation of treatment time, there was no significant difference between the two groups at the 16th week (Z = 1.721, p = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of baricitinib at a dose of 2 mg daily was similar to dupilumab, and the improvement in pruritus was significantly faster in the early stage of treatment (the first 4 weeks) than that of dupilumab.

Prevalence and risk factors of allergic rhinitis among Chinese adults: A nationwide representative cross-sectional study.

Background: The prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) has been increasing steadily worldwide, especially in countries with increasing industrialization such as China. However, available evidence regarding AR prevalence among Chinese adults is scarce and limited to regional data collected in earlier years. We therefore aimed to provide a more recent and robust estimate of AR prevalence using a nationwide representative cross-sectional study in China. Methods: Data of 184 326 participants aged 18 years or older were obtained from the China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance conducted in 2018-2019. AR was determined by self-reported sneezing, nasal itching, obstruction, or rhinorrhea symptoms for at least 1 h in the absence of a cold or flu within the last 12 months. Multivariable logistic model was used to examine the risk factors of AR, and a possible non-linear relationship was further tested by restricted cubic spline. Potential additive interactions of risk factors with sex, residence, and geographic region were assessed by relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). Results: The weighted prevalence of AR was 8.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4%-8.7%), of whom 23.7% (95% CI, 21.3%-26.0%) were aware of their diagnosis. Increased odds of AR were associated with younger age, men, living in urban area or north region, more education, smoking, underweight, and higher income. Despite the nonsignificant linear trend, the spline regression demonstrated a non-linear association between AR and sleep duration, with higher odds at both ends. Additionally, the observed associations were generally stronger among men and people living in urban area and north region, with significant RERI ranging from 0.07 (95% CI, 0.00-0.14) to 0.40 (95% CI, 0.12-0.67). Conclusions: AR is prevalent in China and the associated factors and interactions are helpful to design targeted preventive strategies towards certain subpopulations. The low awareness of AR calls for a national effort on AR screening.

Impact of Omalizumab on Anaphylaxis in Patients Treated for Chronic Urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening systemic allergic reaction. Omalizumab (OMA) is an established treatment in chronic urticaria (CU), but experience in anaphylaxis is limited. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OMA on anaphylaxis in patients with CU who are resistant to antihistamine therapy and have a history of anaphylaxis. METHOD: Patients with antihistamine-resistant CU and a history of anaphylaxis were eligible. OMA was given 300 mg/150 mg every 4 weeks. Urticaria control test (UCT) scores, the episodes of anaphylaxis, and adverse events were recorded during the OMA treatment. RESULTS: A total of 7 adults were included. After starting OMA, all of them achieved a complete control (UCT = 16) after 3 months of OMA treatment; 6 of them did not suffer any attack of anaphylaxis in the follow-up periods (5 patients for more than 12 months and 1 patient for 4 months). No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The study indicated the efficacy and safety of OMA for antihistamine-resistant CU patients with a history of anaphylaxis and its potential as a prevention option for anaphylaxis.

The Emerging Role of Mast Cells in Response to Fungal Infection.

Mast cells (MCs) have been considered as the core effector cells of allergic diseases. However, there are evidence suggesting that MCs are involved in the mechanisms of fungal infection. MCs are mostly located in the border between host and environment and thus may have easy contact with the external environmental pathogens. These cells express receptors which can recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns such as Toll-like receptors (TLR2/4) and C-type Lectins receptors (Dectin-1/2). Currently, more and more data indicate that MCs can be interacted with some fungi (Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Sporothrix schenckii). It is demonstrated that MCs can enhance immunity through triggered degranulation, secretion of cytokines and chemokines, neutrophil recruitment, or provision of extracellular DNA traps in response to the stimulation by fungi. In contrast, the involvement of MCs in some immune responses may lead to more severe symptoms, such as intestinal barrier function loss, development of allergic bronchial pulmonary aspergillosis and increased area of inflammatory in S. schenckii infection. This suggests that MCs and their relevant signaling pathways are potential treatment regimens to prevent the clinically unwanted consequences. However, it is not yet possible to make definitive statements about the role of MCs during fungal infection and/or pathomechanisms of fungal diseases. In our article, we aim to review the function of MCs in fungal infections from molecular mechanism to signaling pathways, and illustrate the role of MCs in some common host-fungi interactions.

Case Report: Omalizumab for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Pregnancy.

Most chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients are female, and pregnancy can aggravate the disease activity of patients, but little is known about the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in pregnant CSU patients. We report two pregnant CSU patients treated with omalizumab and review the published information on omalizumab treatment during 11 pregnancies. The outcomes reported on patients with known pregnancies showed they had normal pregnancies and healthy babies as well as complete control of their CSU. The two new cases we reported support the view that omalizumab could be an effective and safe treatment option for pregnant and breastfeeding CSU patients. Further high-quality studies need to be carried out in order to obtain more information on the long-term efficacy and safety of the use of omalizumab during pregnancy in patients with chronic urticaria, including CSU.