RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235315.].
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of paramedic crew size in the resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains inconclusive. We hypothesised that teams with a larger crew size have better resuscitation performance including chest compression fraction (CCF), advanced life support (ALS), and teamwork performance than those with a smaller crew size. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled study in a simulation setting. A total of 140 paramedics from New Taipei City were obtained by stratified sampling and were randomly allocated to 35 teams with crew sizes of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (i.e. 7 teams in every paramedic crew size). A scenario involving an OHCA patient who experienced ventricular fibrillation and was attached to a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) machine was simulated. The primary outcome was the overall CCF; the secondary outcomes were the CCF in manual CPR periods, time from the first dose of epinephrine until the accomplishment of intubation, and teamwork performance. Tasks affecting the hands-off time during CPR were also analysed. RESULTS: In all 35 teams with crew sizes of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, the overall CCFs were 65.1%, 64.4%, 70.7%, 72.8%, and 71.5%, respectively (P = 0.148). Teams with a crew size of 5 (58.4%, 61.8%, 68.9%, 72.4%, and 68.7%, P<0.05) had higher CCF in manual CPR periods and better team dynamics. Time to the first dose of epinephrine was significantly shorter in teams with 4 paramedics, while time to completion of intubation was shortest in teams with 6 paramedics. Troubleshooting of M-CPR machine decreased the hands-off time during resuscitation (39 s), with teams comprising 2 paramedics having the longest hands-off time (63s). CONCLUSION: Larger paramedic crew size (â§4 paramedics) did not significantly increase the overall CCF in OHCA resuscitation but showed higher CCF in manual CPR period before the setup of the CPR machine. A crew size of â§4 paramedics can also shorten the time of ALS interventions, while teams with 5 paramedics will have the best teamwork performance. Paramedic teams with a smaller crew size should focus more on the quality of manual CPR, teamwork, and training how to troubleshoot a M-CPR machine.
Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/prevención & control , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación/métodos , Masculino , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/patología , Fibrilación Ventricular/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Ventricular/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Objective: A burn mass casualty incident (BMCI) involving 499 patients occurred at a "color party" in Taiwan in June 27, 2015. We implemented a study to identify critical challenges regarding the prehospital emergency care in BMCIs. Methods: A 3-stage, mixed methods study was conducted in 2016. First, a statistical analysis of prehospital management using the data retrieved from the Emergency Medical Management System of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan was performed. This was followed by a face-to-face, open-ended interview with the emergency medical technicians and the staff of the emergency operations center who responded to the incident; and the transcription of the interview data into constructed themes. Results: Our study indicated that the signs of inhalation injury needed to be incorporated in the field triage protocol for BMCIs; the collaborative utilization of regional emergency medical services may improve the surge capacity in the field; and an "island-hopping" strategy for patient transportation may allow the healthcare systems to manage the surge of burn patients more efficiently. Conclusions: Current field triage protocols may be insufficient for burn patients and should be further investigated. The practices in field triage, transport capacity, and transfer strategy can be considered as a part of an efficient prehospital emergency response to BMCIs.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/diagnóstico , Quemaduras/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Adulto , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Colorantes , Polvo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Polvos , Almidón , Taiwán , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effect of video-assistance and audio-assistance on quality of dispatcher-instructed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DI-CPR) for bystanders. METHODS: Five databases were searched, including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Scopus and NIH clinical trial, to find randomized control trials published before June 2017. Qualitative analysis and meta-analysis were undertaken to examine the difference between the quality of video-instructed and audio-instructed dispatcher-instructed bystander CPR. RESULTS: The database search yielded 929 records, resulting in the inclusion of 9 relevant articles in this study. Of these, 6 were included in the meta-analysis. Initiation of chest compressions was slower in the video-instructed group than in the audio-instructed group (median delay 31.5â¯s; 95% CI: 10.94-52.09). The difference in the number of chest compressions per minute between the groups was 19.9 (95% CI: 10.50-29.38) with significantly faster compressions in the video-instructed group than in the audio-instructed group (104.8 vs. 80.6). The odds ratio (OR) for correct hand positioning was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.53-1.30) when comparing the audio-instructed and video-instructed groups. The differences in chest compression depth (mm) and time to first ventilation (seconds) between the video-instructed group and audio-instructed group were 1.6â¯mm (95% CI: -8.75, 5.55) and 7.5â¯s (95% CI: -56.84, 71.80), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Video-instructed DI-CPR significantly improved the chest compression rate compared to the audio-instructed method, and a trend for correctness of hand position was also observed. However, this method caused a delay in the commencement of bystander-initiated CPR in the simulation setting.