The Status and Challenges for Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatments in United States Proton Therapy Centers: An NRG Oncology Practice Survey.

Purpose: To report the current practice pattern of the proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate treatments. Materials and Methods: A survey was designed to inquire about the practice of proton SBRT treatment for prostate cancer. The survey was distributed to all 30 proton therapy centers in the United States that participate in the National Clinical Trial Network in February, 2023. The survey focused on usage, patient selection criteria, prescriptions, target contours, dose constraints, treatment plan optimization and evaluation methods, patient-specific QA, and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) methods. Results: We received responses from 25 centers (83% participation). Only 8 respondent proton centers (32%) reported performing SBRT of the prostate. The remaining 17 centers cited 3 primary reasons for not offering this treatment: no clinical need, lack of volumetric imaging, and/or lack of clinical evidence. Only 1 center cited the reduction in overall reimbursement as a concern for not offering prostate SBRT. Several common practices among the 8 centers offering SBRT for the prostate were noted, such as using Hydrogel spacers, fiducial markers, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for target delineation. Most proton centers (87.5%) utilized pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery and completed Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) phantom credentialing. Treatment planning typically used parallel opposed lateral beams, and consistent parameters for setup and range uncertainties were used for plan optimization and robustness evaluation. Measurements-based patient-specific QA, beam delivery every other day, fiducial contours for IGRT, and total doses of 35 to 40 GyRBE were consistent across all centers. However, there was no consensus on the risk levels for patient selection. Conclusion: Prostate SBRT is used in about 1/3 of proton centers in the US. There was a significant consistency in practices among proton centers treating with proton SBRT. It is possible that the adoption of proton SBRT may become more common if proton SBRT is more commonly offered in clinical trials.

Case report and literature review: A thyroid storm patient with severe acute hepatic failure treated by therapeutic plasma exchange and a double plasma molecular absorption system.

Thyroid storm (TS) leading to acute liver failure is rare but fatal in clinical practice and hepatic failure can remarkably limit medication options for TS. We successfully cured a patient with TS complicated with acute hepatic failure using therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and a double plasma molecular absorption system (DPMAS) and summarized the case characteristics of 10 similar critical patients reported worldwide. We recommend that patients with TS complicated with liver failure disuse propylthiouracil or methimazole. TPE should be utilized to rapidly decrease thyroid hormone levels, and DPMAS should be considered for supportive treatment in the presence of hepatic encephalopathy or dramatic bilirubin elevations.

The status and challenges for prostate SBRT treatments in United States proton therapy centers: An NRG Oncology practice survey.

A survey was designed to inquire about the practice of proton SBRT treatment for prostate cancer. The survey was distributed to all 30 proton therapy centers in the United States that participate in the National Clinical Trial Network in Feb. 2023. The survey focused on usage, patient selection criteria, prescriptions, target contours, dose constraints, treatment plan optimization and evaluation methods, patient-specific QA, and IGRT methods. Results: We received responses from 25 centers (83% participation). Only 8 respondent proton centers (32%) reported performing SBRT of the prostate. The remaining 17 centers cited three primary reasons for not offering this treatment: no clinical need, lack of volumetric imaging, and/or lack of clinical evidence. Only 1 center cited the reduction in overall reimbursement as a concern for not offering prostate SBRT. Several common practices among the 8 centers offering SBRT for the prostate were noted, such as using Hydrogel spacers, fiducial markers, and MRI for target delineation. Most proton centers (87.5%) utilized pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery and completed Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) phantom credentialing. Treatment planning typically used parallel opposed lateral beams, and consistent parameters for setup and range uncertainties were used for plan optimization and robustness evaluation. Measurements-based patient-specific QA, beam delivery every other day, fiducial contours for IGRT, and total doses of 35-40 GyRBE were consistent across all centers. However, there was no consensus on the risk levels for patient selection. Conclusion: Prostate SBRT is used in about 1/3 of proton centers in the US. There was a significant consistency in practices among proton centers treating with proton SBRT. It is possible that the adoption of proton SBRT may become more common if proton SBRT is more commonly offered in clinical trials.

