Intersurgeon variations in postoperative length of stay after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Objectives: To identify factors associated with prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS) after VATS lobectomy (VATS-L), explore potential intersurgeon variation in LOS and ascertain whether or not early discharge influences hospital readmission rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent VATS-L at a single academic center between 2018 and 2021. Each VATS lobectomy procedure was performed by 1 of 7 experienced thoracic surgeons. The primary end point of interest was prolonged LOS, defined as an index LOS >3 days. Results: Among 1006 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy, 632 (63%) had a prolonged LOS. On multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with prolonged LOS were: surgeon (P < .001), patient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06), operation time (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.01), postoperative complication (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.45-5.29), and prolonged air leak (OR, 8.95; 95% CI, 4.17-19.23). There was no significant association between LOS and gender, body mass index, coronary artery disease, prior atrial fibrillation, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, and prior ipsilateral thoracic surgery or sternotomy. There was no association between LOS ≤3 days and hospital readmission (20 [5.3%] vs 39 [5.9%]; OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.50-1.53). Conclusions: An intersurgeon variation in postoperative LOS after VATS-L exists and is independent of patient baseline characteristics or perioperative complications. This variation seems to be more closely related to differences in postoperative management and discharge practices rather than to surgical quality. Postoperative discharge within 3 days is safe and does not increase hospital readmissions.

Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsies, Transbronchial Forceps Lung Biopsies, and Surgical Lung Biopsies in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IMPORTANCE: Lung biopsies are sometimes performed in mechanically ventilated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) of unknown etiology to guide patient management. While surgical lung biopsies (SLB) offer high diagnostic rates, they may also cause significant complications. Transbronchial forceps lung biopsies (TBLB) are less invasive but often produce non-contributive specimens. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsies (TBLC) yield specimens of potentially better quality than TBLB, but due to their novel implementation in the intensive care unit (ICU), their accuracy and safety are still unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our main objective was to evaluate the risk of adverse events in patients with AHRF following the three biopsy techniques. Our secondary objectives were to assess the diagnostic yield and associated modifications of patient management of each technique. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing TBLC, TBLB, and SLB in mechanically ventilated patients with AHRF. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with at least one complication, and secondary outcomes included complication rates, diagnostic yields, treatment modifications, and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients who underwent lung biopsies from 2018 to 2022, all TBLC and SLB patients and 60% of TBLB patients had at least one complication. TBLC patients had higher unadjusted numbers of total and severe complications, but also worse Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and P/F ratios. A total of 25 biopsies (25/26, 96%) provided histopathological diagnoses, 88% (22/25) of which contributed to patient management. ICU mortality was high for all modalities (63% for TBLC, 60% for TBLB and 50% for SLB). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: All biopsy methods had high diagnostic yields and the great majority contributed to patient management; however, complication rates were elevated. Further research is needed to determine which patients may benefit from lung biopsies and to determine the best biopsy modality.

Randomized trial of routine versus on-demand intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation: A feasibility study.

In most centers, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the preferred means to provide cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation. However, there is controversy about whether intraoperative venoarterial (VA) ECMO should be used routinely or selectively. A randomized controlled trial is the best way to address this controversy. In this publication, we describe a feasibility study to assess the practicality of a protocol comparing routine versus selective VA-ECMO during lung transplantation. This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial screened all patients undergoing lung transplantation. Exclusion criteria include retransplantation, multiorgan transplantation, and cases where ECMO is mandatory. We determined that the trial would be feasible if we could recruit 19 participants over 6 months with less than 10% protocol violations. Based on the completed feasibility study, we conclude that the protocol is feasible and safe, giving us the impetus to pursue a multicenter trial with little risk of failure due to low recruitment.

The Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite surgical resection, long-term survival of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor. Adjuvant chemotherapy, the standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC, provides a marginal 5.4% benefit in survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a significant survival benefit in some patients with advanced NSCLC and are being evaluated for perioperative use in resectable NSCLC. METHODS: We conducted a literature search using the PubMed online database to identify clinical trials of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC and studies analyzing biomarkers and immune priming strategies. RESULTS: Building on previous phase I and II trials, randomized phase III trials have shown efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab, perioperative pembrolizumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant pembrolizumab in the treatment of NSCLC with improvement of event-free/disease-free survival of 24% to 42%, leading to United States Food and Drug Administration approval of these drugs in the treatment of resectable NSCLC. Three additional phase III trials have also recently reported the use of immunotherapy both before and after surgery, with pathologic complete response rates of 17% to 25%, significantly better than chemotherapy alone. Perioperative ICI therapy has comparable perioperative morbidity to chemotherapy alone and does not impair surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative immunotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, is safe and improves outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC. Questions regarding patient selection, the need for adjuvant ICI therapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the duration of perioperative immunotherapy remain to be answered by future trials.

