Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 73
Filtrar
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 115(4): 1024-1032, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36216086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aspiration has been associated with graft dysfunction after lung transplantation, leading some to advocate for selective use of fundoplication despite minimal data supporting this practice. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study at 4 academic lung transplant centers to determine the association of gastroesophageal reflux disease and fundoplication with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and survival using Cox multivariable regression. RESULTS: Of 542 patients, 136 (25.1%) underwent fundoplication; 99 (18%) were found to have reflux disease without undergoing fundoplication. Blanking the first year after transplantation, fundoplication was not associated with a benefit regarding freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58-1.49) or death (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.47-1.99) compared with reflux disease without fundoplication. However, a time-dependent adjusted analysis found a slight decrease in mortality (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.28-1.23; P = .157), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.42-1.11; P = .126), and combined bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome or death (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.42-1.04; P = .073) in the fundoplication group compared with the gastroesophageal reflux disease group. CONCLUSIONS: Although a statistically significant benefit from fundoplication was not determined because of limited sample size, follow-up, and potential for selection bias, a randomized, prospective study is still warranted.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Bronquiolitis Obliterante , Bronquiolitis Obliterante , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/epidemiología , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos
2.
Surg Endosc ; 36(1): 778-786, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms are often present in patients with Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Whereas antireflux surgery (ARS) provides predictably excellent results in patients with typical GERD, those with atypical symptoms have variable outcomes. The goal of this study was to characterize the response of LPR symptoms to antireflux surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent ARS between January 2009 and May 2020 were prospectively identified from a single institutional database. Patient-reported information on LPR symptoms was collected at standardized time points (preoperative and 2 weeks, 8 weeks, and 1 year postoperatively) using a validated Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) questionnaire. Patients were grouped by preoperative RSI score: ≤ 13 (normal) and > 13 (abnormal). Baseline characteristics were compared between groups using chi-square test or t-test. A mixed effects model was used to evaluate improvement in RSI scores. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-six patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (mean age 57.8 years, 70% female, mean BMI 29.4). Patients with a preoperative RSI ≤ 13 (n = 61) and RSI > 13 (n = 115) were similar in age, BMI, primary reason for evaluation, DeMeester score, presence of esophagitis, and hiatal hernia (p > 0.05). The RSI > 13 group had more female patients (80 vs 52%, p = < 0.001), higher mean GERD-HRQL score, lower rates of PPI use, and normal esophageal motility. The RSI of all patients improved from a mean preoperative value of 19.2 to 7.8 (2 weeks), 6.1 (8 weeks), and 10.9 (1 year). Those with the highest preoperative scores (RSI > 30) had the best response to ARS. When analyzing individual symptoms, the most likely to improve included heartburn, hoarseness, and choking. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, patients with LPR symptoms achieved a rapid and durable response to antireflux surgery. Those with higher preoperative RSI scores experienced the greatest improvement. Our data suggest that antireflux surgery is a viable treatment option for this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Péptica , Hernia Hiatal , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo , Femenino , Fundoplicación/métodos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Humanos , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/diagnóstico , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/etiología , Reflujo Laringofaríngeo/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 31(9): 993-998, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34252333

RESUMEN

Background: Minimizing bariatric surgery care costs is important since more than 250,000 patients undergo bariatric surgery annually in the United States. The study objective was to compare perioperative costs for the two most common bariatric procedures: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). In addition, we sought to identify predictors of high-cost perioperative care. Methods: Adult patients who underwent LSG or LRYGB from 2012 to 2017 were identified using our institutional bariatric surgery database. Perioperative costs, defined as costs incurred from the time of entering the preoperative unit until exiting the postanesthesia care unit, were obtained through billing data. Median perioperative cost components of LSG and LRYGB were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate patient-level predictors of high-cost care, defined as the top tercile of perioperative costs. Results: We included 546 bariatric surgery patients with a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 49.7 years and 45.9 kg/m2, respectively. There were no significant differences in median perioperative costs between LSG and LRYGB ($14,942 versus $15,016; P = .80). Stapler use was the largest cost contributor for both procedures, accounting for 27.7% and 29.2% of costs for LSG and LRYGB, respectively. In multivariable analyses, preoperative patient characteristics, including BMI, were not associated with high-cost perioperative care. Conclusions: Perioperative costs for LSG and LRYGB were similar in our single institution study. Reducing costs outside of the operating room, including those related to ED visits and complications, may be more impactful than focusing on cost reduction directly related to perioperative care.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Surg Res ; 264: 408-417, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848840