Proton Pencil-Beam Scanning Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies: Patterns of Practice Survey and Recommendations for Future Development from NRG Oncology and PTCOG.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionation using pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PBSPT) is an attractive option for thoracic malignancies. Combining the advantages of target coverage conformity and critical organ sparing from both PBSPT and SBRT, this new delivery technique has great potential to improve the therapeutic ratio, particularly for tumors near critical organs. Safe and effective implementation of PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation to treat thoracic malignancies is more challenging than the conventionally-fractionated PBSPT due to concerns of amplified uncertainties at the larger dose per fraction. NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Cooperative Group (PTCOG) Thoracic Subcommittee surveyed US proton centers to identify practice patterns of thoracic PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation. From these patterns, we present recommendations for future technical development of proton SBRT/hypofractionation for thoracic treatment. Amongst other points, the recommendations highlight the need for volumetric image guidance and multiple CT-based robust optimization and robustness tools to minimize further the impact of uncertainties associated with respiratory motion. Advances in direct motion analysis techniques are urgently needed to supplement current motion management techniques.

NRG Oncology and PTCOG Patterns of Practice Survey and Consensus Recommendations on Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionation using pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PBSPT) is an attractive option for thoracic malignancies. Combining the advantages of target coverage conformity and critical organ sparing from both PBSPT and SBRT, this new delivery technique has great potential to improve the therapeutic ratio, particularly for tumors near critical organs. Safe and effective implementation of PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation to treat thoracic malignancies is more challenging than the conventionally fractionated PBSPT because of concerns of amplified uncertainties at the larger dose per fraction. The NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Thoracic Subcommittee surveyed proton centers in the United States to identify practice patterns of thoracic PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation. From these patterns, we present recommendations for future technical development of proton SBRT/hypofractionation for thoracic treatment. Among other points, the recommendations highlight the need for volumetric image guidance and multiple computed tomography-based robust optimization and robustness tools to minimize further the effect of uncertainties associated with respiratory motion. Advances in direct motion analysis techniques are urgently needed to supplement current motion management techniques.

Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials. RESULTS: Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.

A Novel Inverse Algorithm To Solve the Integrated Optimization of Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer of Proton FLASH Therapy With Sparse Filters.

PURPOSE: The recently proposed Integrated Physical Optimization Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IPO-IMPT) framework allows simultaneous optimization of dose, dose rate, and linear energy transfer (LET) for ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) treatment planning. Finding solutions to IPO-IMPT is difficult because of computational intensiveness. Nevertheless, an inverse solution that simultaneously specifies the geometry of a sparse filter and weights of a proton intensity map is desirable for both clinical and preclinical applications. Such solutions can reduce effective biologic dose to organs at risk in patients with cancer as well as reduce the number of animal irradiations needed to derive extra biologic dose models in preclinical studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Unlike the initial forward heuristic, this inverse IPO-IMPT solution includes simultaneous optimization of sparse range compensation, sparse range modulation, and spot intensity. The daunting computational tasks vital to this endeavor were resolved iteratively with a distributed computing framework to enable Simultaneous Intensity and Energy Modulation and Compensation (SIEMAC). SIEMAC was demonstrated on a human patient with central lung cancer and a minipig. RESULTS: SIEMAC simultaneously improves maps of spot intensities and patient-field-specific sparse range compensators and range modulators. For the patient with lung cancer, at our maximum nozzle current of 300 nA, dose rate coverage above 100 Gy/s increased from 57% to 96% in the lung and from 93% to 100% in the heart, and LET coverage above 4 keV/µm dropped from 68% to 9% in the lung and from 26% to <1% in the heart. For a simple minipig plan, the full-width half-maximum of the dose, dose rate, and LET distributions decreased by 30%, 1.6%, and 57%, respectively, again with similar target dose coverage, thus reducing uncertainty in these quantities for preclinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: The inverse solution to IPO-IMPT demonstrated the capability to simultaneously modulate subspot proton energy and intensity distributions for clinical and preclinical studies.

Safety and efficacy of stereotactic body proton therapy for high-risk lung tumors.