Lobar or sublobar resection of peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We aim to highlight two recent clinical trials that have altered the approach of the management of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: The JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503 trials demonstrated that sublobar resection is noninferior to lobectomy for overall and disease-free survival in patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. SUMMARY: Since 1962, lobectomy has been deemed the gold standard treatment for operable lung cancer. However, two recent clinical trials have demonstrated that, for select patients, sublobar resection is oncologically noninferior; results, which are leading us into a new era for the surgical management of lung cancer. Notwithstanding the progress made by these studies and the opportunities that have been put forth, questions remain. This review aims at reviewing the results of both trials and to discuss future perspectives for the surgical treatment of lung cancer.

Secondary Analysis of the Rate of Second Primary Lung Cancer From Cancer and Leukemia Group B 140503 (Alliance) Trial of Lobar Versus Sublobar Resection for T1aN0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo curative surgical resection are at risk for developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). Cancer and Leukemia Group B 140503 (Alliance) was a multicenter, international, randomized, phase III trial in patients with stage T1aN0 NSCLC (using the TNM staging system seventh edition) and demonstrated the noninferiority for disease-free survival between sublobar resection (SLR) and lobar resection (LR). After surgery, patients underwent computed tomography surveillance as defined by the protocol. The determination of a SPLC was done by the treating physician and recorded in the study database. We performed an analysis of the rate of SPLC (per patient per year) and the 5-year cumulative incidence in the study population and within the SLR and LR arms. Median follow-up was 7 years. The rate per patient per year in the study population, in the SLR arm, and in the LR arm was 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.1), 3.8% (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.9), and 3.1% (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.1), respectively. The estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of SPLC in the study population, SLR arm, and LR arm was 15.9% (95% CI, 12.9 to 18.9), 17.2% (95% CI, 12.7 to 21.5), and 14.7% (95% CI, 10.6 to 18.7), respectively.

Defining Optimal Settings for Lung Cryobiopsy in End-Stage Pulmonary Disease. A Human, Ex Vivo, Diseased Lung Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate optimal settings of probe size, freezing time, and distance to the pleura that influence the size and quality of biopsy specimens during transbronchial lung cryobiopsies in ESPD. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 17 patients undergoing lung transplantation. We created a nonperfused ex vivo bronchoscopy setting to perform multiple cryobiopsies with different probe sizes (1.7, 1.9, and 2.4 mm), freezing times (3, 5, 7, 10, 20, 30 seconds), and probe distance from pleura (5, 10, and 20 mm). Alveolated pulmonary parenchyma area≥50% in histology was considered a good quality biopsy, with a minimum procedural artifact. We used logistic regression to identify independent parameters as risk factors for histologic adequacy. RESULTS: A total of 545 cryobiopsies were obtained from 34 explanted lungs after pneumonectomy for lung transplantation. The mean maximum diameter of the specimen achieved with the 1.7 probe was larger (13.5 mm) than those obtained with 1.9 and 2.4 mm probes (11.3 and 10.7 mm, P= 0.07). More pleural macroscopic damage and pleural tissue in histology occurred with the 2.4 mm probe ( P <0.001). There was no difference in the quality of specimens between the different freezing times and the distance from the pleura. CONCLUSIONS: Freezing time and distance from the pleura did not affect the histologic quality for diagnosing ESPD in severely damaged lungs. Smaller cryoprobe size did not negatively affect sample adequacy.

Lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection for peripheral clinical T1aN0 non-small cell lung cancer: A post hoc analysis of CALGB 140503 (Alliance).

