Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Public Health ; 224: 51-57, 2023 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37734276

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the impacts of the Dekthai Kamsai programme on overweight/obesity, underweight and stunting among male and female primary school students. STUDY DESIGN: A quasi-experiment was conducted in 16 intervention and 19 control schools across Thailand in 2018 and 2019. In total, 896 treated and 1779 control students from grades 1 to 3 were recruited. In intervention schools, a set of multifaceted intervention components were added into school routine practices. Anthropometric outcomes were measured at baseline and at the beginning and end of every school term. METHODS: Propensity score matching with linear and Poisson difference-in-difference analyses were used to adjust for the non-randomisation and to analyse the intervention's effects over time. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the increases in mean BMI-for-age Z-score (BAZ) and the incidence rate of overweight/obesity were lower in the intervention schools at the 3rd, 4th and 8th measurements and the 3rd measurement, respectively. The decrease in mean height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) was lower at the 4th measurement. The decrease in the incidence rate of wasting was lower at the 5th, 7th and 8th measurements. The favourable impacts on BAZ and HAZ were found in both sexes, while the favourable impact on overweight/obesity and unfavourable impact on wasting were found in girls. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention might be effective in reducing BAZ, overweight/obesity, poor height gain, but not wasting. These findings highlight the benefits of a multifaceted school nutrition intervention and a need to incorporate tailor-made interventions for wasting to comprehensively address the double burden of malnutrition.

2.
J Med Assoc Thai ; 89(5): 690-8, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16756057

RESUMEN

An economic evaluation of paclitaxel added subsequently to doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer with lymph nodes positive is presented. Health care cost associated with AC alone vs. AC with paclitaxel was compared under Thai health care context. Based on CALGB9344, paclitaxel increased the disease-free survival (DFS) by 17%. Based on Markov simulation for 15 years, paclitaxel prolonged the patient's life by 0.30 quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Such an increased effectiveness was offset by the adjuvant cost net of recurrence, follow-up, and terminal care by 221,433 Baht. This means an additional year of perfect health gained by paclitaxel is achieved through an incremental cost of 738,111 Baht. Such an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is beyond the threshold recommended by World Health Organization. In women with negative estrogen receptor that DFS was improved to 28%, the ICER of paclitaxel was reduced to 393,984 Baht per QALY.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/economía , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/economía , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/economía , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/economía , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ciclofosfamida/economía , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/economía , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Cadenas de Markov , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA