Preterm and Term Infants Evaluated for Sepsis: Differences in Management and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in practice patterns and outcomes of young preterm versus age-matched term infants evaluated for sepsis, because evaluation and management of this group are not well defined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study at an academic, freestanding children's hospital of previously healthy preterm and term infants aged 0 to 60 days, who presented for initial evaluation of fever and/or hypothermia from 2014 to 2019. We classified infants by gestational age as preterm (32-36 6/7 weeks) and term (37-42 weeks) and compared diagnostic evaluation, management, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 363 preterm infants evaluated for sepsis, 336 met inclusion criteria; within the same study period, 2331 term infants were evaluated for sepsis, of which 600 were randomly selected and 554 were included. Clinicians performed inflammatory marker testing and chest x-rays more frequently in preterm infants 31% vs 25% (P = .034) and 50% vs 32% (P < .001), respectively. Preterm infants had a higher rate of bacteremia 5.9% vs 2.5% (P = .035), were hospitalized more frequently 72% vs 63% (P = .006), and required ICU level of care more often 32% vs 5% (P < .001) than term infants. They had lower rates of viral infections 33% vs 42% (P = .015) and no significant increased return visits. Febrile preterm and term infants, and older hypothermic preterm infants had relatively higher rates of serious bacterial infections. Hypothermic preterm infants had the longest hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Preterm infants had increased rates of bacteremia and required higher level of care compared with age-matched term infants, likely reflecting their increased risk for sepsis and other concomitant morbidities associated with preterm birth.

"Help Me Sleep": A Quality Initiative to Reduce Overnight Vital Signs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sleep is an essential part of the recovery process, yet inpatient sleep quality is poor. Patients and families report that vital signs are the most bothersome overnight disruption. Obtaining vital signs every 4 hours (Q4H) is not evidence-based and is frequently ordered indiscriminately. We aimed to decrease the percentage of patient nights with vital sign checks between 12 am and 6 am in a low-risk population from 98% to 70% within 12 months to minimize overnight sleep disruptions and improve inpatient sleep. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement project on 3 pediatric hospital medicine teams at a large free-standing children's hospital. Our multidisciplinary team defined low-risk patients as those admitted for hyperbilirubinemia and failure to thrive. Interventions were focused around education, electronic health record decision support, and patient safety. The outcome measure was the percentage of patient nights without a vital sign measurement between 12 am and 6 am and was analyzed by using statistical process control charts. Our process measure was the use of an appropriate vital sign order. Balancing measures included adverse patient events, specifically code blues outside the ICU and emergent transfers. RESULTS: From March 2020 to April 2021, our pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) services admitted 449 low-risk patients for a total of 1550 inpatient nights. The percentage of patient nights with overnight vital signs decreased from 98% to 38%. There were no code blues or emergent transfers. CONCLUSION: Our improvement interventions reduced the frequency of overnight vital sign monitoring in 2 low-risk groups without any adverse events.