BACKGROUND: We have recently reported the primary results of CALGB 140503 (Alliance), a randomized trial in patients with peripheral cT1aN0 non-small cell lung cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh) treated with either lobar resection (LR) or sublobar resection (SLR). Here we report differences in disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) between LR, segmental resection (SR), and wedge resection (WR). We also report differences between WR and SR in terms of surgical margins, rate of locoregional recurrence (LRR), and expiratory flow rate at 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: Between June 2007 and March 2017, a total of 697 patients were randomized to LR (n = 357) or SLR (n = 340) stratified by clinical tumor size, histology, and smoking history. Ten patients were converted from SLR to LR, and 5 patients were converted from LR to SLR. Survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Maier estimator and tested by the stratified log-rank test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare margins and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between groups, and the χ2 test was used to test the associations between recurrence and groups. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients had LR, 131 had SR, and 204 had WR. Basic demographic and clinical and pathologic characteristics were similar in the 3 groups. Five-year DFS was 64.7% after LR (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.6%-70.1%), 63.8% after SR (95% CI, 55.6%-73.2%), and 62.5% after WR (95% CI, 55.8%-69.9%) (P = .888, log-rank test). Five-year OS was 78.7% after LR, 81.9% after SR, and 79.7% after WR (P = .873, log-rank test). Five-year LCSS was 86.8% after LR, 89.2% after SR, and 89.7% after WR (P = .903, log-rank test). LRR occurred in 12% after SR and in 14% after WR (P = .295). At 6 months postoperatively, the median reduction in % FEV1 was 5% after WR and 3% after SR (P = .930). CONCLUSIONS: In this large randomized trial, LR, SR, and WR were associated with similar survival outcomes. Although LRR was numerically higher after WR compared to SR, the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the reduction of FEV1 between the SR and WR groups.

Outside the Cage Subcostal RATS Lobectomy: Technical Aspects and Results of the First Series of a Novel Approach to Pulmonary Lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of minimally invasive surgery is to reduce trauma to patients and improve their postoperative outcomes. In this context, the utilization of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in the treatment of lung cancer has increased worldwide. The feasibility of single-incision major pulmonary resections by RATS was recently reported, with the objective of minimizing the surgical trauma of the traditional multiportal RATS approach. However, both techniques require intercostal incisions, potentially causing immediate and chronic pain resulting from intercostal nerve injury. To reduce postoperative pain resulting from intercostal approaches, we developed a nonintercostal, outside the thoracic cage (OTC) approach for RATS lobectomy, avoiding intercostal instrumentation. This report aims to describe the results of the first reported series of OTC subcostal RATS lobectomies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a series of the first consecutive patients operated on using the novel OTC subcostal RATS lobectomy technique. RESULTS: Between August and December 2022, a total of 10 consecutive cases were analyzed. The median age was 63 (55 to 84) years, the mean body mass index was 29 (24 to 45) kg/m2, and the median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was III (II to IV). No serious adverse events were observed, and there was no conversion of the surgical technique. The mean operative time was 132.6 (98 to 223) min. The median length of stay was 2 days. No pain-related complications, readmissions, or 30-day mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that OTC RATS lobectomy is feasible and safe. A phase I clinical trial is currently underway to prospectively assess the safety of the technique as well as its clinical relevance.

Preoperative mediastinal staging in early-stage lung cancer: Targeted nodal sampling is not inferior to systematic nodal sampling.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether targeted sampling (TS), which omits biopsy of triple- normal lymph nodes (LNs) on positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), is noninferior to systematic sampling (SS) of mediastinal LNs during EBUS for staging of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients who are clinical nodal (cN)0-N1 with suspected NSCLC eligible for EBUS based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter trial. During EBUS, all patients underwent TS and then crossed over to SS, whereby at least 3 mediastinal LN stations (4R, 4L, 7) were routinely sampled. Gold standard of comparison was pathologic results. Based on the previous feasibility trial, a noninferiority margin of 6% was established for difference in missed nodal metastasis (MNM) incidence between TS and SS. The McNemar test on paired proportions was used to determine MNM incidence for each sampling method. Analysis was per-protocol using a level of significance of P < .05. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and April 2022, 91 patients were enrolled at 6 high-volume Canadian tertiary care centers. A total of 256 LNs underwent TS and SS. Incidence of MNM was 0.78% in SS and 2.34% in TS, with an absolute difference of 1.56% (95% confidence interval, -0.003% to 4.1%; P = .13). This falls within the noninferiority margin. A total of 6/256 LNs from 4 patients who were not sampled by TS were found to be malignant when sampled by SS. CONCLUSIONS: In high-volume thoracic endosonography centers, TS is not inferior to SS in nodal staging of early-stage NSCLC. This results in change of clinical management for a minority of patients.

Subsecond lung cancer detection within a heterogeneous background of normal and benign tissue using single-point Raman spectroscopy.

