Mitigating surgical emergency practice during COVID-19 pandemic?

PURPOSE: To define the change in Emergency Surgical Unit (ESU) workload during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patient data for a three-week period was prospectively collected for ESU patients during lockdown period and compared to the ESU workload for the same time period prior to lockdown. RESULTS: Surgical emergencies admissions reduced by 2.5 times during our study period (p value = 0.001). In this changed paradigm, the overall number of surgical emergencies were reduced. A high mortality (n = 4, 5.7%) was noted during lockdown period as compared to pre-lockdown period (n = 1, 0.58%, p value = 0.025). Almost half of surgical admissions were tested for COVID-19 based on their symptoms and more than third (n=14, 38.9%) of them were positive. Gastrointestinal symptoms were common in COVID-19 positive group (85.7%) and only a third (36%) of COVID-19 positive patients needed surgical attention. Chest x-ray findings were comparable to PCR testing in terms of sensitivity and specificity but CT chest was more sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: It remains unclear how COVID-19 reduced surgical emergencies. A significant proportion of COVID-19 presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. In a new outbreak all General Surgical patients should be tested with CRP and WCC used as a triage adjunct. KEY WORDS: Coronavirus, COVID-19, Emergency Surgery Pandemic, General Surgery.

The emerging role of microdialysis in diabetic patients undergoing amputation for limb ischemia.

Lower limb ischemia in diabetic patients is a result of macro- and microcirculation dysfunction. Diabetic patients undergoing limb amputation carry high mortality and morbidity rates, and decision making concerning the level of amputation is critical. Aim of this study is to evaluate a novel microdialysis technique to monitor tissue microcirculation preoperatively and predict the success of limb amputation in such patients. Overall, 165 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing lower limb amputation were enrolled. A microdialysis catheter was placed preoperatively at the level of the intended flap for the stump reconstruction, and the levels of glucose, glycerol, lactate and pyruvate were measured for 24 consecutive hours. Patients were then amputated and monitored for 30 days regarding the outcome of amputation. Failure of amputation was defined as delayed healing or stump ischemia. Patients were divided into two groups based on the success of amputation. There was no difference between the two groups regarding gender, ASA score, body mass index, comorbidities, diagnostic modality used, level of amputation, as well as glucose, glycerol, and pyruvate levels. However, local concentrations of lactate were significantly different between the two groups and lactate/pyruvate (L/P) ratio was independently associated with failed amputation (threshold defined at 25.35). Elevated preoperative tissue L/P ratio is independently associated with worse outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing limb amputation. Therefore, preoperative tissue L/P ratio could be used as a predicting tool for limb amputation's outcome, although more clinical data are needed to provide safer conclusions.

Colorectal cancer implant in an external hemorrhoidal skin tag.

External hemorrhoidal skin tags are generally benign. Colorectal cancer metastases to the squamous epithelium of perianal skin tags without other evidence of disseminated disease is a very rare finding. We present the case of a 61-year-old man with metastasis to an external hemorrhoidal skin tag from a midrectal primary adenocarcinoma. This case report highlights the importance of close examination of the anus during surgical planning for colorectal cancers. Abnormal findings of the perianal skin suggesting an implant or metastatic disease warrant biopsy, as distal spread and seeding can occur. In our patient, this finding appropriately changed surgical management.

Noncosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a case-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopic technique.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) colectomy has gained significant momentum with anticipated benefit of improved cosmesis. Feasibility and safety of SIL colectomy have been shown; however, benefits are not well defined. The purpose of this study is to directly compare outcomes of SIL sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease with standard multiport laparoscopic (LAP) technique. METHODS: SIL sigmoid colectomy cases performed for diverticular disease between August 2009 and July 2011 were case matched for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous abdominal operation, and need to mobilize the splenic flexure and compared with an equal number of LAP cases. Data analyzed included operative time, estimated blood loss, procedure conversion, incision length, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-d hospital readmission, and postoperative pain scores. RESULTS: Twenty patients were analyzed in each group with no significant differences found in the six case-matching criteria. Operative time, conversions, estimated blood loss, surgical site infection, and hospital readmissions were similar. The mean incision length for both groups was 5cm (P=0.72). LOS was 3.7d for the SIL group, which was >1d shorter than that for the LAP group (5.0d; P<0.05). Pain score at post-anesthesia care unit discharge and total amount of narcotic pain medication delivered in the post-anesthesia care unit was significantly less in the SIL group (P<0.05), as was maximum visual analog scale pain score on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2 (P≤0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SIL sigmoid colectomy is associated with noncosmetic benefits, including a reduction in early postoperative pain and decreased LOS. These findings may be related to reduced abdominal wall trauma.