Locoregional treatment improves overall survival for liver cancer during second-line regorafenib or immune checkpoint inhibitor.

For advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the best second-line treatment after first-line treatment with sorafenib is unclear. This study aimed to compared the efficacy of second-line regorafenib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced HCC after sorafenib therapy. This retrospective study included 89 patients with HCC treated with sorafenib, and then regorafenib (n = 58) or an ICI (n = 31). Treatment response, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the 2 groups were compared, and factors associated with post-treatment mortality or disease progression were evaluated. During follow-up period, compared to regorafenib, treatment with an ICI results in a slight increase in a 20% decrease of AFP (35.7% vs. 31.8%), complete response rate (6.5% vs. 0%), objective response rate (16.1% vs. 6.9%), median overall survival (13.3 vs. 5 months), and median PFS (3.0 vs. 2.6 months). Combined locoregional treatment (LRT) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.99) during second-line treatment was associated with a decreased risk of post-treatment mortality. After propensity scoring matching, combined LRT during second-line treatment had longer post-treatment OS than patients without combined LRT. A 20% decrease of AFP (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.94) was associated with a decreased risk of post-treatment disease progression. In conclusions, second-line treatment with regorafenib or ICI prolongs OS in patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib. Combined LRT during second-line treatment is associated with decreased post-treatment mortality. A 20% decrease of AFP level may be predictive of a lower rate of disease progression.

Concurrent Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and High-Dose External Beam Radiotherapy for Highly Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo-bev) has been recommended for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). High-dose external beam radiotherapy (RT) is recognized for its excellent local tumor control. The efficacy and safety of concurrent atezo-bev with RT for highly advanced HCC has been minimally explored. METHODS: In this preliminary retrospective study, we assessed patients with highly advanced HCC, characterized by Vp4 portal vein thrombosis or tumors exceeding 50% of liver volume, who received concurrent atezo-bev and RT (group A). Group A included 13 patients who received proton radiation at a dose of 72.6 GyE in 22 fractions, and one patient who received photon radiation at a dose of 54 Gy in 18 fractions. This group was compared with 34 similar patients treated atezo-bev alone as a control (group B). The primary objectives were to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for a higher incidence of Vp4 portal vein thrombosis in group A (78.6% vs. 21.4%, P = .05). Group A achieved a higher ORR (50.0% vs. 11.8%, P < .01) and a longer OS (not reached vs. 5.5 months, P = .01) after a median follow-up of 5.2 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that concurrent RT independently favored longer OS (hazard ratio: 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05-0.63, P < .01). Group A did not increase any grade adverse events (78.6% vs. 58.8%, P = .19) or severe adverse events of grade ≥ 3 (14.3% vs. 14.7%, P = .97) compared to group B. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent high-dose external beam radiotherapy appears to safely enhance the effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for highly advanced patients with HCC. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Subsequent locoregional therapy prolongs survival in progressive hepatocellular carcinoma patients under lenvatinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional therapy and multi-kinase inhibitor agent have been the backbone of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the effect of combination or sequential use of locoregional therapy on HCC patients receiving multi-kinase inhibitor remain uncertain. Therefore, we aim to explore whether the subsequent locoregional therapy provides better survival in HCC patients under lenvatinib treatment. METHODS: From March 2018 to April 2020, a total of 78 unresectable HCC patients receiving lenvatinib were recruited. Image response was evaluated by dynamic image using the modified RECIST criteria. Among patients with tumor progression under lenvatinib treatment, whether receiving subsequent locoregional therapy or not were documented. Overall survival between two groups and the predictors for tumor progression were also analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 78 patients receiving lenvatinib, the median age was 67.8 years old, and 69.2 % were male. Forty-four patients (56.4 %) experienced tumor progression with time to progression 5.1 months (95 % confidence interval (CI): 4.7-6.8) months. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade II (adjusted HR: 2.883, P = 0.0104), and treatment duration less than three months (adjusted HR: 3.801, P = 0.0014) were the independent predictive factors for tumor progression, while patients achieving objective response under lenvatinib treatment within 12 weeks was the independent protective factor for tumor progression (adjusted HR: 0.144, P = 0.0020). Among the 44 patients with tumor progression, twenty-six (59.1 %) patients received subsequent locoregional therapy after tumor progression. Comparing to those with tumor progression without locoregional treatment, patients who received subsequent locoregional therapy had significantly better survival (1st year cumulative survival rate 70 % vs 27 %, log-rank P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: ALBI grade, treatment duration of lenvatinib, and achieving objective image response within twelve weeks were the independent predictive factors for tumor progression. Furthermore, longer overall survival was observed in tumor progression patients with subsequent locoregional therapy and with better liver preserved function.