Significance: Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer overall and the deadliest cancer in North America. Early diagnosis through current bronchoscopy techniques is limited by poor diagnostic yield and low specificity, especially for lesions located in peripheral pulmonary locations. Even with the emergence of robotic-assisted platforms, bronchoscopy diagnostic yields remain below 80%. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether in situ single-point fingerprint (800 to 1700 cm-1) Raman spectroscopy coupled with machine learning could detect lung cancer within an otherwise heterogenous background composed of normal tissue and tissue associated with benign conditions, including emphysema and bronchiolitis. Approach: A Raman spectroscopy probe was used to measure the spectral fingerprint of normal, benign, and cancer lung tissue in 10 patients. Each interrogated specimen was characterized by histology to determine cancer type, i.e., small cell carcinoma or non-small cell carcinoma (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma). Biomolecular information was extracted from the fingerprint spectra to identify biomolecular features that can be used for cancer detection. Results: Supervised machine learning models were trained using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation, showing lung cancer could be detected with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 80%. Conclusions: This proof of concept demonstrates fingerprint Raman spectroscopy is a promising tool for the detection of lung cancer during diagnostic procedures and can capture biomolecular changes associated with the presence of cancer among a complex heterogeneous background within less than 1 s.

Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with resectable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a perioperative approach that includes both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition may provide benefit beyond either approach alone. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with early-stage NSCLC. Participants with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2 stage) NSCLC were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks, each of which was given with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 13 cycles. The dual primary end points were event-free survival (the time from randomization to the first occurrence of local progression that precluded the planned surgery, unresectable tumor, progression or recurrence, or death) and overall survival. Secondary end points included major pathological response, pathological complete response, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 397 participants were assigned to the pembrolizumab group, and 400 to the placebo group. At the prespecified first interim analysis, the median follow-up was 25.2 months. Event-free survival at 24 months was 62.4% in the pembrolizumab group and 40.6% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, or death, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.72; P<0.001). The estimated 24-month overall survival was 80.9% in the pembrolizumab group and 77.6% in the placebo group (P = 0.02, which did not meet the significance criterion). A major pathological response occurred in 30.2% of the participants in the pembrolizumab group and in 11.0% of those in the placebo group (difference, 19.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 13.9 to 24.7; P<0.0001; threshold, P = 0.0001), and a pathological complete response occurred in 18.1% and 4.0%, respectively (difference, 14.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 10.1 to 18.7; P<0.0001; threshold, P = 0.0001). Across all treatment phases, 44.9% of the participants in the pembrolizumab group and 37.3% of those in the placebo group had treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher, including 1.0% and 0.8%, respectively, who had grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved event-free survival, major pathological response, and pathological complete response as compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone followed by surgery. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups in this analysis. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme; KEYNOTE-671 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03425643.).

Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The increased detection of small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has renewed interest in sublobar resection in lieu of lobectomy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in which patients with NSCLC clinically staged as T1aN0 (tumor size, ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned to undergo sublobar resection or lobar resection after intraoperative confirmation of node-negative disease. The primary end point was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomization and disease recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points were overall survival, locoregional and systemic recurrence, and pulmonary functions. RESULTS: From June 2007 through March 2017, a total of 697 patients were assigned to undergo sublobar resection (340 patients) or lobar resection (357 patients). After a median follow-up of 7 years, sublobar resection was noninferior to lobar resection for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.24). In addition, overall survival after sublobar resection was similar to that after lobar resection (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26). The 5-year disease-free survival was 63.6% (95% CI, 57.9 to 68.8) after sublobar resection and 64.1% (95% CI, 58.5 to 69.0) after lobar resection. The 5-year overall survival was 80.3% (95% CI, 75.5 to 84.3) after sublobar resection and 78.9% (95% CI, 74.1 to 82.9) after lobar resection. No substantial difference was seen between the two groups in the incidence of locoregional or distant recurrence. At 6 months postoperatively, a between-group difference of 2 percentage points was measured in the median percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, favoring the sublobar-resection group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with peripheral NSCLC with a tumor size of 2 cm or less and pathologically confirmed node-negative disease in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, sublobar resection was not inferior to lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival. Overall survival was similar with the two procedures. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; CALGB 140503 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00499330.).

Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy and Surgical Lung Biopsy: A Prospective Multi-Centre Agreement Clinical Trial (CAN-ICE).