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is the most commonly performed elective operation in the United States, with over 800,000 cases annually. While clinical outcomes comparing laparoscopic versus open techniques have been well documented, there is little data comparing costs associated with these techniques. This study evaluates the cost of healthcare resources during the 90-d postoperative period following inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Adult patients with an ICD-9 or CPT code for inguinal hernia repair from 2012 to 2014 were included. Patients with continuous enrollment for 6 mo prior to surgery and 6 mo after surgery were analyzed. Related healthcare service costs (readmission and/or ER visit and/or outpatient visit) were calculated by clinical classification software and generalized linear modeling was used to compare healthcare utilization between groups. RESULTS: 124,582 cases were identified (open = 84,535; lap = 40,047). Index surgery cost was 41% higher in laparoscopic cases. The cost for readmission was close to $25,000 and similar between both groups, but the laparoscopic group were 12% less likely to be readmitted for surgical complications within 90-d when compared to the open group. Cost of bilateral laparoscopic repair is less than that of serial unilateral open repairs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair carries a higher index surgery cost than open repair. However, open repair has an increased rate of readmission. To maximize value, efforts should be directed at minimizing readmissions and improving identification of bilateral hernias at the time of initial presentation.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hernia Inguinal/economía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/economía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Surg Endosc ; 35(8): 4794-4804, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33025250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis (GP) is hallmarked by nausea, vomiting, and early satiety. While dietary and medical therapy are the mainstay of treatment, surgery has been used to palliate symptoms. Two established first-line surgical options are gastric electrostimulation (GES) and pyloric procedures (PP) including pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy. We sought to compare these modalities' improvement in Gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) subscores and potential predictors of therapy failure. METHODS: All patients undergoing surgery at a single institution were prospectively identified and separated by surgery: GES, PP, or combined GESPP. GCSI was collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 1 year. Postoperative GCSI score over 2.5 or receipt of another gastroparesis operation were considered treatment failures. Groups were compared using Pearson's chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included: 18 GES, 51 PP, and 13 GESPP. Mean age was 44, BMI was 26.7, and 80% were female. Preoperative GCSI was 3.7. The PP group was older with more postsurgical gastroparesis. More patients with diabetes underwent GESPP. Preoperative symptom scores and gastric emptying were similar among all groups. All surgical therapies resulted in a significantly improved GCSI and nausea/vomiting subscore at 6 weeks and 1 year. Bloating improved initially, but relapsed in the GES and GESPP group. Satiety improved initially, but relapsed in the PP group. Fifty-nine (72%) had surgical success. Ten underwent additional surgery (7 crossed into the GESPP group, 3 underwent gastric resection). Treatment failures had higher preoperative GCSI, bloating, and satiety scores. Treatment failures and successes had similar preoperative gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Both gastric electrical stimulation and pyloric surgery are successful gastroparesis treatments, with durable improvement in nausea and vomiting. Choice of operation should be guided by patient characteristics and discussion of surgical risks and benefits. Combination GESPP does not appear to confer an advantage over GES or PP alone.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Gastroparesia , Piloromiotomia , Adulto , Estimulación Eléctrica , Femenino , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Gastroparesia/etiología , Gastroparesia/cirugía , Humanos , Píloro/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Surg Endosc ; 35(8): 4444-4451, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32909205