Clinical and Dosimetric Results of Proton or Photon Radiation Therapy for Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to report the clinical and dosimetric attributes of patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing proton or photon radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes and dosimetric indices of 159 patients with >5 cm nonmetastatic HCC who underwent definitive radiation therapy using either protons (N = 105) or photons (N = 54) between 2014 and 2018. Additional photon plans were performed in the 105 proton-treated patients using the same dose prescription criteria for intragroup dosimetric comparison. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 47 months, patients with biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 75 Gy exhibited significantly better local control (LC; 2-year: 85.6% vs 20.5%; P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS; median, 7.4 vs 3.2 months; P < .001), and overall survival (OS; median, 18.1 vs 7.3 months; P < .001) compared with those with BED10 < 75 Gy. Notably, proton-treated patients had a significantly higher BED10 (96 vs 67 Gy; P < .001) and improved LC (2-year: 88.5% vs 33.8%; P < .001), PFS (median, 7.4 vs 3.3 months; P = .001), and OS (median, 18.9 vs 8.3 months; P < .001) than those undergoing photon radiation therapy. Furthermore, patients treated with protons had significantly lower V1 of the liver (P < .001), mean upper gastrointestinal tract dose (P < .001), and mean splenic dose (P < .001), with significantly decreased incidences of radiation-induced liver disease (P = .007), grade ≥3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding (P = .001), and grade ≥3 lymphopenia (P = .003). On multivariate analysis, proton radiation therapy consistently correlated with superior LC (P < .001), PFS (P < .001), and OS (P < .001). In intragroup dosimetric comparison, photon plans demonstrated significantly higher mean liver dose (P < .001) compared with actually delivered proton treatments, and 72 (69%) of them had mean liver dose exceeding 28 Gy, which necessitated target dose de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of large HCC radiation therapy, a higher target BED10 was associated with improved outcomes. Notably, proton therapy has demonstrated the capability to deliver ablative doses while also being accompanied by fewer instances of severe toxicity.

A combination of locoregional treatment with systemic therapy after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab failure for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma provides survival benefit.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) is used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the optimal rescue therapy after A+B remains unclear. Combining locoregional therapy (LRT) with systemic treatment has been shown to improve tumor control, but the role in patients who fail A+B is unknown. We retrospectively enrolled patients who experienced radiological progression after A+B. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), post progression survival (PPS), and secondary progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by modified RECIST. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance baseline clinical features. A total of 61 patients were enrolled with a median age of 60.7 years, 83.6% male, 88.5% viral hepatitis-related, and 60.7% without prior systemic treatment before A+B. Patients receiving sequential therapies had significantly longer PPS than supportive care (10.5 vs. 2.3 months, P<0.0001). Among 37 patients received sequential systemic treatment, 18 received combined LRT. The median follow-up after post A+B failure was 6.6 months. The combined LRT group had higher ORR (27.8 vs. 0%, P=0.0197) and DCR (72.2 vs. 26.3%, P=0.0052) than systemic alone group. The median PPS and secondary PFS were significantly longer in combined LRT group (PPS: 12.2 vs. 5.8 months, P=0.0070; PFS: 5.0 vs. 2.6 months, P=0.0134) than systemic alone group. After IPW analysis, patients with combined LRT had superior PPS and secondary PFS. The incidence rates of AEs were higher in LRT combination compared to systemic alone (any grade AEs: 94.4 vs. 63.2%, P=0.0422; severe AEs: 33.3 vs. 5.3%, P=0.0422). No significant albumin-bilirubin index changed in the first 3 months in combined LRT group (0.966 [0.647-1.443], P=0.867) though a trend of deterioration in systemic alone group. In conclusion, sequential systemic therapy provides survival benefits after A+B failure. Furthermore, combining LRT with systemic treatment could provide better tumor responses and survival benefits with acceptable toxicity than systemic therapy alone.