Rationale: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has shown promising results, but prospective studies with matched surgical lung biopsy (SLB) have yielded conflicting results. Objectives: We aimed to assess within- and between-center diagnostic agreement between TBCB and SLB at both the histopathologic and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) levels in patients with diffuse ILD. Methods: In a multicenter prospective study, we performed matched TBCB and SLB in patients referred for SLB. After a blinded review by three pulmonary pathologists, all cases were reviewed by three independent ILD teams in an MDD. MDD was performed first with TBCB, then with SLB in a second session. Within-center and between-center diagnostic agreement was evaluated using percentages and correlation coefficients. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty patients were recruited and underwent contemporaneous TBCB and SLB. Within-center diagnostic agreement between TBCB-MDD and SLB-MDD was reached in 37 of the 60 (61.7%) paired observations, resulting in a Cohen's κ value of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.63). Diagnostic agreement increased among high-confidence or definitive diagnoses on TBCB-MDD (21 of 29 [72.4%]), but not significantly, and was more likely among cases with SLB-MDD diagnoses of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis than fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (13 of 16 [81.2%] vs. 16 of 31 [51.6%]; P = 0.047). Between-center agreement for cases was markedly higher for SLB-MDD (κ = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.89]) than TBCB-MDD (κ = 0.29 [95% CI, 0.09-0.49]). Conclusions: This study demonstrated moderate TBCB-MDD and SLB-MDD diagnostic agreement for ILD, while between-center agreement was fair for TBCB-MDD and substantial for SLB-MDD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02235779).

Plain language summary of the CheckMate 816 study results: nivolumab plus chemotherapy given before surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: In this article, we summarize results from the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 816 clinical study that were published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. The goal of CheckMate 816 was to find out if nivolumab, an immunotherapy that activates a person's immune system (the body's natural defense system) to fight cancer, plus chemotherapy works better than chemotherapy alone when given before surgery in people with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that can be removed surgically (resectable NSCLC). WHAT HAPPENED IN THE STUDY?: Adults who had not previously taken medications to treat NSCLC and whose cancer could be removed with surgery were included in CheckMate 816. During this study, a computer randomly assigned the treatment each person would receive before surgery for NSCLC. In total, 179 people were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy, and 179 people were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone. The researchers assessed whether people who received nivolumab plus chemotherapy lived longer without the cancer geting worse or coming back and whether there were any cancer cells left in the tumor and lymph nodes removed by surgery. The researchers also assessed how adding nivolumab to chemotherapy affected the timing and outcomes of surgery and whether the combination of these drugs was safe. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers found that people who took nivolumab plus chemotherapy lived longer without the cancer getting worse or coming back compared with those who took chemotherapy alone. More people in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group had no cancer cells left in the tumor and lymph nodes removed by surgery. Most people went on to have surgery in both treatment groups; the people who took nivolumab plus chemotherapy instead of chemotherapy alone had less extensive surgeries and were more likely to have good outcomes after less extensive surgeries. Adding nivolumab to chemotherapy did not lead to an increase in the rate of side effects compared with chemotherapy alone, and side effects were generally mild and manageable. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: Results from CheckMate 816 support the benefit of using nivolumab plus chemotherapy before surgery for people with resectable NSCLC. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02998528 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Post-Operative Outcomes Associated With Open Versus Robotic Thymectomy: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

To compare post-operative outcomes associated with thymectomy performed using either open or robotic approaches. Retrospective cohort study from a single-center prospective registry consisting of patients undergoing thymectomy between 2000 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach (open vs robotic). A propensity-score matching analysis was performed in a 2:1 open to robotic ratio, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. We analyzed 234 thymectomies (155 open; 79 robotic). Myasthenia gravis was present in 23.2% and 32.9% (P = 0.249) in the open and in the robotic group, respectively. All covariates were balanced in the matched groups (open n = 114; robotic n =5 9), except lesion size. The robotic approach was significantly associated with shorter surgical time (median 95 vs 65 minutes, P < 0.001), lesser clinical (21.1% vs 6.8%, P = 0.016) and surgical (11.4% vs 1.7%, P = 0.036) complications during the same hospitalization, less Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher complication rates (28.1 vs 15.3%, P = 0.048), chest tube duration (median: 3 vs 0 days, P < 0.001) and in-hospital length of stay (median: 5 vs 0 days, P < 0.001). Bleeding (P = 0.214), ICU length of stay (P = 0.167), reoperation rate (open, 1.8% vs robotic 0%), 90-day mortality (P = 0.341) and readmission rate post discharge (P = 0.277) were similar between the groups. In the matched population with primary thymic epithelial tumors, the completeness of resection rate was similar (open, 92.1% vs robotic 96.8%, P = 0.66.). Robotic thymectomy is associated with improved post-operative outcomes when compared to open thymectomy, without compromising the goals of oncologic surgery. Longer follow-up is needed to ensure oncologic equivalence.

