Association between admission-blood-glucose-to-albumin ratio and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Introduction: It is unclear whether admission-blood-glucose-to-albumin ratio (AAR) predicts adverse clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we performed a observational study to explore the predictive value of AAR on clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent PCI between January 2010 and February 2020 were enrolled in the study. The patients were classified into three groups according to AAR tertile. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), as well as all-cause mortality and MACEs during follow-up. Logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazard regression were the primary analyses used to estimate outcomes. Results: Among the 3,224 enrolled patients, there were 130 cases of in-hospital all-cause mortality (3.9%) and 181 patients (5.4%) experienced MACEs. After adjustment for covariates, multivariate analysis demonstrated that an increase in AAR was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.72, 95% CI: 1.47-5.03, P = 0.001] and MACEs (adjusted OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.18-3.10, P = 0.009), as well as long-term all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19-2.28, P = 0.003] and MACEs (adjusted HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.16-2.14, P = 0.003). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that AAR was an accurate predictor of in-hospital all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.718, 95% CI: 0.675-0.761) and MACEs (AUC = 0.672, 95% CI: 0.631-0.712). Discussion: AAR is a novel and convenient independent predictor of all-cause mortality and MACEs, both in-hospital and long-term, for STEMI patients receiving PCI.

Positive association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and pulmonary infection in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR), a parameter of relative stress-induced hyperglycemia, is an excellent predictive factor for all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, its association with pulmonary infection in patients with STEMI during hospitalization remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were consecutively enrolled from 2010 to 2020. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of pulmonary infection during hospitalization, and the secondary endpoint was in-hospital MACEs, composed of all-cause mortality, stroke, target vessel revascularization, or recurrent myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A total of 2,841 patients were finally included, with 323 (11.4%) developing pulmonary infection and 165 (5.8%) developing in-hospital MACEs. The patients were divided into three groups according to SHR tertiles. A higher SHR was associated with a higher rate of pulmonary infection during hospitalization (8.1%, 9.9%, and 18.0%, P < 0.001) and in-hospital MACEs (3.7%, 5.1%, and 8.6%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that SHR was significantly associated with the risk of pulmonary infection during hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.02, P = 0.021) and in-hospital MACEs (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.17-2.39, P = 0.005) after adjusting for potential confounding factors. The cubic spline models demonstrated no significant non-linear relationship between SHR and pulmonary infection (P = 0.210) and MACEs (P = 0.743). In receiver operating characteristic curve, the best cutoff value of SHR for pulmonary infection was 1.073. CONCLUSIONS: The SHR is independently associated with the risk of pulmonary infection during hospitalization and in-hospital MACEs for patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.

Morphometric Assessment for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis with Optical Coherence Tomography and the Optical Flow Ratio in a Vessel with Single Stenosis.

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis in a vessel with single stenosis. Background: The OCT-based morphofunctional computational method for deriving the optical flow ratio (OFR) has diagnostic value, as it can identify the functional severity of coronary stenosis, but the ability of the OFR to aid the OCT in determining coronary stenosis hemodynamics in single-stenosis lesion remains unclear. Methods: 74 vessels with single stenosis were studied in 69 patients; all cases were performed through OCT and quantitative flow ratio (QFR), and OCT images were used to perform OFR. Results: Among vessels with single stenosis, OFR showed a good correlation with QFR (r = 0.86; p < 0.001). Taking QFR as the standard, the vessel-level diagnosis accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of OFR were 90% (95% CI: 81 to 96), 94% (95% CI: 77 to 99), 88% (95% CI: 74 to 96), 85% (95% CI: 68 to 94) and 95% (95% CI: 82 to 99), respectively. Among vessels with OFR/QFR concordance, both the minimum lumen area (MLA) and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) showed excellent diagnostic efficiency (MLA: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98, p < 0.001; MLD: AUC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98, p < 0.001) in determining the functional significance of coronary stenosis in a single stenosis lesion, and the best cutoff values were 1.55 mm2 and 1.40 mm. Conclusions: OFR has a good correlation with QFR. OCT-measured MLA and MLD have excellent diagnostic efficiency in identifying the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis in a vessel with single stenosis.

Elevated Serum Uric Acid/Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Post-Contrast Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background: The serum uric acid/albumin ratio (sUAR), a novel inflammatory marker, effectively predicts acute kidney injury (AKI) and cardiovascular outcomes. However, whether the sUAR predicts post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. In this study, we evaluated the association between the sUAR and PC-AKI in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. Methods: We consecutively recruited patients with STEMI who underwent PCI and stratified them into three groups according to the terciles of the sUAR. The primary outcome was the incidence of PC-AKI. The association between the sUAR and PC-AKI was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 2861 patients with STEMI were included in this study. The incidence of PC-AKI increased stepwise with increasing sUAR tercile (2.6% vs 4.0% vs 11.6%, p < 0.001), and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse clinical events (MACEs) was highest among patients in the Q3 group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the sUAR was also an independent predictor of PC-AKI (continuous sUAR, per 1-unit increase, odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.06 [1.02-1.10], p = 0.005; tercile of sUAR, OR [95% CI] for Q2 and Q3: 1.18 [0.69-2.01] and 1.85 [1.12-3.06], respectively, with Q1 as a reference) but not in-hospital MACEs. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) of the sUAR for predicting PC-AKI was 0.708 (95% CI: 0.666-0.751), and ROC analysis also showed that the sUAR was superior to uric acid and albumin alone in predicting PC-AKI. Conclusion: Increasing sUAR was significantly associated with a higher risk of PC-AKI but not in-hospital MACEs in patients with STEMI who underwent PCI, suggesting that sUAR had a predictive value for PC-AKI after PCI in patients with STEMI. Further studies are required to confirm this finding.

Approaches to cutaneous wound healing: basics and future directions.

The skin provides essential functions, such as thermoregulation, hydration, excretion and synthesis of vitamin D. Major disruptions of the skin cause impairment of critical functions, resulting in high morbidity and death, or leave one with life-changing cosmetic damage. Due to the complexity of the skin, diverse approaches are needed, including both traditional and advanced, to improve cutaneous wound healing. Cutaneous wounds undergo four phases of healing. Traditional management, including skin grafts and wound dressings, is still commonly used in current practice but in combination with newer technology, such as using engineered skin substitutes in skin grafts or combining traditional cotton gauze with anti-bacterial nanoparticles. Various upcoming methods, such as vacuum-assisted wound closure, engineered skin substitutes, stem cell therapy, growth factors and cytokine therapy, have emerged in recent years and are being used to assist wound healing, or even to replace traditional methods. However, many of these methods still lack assessment by large-scale studies and/or extensive application. Conceptual changes, for example, precision medicine and the rapid advancement of science and technology, such as RNA interference and 3D printing, offer tremendous potential. In this review, we focus on the basics of wound treatment and summarize recent developments involving both traditional and hi-tech therapeutic methods that lead to both rapid healing and better cosmetic results. Future studies should explore a more cost-effective, convenient and efficient approach to cutaneous wound healing. Graphical abstract Combination of various materials to create advanced wound dressings.