Results of the performance test for quality assessment of personal radiation dosimetry services including the influence of the dosimeter readout frequency.

This study was to determine the significance of factors considered for the measurement accuracy of personal dosimeter in dosimetry services such as dosimetry service, irradiation category, years of use and readout frequency. The investigation included management information questionnaire, on-site visit and blind test. The blind test with random selected personal badge was used in inter-comparison of eight dosimetry services, and the test results followed ANSI/HPS N13.11 criteria. This study also analyzed the measurement deviations if they felt in the criteria of ICRP 75 or not. One-way ANOVA tests were used to analyze the significant difference of the measurement deviations in different dosimetry services, irradiation categories, and years of use. Simple linear-regression test was performed for the significance of the prediction model between measurement deviations and readout frequencies. All visited dosimetry services followed the proper statue of basic management and passed the performance check of the tolerance level. The average deviations corresponding to category I, category II deep dose, and category II shallow dose were 6.08%, 9.49%, and 10.41% respectively. There had significant differences of measurement deviation in different dosimetry services (p < 0.0001) and irradiation categories (p = 0.016) but no significant difference in years of use (p = 0.498). There was no significance in the linear-regression model between measurement deviation and badge readout frequencies. Based on the regular calibration of the personal dosimeter, the deviation of the measured value is mainly affected by different dosimetry services and irradiation categories; and there shows no significant influence by years of use and readout frequency.

The Analysis with Quantitative Indexes for Public's Awareness of Radiation Knowledge in Taiwan.

(1) Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiation awareness level of the public in Taiwan. (2) Methods: This study designed an online survey form to investigate the radiation awareness level with six topics: basic knowledge of radiation, environmental radiation, medical radiation, radiation protection, and university/corporate social responsibility. The score of respondents were converted into knowledge and responsibility indexes for the quantitative evaluation. Logistic regression was used to assess the correlation between the knowledge index and individual factors. Paired t-test was used to assess the significant difference in knowledge index between pre-training and post-training. (3) Results: The knowledge index of each job category reflected the proportion of radiation awareness of the job. The logistic regression result indicated that radiation-related people could get higher knowledge index. The paired t-test indicated that the knowledge index before and after class had significant differences in all question topics. (4) Conclusions: The public's awareness of medical radiation was the topic that needed to be strengthened the most-the responses with high knowledge index significantly correlated with their experience in radiation education training or radiation-related jobs. It significantly increased the knowledge index of radiation if the public received radiation education training.

Estimation of the Surface Dose in Breast Irradiation by the Beam Incident Angle and the 1 cm Depth Dose.

To develop a method of estimating surface dose in whole breast irradiation, we used an anthropomorphic phantom with accessories for the simulation of different breast sizes. The surface points, which are measured by TLDs, are set along with two main directions, superior-inferior and medial-lateral. The incident angle between the photon beam and the surface and the doses at 1 cm beneath the surface at every point are assessed by a computerized treatment planning system (cTPS). With the prescription dose of 200 cGy, the average surface doses under tangential irradiation are 97.73 (±14.96) cGy, 99.90 (±10.73) cGy, and 105.26 (±9.21) cGy for large, medium, and small breast volumes, respectively. The surface dose increased in the model of small breast volume without significance (p = 0.39). The linear analysis between surface dose and the incident angle is y = 0.5258x + 69.648, R2 = 0.7131 (x: incident angle and y: surface dose). We develop the percentage of skin surface dose with reference to a depth of 1 cm (PSDR1cm) to normalize the inhomogeneous dose. The relationship between incident angle and PSDR1cm is y = 0.1894x + 36.021, R2 = 0.6536 (x: incident angle and y: PSDR1cm) by linear analysis. In conclusion, the surface dose in whole breast irradiation could be estimated from this linear relationship between PSDR1cm and incident angle in daily clinical practice by cTPS. Further in vivo data should be studied to verify this formula.

Dosimetry audits in Taiwan radiotherapy departments.

Objectives: This study examines the practice of the regulation of Standards for Medical Exposure Quality Assurance (SMEQA) in Taiwan based on on-site quality audit for radiation therapy systems from 2016 to 2019. Methods: 81 radiation therapy departments, 141 linacs, 9 γ knife systems, 34 high dose rate brachytherapy systems, 20 Tomotherapys, and 6 Cyberknives were audited yearly. Data collection and analysis for each institute's documents including QA procedure, ion chamber and electrometer calibration reports, and a questionnaire relating to machine type and staffing, were requested first and reviewed by auditors. On-site SMEQA core item measurements, including beam output, beam profile and energy constancy for external beam therapy systems, and the source strength, positioning, and timer accuracy for brachytherapy systems were audited second. More than 300 photon beams and more than 400 electron beams were measured each year. Results: There were approximately 8.9 radiotherapy units per million population, and 1.2 medical physicists per unit in Taiwan. For the output measurements, more than 78 and 75% of the photon beams and electron beams, respectively, from linacs were with deviations within ±1.0%. Photon beams have lower beam quality measurement deviations than electron beams. Including in-plane and cross-plane measurements, more than 90 and 85% photon and electron beams, respectively, were with flatness consistency within 1.0%. All audit measurements were within the SMEQA acceptance criteria. Conclusions: According to SMEQA regulations on-site QA audits were successfully carried out from 2016 to 2019 for all Taiwan radiotherapy units. The measurement results showed high quality machine performance in Taiwan. Advances in knowledge: Dosimetry audits with directly acquired measurement readings have lower uncertainties; allow immediate feedback, discussion, and adjustment in a timely manner. In addition to regulation system establishment and education and training implementation, the machine quality is closely related to machine maintenance implementation.