Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury in Older Patients: Clinical Characteristics and Drug Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Information on older patients with hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (HA-AKI) and use of drugs is limited. AIM: This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, drug uses, and in-hospital outcomes of hospitalized older patients with HA-AKI. METHODS: Patients aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized in medical wards were retrospectively analyzed. The study patients were divided into the HA-AKI and non-AKI groups based on the changes in serum creatinine. Disease incidence, risk factors, drug uses, and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Of 26,710 older patients in medical wards, 4,491 (16.8%) developed HA-AKI. Older patients with HA-AKI had higher rates of multiple comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index score than those without AKI (p < 0.001). In the HA-AKI group, the proportion of patients with prior use of drugs with possible nephrotoxicity was higher than that of patients with prior use of drugs with identified nephrotoxicity (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients with critical illness, use of nephrotoxic drugs, and the requirements of intensive care unit treatment, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and dialysis as well as in-hospital mortality and hospitalization duration and costs were higher in the HA-AKI than the non-AKI group; these increased with HA-AKI severity (all p for trend <0.001). With the increase in the number of patients with continued use of drugs with possible nephrotoxicity after HA-AKI, the clinical outcomes showed a tendency to worsen (p < 0.001). Moreover, HA-AKI incidence (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 10.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8.27-12.74; p < 0.001), and nephrotoxic drugs exposure (adjusted OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.63-1.91; p < 0.001) had an association with an increased in-hospital mortality risk. CONCLUSION: AKI incidence was high among hospitalized older patients. Older patients with HA-AKI had worse in-hospital outcomes and higher resource utilization. Nephrotoxic drug exposure and HA-AKI incidence were associated with an increased in-hospital mortality risk.

Timing and Origins of Local and Distant Metastases in Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Metastasis is the primary cause of lung cancer-related death. Nevertheless, the underlying molecular mechanisms and evolutionary patterns of lung cancer metastases are still elusive. METHODS: We performed whole-exome sequencing for 40 primary tumors (PTs) and 61 metastases from 47 patients with lung cancer, of which 40 patients had paired PTs and metastases. The PT-metastasis genomic divergence, metastatic drivers, timing of metastatic dissemination, and evolutionary origins were analyzed using appropriate statistical tools and mathematical models. RESULTS: There were various degrees of genomic heterogeneity when comparing the paired primary and metastatic lesions or comparing metastases of different sites. Multiple metastasis-selected/enriched genetic alterations were found, such as MYC amplification, NKX2-1 amplification, RICTOR amplification, arm 20p gain, and arm 11p loss, and these results were were also featured in a meta-analysis cross-validated using an independent cohort from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center database. To elucidate the metastatic seeding time, we applied a metastatic model and found 61.1% of the tumors were late dissemination, in which the metastatic seeding happened approximately 2.74 years before clinical detection. One exception was lymph node metastases whose dissemination time was relatively early. By analyzing the evolutionary origins, we reported that nonlymph node metastases were mainly seeded by the PT (87.5%) rather than the earlier colonized lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results shed light on the molecular features that potentially drive lung cancer metastases. The distinct temporospatial pattern of disease progression revealed that lung cancer was susceptible to either late dissemination or indolent early lymph node metastases, leaving a potential time window to minimize metastases by early cancer detection.

Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant tislelizumab and chemotherapy for Pancoast tumor: A case report.

A 60-year-old man was hospitalized because of numbness and weakness in the right upper limb. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large mass in the right upper lobe invading the right eighth cervical and first thoracic nerve root. Biopsy pathology confirmed primary lung adenocarcinoma with a clinical stage of cT4N0M0 IIIA, negative for anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations but positive for programmed death ligand 1 (3%). Neoadjuvant tislelizumab and chemotherapy were offered to this patient with Pancoast tumor, and tumor shrinkage of 71% was achieved. After the operation, surgical pathology indicated pathologic complete response (pCR). Circulating tumor cells testing was negative after the first adjuvant treatment. In this case, we provide real-world evidence of encouraging pCR with neoadjuvant tislelizumab and chemotherapy for a patient with Pancoast tumor.

Wait-and-See Treatment Strategy Could be Considered for Lung Adenocarcinoma with Special Pleural Dissemination Lesions, and Low Genomic Instability Correlates with Better Survival.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a wait-and-see strategy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with special pleural dissemination lesions (r-pM1a and s-pM1a). Furthermore, the study characterized genomic alternations about disease progression. METHODS: For this study, 131 NSCLC patients with a diagnosis of pM1a were retrospectively selected. Survival differences were evaluated among patients treated with three different initial postoperative treatments: chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and wait-and-see strategy. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on primary and metastatic tumors of 10 patients with dramatic progression and 13 patients with gradual progression. RESULTS: The wait-and-see group showed better progression-free survival (PFS) than the chemotherapy group (p < 0.001) but PFS similar to that of targeted group (p = 0.984). This pattern persisted in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive patients. For patients with EGFR-negative/unknown status, PFS was longer in the wait-and-see group than in the two treatment groups. Furthermore, better overall survival (OS) was observed for the patients who received chemotherapy or targeted therapy after the wait-and-see strategy than for those who received chemotherapy or targeted therapy immediately. Lymph node status was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Finally, WES analysis showed that a high genomic instability index (GIS) and chromosome 18q loss were more common in metastatic tumors, and low GIS was significantly associated with better PFS (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: The wait-and-see strategy could be considered for special pM1a patients without lymph nodes metastasis, and patients with a low GIS may be suitable for this strategy.