Adding nutritional status to the original BCLC stage improves mortality prediction for hepatocellular carcinoma patients in HBV-endemic regions.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with high mortality, especially in Asian populations where chronic HBV infection is a major cause. Accurate prediction of mortality can assist clinical decision-making. We aim to (i) compare the predicting ability of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification (BCLC) stage, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score in predicting short-term mortality (one- and two-year) and (ii) develop a novel model with improved accuracy compared to the conventional models. This study enrolled 298 consecutive HCC patients from our hepatology department. The prognostic values for mortality were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. A novel model was established and internally validated using 5-fold cross-validation, followed by external validation in a cohort of 100 patients. The primary etiology of cirrhosis was hepatitis B virus (HBV), with 81.2% of HCC patients having preserved liver function. Significant differences were observed in hemoglobin (Hb) and serum albumin levels, which reflect patients' nutrition status, between patients who survived for one year and those who died. BCLC exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to NLR but had borderline superiority to the ALBI score. Therefore, a novel model incorporating BCLC, Hb, and serum albumin was developed, internally and externally validated, as well as subgroup sensitivity analysis. The model exhibited significantly higher predictive accuracy for one- and two-year mortality than conventional prognostic predictors, with AUROC values of 0.841 and 0.805, respectively. The novel "BCLC-Nutrition Model", which incorporates BCLC, Hb, and serum albumin, may provide improved predictive accuracy for short-term mortality in HCC patients compared to commonly used prognostic scores. This emphasizes the importance of nutrition in the management of HCC patients.

Combination of systemic immune-inflammation index and albumin-bilirubin grade predict prognosis of regorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Regorafenib improved prognosis for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) after sorafenib treatment failure. We aimed to investigate prognostic value of combining systemic inflammatory markers with liver function evaluation in patients receiving sorafenib-regorafenib sequential therapy. A total of 122 uHCC patients who received sorafenib-regorafenib sequential therapy were retrospectively enrolled for analysis. The pre-treatment preserving liver function and six inflammatory indexes were collected. The Cox regression model was used to identify independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Baseline ALBI grade I (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.725, P = 0.040 for PFS; HR = 0.382, P = 0.012 for OS) and systemic inflammatory index (SII) ≤ 330 (HR = 0.341, P = 0.017 for OS; HR = 0.485, P = 0.037 for OS) were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis and were used to develop the scoring system. Patients who fulfilled both criteria (2 points; score-high) had the longest median PFS (not-reached) and OS (not-reached), followed by fulfilling 1 criterion (1 point; score-intermediate; PFS: 3.7 months and OS: 17.9 months), and patients fulfilled no criterion (0 point; score-low; PFS: 2.9 months, overall log-rank P = 0.001 and OS: 7.5 months, overall log-rank P = 0.003). Additionally, best radiological response was significantly higher in patients with score-high (complete response/partial response/stable disease/progressive disease: score-high: 5.9%/5.9%/58.8%/29.4% vs. score-intermediate: 0%/14.0%/44.2%/41.9% vs. score-low: 0%/0%/25.0%/75.0%; P = 0.011). In conclusion, a combination of baseline ALBI grade and SII index can be used as a simple and powerful parameter to predict prognosis of uHCC patients receiving regorafenib after sorafenib-refractory treatment. The score may help with patient counseling but requires prospective validation.

