A treatment algorithm for ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy has been the focus of increased attention by cardiologists due to recent evidence of an important outcome study comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus optimal medical treatment vs optimal medical treatment alone, concluding for the futility of myocardial revascularization by PCI. A relatively older trial of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the same condition, on the other hand, had concluded for some prognostic improvement at a long-term follow-up. This short manuscript addresses how to triage such patients, frequently encountered in medical practice and considering clinical presentation, imaging results, and surgical risk, to provide practical guidance to treatment.

What Is New in Risk Assessment in Nuclear Cardiology?

Nuclear cardiology techniques allow in-depth evaluation of cardiac patients. A body of literature has established the use of nuclear cardiology. The results obtained with traditional cameras have been reinforced by those obtained with a series of innovations that have revolutionized the field of nuclear cardiology. This article highlights the role of nuclear cardiology in the risk assessment of patients with cardiac disease and sheds light on advancements of nuclear imaging techniques in the cardiovascular field. Patient risk stratification has a key role in modern precision medicine. Nuclear cardiac imaging techniques may quantitatively investigate major disease mechanisms of different cardiac pathologies.

Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: For Whom and How.

Background Myocardial revascularization has been advocated to improve myocardial function and prognosis in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). We discuss the evidence for revascularization in patients with ICM and the role of ischemia and viability detection in guiding treatment. Methods and Results We searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the prognostic impact of revascularization in ICM and the value of viability imaging for patient management. Out of 1397 publications, 4 randomized controlled trials were included, enrolling 2480 patients. Three trials (HEART [Heart Failure Revascularisation Trial], STICH [Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure], and REVIVED [REVascularization for Ischemic VEntricular Dysfunction]-BCIS2) randomized patients to revascularization or optimal medical therapy. HEART was stopped prematurely without showing any significant difference between treatment strategies. STICH showed a 16% lower mortality with bypass surgery compared with optimal medical therapy at a median follow-up of 9.8 years. However, neither the presence/extent of left ventricle viability nor ischemia interacted with treatment outcomes. REVIVED-BCIS2 showed no difference in the primary end point between percutaneous revascularization or optimal medical therapy. PARR-2 (Positron Emission Tomography and Recovery Following Revascularization) randomized patients to imaging-guided revascularization versus standard care, with neutral results overall. Information regarding the consistency of patient management with viability testing results was available in ≈65% of patients (n=1623). No difference in survival was revealed according to adherence or no adherence to viability imaging. Conclusions In ICM, the largest randomized controlled trial, STICH, suggests that surgical revascularization improves patients' prognosis at long-term follow-up, whereas evidence supports no benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention. Data from randomized controlled trials do not support myocardial ischemia or viability testing for treatment guidance. We propose an algorithm for the workup of patients with ICM considering clinical presentation, imaging results, and surgical risk.

Use of cardiac imaging in chronic coronary syndromes: the EURECA Imaging registry.

BACKGROUND: The prospective, multicentre EURECA registry assessed the use of imaging and adoption of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines (GL) in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). METHODS: Between May 2019 and March 2020, 5156 patients were recruited in 73 centres from 24 ESC member countries. The adoption of GL recommendations was evaluated according to clinical presentation and pre-test probability (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: The mean age of the population was 64 ± 11 years, 60% of patients were males, 42% had PTP >15%, 27% had previous CAD, and ejection fraction was <50% in 5%. Exercise ECG was performed in 32% of patients, stress imaging as the first choice in 40%, and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in 22%. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the first or downstream test in 17% and 11%, respectively. Obstructive CAD was documented in 24% of patients, inducible ischaemia in 19%, and 13% of patients underwent revascularization. In 44% of patients, the overall diagnostic process did not adopt the GL. In these patients, referral to stress imaging (21% vs. 58%; P < 0.001) or CTCA (17% vs. 30%; P < 0.001) was less frequent, while exercise ECG (43% vs. 22%; P < 0.001) and ICA (48% vs. 15%; P < 0.001) were more frequently performed. The adoption of GL was associated with fewer ICA, higher proportion of diagnosis of obstructive CAD (60% vs. 39%, P < 0.001) and revascularization (54% vs. 37%, P < 0.001), higher quality of life, fewer additional testing, and longer times to late revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CCS, current clinical practice does not adopt GL recommendations on the use of diagnostic tests in a significant proportion of patients. When the diagnostic approach adopts GL recommendations, invasive procedures are less frequently used and the diagnostic yield and therapeutic utility are superior.

