ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach.

BACKGROUND: Cancers with a defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system contain thousands of mutations most frequently located in monomorphic microsatellites and are thereby defined as having microsatellite instability (MSI). Therefore, MSI is a marker of dMMR. MSI/dMMR can be identified using immunohistochemistry to detect loss of MMR proteins and/or molecular tests to show microsatellite alterations. Together with tumour mutational burden (TMB) and PD-1/PD-L1 expression, it plays a role as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy. METHODS: To define best practices to implement the detection of dMMR tumours in clinical practice, the ESMO Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group launched a collaborative project, based on a systematic review-approach, to generate consensus recommendations on the: (i) definitions related to the concept of MSI/dMMR; (ii) methods of MSI/dMMR testing and (iii) relationships between MSI, TMB and PD-1/PD-L1 expression. RESULTS: The MSI-related definitions, for which a consensus frame-work was used to establish definitions, included: 'microsatellites', 'MSI', 'DNA mismatch repair' and 'features of MSI tumour'. This consensus also provides recommendations on MSI testing; immunohistochemistry for the mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 represents the first action to assess MSI/dMMR (consensus with strong agreement); the second method of MSI/dMMR testing is represented by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assessment of microsatellite alterations using five microsatellite markers including at least BAT-25 and BAT-26 (strong agreement). Next-generation sequencing, coupling MSI and TMB analysis, may represent a decisive tool for selecting patients for immunotherapy, for common or rare cancers not belonging to the spectrum of Lynch syndrome (very strong agreement). The relationships between MSI, TMB and PD-1/PD-L1 expression are complex, and differ according to tumour types. CONCLUSIONS: This ESMO initiative is a response to the urgent questions raised by the growing success of immunotherapy and provides also important insights on the relationships between MSI, TMB and PD-1/PD-L1.

RAS testing for colorectal cancer patients is reliable in European laboratories that pass external quality assessment.

Wild-type status of KRAS and the NRAS gene (exon 2, 3, and 4) in the tumor should be determined before treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with EGFR-targeting agents. There is a large variation in test methods to determine RAS status, and more sensitive detection methods were recently introduced. Data from quality assessment programs indicate substantial error rates. This study assessed the completeness and correctness of RAS testing in European laboratories that successfully passed external quality assessment (EQA). Participants were requested to send material of their most recent ten patients with mCRC who had been tested for RAS status. Isolated DNA, a hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue slide with a marked area for macrodissection and accompanying patient reports were requested. Samples were reevaluated in a reference laboratory by using a next-generation sequencing approach. In total, 31 laboratories sent in the requested material (n = 309). Despite regulations for anti-EGFR therapy, one institute did not perform full RAS testing. Reanalysis was possible for 274 samples with sufficient DNA available. In the hotspot codons of KRAS and NRAS, seven discordant results were obtained in total, five of them leading to a different prediction of anti-EGFR therapy efficacy (2%; n = 274). Results show that oncologists can rely on the quality of laboratories with good performance in EQA. Oncologists need to be aware that the testing laboratory participates successfully in EQA programs. Some EQA providers list the good performing laboratories on their website.

Using a semi-conductor sequencing-based panel for genotyping of HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer: a retrospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of testing actionable mutations in small amounts of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material in multiple genes of the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway and to determine the frequency of these mutations in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). DESIGN: A retrospective pilot study was performed. SETTING: In OPC, no predictive markers for response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition are known. Therefore, identifying predictive biomarkers is of utmost importance, but is often hampered by the small amount of tumour material available. PARTICIPANTS: We included the archival material of 45 OPC, all treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy between 2003 and 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Besides the HPV status, we assessed mutations using a gene panel that targets 16 genes in the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway and six other genes. The polymerase chain reaction required only 10 ng DNA. RESULTS: In total, 42 of the 45 biopsies have been successfully analysed. In total 20 of 42 samples were HPV-positive and 22 of 42 were HPV-negative. In the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway, mutations in PIK3CA were most frequently identified. A TP53 mutation was identified in one HPV-positive sample and in 13 HPV-negative samples. Additionally, three mutations in three different genes were found. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated an assay to identify mutations in the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway. As only small amounts of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material are sufficient for reliable analysis, this test opens up new possibilities for personalised medicine.

