Developing a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare.

Improving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences. Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine procedures involving laboratory animals (the '3Rs'), work in the humanities and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes, generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities. Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international harmonisation, openness and public engagement, 'cultures of care', harm-benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.

Optimization of 1,3,4-benzotriazepine-based CCK(2) antagonists to obtain potent, orally active inhibitors of gastrin-mediated gastric acid secretion.

Starting from a novel, achiral 1,3,4-benzotriazepine-based CCK2 receptor antagonist, a process of optimization has afforded further compounds of this type that maintain the nanomolar affinity for recombinant, human CCK2 receptors and high selectivity over CCK1 receptors observed in the initial lead but display more potent inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in vivo. Moreover, this has largely been achieved without altering their potency at wild-type canine and rat receptors, as judged by their displacement of [125I]-BH-CCK-8S in a radioligand binding assay and by their activity in an isolated, perfused rat stomach bioassay, respectively. 2-(5-Cyclohexyl-1-(2-cyclopentyl-2-oxo-ethyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydro-3H-1,3,4-benzotriazepin-3-yl)-N-(3-(5-oxo-2,5-dihydro- [1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-phenyl)-acetamide (47) was identified as the most effective compound stemming from this approach, proving to be a potent inhibitor of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in rats and dogs by intravenous bolus as well as by enteral administration.

Optimization of the in vitro and in vivo properties of a novel series of 2,4,5-trisubstituted imidazoles as potent cholecystokinin-2 (CCK2) antagonists.

The systematic optimization of the structure of a novel 2,4,5-trisubstituted imidazole-based cholecystokinin-2 (CCK(2)) receptor antagonist afforded analogues with nanomolar receptor affinity. These compounds were now comparable in their potency to the bicyclic heteroaromatic-based compounds 5 (JB93182) and 6 (JB95008), from which the initial examples were designed using a field-point based molecular modeling approach. They were also orally active as judged by their inhibition of pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in conscious dogs, in contrast to the bicyclic heteroaromatic-based compounds, which were ineffective because of biliary elimination. Increasing the hydrophilicity through replacement of a particular methylene group with an ether oxygen, as in 3-{[5-(adamantan-1-yloxymethyl)-2-cyclohexyl-1H-imidazole-4-carbonyl]amino}benzoic acid (53), had little effect on the receptor affinity but significantly increased the oral potency. Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics and the inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated acid output following bolus intraduodenal administration of both 53 and 6 indicated that 53 was well absorbed, had a longer half-life, and was not subject to the elimination pathways of the earlier series.