Purpose: Stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) is an emerging treatment strategy for lung tumors that aims to combine the excellent local control benefits of ultra-hypofractionation with the physical advantages of protons, which reduce the integral dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared to photons. To date, however, very little data delivering SBPT in 5 or fewer fractions to lung tumors have been reported. Given that photon stereotactic body radiation therapy can struggle to deliver ablative doses to high-risk tumors (i.e., central/ultra-central location, prior in-field radiation, tumor size >5 cm, or the presence of severe pulmonary comorbidities) while adhering to OAR dose constraints, we hypothesized that SBPT would be an effective alternative for patients with high-risk tumors. Methods and Materials: Twenty-seven high-risk patients with 29 lung tumors treated with SBPT at the New York Proton Center between December 2019 and November 2022 were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into three major subgroups: early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), locally recurrent NSCLC, and metastatic cancer from lung cancer or other histologies. Patient characteristics were reported using descriptive statistics, actuarial methods were used to quantify disease control rates, and toxicities were scored using CTCAE v 5.0. Results: The most common high-risk indications for SBPT were central/ultra-central tumor location (69.0%), severe COPD (48.1%), reirradiation (44.4%), significant pulmonary fibrosis (22.2%), and large tumor size > 5 cm (18.5%). In total, 96.6% of tumors were fully covered by the prescription dose without compromising target coverage. Three-year actuarial rates of local control for early-stage NSCLC, locally recurrent NSCLC, and metastatic patients were 89%, 100%, and 43%, respectively. Three-year actuarial rates of regional control were 89%, 67%, and 86%. Three-year actuarial rates of distant metastasis-free survival were 79%, 100%, and 0%. Two patients (7.4%), both of whom had clinically significant baseline interstitial lung disease and pre-treatment continuous oxygen demand, experienced grade ≥2 pulmonary toxicity (1 grade 3, 1 grade 5). There were no acute or late grade ≥2 toxicities related to esophagitis, cardiac injury, airway injury, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage or brachial plexopathy. Conclusions: In the largest study of proton SBRT reported to date, SBPT has a favorable toxicity profile while being an effective approach for treating most high-risk tumors without requiring dose de-escalation or compromising tumor coverage and warrants further investigation.

Advances in treatment planning and management for the safety and accuracy of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using proton pencil beam scanning: Simulation, planning, quality assurance, and delivery recommendations.

This study presents the clinical experiences of the New York Proton Center in employing proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) for the treatment of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. It encompasses a comprehensive examination of multiple facets, including patient simulation, delineation of target volumes and organs at risk, treatment planning, plan evaluation, quality assurance, and motion management strategies. By sharing the approaches of the New York Proton Center and providing recommendations across simulation, treatment planning, and treatment delivery, it is anticipated that the valuable experience will be provided to a broader proton therapy community, serving as a useful reference for future clinical practice and research endeavors in the field of stereotactic body proton therapy for lung tumors.

Proton liver stereotactic body radiation therapy: Treatment techniques and dosimetry feasibility from a single institution.

Purpose: To assess the resulting dosimetry characteristics of simulation and planning techniques for proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of primary and secondary liver tumors. Methods: Consecutive patients treated under volumetric daily image guidance with liver proton SBRT between September 2019 and March 2022 at Emory Proton Therapy Center were included in this study. Prescriptions ranged from 40 Gy to 60 Gy in 3- or 5-fraction regimens, and motion management techniques were used when target motion exceeded 5 mm. 4D robust optimization was used when necessary. Dosimetry evaluation was conducted for ITV V100, D99, Dmax, and liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-samples Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Thirty-six tumors from 29 patients were treated. Proton therapy for primary and secondary liver tumors using motion management techniques and robust optimization resulted in high target coverage and low doses to critical organs. The median ITV V100% was 100.0%, and the median ITV D99% was 111.3%. The median liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc were 499 cGy and 5.7 cGy, respectively. The median conformity index (CI) was 1.03, and the median R50 was 2.56. Except for ITV D99% (primary 118.1% vs. secondary 107.2%, p = 0.005), there were no significant differences in age, ITV volume, ITV V100%, ITV maximum dose, liver-ITV mean dose, or D700cc between primary and secondary tumor groups. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that proton therapy with motion management techniques and robust optimization achieves excellent target coverage with low normal liver doses for primary and secondary liver tumors. The results showed high target coverage, high conformality, and low doses to the liver.

Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment approach for early-stage lung cancer and intrathoracic oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. While local control is often excellent with this modality when delivered with photon therapy, toxicities for select patients can be significant. Proton therapy offers a unique opportunity to widen the therapeutic window when treating patients with thoracic malignancies requiring or benefitting from ultra-high doses per fraction. Thoracic proton SBRT may be particularly beneficial in cases requiring dose escalation, for tumors >5 cm, for central or ultra-central tumors, for reirradiation, in patients with interstitial lung diseases, and when combining radiation with immunotherapy. These clinical indications are detailed, along with supporting literature and clinical recommendations. Other considerations, future directions and potential benefits of proton SBRT, including sparing lymphocytes, when delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy or as FLASH, and for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer or in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, are also discussed.

