Validation of a new emotion regulation self-report questionnaire for children.

OBJECTIVE: To examine and validate the self-report Questionnaire on the Regulation of Unpleasant Moods in Children (FRUST), which is a modified and shortened version of the Questionnaire for the Assessment of Emotion Regulation in Children and Adolescents (FEEL-KJ). METHODS: The data comprised child and parent ratings of a community-screened sample with differing levels of affective dysregulation (AD) (N = 391, age: M = 10.64, SD = 1.33, 56% male). We conducted latent factor analyses to establish a factor structure. Subsequently, we assessed measurement invariance (MI) regarding age, gender, and AD level and evaluated the internal consistencies of the scales. Finally, we examined the convergent and divergent validity of the instrument by calculating differential correlations between the emotion regulation strategy (ERS) scales and self- and parent-report measures of psychopathology. RESULTS: A four-factor model, with one factor representing Dysfunctional Strategies and the three factors Distraction, Problem-Solving and Social Support representing functional strategies provided the best fit to our data and was straightforward to interpret. We found strong MI for age and gender and weak MI for AD level. Differential correlations with child and parent ratings of measures of psychopathology supported the construct validity of the factors. CONCLUSIONS: We established a reliable and valid self-report measure for the assessment of ERS in children. Due to the reduced number of items and the inclusion of highly specific regulatory behaviors, the FRUST might be a valuable contribution to the assessment of ER strategies for diagnostic, therapeutic, and research purposes.

Attitudes toward innovative mental health treatment approaches in Germany: E-mental health and home treatment.

E-mental health and home treatment are treatment approaches that have proven to be effective, but are only slowly implemented in the German health care system. This paper explores the attitudes toward these innovative treatment approaches. Data was collected in two large, non-clinical samples representative of the German population in spring 2020 (N = 2,503) and winter 2020/2021 (N = 2,519). Statistical associations between variables were examined using two-tailed tests. Binary and multinomial logistic regressions were performed to predict attitudes toward online-based treatment concepts and home treatment approaches. Only few (<20%) people preferred online-based treatment approaches, while a larger proportion (~50%) could imagine being treated at home. Overall, younger subjects were more open to online-therapy approaches, while people with lower education preferred more often a traditional therapy setting. Acceptance of online-therapy did not raise significantly during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic. When different online-based treatment options were available, the probability of accepting home treatment significantly increased with increasing levels of therapeutic support. Further promotion of acceptance for online-therapy and home treatment seems to be necessary. In the future, more information on innovative treatment approaches should be actively provided.

[Parental Stress: Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Parental Stress Scale in the General Population]. / Stress durch Elternschaft: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version der Parental Stress Scale in der Allgemeinbevölkerung.

Parental stress has negative impact on parents and their children. Parental stress may be of special interest for family and child well-being due to Covid-19 pandemic. A reliable and valid assessment of parental stress would be beneficial both in research and clinical practice. The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) is internationally well established as an economic and psychometric valid assessment. It consists of 18 items. The study evaluated the factor structure of the German version of the PSS in a general population (n=386 parents with children<16 years) for the first time. The sample was part of a representative sample (n=2519). The confirmatory factor analysis did not confirm internationally previously reported models. Eliminating one item, the explorative factor analysis suggested a two factor structure with the dimensions "lack of confident" and "worries and strain". Both subscales showed a good internal consistence (McDonalds ω≥0,87). We observed correlations of the PSS-17 items with family dysfunction and elevated scores for depressive or anxiety symptoms, but not with sociodemographic factors. One conclusion is that the multidimensional construct of parental stress maybe is not comprehensively represented by the PSS. For the use in clinical practice and research this has to be taken into account. Albeit, the German version of the PSS is an economic, reliable and valid assessment.

[Assessment of General Family Functioning: Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Brief Assessment of Family Functioning Scale]. / Die Erfassung des allgemeinen familiären Funktionsniveaus: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version der Brief Assessment of Family Functioning Scale.

The functionality of the family system is not only a central theme in developmental psychology and family research, but also plays a key role in many physical illnesses and mental disorders. Despite its high relevance, there are only a very few brief and user-friendly self-report measures assessing general family functioning. This gap is closed by the Brief Assessment of Family Functioning Scale (BAFFS), which consists of three items of the General Functioning Scale of the internationally well-established Family Assessment Device. In this study, the German version (KSAFF) of the BAFFS was psychometrically evaluated for the first time in a large and representative general population sample (n=2463). Using multigroup confirmatory factor analyses, strong measurement invariance was shown for relevant subsamples (women vs. men; participants in partnerships with vs. without children) with good model fit. Although one of the three items, which is the only negatively formulated item, yielded insufficient psychometric item characteristics, the internal consistency was Cronbach's α=0.71. As an indication of adequate construct validity, associations of family functioning with socioeconomic status as well as with current depression and anxiety were found in accordance with the hypothesis. Although application experiences and psychometric analyses of the German version of the BAFFS in relevant clinical samples are pending, this three-item self-report measure can be recommended as an economic, user-friendly assessment device for general family functioning, particularly since it yielded satisfactory to good psychometric properties in the general population.