RESUMEN
Rationale: Apneic individuals have reduced airway caliber during sleep. The biomechanical changes in upper airway anatomy contributing to this airway narrowing are largely unknown. Objectives: We sought to investigate the state-dependent (wake vs. sleep) biomechanical behavior of the upper airway soft-tissue and craniofacial structures. Methods: Upper airway magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 15 sleep-deprived control subjects (apnea-hypopnea index, <5; 0.3 ± 0.5 events per hour) and 12 sleep-deprived apneic subjects (apnea-hypopnea index, ⩾5; 35.2 ± 18.1 events per hour) during wake and sleep and analyzed for airway measures and soft-tissue/mandibular movement. Results: In the retropalatal region, control subjects showed sleep-dependent reductions (P ⩽ 0.037) in average cross-sectional airway area (CSA), minimum CSA, and anteroposterior and lateral dimensions. Apneic subjects showed sleep-dependent reductions (P ⩽ 0.002) in average CSA, minimum CSA, and anteroposterior and lateral dimensions. In the retroglossal region, control subjects had no sleep-dependent airway reductions. However, apneic subjects had sleep-dependent reductions in minimal CSA (P = 0.001) and lateral dimensions (P = 0.014). Control subjects only showed sleep-dependent posterior movement of the anterior-inferior tongue octant (P = 0.039), whereas apneic subjects showed posterior movement of the soft palate (P = 0.006) and all tongue octants (P ⩽ 0.012). Sleep-dependent medial movement of the lateral walls was seen at the retropalatal minimum level (P = 0.013) in control subjects and at the retropalatal and retroglossal minimum levels (P ⩽ 0.017) in apneic subjects. There was posterior movement of the mandible in apneic subjects (P ⩽ 0.017). Conclusions: During sleep, control and apneic subjects showed reductions in retropalatal airway caliber, but only the apneic subjects showed retroglossal airway narrowing. Reductions in anteroposterior and lateral airway dimensions were primarily due to posterior soft palate, tongue and mandibular movement and to medial lateral wall movement. These data provide important initial insights into obstructive sleep apnea pathogenesis.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Orofaringe , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Orofaringe/diagnóstico por imagen , Orofaringe/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Adulto , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Polisomnografía , Sueño/fisiología , Lengua/diagnóstico por imagen , Lengua/fisiopatología , Paladar Blando/diagnóstico por imagen , Paladar Blando/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Background: Aspirin therapy and/or type 2 (T2) biologics are used in the management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Objective: To identify the number of patients with AERD who tolerated aspirin therapy, yet due to persistent symptoms, incorporated T2 biologic management. Methods: A retrospective review was performed between July 2016 and June 2019. Patients with AERD and who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), aspirin desensitization (AD), and at least 6 months of aspirin therapy (ATAD) after AD, and who remained biologic-naive up through this timepoint were included in the study. Introduction of a T2 biologic while on ATAD was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was a change in a validated patient-reported outcome measure for chronic rhinosinusitis score between the postoperative predesensitization timepoint, and the 6-month postdesensitization timepoint, presented as means and compared by using the Student's t-test. Results: A total of 103 patients met inclusion criteria. Two patients (1.9%) ultimately supplemented ATAD with a T2 biologic. The mean outcomes measure test score after 6 months of ATAD for patients who received biologics was 40.5 versus 15 in those who did not receive biologics (p = 0.02). The mean differences between the postoperative predesensitization test score and the 6-month postdesensitization test score for patients who went on to receive biologics was an increase of 13 versus a decrease of 10 for those patients who did not receive biologics (p = 0.12). Conclusion: ESS, coupled with AD and ATAD, was successful in the long-term management of the majority of the patients with AERD, which rarely required the incorporation of T2 biologics. Patient questionnaires, such as outcomes measure test score, may identify aspirin therapy failures and help guide the practitioner in deciding when to introduce T2 biologics into the patient's treatment regimen.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Asma Inducida por Aspirina/terapia , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Endoscopía , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales , Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/inmunología , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Aspirina/inmunología , Asma Inducida por Aspirina/diagnóstico , Asma Inducida por Aspirina/inmunología , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) includes endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and aspirin desensitization (AD) with aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD). The objective of this study was to determine the rate of major complications associated with aspirin use that resulted in the discontinuation of aspirin therapy. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients with AERD who underwent ESS, AD, and ATAD at a single AERD tertiary center between July 2016 and February 2019. Complications associated with aspirin that resulted in the discontinuation of aspirin therapy were analyzed via analysis of variance and logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 109 AERD patients underwent ESS with subsequent AD. Ten patients (9.2%) discontinued therapy after AD, before starting ATAD. Eight patients (7.3%) discontinued therapy after starting ATAD. There were 91 patients (83.5%) with no complications throughout ATAD. Reasons for discontinuation included gastritis, upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleed, anaphylaxis, persistent sinonasal symptoms, recurrent epistaxis, asthma exacerbation, and a nummular rash. There was no significant correlation between complication rate and (1) aspirin doses (analysis of variance [ANOVA] F: 0.69; p = 0.51), (2) gender (odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 1.65; p = 0.30), (3) age (OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.09; p = 0.06), or (4) race/ethnicity (OR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.44; p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: AD with ATAD was associated with only a 0.92% incidence of a clinically significant GI bleed, and only a 0.92% incidence of anaphylaxis. A remaining 16 patients (14.7%) discontinued aspirin therapy due to minor clinical sequelae. These findings demonstrate that the majority of AERD patients tolerate AD with ATAD without any major complications.