Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767280

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is common, but concerns regarding post-operative complications and mortality remain. No study has described the Danish patient population undergoing general anesthesia on a national level. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing general anesthesia in Denmark. METHODS: This study was a registry-based observational cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing general anesthesia in Denmark during 2020 and 2021. Data from nationwide registries covering patient characteristics, anesthesia and procedure information, and patient outcomes were combined. Descriptive statistics were used to present findings, both overall and in subgroups based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. RESULTS: We identified 453,133 cases of general anesthesia in 328,951 unique patients. The median age was 57 years (quartiles: 41, 71), and 242,679 (54%) were females. Data on ASA classification were missing for less than 1% of the population, and ASA II was the most prevalent ASA classification (49%). Among cases of general anesthesia, 0.1% experienced a stroke, 0.2% had in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 3.9% had a stay in the intensive care unit within 30 days. Mortality at 30 days and 1 year were 1.8% and 6.3%, respectively, increasing with a higher ASA classification. CONCLUSION: This study offers the first comprehensive overview of adult patients undergoing general anesthesia in Denmark. Post-anesthesia complications were few and increased with ASA classification.

2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(9): 1051-1060, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite improved medical treatment strategies, postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting remain major challenges. This systematic review investigated the relationship between perioperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions and postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched on March 8, 2021 for randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of perioperative respiratory or hemodynamic interventions in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Investigators reviewed trials for relevance, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed when feasible. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: This review included 65 original trials; of these 48% had pain, nausea, and/or vomiting as the primary focus. No reduction of postoperative pain was found in meta-analyses when comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment, high (80%) to low (30%) fraction of oxygen, low (5-7 ml/kg) to high (9-12 ml/kg) tidal volume, or goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care. In the meta-analysis comparing recruitment maneuvers with no recruitment maneuvers, patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery had less shoulder pain 24 h postoperatively (mean difference in the numeric rating scale from 0 to 10: -1.1, 95% CI: -1.7, -0.5). In meta-analyses, comparing high to low fraction of inspired oxygen and goal-directed hemodynamic therapy to standard care in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting was reduced (odds ratio: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.87 and 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.85). The certainty in the evidence was mostly very low to low. The results should be considered exploratory given the lack of prespecified hypotheses and corresponding risk of Type 1 errors. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence regarding the impact of intraoperative respiratory and hemodynamic interventions on postoperative pain or nausea and vomiting. More definitive trials are needed to guide clinical care within this area.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Postoperatorio , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios , Adulto , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Oxígeno/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control
3.
Br J Pharmacol ; 179(10): 2175-2192, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34623632

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by pulmonary oedema and severe hypoxaemia. We investigated whether genetic deficit or blockade of calcium-activated potassium (KCa 3.1) channels would counteract pulmonary oedema and hypoxaemia in ventilator-induced lung injury, an experimental model for ARDS. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: KCa 3.1 channel knockout (Kccn4-/- ) mice were exposed to ventilator-induced lung injury. Control mice exposed to ventilator-induced lung injury were treated with the KCa 3.1 channel inhibitor, senicapoc. The outcomes were oxygenation (PaO2 /FiO2 ratio), lung compliance, lung wet-to-dry weight and protein and cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). KEY RESULTS: Ventilator-induced lung injury resulted in lung oedema, decreased lung compliance, a severe drop in PaO2 /FiO2 ratio, increased protein, neutrophils and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in BALF from wild-type mice compared with Kccn4-/- mice. Pretreatment with senicapoc (10-70 mg·kg-1 ) prevented the reduction in PaO2 /FiO2 ratio, decrease in lung compliance, increased protein and TNF-α. Senicapoc (30 mg·kg-1 ) reduced histopathological lung injury score and neutrophils in BALF. After injurious ventilation, administration of 30 mg·kg-1 senicapoc also improved the PaO2 /FiO2 ratio and reduced lung injury score and neutrophils in the BALF compared with vehicle-treated mice. In human lung epithelial cells, senicapoc decreased TNF-α-induced permeability. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Genetic deficiency of KCa 3.1 channels and senicapoc improved the PaO2 /FiO2 ratio and decreased the cytokines after a ventilator-induced lung injury. Moreover, senicapoc directly affects lung epithelial cells and blocks neutrophil infiltration in the injured lung. These findings indicate that blocking KCa 3.1 channels is a potential treatment in ARDS-like disease.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica , Acetamidas , Animales , Hipoxia/complicaciones , Hipoxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoxia/metabolismo , Pulmón/metabolismo , Ratones , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Tritilo/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/patología
4.
A A Pract ; 15(3): e01420, 2021 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33684076