A spot-specific range uncertainty framework for robust optimization of proton therapy treatments.

PURPOSE: An accurate estimation of range uncertainties is essential to exploit the potential of proton therapy. According to Paganetti's study, a value of 2.4% (1.5 standard deviation) is currently recommended for planning robust treatments with Monte Carlo dose engines. This number is based on a dominant contribution from the mean excitation energy of tissues. However, it was recently shown that expressing tissues as a mixture of water and "dry" material in the CT calibration process allowed for a significant reduction of this uncertainty. We thus propose an adapted framework for pencil beam scanning robust optimization. First, we move towards a spot-specific range uncertainty (SSRU) determination. Second, we use the water-based formalism to reduce range uncertainties and, potentially, to spare better the organs at risk. METHODS: The stoichiometric calibration was adapted to provide a molecular decomposition (including water) of each voxel of the CT. The SSRU calculation was implemented in MCsquare, a fast Monte Carlo dose engine dedicated to proton therapy. For each spot, a ray-tracing method was used to propagate molecular I-values uncertainties and obtain the corresponding effective range uncertainty. These were then combined with other sources of range uncertainties, according to Paganetti's study of 2012. The method was then assessed on three head-and-neck patients. Two plans were optimized for each patient: the first one with the classical 2.4% flat range uncertainty (FRU), the second one with the variable range uncertainty. Both plans were then compared in terms of target coverage and OAR mean dose reduction. Robustness evaluations were also performed, using the SSRU for both plans in order to simulate errors as realistically as possible. RESULTS: For patient 1, it was found that the median SSRU was 1.04% (1.5 standard deviation), yielding, therefore, a very large reduction from the 2.4% FRU. All three SSRU plans were found to have a very good robustness level at a 90% confidence interval while sparing OAR better than the classical plan. For instance, in nominal cases, average reductions in the mean dose of 15.7, 8.4, and 13.2% were observed in the left parotid, right parotid, and pharyngeal constrictor muscle, respectively. As expected, the classical plans showed a higher but unnecessary level of robustness. CONCLUSIONS: Promising results of the SSRU framework were observed on three head-and-neck cases, and more patients should now be considered. The method could also benefit to other tumor sites and, in the long run, the variable part of the range uncertainty could be generalized to other sources of uncertainty in order to move towards more and more patient-specific treatments.

Deep learning-based Fast Volumetric Image Generation for Image-guided Proton FLASH Radiotherapy.

Objective: FLASH radiotherapy leverages ultra-high dose-rate radiation to enhance the sparing of organs at risk without compromising tumor control probability. This may allow dose escalation, toxicity mitigation, or both. To prepare for the ultra-high dose-rate delivery, we aim to develop a deep learning (DL)-based image-guide framework to enable fast volumetric image reconstruction for accurate target localization for proton FLASH beam delivery. Approach: The proposed framework comprises four modules, including orthogonal kV x-ray projection acquisition, DL-based volumetric image generation, image quality analyses, and water equivalent thickness (WET) evaluation. We investigated volumetric image reconstruction using kV projection pairs with four different source angles. Thirty patients with lung targets were identified from an institutional database, each patient having a four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) dataset with ten respiratory phases. Leave-phase-out cross-validation was performed to investigate the DL model's robustness for each patient. Main results: The proposed framework reconstructed patients' volumetric anatomy, including tumors and organs at risk from orthogonal x-ray projections. Considering all evaluation metrics, the kV projections with source angles of 135° and 225° yielded the optimal volumetric images. The patient-averaged mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, structural similarity index measure, and WET error were 75±22 HU, 19±3.7 dB, 0.938±0.044, and -1.3%±4.1%. Significance: The proposed framework has been demonstrated to reconstruct volumetric images with a high degree of accuracy using two orthogonal x-ray projections. The embedded WET module can be used to detect potential proton beam-specific patient anatomy variations. This framework can rapidly deliver volumetric images to potentially guide proton FLASH therapy treatment delivery systems.

MPLA case: I didn't realize those were the expectations!

This work of fiction is part of a case study series developed by the Medical Physics Leadership Academy (MPLA). It is intended to facilitate the discussion of how students and advisors can better communicate expectations and navigate difficult conversations. In this case, a fourth-year Ph.D. student Emma learns that her advisor Dr. So is leaving the institution and has not arranged to bring any students with him. As Emma and Dr. So meet to discuss Emma's next steps, the conversation reveals misunderstandings and miscommunications of expectations, including a specific publication requirement for graduation from Dr. So. Having just learned of Dr. So's publication requirement, Emma realizes that graduating before the lab shuts down is not feasible. The intended use of this case, through group discussion or self-study, is to encourage readers to discuss the situation at hand and inspire professionalism and leadership thinking. This case study falls under the scope of and is supported by the MPLA, a committee in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM).

Measurement of the time structure of FLASH beams using prompt gamma rays and secondary neutrons as surrogates.

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of online monitoring of irradiation time (IRT) and scan time for FLASH proton radiotherapy using a pixelated semiconductor detector.Approach. Measurements of the time structure of FLASH irradiations were performed using fast, pixelated spectral detectors based on the Timepix3 (TPX3) chips with two architectures: AdvaPIX-TPX3 and Minipix-TPX3. The latter has a fraction of its sensor coated with a material to increase sensitivity to neutrons. With little or no dead time and an ability to resolve events that are closely spaced in time (tens of nanoseconds), both detectors can accurately determine IRTs as long as pulse pile-up is avoided. To avoid pulse pile-up, the detectors were placed well beyond the Bragg peak or at a large scattering angle. Prompt gamma rays and secondary neutrons were registered in the detectors' sensors and IRTs were calculated based on timestamps of the first charge carriers (beam-on) and the last charge carriers (beam-off). In addition, scan times inx,y, and diagonal directions were measured. The experiment was carried out for various setups: (i) a single spot, (ii) a small animal field, (iii) a patient field, and (iv) an experiment using an anthropomorphic phantom to demonstratein vivoonline monitoring of IRT. All measurements were compared to vendor log files.Main results. Differences between measurements and log files for a single spot, a small animal field, and a patient field were within 1%, 0.3% and 1%, respectively.In vivomonitoring of IRTs (95-270 ms) was accurate within 0.1% for AdvaPIX-TPX3 and within 6.1% for Minipix-TPX3. The scan times inx,y, and diagonal directions were 4.0, 3.4, and 4.0 ms, respectively.Significance. Overall, the AdvaPIX-TPX3 can measure FLASH IRTs within 1% accuracy, indicating that prompt gamma rays are a good surrogate for primary protons. The Minipix-TPX3 showed a somewhat higher discrepancy, likely due to the late arrival of thermal neutrons to the detector sensor and lower readout speed. The scan times (3.4 ± 0.05 ms) in the 60 mm distance ofy-direction were slightly less than (4.0 ± 0.06 ms) in the 24 mm distance ofx-direction, confirming the much faster scanning speed of the Y magnets than that of X. Diagonal scan speed was limited by the slower X magnets.

Characterization of 250 MeV Protons from the Varian ProBeam PBS System for FLASH Radiation Therapy.

Shoot-through proton FLASH radiation therapy has been proposed where the highest energy is extracted from a cyclotron to maximize the dose rate (DR). Although our proton pencil beam scanning system can deliver 250 MeV (the highest energy), this energy is not used clinically, and as such, 250 MeV has yet to be characterized during clinical commissioning. We aim to characterize the 250-MeV proton beam from the Varian ProBeam system for FLASH and assess the usability of the clinical monitoring ionization chamber (MIC) for FLASH use. We measured the following data for beam commissioning: integral depth dose curve, spot sigma, and absolute dose. To evaluate the MIC, we measured output as a function of beam current. To characterize a 250 MeV FLASH beam, we measured (1) the central axis DR as a function of current and spot spacing and arrangement, (2) for a fixed spot spacing, the maximum field size that achieves FLASH DR (ie, > 40 Gy/s), and (3) DR reproducibility. All FLASH DR measurements were performed using an ion chamber for the absolute dose, and irradiation times were obtained from log files. We verified dose measurements using EBT-XD films and irradiation times using a fast, pixelated spectral detector. R90 and R80 from integral depth dose were 37.58 and 37.69 cm, and spot sigma at the isocenter were σx = 3.336 and σy = 3.332 mm, respectively. The absolute dose output was measured as 0.343 Gy*mm2/MU for the commissioning conditions. Output was stable for beam currents up to 15 nA and gradually increased to 12-fold for 115 nA. Dose and DR depended on beam current, spot spacing, and arrangement and could be reproduced with 6.4% and 4.2% variations, respectively. Although FLASH was achieved and the largest field size that delivers FLASH DR was determined as 35 × 35 mm2, the current MIC has DR dependence, and users should measure dose and DR independently each time for their FLASH applications.