Prognostic impact of patients' management based on anatomic/functional phenotype: a study in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: In stable coronary artery disease (CAD), the prognostic interaction between clinical variables and treatment appropriateness based on anatomic/functional phenotype needs to be evaluated. METHODS: 1585 consecutive patients underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and coronary angiography within 90 days. Obstructive CAD (> 70% stenosis) with downstream moderate-to-severe ischemia (> 10%) was considered significant. Coronary revascularization was considered appropriate if all hemodynamically significant lesions were revascularized, while medical therapy only was deemed appropriate in the absence of hemodynamically significant CAD. RESULTS: Obstructive CAD and moderate-to-severe ischemia were documented in 1184 (75%) and 466 (29%) patients, respectively. Over mean follow-up of 4.7 ± 2.5 years, the primary endpoint (cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction) occurred in 132 (8.2%) patients. Of patients with obstructive CAD, 797 (67%) were managed appropriately. Patients' management was inappropriate in 389 patients, because either non-hemodynamically significant lesions were revascularized (50%, including 2 patients with non-obstructive lesions being inappropriately revascularized) or ischemia-causing CAD was left untreated (50%). At multivariate analysis, an inappropriate management (P < .001) was correlated with the primary endpoint, together with previous myocardial infarction (P = .009), lower ejection fraction (P < .001) and higher glucose levels (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In stable CAD patients, management based on anatomic/functional phenotyping was correlated with a prognostic advantage at long-term follow-up. Correlation between treatment categories and patients' prognosis. A significantly higher event-rate was observed in patients where hemodynamically significant coronary lesions were left untreated-either because MT was not-adherently chosen or in the case of incomplete revascularization-than in those that were revascularized completely (17.6% vs 5.1%; P < .001). Conversely, the revascularization of non-hemodynamically significant CAD correlated with a higher event-rate than that of similar patients managed medically (13.8% vs 8.3%, P = .04). The event-rate of patients in whom coronary revascularization was performed in the presence of hemodynamically significant CAD ('appropriate revascularization') was similar to those with "No CAD/non-obstructive CAD" (5.1% vs 3.5%; P = NS).

Cardiac Imaging on COVID-19 Pandemic Era: the Stand, The Lost, and Found.

Purpose of Review: The present review will outline the main effects of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular pathologies, focusing on the role of modern non-invasive cardiac imaging techniques in this setting. Recent Findings: Multimodality cardiac imaging seems particularly suited for the in-depth characterization of patients with COVID-19, allowing the assessment of the variegated impact of the disease on the different aspects of myocardial perfusion, structure, and function. Summary: The infection of SARS-CoV-2, leading to the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), has represented a consistent challenge for the organization of the healthcare systems, associating to a significant increase of the fatality rate of different acute and chronic disease. Moreover, the reallocation of healthcare providers led to a significant reduction of the availability of tests and therapies, with the deferral of non-urgent tests and non-lifesaving procedures.

The diagnostic value of SPECT CZT quantitative myocardial blood flow in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of global MBF and MFR quantitation performed by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) for the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: 52 CAD patients underwent CZT MPS, with the evaluation of MBF and MFR, followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). According to MPS and ICA results, all patients were divided into three groups: (1) non-obstructive CAD and normal MPS scan (control group) (n = 7), (2) one vessel disease (1VD) (n = 16), (3) multivessel disease (MVD) (n = 29). RESULTS: Global absolute MBF and MFR were significantly reduced in MVD patients as compared to those with 1VD [0.93 (IQR 0.76; 1.39) vs 1.94 (1.37; 2.21) mL·min-1·g-1, P = .00012] and [1.4 (IQR 1.02; 1.85) vs 2.3 (1.8; 2.67), P = . 0 004], respectively. The Syntax score correlated with global stress MBF (ρ = - 0.64; P < .0001) and MFR (ρ = - 0.53; P = .0003). ROC analysis showed higher sensitivity and specificity for stress MBF and MFR compared with semiquantitative MPS stress evaluation. Multivariate regression analysis showed that only stress MBF [OR (95% CI) 0.59 (0.42-0.82); P < .0003] was an independent predictor of MVD. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative myocardial blood flow values assessed with the use of CZT camera may identify high-risk patients, such as those with multivessel disease.