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of inguinal hernias is predominantly based on physical exam, although imaging may be used in select cases. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of unnecessary imaging used in the diagnosis of inguinal hernias. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair at a large academic health system in the U.S. from 2010 to 2017 were included. Within this cohort, we identified patients who received imaging 6 months prior to surgery. Through chart review of physical exam findings and imaging indications, we categorized patients into four imaging categories: unrelated, necessary, unnecessary, and borderline. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with receipt of unnecessary imaging. RESULTS: Of 2162 patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery, 249 patients had related imaging studies 6 months prior to surgery. 47.0% of patients received unnecessary imaging. 66.9% and 33.1% of unnecessary studies were ultrasounds and CT scans, respectively. 24.5% of patients had necessary studies, while 28.5% had studies with borderline indications. On multivariable analysis, having a BMI between 25.0 and 29.9 kg/m2 was associated with receipt of unnecessary studies. Primary care providers and ED physicians were more likely to order unnecessary imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 50% of all patients who receive any related imaging prior to surgery had potentially unnecessary diagnostic radiology studies. This not only exposes patients to avoidable risks, but also places a significant economic burden on patients and our already-strained health system.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Radiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Hernia Inguinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Surg Endosc ; 35(9): 5159-5166, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997270

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Typically, in-person follow-up in clinic is utilized after outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Studies have shown that phone follow-up may be successfully used for the detection of postoperative hernia recurrences. However, no studies have evaluated the detection rates of other postoperative complications, such as emergency department visits and readmissions, with the utilization of phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. The objective of our study was to investigate the safety of a phone follow-up care pathway following elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients who underwent elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2019 at a large academic health system in the Midwest United States were identified from the electronic health record. Patients were categorized by type of postoperative follow-up: in-person or phone follow-up. Baseline demographics, operative, and postoperative data were compared between follow-up groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate predictors of having any related emergency department (ED) visit/readmission/reoperation within 90 days. RESULTS: We included 2009 patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair during the study period. 321 patients had in-person follow-up only, while 1,688 patients had phone follow-up. There was a higher rate of laparoscopic repair in the phone follow-up group (85.4% vs. 53.0% for in-person follow-up). There were no differences in rates of related 90-day ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations between the phone and in-person follow-up groups. On multivariable logistic regression, receipt of phone follow-up was not a predictor of having 90-day ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR 1.30, 95% CI [0.83, 2.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent phone follow-up had similarly low rates of adverse outcomes to those with in-person follow-up. Phone follow-up protocols may be implemented as an alternative for patients and provide a means to decrease healthcare utilization following inguinal hernia repair.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 25(1): 28-35, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33111260

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: pH impedance testing is the most sensitive diagnostic test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The literature remains inconclusive on which preoperative pH impedance testing parameters are associated with an improvement in heartburn symptoms after anti-reflux surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate which parameters on preoperative pH impedance testing were associated with improved GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) following surgery. METHODS: Data from a single-institution foregut database were used to identify patients with reflux symptoms who underwent anti-reflux surgery between 2014 and 2020. Acid and impedance parameters were extracted from preoperative pH impedance studies. GERD-HRQL was assessed pre- and postoperatively with a questionnaire that evaluated heartburn, dysphagia, and the impact of acid-blocking medications on daily life. Patient characteristics, fundoplication type, and four pH impedance parameters were included in a multivariable linear regression model with improvement in GERD-HRQL as the outcome. RESULTS: We included 108 patients (59 Nissen and 49 Toupet fundoplications), with a median follow-up time of 1 year. GERD-HRQL scores improved from 22.4 (SD ± 10.1) preoperatively to 4.2 (± 6.2) postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, a normal preoperative acid exposure time (p = 0.01) and Toupet fundoplication (vs. Nissen; p = 0.03) were independently associated with greater improvement in GERD-HRQL. CONCLUSIONS: Of the four pH impedance parameters that were investigated, a normal preoperative acid exposure time was associated with greater improvement in quality of life after anti-reflux surgery. Further investigation into the critical parameters on preoperative pH impedance testing using a multi-institutional cohort is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopía , Impedancia Eléctrica , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Surg Endosc ; 34(4): 1704-1711, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31292743

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heller myotomy (HM) has historically been considered the gold standard treatment for achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less-invasive procedure and offers a quicker recovery. Although some studies have compared short-term outcomes of HM and POEM, predictors of long-term dysphagia resolution remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes for achalasia patients who underwent either POEM or HM over a 9-year period. METHODS: Data from our single academic institutional foregut database were used to identify achalasia patients who underwent HM or POEM from 2009 to 2018. Electronic health record data were reviewed to obtain patient characteristics and operative data. Achalasia severity stages were established for each patient using esophagram findings from an attending radiologist blinded to the procedure type. Postoperative outcomes were assessed via telephone for patients with at least 9 months of follow-up using Eckardt dysphagia scores. Patient age, sex, type of operation, and duration of follow-up were included in a multivariable linear regression model with Eckardt score as the outcome. RESULTS: Our cohort included 141 patients (97 HM and 44 POEM). Eighty-two patients completed a phone survey at the 9 months or greater time interval (response rate = 58%). Mean Eckardt scores were 2.98 and 2.53 at a median follow-up of 3 years and 1 year for HM and POEM patients, respectively (an Eckardt score ≤ 3 is considered a successful myotomy). Lower stages of achalasia on esophagram (e.g., Stage 0 vs. Stage 4) were associated with greater dysphagia improvement. On multivariable analysis, operative approach was not associated with a statistically significant difference in dysphagia outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: POEM and HM were associated with similar rates of dysphagia resolution for achalasia patients at a median of 2 years of follow-up. Both procedures appear to be durable options for achalasia treatment.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/cirugía , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Miotomía de Heller/métodos , Piloromiotomia/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Acalasia del Esófago/complicaciones , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Surg Endosc ; 34(1): 240-248, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While clinical outcomes have been reported for anti-reflux surgery (ARS), there are limited data on post-operative encounters, including readmission, and their associated costs. This study evaluates healthcare utilization during the 90-day post-operative period following ARS including fundoplication and/or paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the Truven Health MarketScan® Databases. Patients older than 16 years with an ICD-9 procedure code or Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for ARS and a primary diagnosis of GERD during 2012-2014 were selected. Healthcare spending and utilization on emergency department (ED) visits, performance of outpatient endoscopy, and readmission were examined. Reasons for readmission were classified based on ICD-9 code. RESULTS: A total of 40,853 patients were included in the cohort with a mean age of 49 years and females comprising 76.0%. Mean length of stay was 1.4 days, and 93.0% of patients underwent a laparoscopic approach. The mean cost of the index surgical admission was $24,034. Readmission occurred in 4.2% of patients, and of those, 26.3% required a surgical intervention. Patients requiring one or more related readmissions accrued additional costs of $29,513. Some of the most common reasons for readmission were related to nutritional, metabolic, and fluid and electrolyte disorders. Presentation to the ED occurred in 14.0% of patients, and outpatient upper endoscopy was required in 1.5% of patients, but with much lower associated costs as compared to readmission ($1175). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients undergoing ARS do not require additional care within 90 days of surgery. Patients who are readmitted accrue costs that almost double the overall cost of care compared to the initial hospitalization. Measures to attenuate potentially preventable readmissions after ARS may reduce healthcare utilization in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/economía , Fundoplicación/economía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Endoscopía/economía , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/economía , Hernia Hiatal/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
11.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 24(4): 949-958, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31792901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the landmark MAGIC trial in 2006, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard of care for stage II/III gastric cancer. Nevertheless, many patients still do not begin their treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The objective of our study was to identify factors associated with underutilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with pathological stage II and III primary gastric cancer between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were compared with those who underwent surgery only or surgery followed by chemotherapy. Predictors of receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified using multivariable logistic regression model. Median survival was calculated for each treatment strategy. RESULTS: We included 15,947 patients with pathological stage II/III gastric cancer. The proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased from less than 5% before 2006 to 27.5% in 2015. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with no receipt of neoadjuvant therapy included treatment year before 2006 and age greater than 80. Treatment at high-volume centers, academic research programs, or integrated network cancer programs and undergoing total/subtotal or en bloc gastrectomy predicted receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ten years after the publication of the MAGIC trial, fewer than 1/3 of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer are receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which has been shown to improve disease-specific survival. Further studies are needed to understand these disparities and ensure both patients and providers are having evidence-based discussions about multimodal therapy for gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
12.
Surg Clin North Am ; 99(3): 501-510, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047038