Using Arterial Pulse and Laser Doppler Analyses to Discriminate between the Cardiovascular Effects of Different Running Levels.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Running can induce advantageous cardiovascular effects such as improved arterial stiffness and blood-supply perfusion. However, the differences between the vascular and blood-flow perfusion conditions under different levels of endurance-running performance remains unclear. The present study aimed to assess the vascular and blood-flow perfusion conditions among 3 groups (44 male volunteers) according to the time taken to run 3 km: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3. METHODS: The radial blood pressure waveform (BPW), finger photoplethygraphy (PPG), and skin-surface laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) signals of the subjects were measured. Frequency-domain analysis was applied to BPW and PPG signals; time- and frequency-domain analyses were applied to LDF signals. RESULTS: Pulse waveform and LDF indices differed significantly among the three groups. These could be used to evaluate the advantageous cardiovascular effects provided by long-term endurance-running training, such as vessel relaxation (pulse waveform indices), improvement in blood supply perfusion (LDF indices), and changes in cardiovascular regulation activities (pulse and LDF variability indices). Using the relative changes in pulse-effect indices, we achieved almost perfect discrimination between Level 3 and Level 2 (AUC = 0.878). Furthermore, the present pulse waveform analysis could also be used to discriminate between the Level-1 and Level-2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings contribute to the development of a noninvasive, easy-to-use, and objective evaluation technique for the cardiovascular benefits of prolonged endurance-running training.

Effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannulae compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in preventing reintubation in patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Many intensive care unit patients who undergo endotracheal extubation experience extubation failure and require reintubation. Because of the high mortality rate associated with reintubation, postextubation respiratory management is crucial, especially for high-risk populations. We conducted the present study to compare the effectiveness of oxygen therapy administered using high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preventing reintubation among patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). This single-center, prospective, unblinded randomized controlled trial was at the respiratory care center (RCC). Participants were randomized to an HFNC group or an NIPPV group (20 patients in each) and received noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) administered using their assigned method. The primary outcome was reintubation within7 days after extubation. None of the patients in the NIPPV group required reintubation, whereas 5 (25%) of the patients in the HFNC group required reintubation (P = 0.047). The 90-day mortality rates of the NIPPV and HFNC groups (four patients [20%] vs. two patients [10%], respectively) did not differ significantly. No significant differences in length of RCC stay, length of hospital stay, time to liberation from NRS, and ventilator-free days at 28-day were identified. The time to event outcome analysis also revealed that the risk of reintubation in the HFNC group was higher than that in the NIPPV group (P = 0.018). Although HFNC is becoming increasingly common as a form of postextubation NRS, HFNC may not be as effective as NIPPV in preventing reintubation among patients who have been receiving PMV for at least 2 weeks. Additional studies evaluating HFNC as an alternative to NIPPV for patients receiving PMV are warranted.ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT04564859; IRB number: 20160901R.Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04564859 ).

Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab(A + B) have been used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as first-line therapy. Real-world studies comparison of efficacy and safety in these two regimens are limited, we therefore conduct this study to investigate these issues. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients received lenvatinib (n = 46) and A + B (n = 46) as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC in a tertiary medical center. Objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed for baseline clinical features balance. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients with median age of 63.8 year-old, 78.3% male, 85.9% viral hepatitis infected, 67.4% BCLC stage C were enrolled. The median treatment and follow-up duration were 4.7 months and 9.4 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in ORR (26.1% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.1226), PFS (5.9 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.4066), and OS (not reached vs. not reached, p = 0.7128) between the lenvatinib and A + B groups. After IPW, the results of survival and response rate were also compared. Subgroup analysis suggested that using lenvatinib was not inferior to A + B in regards of PFS, including those with elder, Child-Pugh class B, beyond up-to-seven, or portal vein invasion VP4 patients. Among the lenvatinib treated patients, multivariate analysis showed patients elder than 65-year-old was an independent predictor associated with shorter PFS (adjust HR: 2.085[0.914-4.753], p = 0.0213). The incidence rates of adverse events were similar between two groups (76 vs. 63%, p = 0.1740). Both of two regimens had similarly few impact on liver function by comparison of baseline, third month, and sixth month albumin-bilirubin index and Child-Pugh score. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib are similar to A + B as a first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC.