Surgical Cost Awareness Program Study: Impact of a Novel, Real-Time, Cost Awareness Intervention on Operating Room Expenses in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: For surgical patients, operating room expenses are significant drivers of overall hospitalization costs. Surgical teams often lack awareness of the costs associated with disposable surgical supplies, which may lead to unnecessary expenditures. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a Surgical Cost Awareness Program would reduce operating room costs. STUDY DESIGN: A prototype software displays the types and costs of disposable instruments used in real-time during surgery and generates insight-driven operative cost reports, which are automatically sent to the surgeons. A prospective pre-post controlled trial of thoracoscopic lobectomy procedures performed by 7 surgeons at a single academic center was conducted. Control and intervention groups consisted of consecutive cases from February 2nd through June 23, 2021, and from June 28th through December 22, 2021, respectively. The primary outcome was mean per case surgical disposables cost. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-two lobectomies were evaluated throughout the study period (control: n = 164; intervention: n = 158). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean disposables cost per case was $3,320.73 ± $814.83 in the control group compared with $2,567.64 ± $594.59 in the intervention group, representing a mean cost reduction of $753.08 (95% CI, $622.29 to $883.87; p < 0.001). All surgeons experienced a reduction in disposable costs after the intervention. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Providing real-time educational feedback to surgical teams significantly reduced costs associated with disposable surgical equipment without compromising perioperative outcomes for lobectomy. Integrating the novel AssistIQ software across other procedural settings may generate further data insights with the potential for significant cost savings on a larger scale.

Evaluation of deployment capability of a novel outside-the-scope, detachable catheter system for ablation of lung lesions in ex vivo human lung models.

Objectives: Effective transbronchial ablation of lung nodules requires precise catheter delivery to the target lesion and freedom from the bronchoscope for safety throughout the procedure and to allow for multiple catheter insertions. A fully detachable, outside-the-scope (OTS) probe system was developed that attaches to a flexible bronchoscope. Using this system, the operator can deploy the probe in the target and completely detach it from the scope. Our aim was to demonstrate the endobronchial deployment accuracy and feasibility of an OTS, detachable, simulated ablation catheter driven to peripheral lung targets in ex vivo-ventilated human lung models. Methods: A balloon catheter inflated with radiopaque contrast was used as a simulated peripheral target in freshly explanted lungs from lung transplant recipients. A simulated ablation catheter was positioned outside and aligned to the tip of the bronchoscope using the OTS system. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the bronchoscope and the catheter were driven toward the target in mechanically ventilated lungs. Once the catheter tip was confirmed within the target, the OTS system was released and the probe was detached from the scope. The bronchoscope was retracted and fluoroscopy was used to confirm the position of the catheter. Results: Twelve peripheral targets were simulated. The ablation catheter was successfully deployed with its tip positioned within 5 mm from the target and confirmed stability during multiple cycles of ventilation. Conclusions: A novel, detachable, OTS system can be successfully deployed in peripheral lung targets with potential clinical applications for multiple procedures in advanced bronchoscopy where scope freedom is advantageous.

Does Myasthenia Gravis Affect Long-Term Survival in Thymic Carcinomas? An ESTS Database Analysis.

Background: Thymic carcinoma is a rare and highly malignant tumor with a dismal prognosis, which occasionally coexists with myasthenia gravis (MG). This study aims to investigate the MG incidence on a surgical cohort of patients with thymic carcinoma and to explore its influence on long-term survival. Methods: the prospectively collected data from the ESTS database on thymic epithelial tumors were reviewed. Clinical, pathological, and survival information on thymic carcinoma were analyzed. Results: the analysis was conducted on 203 patients, with an equal gender distribution (96 males and 107 females). MG was detected in 22 (10.8%) patients, more frequently elderly (>60 years, p = 0.048) and male (p = 0.003). Induction therapy was performed in 22 (10.8%) cases. After surgery, 120 (59.1%) patients had a Masaoka stage II−III while complete resection (R0) was achieved in 158 (77.8%). Adjuvant therapy was performed in 68 cases. Mean follow-up was 60 (SD = 14) months. The 3-year, 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 79%, 75% and 63%, respectively. MG did not seem to influence long-term survival (5-year survival in non-MG−TCs 78% vs. 50% in MG−TCs, p = ns) as age < 60 years, female gender, early Masaoka stage, and postoperative radiotherapy did, conversely. Conclusions: myasthenia occurred in about 10% of thymic carcinomas and it did not seem to affect significantly the long-term prognosis in surgically treated thymic carcinoma-patients.