Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Allergy ; 71(11): 1552-1560, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27015954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In a previously reported CoFAR study, 55 subjects with egg allergy underwent randomized, placebo-controlled egg oral immunotherapy (eOIT). Active treatment induced desensitization in most and sustained unresponsiveness (SU) in a smaller subset. We hypothesized that component-resolved analysis of IgE, IgG4, IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 may identify potential biomarkers of SU in OIT subjects. METHODS: Longitudinal samples for 51 egg-allergic subjects (37 active and 14 placebo) were available. Egg white (EW)-, ovalbumin (OVA)-, and ovomucoid (OVM)-specific levels of IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 were quantified by ELISA. IgE and IgG4 to these antigens were quantified using ImmunoCAP® . Clinical responders achieved SU to egg; all others were considered nonresponders. Between-group comparisons were made among active and placebo, as well as responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: No placebo subjects achieved responder status. Through month 48, among the 37 active subjects, baseline IgE-OVM was lower in responders (median 3.97 kU/l, n = 19) than in nonresponders (10.9 kU/l, n = 18, P = 0.010). Logistic regression analysis revealed that lower baseline IgE-EW (P = 0.038), IgE-OVM (P = 0.032), and a higher IgG4/IgE-OVM ratio (P = 0.013) were associated with clinical response. Relative increases in IgG4-EW, IgA-EW, and IgA2-EW were observed in responders (P = 0.024, 0.024, and 0.029, respectively). IgG4/IgE, IgA/IgE, and IgA2/IgE ratios for EW and IgA/IgE ratio for OVA were found to be significantly elevated among responders (P = 0.004, 0.009, 0.028, and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increased IgG4-EW, IgA-EW, and IgA2-EW during eOIT are associated with clinical response to eOIT. Lower pretreatment IgE-EW and IgE-OVM are also associated with SU. Future studies are needed to evaluate and validate these potential biomarkers.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Hipersensibilidad al Huevo/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Huevo/terapia , Huevos/efectos adversos , Inmunoglobulina A/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Administración Oral , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Neurology ; 70(19): 1688-90, 2008 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18057316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Clinical Trials Group established the Clinical Research Collaboration (CRC) Project in 2005 to increase community-based physician involvement in NINDS-sponsored research. METHODS: We assessed a random sample of 112 of the more than 1,000 current NINDS-sponsored clinical research studies to determine which could involve community physicians in enrollment or follow-up. Scoring factors were based on the premise that participation is feasible for noninvasive studies with simple screening, and follow-up criteria and visit frequency consistent with usual care. Scored studies included 26 Phase III, 31 Phase I/II, and 55 nonclinical trials. RESULTS: Overall, 41% of the sampled research studies were considered conducive to community physician participation that exceeds referral only; 21% with participation in all study activities and 20% with ability to provide some follow-up. Specialized neuropsychological or neurologic scale testing was judged to exclude community physician participation in 16% of studies. CONCLUSION: Many National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke studies are available in which community-based physicians could participate. Involving community physicians may increase efficiency of completing clinical research and encourage application of research findings in community practices.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/tendencias , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/tendencias , Neurología/tendencias , Médicos/tendencias , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/tendencias , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Tamizaje Masivo , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/estadística & datos numéricos , Neurología/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/tendencias , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA