Meaningful Work, Career Fit, and Professional Well-Being of Pediatric Academicians in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Examine associations between time spent in academic activities perceived as meaningful and professional well-being among academic pediatrics faculty. METHODS: The sample comprised 248 full-time pediatric faculty (76% female, 81% white, non-Hispanic, 41% instructor or assistant professor) across the United States who completed an online survey in November 2019. Survey items included sociodemographic and professional characteristics, professional well-being measures (Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index; Maslach Burnout Inventory; Intention to Leave Academic Medicine), perceived meaningfulness of academic activities and assigned time to those activities. We defined global career fit as total percentage time assigned to professional activities considered meaningful by individuals, and activity-specific career fit as percentage time assigned to each meaningful professional activity. RESULTS: As global career fit scores increased, professional fulfillment increased (r = 0.45, P < .001), whereas burnout (r = -0.29, P < .001) and intention to leave (r = -0.22, P < .001) decreased. Regarding activity-specific career fit, for individuals who considered patient care meaningful, as assigned time to patient care increased, professional fulfillment decreased (r = -0.14, P = .048) and burnout (r = 0.16, P = .02) and intention to leave (r = 0.26, P < .001) increased. There was no significant correlation between assigned time for teaching, research, or advocacy and professional well-being. Faculty were less likely to intend to leave academic medicine as assigned time increased for administrative or leadership activities if considered meaningful (r = -0.24, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Time assigned to meaningful work activities may relate to professional well-being of academic pediatrics faculty. More time assigned to patient care, despite being meaningful, was associated with poor self-reported professional well-being. Effort allocation among diverse academic activities needs to be optimized to improve faculty well-being.

Family, Neighborhood and Parent Resilience Are Inversely Associated With Reported Depression in Adolescents Exposed to ACEs.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of 1) extrinsic resilience factors and 2) adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) with a caregiver reported diagnosis of depression in a nationally representative sample of adolescents. METHODS: A cross sectional analysis of the 2016-2017 National Survey of Children's Health, restricted to adolescents 12 to 17 years old was conducted. The dependent variable was caregiver reported depression: no current diagnosis vs. current diagnosis of depression. Independent variables were reported ACEs dichotomized as lower (0-3) or higher (4 or more), and specific resilience factors: family resilience, neighborhood cohesion and caregiver emotional support. Resilience factors were analyzed as a composite score dichotomized as lower (0-3) or higher (4 or more) and individually. Purposeful selection multivariable logistic regression model building was used to estimate the associations between reported diagnosis of depression, ACEs and resilience factors adjusting for demographic covariates. RESULTS: Study sample consisted of 29,617 (weighted N = 24,834,232) adolescents, 6% with current reported diagnosis of depression, 8% with higher ACEs and 91% with higher resilience. Family resilience, neighborhood cohesion and caregiver emotional supports were each independently associated with lower odds of reported diagnosis of depression. However, with all resilience factors in the model, only family resilience and neighborhood cohesion (specifically school safety) remained significantly associated with lower odds of reported diagnosis of depression. CONCLUSION(S): In this nationally representative sample, family resilience and neighborhood cohesion were associated with lower odds of a reported diagnosis of depression even with confounding ACEs exposure. These factors may be important targets for future intervention.

Associations of Pediatric Symptom Checklist Scores with Sexual Activity and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Urban Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between the Youth Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (YPSC-17) and adolescents' reports of ever having sex and with having positive testing results for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS: Analyzed electronic data from primary care clinics for 27,901 adolescents aged 13-17 years with responses to the YPSC-17 and urine screen results for gonorrhea/chlamydia. RESULTS: On the YPSC-17 in total 8.3% screened positive. Over one quarter (26%) reported ever having sex and 11% of sexually active youth had a positive STI test. Logistic regression analyses revealed increased odds of sexual activity among those positive on the YPSC-17 total (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.68-2.08) or any subscale (INT-aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.32-1.55; EXT-aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.40-1.88; ATT-aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.47-1.90). In addition, sexually active youth with positive EXT (aOR 1.41 95% CI 1.00-1.98) scores were more likely to have STIs. CONCLUSION: The YPSC-17 can identify adolescents with heightened risks for STIs.

Primary Care Providers as Mental Health Counselors: Views from Urban, Minority Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To examine urban, minority adolescents' preferences for receiving guidance for mental health (MH) issues from primary care providers (PCPs) or from mental health providers (MHPs). METHODS: Adolescents (13-21 years) from three community clinics and one school-based health center (SBHC) in the Bronx, N.Y. completed anonymous surveys. Characteristics of adolescents who preferred the PCP vs. MHP and adolescents' attitudes about the PCP vs. the MHP were compared. RESULTS: Adolescents (N=135), mean age 16 years, majority Hispanic participated. Although 85% strongly agreed or agreed that their PCP was knowledgeable about MH, 57% preferred to talk to a MHP. Those who preferred the MHP were younger, attend a SBHC, and trust information on MH from a MHP. Those who preferred the PCP were more likely to report feeling comfortable talking to their PCP about MH. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority preferred a MHP, PCPs appeared to be an acceptable alternative for MH care.

Adolescents' views on barriers to health care: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine from adolescents using health care their: 1) perceptions of barriers to obtaining health services, 2) views on how to overcome the barriers and 3) views on how to create an adolescent-friendly primary care practice. DESIGN: Six focus group interviews. METHODS: Adolescents 11-21 years old from three health centers in the Bronx were recruited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) barriers to accessing health care such as insurance, language barriers, transportation, making an appointment; 2) identifying barriers related to issues of consent and confidentiality; 3) exploring barriers to accessing mental health and related issues; and 4) their visions of an adolescent-friendly office. RESULTS: Thirty-one adolescents, aged 11-21 years old, participated. The majority were Hispanic and 52% were female. Fifty percent of adolescents had a routine visit within the past month. Most adolescents reported experiencing barriers to making an appointment. Additionally, they complained about long waiting times to be seen by providers on the day of their scheduled appointment. Another key barrier was related to knowledge and perceptions about consent and confidentiality. Further, in regard to mental health, many adolescents from focus groups reported that they felt that their primary providers had little interest in this topic and limited knowledge about it. Most of the adolescents reported no barriers with insurance, language or transportation. Their visions of an adolescent-friendly office would include a separate adolescent waiting area equipped with entertainment units. CONCLUSION: In this study of adolescents who already have primary care providers and are seemingly well-connected to the health care system, there remained significant reported barriers to accessing necessary health services.

Emergency contraception: are pediatric residents counseling and prescribing to teens?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: (1) To assess pediatric residents' attitudes and practices related to counseling about and prescribing emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) for teens. (2) To determine whether attitudes, counseling, and prescribing practices vary among different levels of residency training. DESIGN: Questionnaire. SETTING: Two large inner-city academic medical centers in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric residents (PGY 1-3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes, counseling and prescribing patterns of ECPs by the pediatric residents RESULTS: 101/120 residents participated in the survey; 35% PGY1, 38% PGY2, 28% PGY3. Less than a third (26%) reported counseling teens about the availability of ECPs during routine non-acute care visits and just over half (56%) provided ECP counseling during visits for contraception. Only 6% of pediatric residents reported that they prescribed ECPs often, while 42% never prescribed ECPs. The majority of the residents did not think that prescribing ECPs would encourage teens to practice unsafe sex or would discourage compliance with other contraceptive methods (70% and 68%, respectively). However, the majority (67%) also reported that they did not think that ECPs should be available over the counter, without prescription. Further analysis by year of training showed that more junior and senior residents than interns counseled adolescents about ECPs at both routine health care maintenance visits and at visits for contraception (32% vs 15%; 62% vs 42%, respectively), would provide adolescent girls with ECPs to have on hand prior to an episode of unprotected sex (52% vs 31%), and thought that ECPs should be available over the counter (39% vs 20%), P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents are missing opportunities to prevent unintended teenage pregnancy but they become more likely to counsel about and prescribe ECPs as they progress through residency training.

Are adolescent girls with Chlamydia infection notifying their partners?

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the proportion of inner-city adolescent girls diagnosed with chlamydial cervicitis who notify their sex partners; (2) to examine girls' attitudes and perceptions about partner notification and treatment; and (3) to assess whether or not girls knew if their partners were treated for chlamydia infection. DESIGN/METHODS: Adolescent girls who had a positive DNA hybridization test for chlamydial cervicitis from March 2000 to May 2002 completed a 37-item self-administered survey assessing sexual behavior and partner notification, as well as the Rosenberg self esteem scale. Subjects completed the survey 1-3 months after the diagnosis of chlamydia infection. RESULTS: Fifty-five adolescent girls (46% Hispanic, 36% African American) aged 13-21 years (mean 18.3 years) completed the survey. The median age at first intercourse was 14 (SD = 1.6); median number of lifetime sex partners was 4. Forty-one subjects (75%) notified their sex partners. The most common reasons for partner notification were"I did not want my sex partner to give the infection back to me"and"I wanted to let my sex partner know that he/she had given me the infection". There was a trend toward increased notification if the girls were 18 years of age or older (P = 0.07) or had only one lifetime sex partner (P = 0.08). Of the 41 subjects who notified their partners, 22 (54%) reported that the partners were treated; 16 did not know, and three knew that partners were not treated. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of inner-city girls in this study notified their partners about chlamydia infection. Self-protection from re-infection was an important reason given for notification and suggests that girls in committed ongoing relationships might be more likely to notify partners.