RESUMEN

The right supraclavicular fossa view allows for ultrasonographic visualization of the central veins. A preprocedural scan of an asymptomatic 38-year-old man referred for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion revealed a large thrombus in the right brachiocephalic vein. Hence, a left-sided insertion was chosen. Using the right supraclavicular view, the PICC was visualized in the left brachiocephalic vein, and the catheter was followed to its final position, avoiding contact with the thrombus. Thus, the right supraclavicular fossa view allowed for the detection of relevant pathology and facilitated an alternative feasible strategy with real-time catheter guidance during PICC insertion.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Adulto , Catéteres , Humanos , Masculino , Ultrasonografía , Venas
5.
Resuscitation ; 158: 258-269, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33147523

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of new promising therapies to improve the dismal outcomes from cardiac arrest. The objectives of this study were: (1) To identify novel pharmacological therapies investigated in experimental animal studies and (2) to identify pharmacological therapies translated from experimental animal studies to clinical trials. METHODS: PubMed was searched to first identify relevant experimental cardiac arrest animal models published within the last 20 years. Based on this, a list of interventions was created and a second search was performed to identify clinical trials testing one of these interventions. Data extraction was performed using standardised data extraction forms. RESULTS: We identified 415 animal studies testing 190 different pharmacological interventions. The most commonly tested interventions were classified as vasopressors, anaesthetics/gases, or interventions aimed at molecular targets. We found 43 clinical trials testing 26 different interventions identified in the animal studies. Of these, 13 trials reported positive findings and 30 trials reported neutral findings with regards to the primary endpoint. No study showed harm of the intervention. Some interventions tested in human clinical trials, had previously been tested in animal studies without a positive effect on outcomes. A large number of animal studies was performed after publication of a clinical trial. CONCLUSION: Numerous different pharmacological interventions have been tested in experimental animal models. Despite this only a limited number of these interventions have advanced to clinical trials, however several of the clinical trials tested interventions that were first tested in experimental animal models.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco , Animales , Paro Cardíaco/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos
7.
Resuscitation ; 149: 150-157, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32142750

RESUMEN

AIM: To perform a systematic review of the literature on intravenous (IV) vs. intraosseous (IO) administration of drugs during cardiac arrest in order to inform an update of international guidelines. METHODS: The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO. Medline, Embase and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews were searched on December 17, 2019 for studies comparing IV to IO administration of drugs. The population included neonatal, paediatric, and adult patients with cardiac arrest. Two investigators reviewed each search for study relevance, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of individual studies. Meta-analyses were performed for studies without a critical risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. RESULTS: We included six observational studies comparing IV to IO administration of drugs and two randomized trials assessing the effect of specific drugs in subgroups related to IV vs. IO administration. All studies included adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. No studies were identified in neonatal or paediatric patients. The risk of bias for the observational studies was overall assessed as critical or serious, with confounding and selection bias being the primary sources of bias. The meta-analyses excluding studies with a critical risk of bias favoured IV access for all outcomes. Using GRADE, the certainty of evidence was judged at very low. Subgroup analyses of the two randomized trials demonstrated no statistically significant interactions between the route of access and study drugs on outcomes. However, these trials were underpowered to assess such interactions. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a limited number of studies comparing IV vs. IO administration of drugs during cardiac arrest. Pooled results from four observational studies favoured IV access with very low certainty of evidence. From the subgroup analyses of two randomized clinical trials, there was no statistically significant interaction between the route of access and study drug on outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infusiones Intraóseas
8.
Resusc Plus ; 3: 100016, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223299

RESUMEN

AIM: To perform a review of the literature on the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase were searched on January 24, 2020 for studies evaluating the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and/or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Two reviewers independently screened the titles/abstracts and selected full texts for relevance. Data were extracted from included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 4960 unique records. We included nine studies evaluating the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and/or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. All studies were observational cohort studies, of which seven were from the USA. Seven studies were in an adult population, while two studies were in a pediatric population. Results were overall inconsistent although some studies found a higher in-hospital cardiac arrest incidence in patients from low-income communities. There was no clear association between other socioeconomic factors (i.e. education, occupation, marital status, and insurance) and risk of or outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Due to the scarcity and heterogeneity of available studies, meta-analyses were not performed. CONCLUSION: There are limited data regarding the association between socioeconomic status and risk of and outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest and further research is warranted. Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and in-hospital cardiac arrest may reveal strategies to mitigate potential inequalities.

9.
Resuscitation ; 147: 1-11, 2020 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846693

RESUMEN

AIM: To provide an overview of published and registered trials related to post-cardiac arrest interventions. DATA SOURCE: We searched PubMed and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized clinical trials in adults specifically addressing a post-cardiac arrest intervention. RESULTS: We identified 65 manuscripts reporting randomized clinical trials. The majority of the trials were published within the last 10 years and the sample sizes were generally low with a median of 90 participants (quartiles: 49, 262; range: 9, 1359). The majority of the trials were conducted in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (79%), while only 6% were conducted specifically in in-hospital cardiac arrest and 15% included both in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We identified 48 registered trials online. The median target sample size is 100 participants (quartiles: 60, 400; range: 20, 1900). The majority of trials are enrolling patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (71%) while 6% specifically focuses on in-hospital cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of published and registered trials addressing post-cardiac arrest interventions. We believe this information will be relevant to guide future research.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...