Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE), a natural polyphenol to increase the therapeutic window for lung adenocarcinomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lung cancers are highly resistant to radiotherapy, necessitating the use of high doses, which leads to radiation toxicities such as radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) has been suggested to have anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in tumour cells, while radioprotective anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects in the normal tissue. We investigated the radiosensitizing and radioprotective effects of CAPE in lung cancer cell lines and normal tissue in vitro and ex vivo, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects of CAPE in lung cancer were investigated using viability and clonogenic survival assays. The radioprotective effects of CAPE were assessed in vitro and ex vivo using precision cut lung slices (PCLS). Potential underlying molecular mechanisms of CAPE focusing on cell cycle, cell metabolism, mitochondrial function and pro-inflammatory markers were investigated. RESULTS: Treatment with CAPE decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 57.6 ± 16.6 µM). Clonogenic survival assays showed significant radiosensitization by CAPE in lung adenocarcinoma lines (p < 0.05), while no differences were found in non-adenocarcinoma lines (p ≥ 0.13). Cell cycle analysis showed an increased S-phase (p < 0.05) after incubation with CAPE in the majority of cell lines. Metabolic profiling showed that CAPE shifted cellular respiration towards glycolysis (p < 0.01), together with mitochondrial membrane depolarization (p < 0.01). CAPE induced a decrease in NF-κB activity in adenocarcinomas and decreased pro-inflammatory gene expression in PCLS. CONCLUSION: The combination of CAPE and radiotherapy may be a potentially effective approach to increase the therapeutic window in lung cancer patients.

Independent and functional validation of a multi-tumour-type proliferation signature.

BACKGROUND: Previously we demonstrated that an mRNA signature reflecting cellular proliferation had strong prognostic value. As clinical applicability of signatures can be controversial, we sought to improve our marker's clinical utility by validating its biological relevance, reproducibility in independent data sets and applicability using an independent technique. METHODS: To facilitate signature evaluation with quantitative PCR (qPCR) a novel computational procedure was used to reduce the number of signature genes without significant information loss. These genes were validated in different human cancer cell lines upon serum starvation and in a 168 xenografts panel. Analyses were then extended to breast cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient cohorts. RESULTS: Expression of the qPCR-based signature was dramatically decreased under starvation conditions and inversely correlated with tumour volume doubling time in xenografts. The signature validated in breast cancer (hazard ratio (HR)=1.63, P<0.001, n=1820) and NSCLC adenocarcinoma (HR=1.64, P<0.001, n=639) microarray data sets. Lastly, qPCR in a node-negative, non-adjuvantly treated breast cancer cohort (n=129) showed that patients assigned to the high-proliferation group had worse disease-free survival (HR=2.25, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a qPCR-based proliferation signature. This test might be used in the clinic to select (early-stage) patients for specific treatments that target proliferation.