Combination of CRAFITY score with Alpha-fetoprotein response predicts a favorable outcome of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab are promising agents for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We tried to guide the treatment based on recent developed CRAFITY score combining with on-treatment AFP response. Eighty-nine patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab regardless of as a first-line therapy or not for unresectable HCC were enrolled for analyses. Radiologic evaluation was based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 25.0% and 65.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that low CRAFITY score (AFP<100 ng/ml or CRP<10 mg/l) and satisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (≥75% decrease or ≤10% increase from baseline) were independent factors determining good overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.143, P=0.002 & HR=0.337, P=0.031), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.419, P=0.022 & HR=0.429, P=0.025) and good responder (odds ratio [OR]=1.763, P=0.044 & OR=3.881, P=0.011). Patients were further divided into three classes by combination of CRAFITY score and AFP response at 6 weeks [The CAR (CRAFITY score and AFP-Response) classification)]: low CRAFITY score with satisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (class I), either high CRAFITY score or unsatisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (class II) and high CRAFITY score together with unsatisfactory AFP response at 6 weeks (class III). ORR was 35.0%, 18.2%, and 0% in class I, II and III patients, respectively (overall P=0.034). Patients in the class I had the best OS and PFS, followed by class II and class III (median OS: not reached vs. 11.1 vs. 4.3 months, log-rank P<0.001; median PFS: 7.9 vs. 6.6 vs. 2.6 months, log-rank P=0.001). Combination CRAFITY score and AFP response at 6 weeks with AUROC predicts OS and tumor response to be 0.809 and 0.798, respectively, better than either CRAFITY score (0.771 & 0.750) or AFP response at 6 weeks (0.725 & 0.680) alone. In conclusions, the CAR classification which combining CRAFITY score and AFP response at 6 weeks provides a practical guidance for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in unresectable HCC patients.

Proton beam radiotherapy combined with anti-PD1/PDL1 immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Anti-Programmed cell Death protein 1 (Anti-PD1) or Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1) immune checkpoint inhibitors provide treatment options for advanced HCC patients with low response rates. Combination therapy is becoming a major issue to improve the unmet need. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) could effectively control the local tumor with a low-risk injury to peripheral liver parenchyma. We retrospectively reviewed the patients who have received PBT combined with anti-PD1/PDL1 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the advanced HCC patients. This study reviewed 29 advanced HCC patients who have received PBT and anti-PD1/PDL1 during 2016 and 2019. All were Child-Pugh A and performance status 0-1. Seventeen patients (58.6%) had extrahepatic spreading. Concurrent PBT started during anti-PD1/PDL1 with a median of 96.6 grays equivalent dose. The PBT field covered all tumors in 13 (44.8%) patients under curative intent. Other patients (55.2%) received palliative PBT that covered only the principal tumors. All patients have completed the concurrent PBT protocol. The median anti-PD1/PDL1 duration was 3.9 months. After a median follow-up of 13.2 months, the rates of 1-year PBT infield tumor control, 1-year outfield tumor control, and overall response were 90.5%, 90.9%, and 61.5%, and 70.8%, 69.2%, and 43.8%, respectively for curative-intent and palliative-control PBT. Complete response was found in 4 (30.8%) curative-intent and 1 (6.3%) palliative-control patients. The median overall progression-free survival was 27.2 months for curative-intent patients and 15.9 months for palliative-control patients. The overall survival was non-reached for both groups. The ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score change at 3-month and 6-month after PBT initiation were nonsignificant. No unexpected adverse event occurred except nine patients (31.0%) had treatment-related adverse events higher than or equal to Grade 3, including 2 (6.9%) had a radiation-induced liver injury. PBT combined with anti-PD1/PDL1 was safe without unexpected adverse events. The concurrent therapy could effectively treat advanced HCC through sustained local tumor necrosis and effective systemic tumor control for the patients who received curative-intent or palliative-control PBT combined with anti-PD1/PDL1.

Predicting Hazardous Alcohol Drinking Behaviors in Family Members of Hazardous Alcohol-Drinker Patients.