Feasibility study of hybrid inverse planning with transmission beams and single-energy spread-out Bragg peaks for proton FLASH radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) proton planning with only transmission beams (TBs) has limitations in normal tissue sparing. The single-energy spread-out Bragg peaks (SESOBPs) of the FLASH dose rate have been demonstrated feasible for proton FLASH planning. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of combining TBs and SESOBPs for proton FLASH treatment. METHODS: A hybrid inverse optimization method was developed to combine the TBs and SESOBPs (TB-SESOBP) for FLASH planning. The SESOBPs were generated field-by-field from spreading out the BPs by pre-designed general bar ridge filters (RFs) and placed at the central target by range shifters (RSs) to obtain a uniform dose within the target. The SESOBPs and TBs were fully placed field-by-field allowing automatic spot selection and weighting in the optimization process. A spot reduction strategy was conducted in the optimization process to push up the minimum MU/spot assuring the plan deliverability at beam current of 165 nA. The TB-SESOBP plans were validated in comparison with the TB only (TB-only) plans and the plans with the combination of TBs and BPs (TB-BP plans) regarding 3D dose and dose rate (dose-averaged dose rate) distributions for five lung cases. The FLASH dose rate coverage (V40Gy/s ) was evaluated in the structure volume receiving > 10% of the prescription dose. RESULTS: Compared to the TB-only plans, the mean spinal cord D1.2cc drastically reduced by 41% (P < 0.05), the mean lung V7Gy and V7.4 Gy moderately reduced by up to 17% (P < 0.05), and the target dose homogeneity slightly increased in the TB-SESOBP plans. Comparable dose homogeneity was achieved in both TB-SESOBP and TB-BP plans. Besides, prominent improvements were achieved in lung sparing for the cases of relatively large targets by the TB-SESOBP plans compared to the TB-BP plans. The targets and the skin were fully covered with the FLASH dose rate in all three plans. For the OARs, V40Gy/s  = 100% was achieved by the TB-only plans while V40Gy/s  > 85% was obtained by the other two plans. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the hybrid TB-SESOBP planning was feasible to achieve FLASH dose rate for proton therapy. With pre-designed general bar RFs, the hybrid TB-SESOBP planning could be implemented for proton adaptive FLASH radiotherapy. As an alternative FLASH planning approach to TB-only planning, the hybrid TB-SESOBP planning has great potential in dosimetrically improving OAR sparing while maintaining high target dose homogeneity.

An Integrated Physical Optimization Framework for Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy FLASH Treatment Planning Allows Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer Optimization Using Patient-Specific Ridge Filters.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific ridge filters provide a passive means to modulate proton energy to obtain a conformal dose. Here we describe a new framework for optimization of filter design and spot maps to meet the unique demands of ultrahigh-dose-rate (FLASH) radiation therapy. We demonstrate an integrated physical optimization Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) (IPO-IMPT) approach for optimization of dose, dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed an inverse planning software to design patient-specific ridge filters that spread the Bragg peak from a fixed-energy, 250-MeV beam to a proximal beam-specific planning target volume. The software defines patient-specific ridge filter pin shapes and uses a Monte Carlo calculation engine, based on Geant4, to provide dose and LET influence matrices. Plan optimization, using matRAD, accommodates the IPO-IMPT objective function considering dose, dose rate, and LET simultaneously with minimum monitor unit constraints. The framework enables design of both regularly spaced and sparse-optimized ridge filters, from which some pins are omitted to allow faster delivery and selective LET optimization. To demonstrate the framework, we designed ridge filters for 3 example patients with lung cancer and optimized the plans using IPO-IMPT. RESULTS: The IPO-IMPT framework selectively spared the organs at risk by reducing LET and increasing dose rate, relative to IMPT planning. Sparse-optimized ridge filters were superior to regularly spaced ridge filters in dose rate. Depending on which parameter is prioritized, volume distributions and histograms for dose, DADR, and LETd, using evaluation structures specific to heart, lung, and esophagus, show high levels of FLASH dose-rate coverage and/or reduced LETd, while maintaining dose coverage within the beam specific planning target volume. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of using an IPO-IMPT framework to accomplish proton FLASH stereotactic body proton therapy, accounting for dose, DADR, and LETd simultaneously.