The genetic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer predisposition - guidelines for gene discovery.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a cumulative term applied to a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of neoplasms that occur in the bowel. Based on twin studies, up to 45 % of the CRC cases may involve a heritable component. Yet, only in 5-10 % of these cases high-penetrant germline mutations are found (e.g. mutations in APC and DNA mismatch repair genes) that result in a familial aggregation and/or an early onset of the disease. Genome-wide association studies have revealed that another ~5 % of the CRC cases may be explained by a cumulative effect of low-penetrant risk factors. Recent attempts to identify novel genetic factors using whole exome and whole genome sequencing has proven to be difficult since the remaining, yet to be discovered, high penetrant CRC predisposing genes appear to be rare. In addition, most of the moderately penetrant candidate genes identified so far have not been confirmed in independent cohorts. Based on literature examples, we here discuss how careful patient and cohort selection, candidate gene and variant selection, and corroborative evidence may be employed to facilitate the discovery of novel CRC predisposing genes. CONCLUSIONS: The picture emerges that the genetic predisposition to CRC is heterogeneous, involving complex interplays between common and rare (inter)genic variants with different penetrances. It is anticipated, however, that the use of large clinically well-defined patient and control datasets, together with improved functional and technical possibilities, will yield enough power to unravel this complex interplay and to generate accurate individualized estimates for the risk to develop CRC.

Fourfold increased detection of Lynch syndrome by raising age limit for tumour genetic testing from 50 to 70 years is cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: Recognising colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) can increase life expectancy of these patients and their close relatives. To improve identification of this under-diagnosed disease, experts suggested raising the age limit for CRC tumour genetic testing from 50 to 70 years. The present study evaluates the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this strategy. METHODS: Probabilistic efficacy and cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out comparing tumour genetic testing of CRC diagnosed at age 70 or below (experimental strategy) versus CRC diagnosed at age 50 or below (current practice). The proportions of LS patients identified and cost-effectiveness including cascade screening of relatives, were calculated by decision analytic models based on real-life data. RESULTS: Using the experimental strategy, four times more LS patients can be identified among CRC patients when compared with current practice. Both the costs to detect one LS patient (€9437/carrier versus €4837/carrier), and the number needed to test for detecting one LS patient (42 versus 19) doubled. When family cascade screening was included, the experimental strategy was found to be highly cost-effective according to Dutch standards, resulting in an overall ratio of €2703 per extra life-year gained in additionally tested patients. CONCLUSION: Testing all CRC tumours diagnosed at or below age 70 for LS is cost-effective. Implementation is important as relatives from the large number of LS patients that are missed by current practice, can benefit from life-saving surveillance.

HNF4A immunohistochemistry facilitates distinction between primary and metastatic breast and gastric carcinoma.

The distinction between primary gastric adenocarcinoma and gastric metastatic breast carcinoma can be difficult. Expression of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4A (HNF4A) has been described as being specific to distinguish between neoplastic gastric and breast epithelial cells. The aim of this study was to validate the use of HNF4A with immunohistochemistry in discriminating gastric from breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemical expressions of HNF4A, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and BRST-2 were determined in primary sporadic gastric adenocarcinomas (n = 107) and breast carcinomas (n = 105). The same markers and clinicopathological features were studied in 1 patient with breast metastasis of gastric cancer, 6 patients with gastric metastases of breast cancer, and 13 patients with both primary gastric and breast carcinomas. HNF4A expression was seen in 106 of 107 primary gastric adenocarcinomas and was absent in all 105 primary breast carcinomas (sensitivity 99 %, specificity 100 %). ER, PR, and BRST-2 were 100 % specific for breast carcinomas with sensitivities of 77, 58, and 38 %, respectively. The metastasis of gastric carcinoma to the breast showed strong expression of HNF4A. None of the metastases of breast carcinomas to the stomach showed expression of HNF4A. Tissues of patients with two primary carcinomas showed strong expression of HNF4A in all gastric carcinomas and no expression in breast carcinomas. Our results indicate that HNF4A is a very good marker to discriminate between primary and metastatic gastric and breast carcinomas.

Young age and a positive family history of colorectal cancer are complementary selection criteria for the identification of Lynch syndrome.

Families at high risk for Lynch syndrome can effectively be recognised by microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of a MSI test for the identification of Lynch syndrome in patients selected by a pathologist mainly based on young age at diagnosis (MSI-testing-indicated-by-a-Pathologist; MIPA), with that of patients selected by a clinical geneticist mainly based on family history (MSI-testing-indicated-by-Family-History; MIFH). Patients with a Lynch syndrome associated tumour were selected using MIPA (n=362) or MIFH (n=887). Germline DNA mutation testing was performed in 171 out of 215 patients (80%) with a MSI positive tumour. MSI was tested positive in 20% of the MIPA-group group compared to 16% in the MIFH-group (P=0.291). In 91 of 171 patients with MSI positive tumours tested for germline mutations were identified as Lynch syndrome patients: 42% in the MIPA-group and 56% in the MIFH-group (P=0.066). Colorectal cancer (CRC) or endometrial cancer (EC) presenting at an age below 50 years would have led to the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in 89% of these families (CRC below 50 years: 88% and EC below 50 years: 12%). Families detected by MIPA were characterised more often by extracolonic Lynch syndrome associated malignancies, especially EC (P<0.001). Our results indicate that recognition of Lynch syndrome by CRC or EC below 50 years is as effective as a positive family history. Families from patients selected by individual criteria more often harbour extracolonic Lynch syndrome associated malignancies.

Tumours with loss of MSH6 expression are MSI-H when screened with a pentaplex of five mononucleotide repeats.

BACKGROUND: microsatellite instability (MSI) is commonly screened using a panel of two mononucleotide and three dinucleotide repeats as recommended by a consensus meeting on MSI tumours held at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA). According to these recommendations, tumours are classified as MSI-H when at least two of the five microsatellite markers show instability, MSI-L when only one marker shows instability and MSS when none of the markers show instability. Almost all MSI-H tumours are characterised by alterations in one of the four major proteins of the mismatch repair (MMR) system (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) that renders them MMR deficient, whereas MSI-L and MSS tumours are generally MMR proficient. However, tumours from patients with a pathogenic germline mutation in MSH6 can sometimes present an MSI-L phenotype with the NCI panel. The MSH6 protein is not involved in the repair of mismatches of two nucleotides in length and consequently the three dinucleotide repeats of the NCI panel often show stability in MSH6-deficient tumours. METHODS: a pentaplex panel comprising five mononucleotide repeats has been recommended as an alternative to the NCI panel to determine tumour MSI status. Several studies have confirmed the sensitivity, specificity and ease of use of the pentaplex panel; however, its sensitivity for the detection of MSH6-deficient tumours is so far unknown. Here, we used the pentaplex panel to evaluate MSI status in 29 tumours known to harbour an MSH6 defect. RESULTS: MSI-H status was confirmed in 15 out of 15 (100%) cases where matching normal DNA was available and in 28 out of 29 (97%) cases where matching DNA was not available or was not analysed. CONCLUSION: these results show that the pentaplex assay efficiently discriminates the MSI status of tumours with an MSH6 defect.

Risk of urothelial bladder cancer in Lynch syndrome is increased, in particular among MSH2 mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal, endometrial and upper urinary tract tumours are characteristic for Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colon carcinoma, HNPCC). The aim of the present study was to establish whether carriers of mutations in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 are at increased risk of urinary bladder cancer. METHODS: Carriers and first degree relatives of 95 families with a germline mutation in the MLH1 (n=26), MSH2 (n=43), or MSH6 (n=26) gene were systematically questioned about the occurrence of carcinoma. The cumulative risk of cancer occurring before the age of 70 years (CR70) was compared to the CR70 of the general Dutch population. Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins was performed on bladder tumour tissue. RESULTS: Bladder cancer was diagnosed in 21 patients (90% men) from 19 Lynch syndrome families (2 MLH1, 15 MSH2, and 4 MSH6). CR70 for bladder cancer was 7.5% (95% CI 3.1% to 11.9%) for men and 1.0% (95% CI 0% to 2.4%) for women, resulting in relative risks for mutation carriers and first degree relatives of 4.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 7.2) for men and 2.2 (95% CI 0.3 to 8.0) for women. Men carrying an MSH2 mutation and their first degree relatives were at highest risks: CR70 for bladder and upper urinary tract cancer being 12.3% (95% CI 4.3% to 20.3%) and 5.9% (95% CI 0.7% to 11.1%). Bladder cancer tissue was MSI positive in 6/7 tumours and loss of IHC staining was found in 14/17 tumours, indicating Lynch syndrome aetiology. CONCLUSION: Patients with Lynch syndrome carrying an MSH2 mutation are at increased risk of urinary tract cancer including bladder cancer. In these cases surveillance should be considered.

Deficient mismatch repair system in patients with sporadic advanced colorectal cancer.

A deficient mismatch repair system (dMMR) is present in 10-20% of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a favourable prognosis in early stage disease. Data on patients with advanced disease are scarce. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and outcome of sporadic dMMR in advanced CRC. Data were collected from a phase III study in 820 advanced CRC patients. Expression of mismatch repair proteins was examined by immunohistochemistry. In addition microsatellite instability analysis was performed and the methylation status of the MLH1 promoter was assessed. We then correlated MMR status to clinical outcome. Deficient mismatch repair was found in only 18 (3.5%) out of 515 evaluable patients, of which 13 were caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. The median overall survival in proficient MMR (pMMR), dMMR caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter and total dMMR was 17.9 months (95% confidence interval 16.2-18.8), 7.4 months (95% CI 3.7-16.9) and 10.2 months (95% CI 5.9-19.8), respectively. The disease control rate in pMMR and dMMR patients was 83% (95% CI 79-86%) and 56% (30-80%), respectively. We conclude that dMMR is rare in patients with sporadic advanced CRC. This supports the hypothesis that dMMR tumours have a reduced metastatic potential, as is observed in dMMR patients with early stage disease. The low incidence of dMMR does not allow drawing meaningful conclusions about the outcome of treatment in these patients.

The impact of a false-positive MRI on the choice for mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers is limited.

PURPOSE: To assess the false-positive rate of breast cancer surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in BRCA mutation carriers and the impact of an abnormal mammography or breast MRI on the patients' decision for prophylactic mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 196 BRCA mutation carriers were included with a median follow-up of 2 years (range 1-9) with annual mammography and MRI. Preference for prophylactic mastectomy was registered at first surveillance after the mutation carriership was revealed. RESULTS: In all, 41% (81 of 196) of the women had at least one positive MRI or mammography. Malignancy was detected in 17 women: 11 at surveillance, 4 at an intended prophylactic mastectomy and 2 had an interval cancer. Imaging by mammography and MRI had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 90%. The probability that a positive MRI result is false positive was 83%. In the group with a prior preference for mastectomy with and without a false-positive imaging, prophylactic mastectomy was carried out in 89% and 66%, respectively (P = 0.06), in the group with prior preference for surveillance these percentages were 15% and 11%, respectively (P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Although the rate of false-positive MRI results is high, the impact on the choice for prophylactic mastectomy is limited and is determined by the woman's preference before the establishment of a BRCA mutation.

Predisposition to colorectal cancer: exploiting copy number variation to identify novel predisposing genes and mechanisms.

Although cancer is mostly regarded as an acquired disease, familial predisposition plays a significant role in many cancer types. Thus far, several high penetrant cancer predisposing genes have been identified. As yet, however, these genes explain only a fraction of the familial and/or hereditary cases of cancer. This has led to the exploration of the human genome for novel cancer predisposing genes. The identification of such genes will not only increase our understanding of cancer predisposition and development, but will also have direct implications for genetic counseling and personalized management of the patients and their family members. Here we provide an inventory of currently known molecular mechanisms related to familial colorectal cancer development and an outline of copy number analysis-based strategies to identify new predisposing genes. Finally, we discuss a novel copy number-associated epigenetic mechanism underlying the predisposition to colorectal cancer.

Is early-onset microsatellite and chromosomally stable colorectal cancer a hallmark of a genetic susceptibility syndrome?

Most colorectal cancers show either microsatellite or chromosomal instability. A subset of colorectal cancers, especially those diagnosed at young age, is known to show neither of these forms of genetic instability and thus might have a distinct pathogenesis. Colorectal cancers diagnosed at young age are suggestive for hereditary predisposition. We investigate whether such early-onset microsatellite and chromosomally stable colorectal cancers are a hallmark of a genetic susceptibility syndrome. The ploidy status of microsatellite stable (familial) colorectal cancers of patients diagnosed before age 50 (n = 127) was analyzed in relation to the histopathological characteristics and family history. As a control the ploidy status of sporadic colorectal cancer, with normal staining of mismatch repair proteins, diagnosed at the age of 69 years or above (n = 70) was determined. A diploid DNA content was used as a marker for chromosomal stability. Within the group of patients with (familial) early onset microsatellite stable colorectal cancer the chromosomally stable tumors did not differ from chromosomally unstable tumors with respect to mean age at diagnosis, fulfillment of Amsterdam criteria or pathological characteristics. Segregation analysis did not reveal any family with microsatellite and chromosomally stable colorectal cancer in 2 relatives. The prevalence of microsatellite and chromosomally stable colorectal cancer was not significantly different for the early and late onset group (28 and 21%, respectively). We find no evidence that early-onset microsatellite and chromosomally stable colorectal cancer is a hallmark of a hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome.

[Recognition of congenital endometrial carcinoma: the importance of family history and investigation of microsatellite instability in the tumour]. / Herkennen van erfelijk endometriumcarcinoom: het belang van familieanamnese en onderzoek naar microsatellietinstabiliteit in de tumor.

Endometrial cancer diagnosed at a relatively young age or in a patient with a medical history of colorectal cancer may be indicative of Lynch syndrome. Four women, aged 43, 60, 41 and 54 respectively, with a family history of endometrial or colorectal neoplasm were examined for microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumour tissue with positive results. Subsequently, a mutation was found in one of the DNA mismatch repair genes. Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is caused by a germline mutation in a mismatch repair gene and is an autosomal dominant disorder that is characterized by the development of carcinoma of the endometrium and colorectum at a relatively young age. Until recently, recognition of Lynch syndrome was mainly based on an, often incomplete, family history, but today the presence of MSI in tumour tissue can be used to identify patients at risk for Lynch syndrome. A pathologist can contribute to identifying a patient at risk for Lynch syndrome by initiating MSI testing when: (a) endometrial cancer is diagnosed under the age of 50, (b) a combination of endometrial cancer and colorectal cancer is diagnosed under the age of 70.

Patients with an unexplained microsatellite instable tumour have a low risk of familial cancer.

The cancer risk is unknown for those families in which a microsatellite instable tumour is neither explained by MLH1 promoter methylation nor by a germline mutation in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene. Such information is essential for genetic counselling. Families suspected of Lynch syndrome (n = 614) were analysed for microsatellite instability, MLH1 promoter methylation and/or germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Characteristics of the 76 families with a germline mutation (24 MLH1, 2 PMS2, 32 MSH2, and 18 MSH6) were compared with those of 18 families with an unexplained microsatellite instable tumour. The mean age at diagnosis of the index patients in both groups was comparable at 44 years. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the loss of an MMR protein. Together this suggests germline inactivation of a known gene. The Amsterdam II criteria were fulfilled in 50/75 families (66%) that carried a germline mutation in an MMR gene and in only 2/18 families (11%) with an unexplained microsatellite instable tumour (P<0.0001). Current diagnostic strategies can detect almost all highly penetrant MMR gene mutations. Patients with an as yet unexplained microsatellite instable tumour likely carry a different type of mutation that confers a lower risk of cancer for relatives.

[DNA-based diagnosis of hereditary tumour predisposition]. / DNA-diagnostiek naar erfelijke aanleg voor tumoren.

Of all forms of cancer, approximately 5% are caused by factors leading to a strong genetic predisposition. DNA diagnosis is currently used in families with hereditary tumour syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (Lynch syndrome), and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Those persons who have not inherited the predisposition no longer have to undergo regular examinations. DNA diagnosis for a hereditary predisposition is currently also performed in patients with cancer at a relatively young age, even if the family history is unclear or negative. Consideration of the patient in the context of his or her family is important for both medico-technical and psychosocial reasons. This is true of both diagnostic and presymptomatic DNA diagnosis. For these reasons, the clinical application of the DNA diagnosis of hereditary tumours has become an integral part of the work of the multidisciplinary cancer family clinics of the university medical centres and the cancer centres. Guidelines for the management of hereditary tumours have recently been issued, with criteria for referral to the specialised outpatient clinics.

[Preventive resection of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer]. / Preventieve resectie van erfelijk, diffuus maagcarcinoom.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancers are rare, accounting for at most 1-3% of gastric cancers. It can be caused by a mutation in the tumour-suppressor gene CDH1. A healthy person carrying a CDH1 mutation has a cumulative risk of developing gastric cancer of 70-80%. In most cases, gastric cancer is detected before the age of 40 years. The effectiveness of screening for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer or early detection with twice-yearly upper GI endoscopy with blind biopsies is highly questionable. Given the poor prognosis of patients with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, prophylactic gastrectomy can be considered an option for patients with a CDH1 mutation. It is recommended that the supervision, screening and possible preventative gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancers are handled by a multidisciplinary team in a specialised centre.

Very low prevalence of germline MSH6 mutations in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer suspected patients with colorectal cancer without microsatellite instability.

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 and results in high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-high) in tumours of HNPCC patients. The MSI test is considered reliable for indicating mutations in MLH1 and MSH2, but is questioned for MSH6. Germline mutation analysis was performed in 19 patients with an MSI-high tumour and absence of MSH2 and/or MSH6 protein as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), without an MLH1 or MSH2 mutation, and in 76 out of 295 patients suspected of HNPCC, with a non-MSI-high colorectal cancer (CRC). All 295 non-MSI-high CRCs were analysed for presence of MSH6 protein by IHC. In 10 patients with an MSI-high tumour without MSH2 and/or MSH6 expression, a pathogenic MSH6 mutation was detected, whereas no pathogenic MSH6 mutation was detected in 76 patients with a non-MSI-high CRC and normal MSH6 protein expression. In none of the 295 CRCs loss of MSH6 protein expression was detected. The prevalence of a germline MSH6 mutation is very low in HNPCC suspected patients with non-MSI-high CRC. Microsatellite instability analysis in CRCs is highly sensitive to select patients for MSH6 germline mutation analysis.

Numerous high-risk epithelial lesions in familial breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the occurrence of high-risk epithelial lesions in women of breast cancer families with and without a BRCA mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study of women at very high risk of breast cancer undergoing prophylactic mastectomy (68 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 14 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 24 non-BRCA mutation carriers). RESULTS: The prevalence of high-risk lesions is equal in women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation, but is higher in non-BRCA mutation carriers: all lesions 43% versus 71% (p=0.02), atypical lobular hyperplasia 26% versus 67% (p=0.001), atypical ductal hyperplasia 17% versus 42% (p=0.01), lobular carcinoma-in situ 15% versus 29% (p=0.10) and ductal carcinoma-in situ 9% versus 17% (p=0.25). The presence of high-risk lesions is related to absence of a BRCA mutation and to age over 40 years. CONCLUSION: Women with an autosomal dominant family history for breast cancer, with and without a BRCA mutation are prone to develop high-risk epithelial lesions, especially over 40 years.

Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of 'easy to apply' probability models.

To establish an efficient, reliable and easy to apply risk assessment tool to select families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients for BRCA mutation testing, using available probability models. In a retrospective study of 263 families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, the utility of the Frank (Myriad), Gilpin (family history assessment tool) and Evans (Manchester) model was analysed, to select 49 BRCA mutation-positive families. For various cutoff levels and combinations, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared. The best combinations were subsequently validated in additional sets of families. Comparable sensitivity and specificity were obtained with the Gilpin and Evans models. They appeared to be complementary to the Frank model. To obtain an optimal sensitivity, five 'additional criteria' were introduced that are specific for the selection of small or uninformative families. The optimal selection is made by the combination 'Frank >or=16% or Evans2 >or=12 or one of five additional criteria'. The efficiency of the selection of families for mutation testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 can be optimised by using a combination of available easy to apply risk assessment models.