Family members of hazardous or harmful alcohol drinkers suffer many consequences of their relative's alcohol-drinking behaviors and risk developing their own hazardous alcohol drinking behaviors. Studies of alcohol-related healthcare problems have mainly focused on patients, with few studies on their family members. This cross-sectional study explored factors predicting hazardous alcohol drinking behaviors in family members of hazardous alcohol-drinker patients. Participants were recruited from four randomly chosen hospitals in Taiwan. Data were collected using self-report questionnaires on family members' alcohol use, perceived stress, coping mechanisms, social support, health, quality of life, protective factors against hazardous alcohol drinking, facilitative factors for hazardous alcohol drinking, and demographics. The 318 family members who participated in this study were divided by their Chinese-version Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores into two groups: hazardous alcohol drinkers (score ≥ 8) and non-hazardous alcohol drinkers (score < 8). Significant factors predicting hazardous alcohol drinking behaviors were found by logistic regression to be the frequency of using general coping mechanisms (OR = 1.29, p < 0.01), the frequency of using strategies to cope with patients' drinking-related behaviors (OR = 0.89, p < 0.01), factors protecting against hazardous alcohol drinking (OR = 0.76, p < 0.01) and factors facilitating hazardous alcohol drinking (OR = 1.52, p < 0.01). Interventions should be designed for family members of hazardous alcohol drinkers to address these four significant predictors.

Soluble form of CTLA-4 is a good predictor for tumor recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: A soluble form of cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-antigen-4 (sCTLA-4) is a prognostic biomarker for several cancers but remains unclear in HCC patients. The aim of study is to evaluate the predictive role of serum sCTLA-4 levels for tumor recurrence of chronic hepatis C (CHC)-HCC patients receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective study recruiting 88 CHC-HCC patients was done between 2013 and 2019. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of early recurrence. All tests were two-tailed, and the level of statistical significance was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 44.4 months, 53 of the 88 (60.2%) CHC-HCC patients encountered early recurrence within 2 years. The predictability of sCTLA-4 for local recurrence (LR) and intrahepatic metastasis (IHM) by 2-years using AUROC curve analysis were 0.740 and 0.715, respectively. Patients with high sCTLA-4 levels (>9 ng/ml) encountered shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) for LR (log-rank p = 0.017) but paradoxically longer RFS for IHM (log-rank p = 0.007) compared to those with low levels (≤9 ng/ml). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, sCTLA-4 levels and antiviral therapy were independent prognostic factor of early recurrence both in LR and IHM. A combination of baseline sCTLA-4 and AFP level could improve the predictability of early LR and IHM with specificity of 80.0% and 79.7% and positive predictive value of 63.3% and 67.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: sCTLA-4 level is a good predictor for early HCC recurrence with higher levels indicating susceptibility to early LR, but protecting from early IHM.

Proton Beam Therapy in Managing Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Bile Duct Invasion.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion is a rare and notorious subtype of HCC. This study included patients that had unresectable HCC with bile duct invasion and proton beam therapy between November 2015 and February 2021. Twenty patients fit the inclusion criteria. The median tumor size was 6.3 cm. Nine patients (45.0%) had major vascular invasions. All included patients received the radiation dose of 72.6 gray relative biological effectiveness due to the proximity of porta hepatis and tumor. The median follow-up time was 19.9 months. The median overall survival was 19.9 months among deceased patients. The 1-year cumulative local recurrence rates were 5.3%, with only two patients developing in-field failure. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 79.4% and 53.3%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 58.9%. Four patients developed radiation-induced liver disease. The 1-year cholangitis-free survival was 55.0%. Skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity and rarely severe. Eight patients developed ≤ grade 3 gastrointestinal ulcers. Proton beam therapy offers desirable survival outcomes for unresectable HCC patients with bile duct invasion. Optimal local tumor control could also be obtained within acceptable toxicities.

Dynamic Change of Albumin-Bilirubin Score Is Good Predictive Parameter for Prognosis in Chronic Hepatitis C-hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization.