RESUMEN

Esophagectomy is the mainstay for treating esophageal cancers and other pathology. Even with refinements in surgical techniques and the introduction of minimally invasive approaches, the overall morbidity remains formidable. Complications, if not quickly recognized, can lead to significant long-term sequelae and even death. Vigilance with a high degree of suspicion remains the surgeon's greatest ally when caring for a patient who has recently undergone an esophagectomy. In this review, we highlight different approaches in dealing with anastomotic leaks, chyle leaks, cardiopulmonary complications, and later functional issues after esophagectomy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Quilo , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Fístula Gástrica/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Gastroparesia/etiología , Hernia Hiatal/etiología , Humanos , Neumonía/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fístula del Sistema Respiratorio/etiología , Parálisis de los Pliegues Vocales/etiología
13.
J Surg Res ; 242: 136-144, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31077945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative testing of anastomoses and staples lines is commonly performed to minimize the risk of postoperative leaks in bariatric surgery, but its impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the association between leak testing and 30-d postoperative leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission rates for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study utilizing 2015-2016 data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Postoperative outcomes were compared using χ2 test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30-d outcomes. RESULTS: We included 237,081 patients. Leak testing was performed on 73.0% and 92.1% of LSG and RYGB patients, respectively. LSG was associated with lower rates of leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission than RYGB. On multivariable analysis, intraoperative leak testing was associated with increased rates of postoperative leak for LSG and RYGB (OR 1.48 and 1.90, respectively) and lower rates of bleed for LSG (OR 0.76). There were no significant associations between leak testing and rates of reoperation or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Use of intraoperative leak testing was not associated with improved outcomes for either LSG or RYGB. A prospective trial investigating leak testing is warranted to better elucidate its impact.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Adulto , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grapado Quirúrgico/efectos adversos , Grapado Quirúrgico/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 22(6): 955-963, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404983

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the USA, a quarter of elderly patients do not receive any treatment for regional gastric cancer, which results in poorer outcomes. We sought to identify factors associated with undertreatment of regional gastric cancer in this population, as well as to assess overall survival in the undertreated population. METHODS: Elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) diagnosed with regional gastric cancer between 2001 and 2009 were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked databases. Treatment was defined as receiving any medical or surgical therapy for gastric cancer. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with failure to receive treatment. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of 5972 patients with regional gastric cancer, 1586 (26.5%) received no treatment. Median age was 78 years; 56.1% of patients were men. On multivariable analysis, the factors strongly associated with lack of therapy were age ≥ 80 years, black race, lower education level, and diagnosis before 2007. As expected, patients who received therapy had better overall survival (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Specifically, median survival and 5-year survival were 16.5 months and 20.5% for treated patients, compared with 9.1 months and 19.0% for untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with gastric cancer have better overall 5-year survival after receiving treatment for their cancer. Disparities in the use of treatment for curable cancers are associated with older age, black race, lower educational level, and diagnosis before 2007.


Asunto(s)
Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Negro o Afroamericano , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Medicare , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 14(1): 8-13, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28869165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is a common condition that bariatric surgeons encounter. Expert opinion is split on whether bariatric surgery and PEH repair should be completed concurrently or sequentially. We hypothesized that concurrent bariatric surgery and PEH repair is safe. OBJECTIVES: We examined 30-day outcomes after concomitant PEH repair and bariatric surgery. SETTING: National database, United States. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2011-2014), we identified patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with or without PEH repair. A propensity score-matching algorithm was used to compare patients who underwent either LRYGB or LSG with PEH repair. The primary outcome was overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes included mortality, serious morbidity, readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: Of the 76,343 patients in this study, 5958 (7.80%) underwent PEH repair concurrently with bariatric surgery. The frequency of bariatric operations that included PEH repair increased over time (2.14% in 2010 versus 12.17% in 2014, P<.001). The rate of PEH/LSG was higher than PEH/LRYGB in 2014 (8.9 % versus 3.2%). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the matched cohort of PEH and non-PEH patients. Subgroup analysis showed significantly greater rates of morbidity (6.20% versus 2.69%, P<.001), readmission (6.33% versus 3.06%, P<.001), and reoperation (3.00% versus 1.05%, P<.001) for PEH/LRYGB versus PEH/LSG. CONCLUSIONS: A PEH repair at the time of bariatric surgery does not appear to be associated with increased morbidity or mortality. A concurrent approach to treat patients with severe obesity and PEH appears safe.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Am J Surg ; 215(1): 196-199, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28173937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We examined the types of technology used by medical students in clinical clerkships, and the perception of technology implementation into the curriculum. METHODS: An online survey about technology use was completed prior to general surgery clinical clerkship. Types of devices and frequency/comfort of use were recorded. Perceptions of the benefits and barriers to technology use in clerkship learning were elicited. RESULTS: 125/131 (95.4%) students responded. Most students owned a smart phone (95.2%), tablet (52.8%), or both (50%); 61.6% spent > 11 h/week learning on a device at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine for educational purposes. Technology use was seen as beneficial by 97.6% of students. Classes that used technology extensively were preferred by 54% of students, although 47.2% perceived decreased faculty/classmate interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Students use mobile technology to improve how they learn new material, and prefer taking classes that incorporate information technology. However, in-person/blended curricula are preferable to completely online courses.


Asunto(s)
Prácticas Clínicas/métodos , Instrucción por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Curriculum , Cirugía General/educación , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Percepción , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Baltimore , Prácticas Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Computadoras de Mano/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Aplicaciones Móviles/estadística & datos numéricos , Teléfono Inteligente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Surg Endosc ; 32(1): 217-224, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28643054

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to have significant benefits when compared to open inguinal hernia repair, yet remains underutilized in the United States. The traditional model of short, hands-on, cognitive courses to enhance the adoption of new techniques fails to lead to significant levels of practice implementation for most surgeons. We hypothesized that a comprehensive program would facilitate the adoption of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP) for practicing surgeons. METHODS: A team of experts in simulation, coaching, and hernia care created a comprehensive training program to facilitate the adoption of TEP. Three surgeons who routinely performed open inguinal hernia repair with greater than 50 cases annually were recruited to participate in the program. Coaches were selected based on their procedural expertise and underwent formal training in surgical coaching. Participants were required to evaluate all aspects of the educational program and were surveyed out to one year following completion of the program to assess for sustained adoption of TEP. RESULTS: All three participants successfully completed the first three steps of the seven-step program. Two participants completed the full course, while the third dropped out of the program due to time constraints and low case volume. Participant surgeons rated Orientation (4.7/5), GlovesOn training (5/5), and Preceptored Cases (5/5) as highly important training activities that contributed to advancing their knowledge and technical performance of the TEP procedure. At one year, both participants were performing TEPs for "most of their cases" and were confident in their ability to perform the procedure. The total cost of the program including all travel, personal coaching, and simulation was $8638.60 per participant. DISCUSSION: Our comprehensive educational program led to full and sustained adoption of TEP for those who completed the course. Time constraints, travel costs, and case volume are major considerations for successful completion; however, the program is feasible, acceptable, and affordable.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/educación , Laparoscopía/educación , Curriculum , Educación Médica Continua/economía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos
18.
J Surg Res ; 218: 117-123, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28985837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is an effective weight loss and comorbidity treatment among severely obese patients. However, there are limited data describing its impact on patient-reported quality of life (QoL). We examined patient-reported QoL after bariatric surgery and analyzed variables associated with higher postoperative QoL. METHODS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, and weight loss data were obtained from our institutional database for patients who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2010 to December 2012. QoL scores were obtained during preoperative and postoperative visits (2, 6, 12, 24, 52, and 104 wk) from the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to generate odds ratios for variables hypothesized a priori to be associated with higher postoperative QoL. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were included in the study. Patients lost an average of 59.1% (±19.0) of excess body weight 1 y after surgery. One-year postoperative QoL scores were available for 42% of patients. Mean QoL scores improved from 0.82 preoperatively to 1.66 1 y postoperatively (P = 0.004). Patients scored higher in all individual areas of Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II: self-esteem (0.22 versus 0.36), physical activity (0.11 versus 0.31), social life (0.28 versus 0.36), work ability (0.07 versus 0.22), sexual functioning (0.04 versus 0.16), and approach to food (0.11 versus 0.26; all P values <0.05). On multivariable analysis, higher QoL was associated with private insurance/self-pay versus Medicare (odds ratio 4.20 [95% confidence interval 1.39-12.68]). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery patients experienced significant improvement in QoL 1 y after surgery. Identifying modifiable predictors of high QoL after bariatric surgery requires additional investigation.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Derivación Gástrica , Indicadores de Salud , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 27(9): 931-936, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28737451

