Safety and efficacy of nilotinib in routine clinical practice in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase with resistance or intolerance to imatinib: results from the NOVEL study.

BACKGROUND: Nilotinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in many countries, including Taiwan. Though a number of controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib, studies assessing the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in routine clinical practice are limited. METHODS: The current study was an open-label, single-arm study conducted across 12 centers in Taiwan in adult patients with CML in chronic or accelerated phase with confirmed Ph+ chromosome (or BCR-ABL) and resistant or intolerant to one or more previous TKIs. The primary objective was to collect the long-term safety data in patients treated with nilotinib 400 mg, twice daily for up to 2 years. RESULTS: The study enrolled 85 patients with CML, including 76 in the chronic phase (CML-CP) and 9 in the accelerated phase (CML-AP). Overall, 1166 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 80 patients (94.1%), of which 70 AEs (6%) in 28 patients (32.9%) were serious and 336 AEs (28.8%) reported in 60 patients (70.6%) were drug-related. Common drug-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (21.2%), increased alanine aminotransferase (21.2%) and pruritus (17.7%). Of the 85 patients, 19 switched from imatinib due to intolerance - AEs were resolved in 16 of these 19 patients (84.2%). By 24 months, the cumulative rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), MR4.0 (BCR-ABL1IS ⩽0.01%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ⩽0.0032%) were 75.3, 56.8, 16.2 and 7.4%, respectively. Patients with CML-CP at baseline had higher overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those with CML-AP. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that demonstrated that nilotinib is effective and well-tolerated in patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib in the real-world setting in Taiwan, reflecting effective management of CML by physicians under routine clinical practice in Taiwan.

Everolimus Plus Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Clinical Trial.

Importance: Cotargeting the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway and estrogen receptor may prevent or delay endocrine resistance in patients receiving first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Objective: To investigate the combination of everolimus plus endocrine therapy in first-line and second-line treatment settings for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 BOLERO-4 (Breast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus) clinical trial, 245 patients were screened for eligibility; 202 were enrolled between March 7, 2013, and December 17, 2014. A median follow-up of 29.5 months had been achieved by the data cutoff date (December 17, 2016). Interventions: Patients received first-line treatment with everolimus, 10 mg/d, plus letrozole, 2.5 mg/d. Second-line treatment with everolimus, 10 mg/d, plus exemestane, 25 mg/d, was offered at the investigator's discretion upon initial disease progression. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the first-line setting per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication and at least 1 postbaseline safety assessment. Results: A total of 202 women treated in the first-line setting had a median age of 64.0 years (interquartile range, 58.0-70.0 years) with metastatic (194 [96.0%]) or locally advanced (8 [4.0%]) breast cancer. Median progression-free survival was 22.0 months (95% CI, 18.1-25.1 months) with everolimus and letrozole. Median overall survival was not reached; 24-month estimated overall survival rate was 78.7% (95% CI, 72.1%-83.9%). Fifty patients started second-line treatment; median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI, 1.9-7.4 months). No new safety signals were observed. In the first-line setting, the most common all-grade adverse event was stomatitis (139 [68.8%]); the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse event was anemia (21 [10.4%]). In the second-line setting, the most common adverse events were stomatitis and decreased weight (10 [20.0%] each); the most common grade 3 to 4 adverse event was hypertension (5 [10.0%]). There were 50 (24.8%) deaths overall during the study; 40 were due to study indication (breast cancer). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this trial add to the existing body of evidence suggesting that everolimus plus endocrine therapy is a good first-line treatment option for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01698918.

Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Develop Everolimus-Related Hyperglycemia and Hypercholesterolemia: Combined Subgroup Analyses of the RECORD-1 and REACT Trials.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia and hypercholesterolemia are class effects of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to characterize safety and efficacy of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with everolimus in RECORD-1 (REnal Cell cancer treatment with Oral RAD001 given Daily) and REACT (RAD001 Expanded Access Clinical Trial in RCC) who developed these events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with vascular endothelial growth factor-refractory mRCC received everolimus 10 mg/d in the randomized RECORD-1 (n = 277) and open-label REACT (n = 1367) studies. Outcomes included safety, treatment duration, overall response, and progression-free survival for patients who developed hypercholesterolemia or hyperglycemia. RESULTS: In RECORD-1, 12% (33 of 277) and 20% (55 of 277) of patients developed any grade hyperglycemia or hypercholesterolemia, respectively, with only 6% (78 of 1367) and 1% (14 of 1367) of the same events, respectively, in REACT. Median everolimus treatment duration was similar for patients with hyperglycemia or hypercholesterolemia (RECORD-1, 6.2 and 6.2 months, respectively; REACT, 4.4 and 4.5 months, respectively), but longer than the overall populations (RECORD-1, 4.6 months; REACT, 3.2 months). In RECORD-1/REACT, 82%/68% of patients with hyperglycemia and 75%/71% of patients with hypercholesterolemia achieved partial response or stable disease. The incidence of clinically notable Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, other than anemia and lymphopenia, appeared to be similar across trials and subgroups. Although there was a trend for improved progression-free survival with development of hyperglycemia or hypercholesterolemia, the association was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Hyperglycemia and hypercholesterolemia were observed in low numbers of patients, and although these events might be associated with improved response to everolimus, the differences were not significant. These findings should be validated with prospective biomarker studies.

An Indirect Comparison of Everolimus Versus Axitinib in US Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in Whom Prior Sunitinib Therapy Failed.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a weight-adjusted indirect comparison to approximate the relative efficacy of everolimus versus axitinib among patients with second-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma in whom sunitinib therapy previously failed. METHODS: Individual patient data from the RECORD-1 (Renal Cell Cancer Treatment With Oral RAD001 Given Daily) Phase III clinical trial provided information for patients taking everolimus. Summary baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes were available for patients taking axitinib who were included in the AXIS (axitinib versus sorafenib) Phase III clinical trial. A Bayesian latent class mixture model differentiating responders and nonresponders and with imbedded Weibull regression on PFS was used to identify sex, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk score, and time receiving prior sunitinib therapy as prognostic factors for PFS based on posterior probability >95%. Patients taking everolimus were weighted up or down based on their combination of prognostic variables. Weights were calculated by dividing the proportion of patients observed in AXIS for a given characteristic by the proportion observed in RECORD-1 and taking the product of the values derived for all three weighting variables considered. Weighted PFS distributions were derived with bootstrapped 95% CIs and compared with those reported for the AXIS trial. FINDINGS: After weighting, distributions of the 3 key baseline characteristics were more closely aligned between the 2 studies; however, some differences remained. A slightly lower rate of poor-risk patients was evident in RECORD-1 (30%) versus AXIS (36%), and a 9% lower proportion of males was observed in the everolimus group compared with the axitinib group. Distributions of time receiving prior sunitinib therapy were almost equivalent between the treatment arms. A median PFS of 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.5-10.6 months) was observed for patients in the weighted everolimus group compared with 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.5-6.4 months) in the AXIS trial. IMPLICATIONS: Similar median PFS point estimates and overlapping CIs suggest that everolimus and axitinib have similar efficacy. Although these results do not negate the need for direct comparison, this study may be used to inform clinical and reimbursement decisions until such evidence is available.