Background and Aims: The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade is a good index for liver function evaluation and is also associated with the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving TACE. However, the correlation between the dynamic change to the ALBI score and clinical outcome is seldom discussed. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the application of ALBI grade and dynamic change of ALBI grade (delta ALBI grade) after first TACE for prognosis prediction in HCC patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Method: From January 2005 to December 2015, newly diagnosed naive chronic hepatitis C-hepatocellular carcinoma (CHC-HCC) patients who were treated with TACE as the initial treatment at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, were retrospectively recruited. The pre-treatment host factors, tumor status and noninvasive markers were collected. The Cox regression model was used to identify independent predictors of overall survival and tumor recurrence. Results: Among 613 treatment-naive CHC-HCC patients, 430 patients died after repeated TACE during a median follow-up of 26.9 months. Complete remission after repeated TACE occurred in 46.2% patients, and 208 patients (33.9%) had tumor recurrence, with a median recurrence-free interval of 8.5 months. In Cox regression analysis, ALBI grade II/III (aHR: 1.088, p = 0.035) and increased delta ALBI grade (aHR: 1.456, p = 0.029) were independent predictive factors for tumor recurrence. Furthermore, ALBI grade II/III (aHR: 1.451, p = 0.005) and increased delta ALBI grade during treatment (aHR: 1.436, p = 0.006) were predictive factors for mortality, while achieving complete response after repeated TACE (aHR: 0.373, p < 0.001) and anti-viral therapy (aHR: 0.580, p = 0.002) were protective factors for mortality. Conclusion: Both ALBI and delta ALBI grade are independent parameters to predict survival and tumor recurrence of CHC-HCC patients receiving TACE treatment.

GALNT14 genotype-guided chemoembolization plus sorafenib therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: GALNT14-rs9679162 "TT" genotype is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). We investigated whether patients with GALNT14-rs9679162 "non-TT" unfavorable genotype benefited from chemoembolization plus sorafenib combination therapy. METHODS: Intermediate stage HCC patients were recruited for GALNT14-rs9679162 genotyping before TACE. Patients with "TT" genotype received only TACE, labeled as TT (TACE) group. Patients with "non-TT" genotype ("GG" or "GT") were randomized to receive either TACE alone, labeled as Non-TT (TACE) group, or TACE plus sorafenib, labeled as Non-TT (TACE + Sora) group. The latter group received sorafenib 400 mg daily plus TACE. RESULTS: From October 2015 to April 2019, 103 HCC patients scheduled to receive chemoembolization were screened. Of them, 84 met inclusion criteria and were assigned to TT (TACE) (n = 25), Non-TT (TACE) (n = 30) and Non-TT (TACE + Sora) (n = 29) groups according to their GALNT14 genotypes. Repeated TACE sessions were performed on-demand and patients were followed until November 2020. It was found that TT (TACE) and Non-TT (TACE + Sora) patients had shorter time-to-complete response compared with that in Non-TT (TACE) patients (p < 0.001 and 0.009, respectively). These two groups also had longer time-to-TACE progression (p < 0.001 and 0.006, respectively) and longer progression-free survival (p = 0.001 and 0.021, respectively). However, TT (TACE) patients harbored longer overall survival compared with those in non-TT (TACE + Sora) and non-TT (TACE) patients (p = 0.028, < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Combination of sorafenib and TACE for "non-TT" patients partially overcame the genetic disadvantage on treatment outcomes in terms of time-to-complete response, time-to-TACE progression and progression-free survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02504983.