Cardiac sympathetic dysfunction in left ventricular hypertrophy caused by arterial hypertension and degenerative aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate cardiac sympathetic innervation in hypertensive patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (H) and aortic stenosis (AS) submitted to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two hypertensive elders (82 ± 5 years) with severe AS and significant LVH (> 122 g·m-2 in women and > 149 g·m-2 in men) were compared with 14 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (HT) with similar degree of LVH and 10 controls. 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT acquisitions were obtained to assess sympathetic innervation and LV perfusion. The innervation/perfusion mismatch score was taken as an indicator of cardiac sympathetic dysfunction. The imaging protocol was repeated 6 months after TAVI. Regional MIBG uptake was more heterogeneous in HT and AS patients than controls, and therefore, innervation/perfusion mismatch score was higher in both AS (9 ± 8) and HT (5 ± 2) than controls (1 ± 1, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, significant LVH was the major predictor of impaired LV sympathetic innervation (OR 19.45, 95% CI 1.87-201.92; P = .013). After TAVI, no differences in measures of LV sympathetic innervation were evident, although only a marginal LV mass reduction was observed (- 5.4 ± 2.4 g). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac sympathetic innervation is impaired in patients with LVH, either with AS or not, and is not impacted significantly by TAVI procedure.

Association of Circulating Heme Oxygenase-1, Lipid Profile and Coronary Disease Phenotype in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway has an emerging role in atherosclerosis. Activated by oxidative stress, it is deemed to exert athero-protective effects. We aimed at evaluating the relationships between plasma HO-1, clinical/molecular profiles and coronary disease patterns in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). METHODS: HO-1 was measured in 526 patients (60 ± 9 years, 318 males) with CCS. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and stress imaging were used to assess the disease phenotype (coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial ischemia) in a subgroup of 347 patients. RESULTS: In the overall population, HO-1 median value (25-75 percentile) was 5.195 (1.75-8.25) ng/mL. Patients with higher HO-1 were more frequently male, had a higher BMI and lower LVEF%, but otherwise similar risk factors than the other patients. Their bio-humoral profile was characterized by higher markers of endothelial/myocardial dysfunction, but lower levels of cholesterol lipoproteins. Coronary artery disease was characterized by more diffuse atherosclerosis, with mainly non-obstructive and calcified plaques, and a higher prevalence of functional ischemia. CONCLUSION: In patients with CCS, higher plasma HO-1 levels are associated with lower cholesterol and a more diffuse but mainly non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis, confirming a potential role for the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway as a protective feedback.

Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The Role of Imaging.

In the last decades, the effective management of some cardiovascular risk factors in the general population has led to a progressive decrease in the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Nevertheless, coronary heart disease remains the major cause of death in developed and developing countries and chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) are still a major target of utilization of non-invasive cardiac imaging and invasive procedures. Current guidelines recommend the use of non-invasive imaging in patients with CCS to identify subjects at higher risk to be referred for invasive coronary angiography and possible revascularization. These recommendations are challenged by two opposite lines of evidence. Recent trials have somewhat questioned the efficacy of coronary revascularization as compared with optimal medical therapy in CCS. As a consequence the role of imaging in these patients and in in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy is under debate. On the other hand, real-life data indicate that a consistent proportion of patients undergo invasive procedure and are revascularized without any previous non-invasive imaging characterization. On top of this, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the sanitary systems caused a change in the current management of patients with CAD. In the present review we will discuss these conflicting data analyzing the evidence which has been recently accumulated as well as the gaps of knowledge which should still be filled.

Triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol predict coronary heart disease risk in patients with stable angina.

We assessed whether high triglycerides (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, expressed by an increased TG/HDL-C ratio, predict coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD) outcomes in patients with stable angina. We studied 355 patients (60 ± 9 years, 211 males) with stable angina who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), were managed clinically and followed for 4.5 ± 0.9 years. The primary composite outcome was all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction. At baseline, the proportion of males, patients with metabolic syndrome, diabetes and obstructive CAD increased across TG/HDL-C ratio quartiles, together with markers of insulin resistance, hepatic and adipose tissue dysfunction and myocardial damage, with no difference in total cholesterol or LDL-C. At follow-up, the global CTA risk score (HR 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.09, P = 0.001) and the IV quartile of the TG/HDL-C ratio (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.30-6.26, P < 0.01) were the only independent predictors of the primary outcome. The TG/HDL-C ratio and the CTA risk score progressed over time despite increased use of lipid-lowering drugs and reduction in LDL-C. In patients with stable angina, high TG and low HDL-C levels are associated with CAD related outcomes independently of LDL-C and treatments.Trial registration. EVINCI study: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00979199, registered September 17, 2009; SMARTool study: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04448691, registered June 26, 2020.