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic fundoplication is the gold standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to medical management. Although many studies have compared Nissen fundoplication (NF) to Toupet fundoplication (TF), it is unclear which operation provides the best long-term reflux control. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after NF versus TF. METHODS: Clinical data from our single academic institutional foregut database were used to identify patients who underwent NF or TF (June 2010 to May 2016). Postoperative QoL was assessed through telephone at 1, 3, or 5 years postsurgery, using GERD-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), and Eckardt Dysphagia scores. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and satisfaction with surgery were also obtained. Trends in outcomes over time were analyzed by logistic regression or Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: Our cohort included 155 TF and 161 NF patients. TF patients reported baseline dysphagia at higher rates (42.6% versus 19.9%; P < .001) and had worse preoperative esophageal dysmotility than NF patients. There were no significant differences in GERD-HRQL or GCSI scores between TF and NF patients at any time point postoperatively. Long-term satisfaction was equivalent between TF and NF patients 5 years postoperatively (70.0% versus 77.4%; P = .67). NF patients had higher Eckardt dysphagia scores 1 year after surgery compared to TF patients, but this difference was not present at 3 or 5 years postoperatively. Over time, PPI use increased and there was a trend toward increased GERD-HRQL scores in the TF group. CONCLUSIONS: Both TF and NF provide excellent long-term satisfaction for patients with GERD. NF and TF patients reported similar postoperative QoL scores. Our finding of increasing PPI use and a trend toward worsening GERD scores following TF warrants additional investigation regarding the long-term durability of TF.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de la Motilidad Esofágica/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación
20.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 27(8): 755-760, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28557566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is the gold standard treatment for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional surgical outcomes following LARS are well described, but limited data exist regarding patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to identify preoperative characteristics that were independently associated with a high GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) following LARS. METHODS: Clinical data from our single institution foregut surgery database were used to identify all patients with GERD who underwent primary LARS from June 2010 to November 2015. Electronic health record data were reviewed to extract patient characteristics, diagnostic study characteristics, and operative data. Postoperative GERD-HRQL data were obtained through telephone follow-up. Variables hypothesized a priori to be associated with high GERD-HRQL after LARS, which were significant at P ≤ .2 on bivariate analysis, were entered into a multivariable linear regression model with GERD-HRQL as the outcome. RESULTS: The study included 248 patients; 69.0% were female, 56.9% were married, and 58.1% had concurrent atypical symptoms. The most commonly performed fundoplications were Nissen (44.8%), Toupet (41.3%), and Dor (14.1%), respectively. The median follow-up interval was 3.4 years. The telephone response rate was 60.1%. GERD-HRQL scores improved from 24.8 (SD ±11.4) preoperatively to 3.0 (SD ±5.9) postoperatively. 79.9% of patients were satisfied with their condition at follow-up. On multivariable analysis, being married (P = .04) and absence of depression (P = .02) were independently associated with a higher postoperative QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Strong social support and psychiatric well-being appear to be important predictors of a higher QoL following LARS. Optimizing social support and treating depression preoperatively and postoperatively may improve QoL outcomes for LARS patients.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/psicología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...