Complete response at first transarterial chemoembolization predicts favorable outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the mainstay of treatment for patients with intermediate/advanced stage or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the palliative nature of TACE treatment, embolizing the tumor feeding vessels and leading to progressive tumor necrosis, complete response (CR) after TACE could still be observed in a certain population. Thus, this study aimed to investigate both the predictors for CR and the long-term prognosis of the patients with CR after TACE. The study recruited new diagnosed HCC patients initially treated with TACE from 2010 to 2013. Post TACE response was assessed by scheduled image studies according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Then, pre-TACE factors were compared between patients with and without CR. After the first session of TACE, 22.3% of the 669 TACE treated patients achieved CR. During a median of 26.6 months follow-up, patients with CR had better overall survival than those without (median: 35.8 vs. 24.0 months, P<0.001). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B (OR: 0.419, P=0.005), tumor burden beyond up-to-7 criteria (OR: 0.118, P<0.001), bilobar tumor extent (OR: 0.236, P<0.001), higher alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (≥20 ng/ml, OR: 0.614, P=0.039) and higher platelet counts (>150 k/µl, OR: 0.482, P=0.002) were unfavorable predictors for CR after first TACE. In addition, macrovascular invasion (HR: 3.113, P=0.001) and higher AFP levels (≥15 ng/ml, HR: 2.601, P=0.007) were predictors for early HCC recurrence whereas diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR: 2.166, P=0.006) was the only significant predictor for late HCC recurrence in CR patients. In conclusion, more than one-fifth of HCC patients achieved CR after first TACE and these patients had favorable prognosis. Furthermore, tailored post-TACE follow-up strategies shall be considered in patients with different risk factors of early or late recurrence after CR.

MELD score is the better predictor for 30-day mortality in patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma treated by trans-arterial embolization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rupture is a catastrophic life-threatening complication that could be rescued by trans-arterial embolization (TAE). However, deteriorated liver function with total bilirubin more than 3 mg/dL was deemed as a relative contraindication. This study was aimed to re-evaluate this relative contraindication. METHODS: Patients with ruptured HCC and treated by TAE between February 2005 and December 2016 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou branch were recruited. Pre-TAE characteristics including age, gender, etiology, liver biochemistry, Child-Pugh classification, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, the presence of shock, tumor staging and post TAE liver function were compared between patients with and without post-TAE 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were enrolled. The successful hemostatic rate after embolization was 91.4% and the median overall survival was 224 days. The 30-day cumulative mortality rate is 20.4%. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, male [aOR: 0.25, P=0.034] MELD score [aOR: 13.61, P<0.001], tumor size [aOR: 1.21, P=0.023] are the independent predictors for 30-day mortality. MELD score has better predictability of post-TAE 30-day mortality than total bilirubin level (AUROC: 0.818 vs. 0.668). The cut-off points of MELD score 13 has higher negative predictive value of 95% for post-TAE 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: TAE is effective for the initial hemostasis in patients with HCC rupture. MELD score ≥13 rather than only total bilirubin level >3 mg/dL be more predictive of post TAE 30-day mortality.

Alpha-fetoprotein response at different time-points is associated with efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nivolumab monotherapy has a modest objective response rate (ORR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To overcome the lack of biomarkers that predict delayed alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response beyond 4 weeks, we applied a novel 50-10 rule of AFP response for unresectable HCC patients under nivolumab monotherapy and proposed an algorithm based on on-treatment AFP reduction at different time-points. Ninety unresectable HCC patients who underwent nivolumab monotherapy in 2015-2019 were retrospectively recruited and divided into four classes: rapid AFP decrease of ≥ 50% of baseline at week 4 (class I), AFP changes within ± 50% of baseline at week 4 that later decreased to ≥ 10% of baseline (class II) or not (class III) at week 12, and rapid AFP increase of ≥ 50% of baseline at week 4 (class IV). ORR was 47.4%, 36.0%, 7.7%, and 5.0% in class I-IV patients, respectively. Rapid (class I) and delayed (class II) AFP responders had significantly higher ORR, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than non-responders (class III and IV) (ORR: 40.9% vs. 6.5%, P<0.001; median OS: not reached vs. 9.6 months, log-rank P<0.001; median PFS: 9.6 vs. 2.8 months, log-rank P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, AFP response was an independent factor associated with good OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.301, P=0.001) and PFS (HR=0.332, P<0.001). Moreover, AFP responders had higher ORR and better OS as well as PFS than non-responders, regardless of nivolumab as a first- or more than a second-line therapy (all P<0.05). In conclusion, the novel 50-10 rule of AFP response provides practical guidance for nivolumab monotherapy in unresectable HCC patients. However, this algorithm remains to be verified in a large prospective cohort.