ERalpha and ERbeta expression and transcriptional activity are differentially regulated by HDAC inhibitors.

The proliferative action of ERalpha largely accounts for the carcinogenic activity of estrogens. By contrast, recent data show that ERbeta displays tumor-suppressor properties, thus supporting the interest to identify compounds that could increase its activity. Here, we show that histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDI) upregulated ERbeta protein levels, whereas it decreased ERalpha expression. Part of this regulation took place at the mRNA level through a mechanism independent of de novo protein synthesis. In addition, we found that, in various cancer cells, the treatment with different HDI enhanced the ligand-dependent activity of ERbeta more strongly than that of ERalpha. On the other hand, in MDA-MB231 and HeLa cells, the expression of ERs modified the transcriptional response to HDI. The use of deletion mutants of both receptors demonstrated that AF1 domain of the receptors was required. Finally, we show that ERbeta expression led to a dramatic increased in the antiproliferative activity of HDI, which correlated with a modification of the transcription of genes involved in cell cycle control by HDI. Altogether, these data demonstrate that the interference of ERbeta and HDAC on the control of transcription and cell proliferation constitute a promising approach for cancer therapy.

Oestrogen receptor alpha increases p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene expression and the antiproliferative activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors in human breast cancer cells.

We analysed the antiproliferative activity of various histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors such as trichostatin A (TSA) on human breast cancer cells. We observed a lower sensitivity to HDAC inhibition for oestrogen receptor negative (ER-) versus positive (ER+) cell lines. This differential response was associated neither with a modification of drug efflux via the multidrug resistance system nor with a global modification of histone acetyltransferase (HAT)/HDAC activities. In contrast, we demonstrated that in ER+ breast cancer cells the p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene was more sensitive to TSA regulation and was expressed at higher levels. These differences were observed both in transient transfection experiments and on the endogenous p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene. The Sp1 transcription factor, which was shown to interact in vitro with both class I and class II HDACs, is sufficient to confer the differential sensitivity to TSA and participated in the control of p21(WAF1/CIP1) basal expression. Finally, re-expression of ERalpha following adenoviral infection of ER- breast cancer cells increased both p21(WAF1/CIP1) protein accumulation and the growth inhibitory activity of TSA. Altogether, our results highlight the key role of ERalpha and p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene expression in the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to hyperacetylating agents.