Managing children with daytime urinary incontinence: a survey of Dutch general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, parents of children with daytime urinary incontinence (UI) first consult general practitioners (GPs). However, GPs need more specific guidelines for daytime UI management, resulting in care and referral decisions being made without clear guidance. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify Dutch GP considerations when treating and referring a child with daytime UI. METHODS: We invited GPs who referred at least one child aged 4-18 years with daytime UI to secondary care. They were asked to complete a questionnaire about the referred child and the management of daytime UI in general. RESULTS: Of 244 distributed questionnaires, 118 (48.4%) were returned by 94 GPs. Most reported taking a history and performing basic diagnostic tests like urine tests (61.0%) and physical examinations (49.2%) before referral. Treatment mostly involved lifestyle advice, with only 17.8% starting medication. Referrals were usually at the explicit wish of the child/parent (44.9%) or because of symptom persistence despite treatment (39.0%). GPs usually referred children to a paediatrician (n = 99, 83.9%), only referring to a urologist in specific situations. Almost half (41.4%) of the GPs did not feel competent to treat children with daytime UI and more than half (55.7%) wanted a clinical practice guideline. In the discussion, we explore the generalisability of our findings to other countries. CONCLUSION: GPs usually refer children with daytime UI to a paediatrician after a basic diagnostic assessment, usually without offering treatment. Parental or child demand is the primary stimulus for referral.

Parents' expectations of the outpatient care for daytime urinary incontinence in children: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Daytime urinary incontinence (UI) can have an enormous impact on a child's life, lowering both self-esteem and quality of life. Although most children start therapy after their first visit to our outpatient clinic, no studies have reported on parents' or patients' expectations of care for daytime UI in this setting. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the expectations of the parents of children referred to an outpatient clinic for daytime UI. STUDY DESIGN: This was a qualitative study that involved performing semi-structured interviews with the parents of children who had been referred for daytime UI (with or without nocturnal enuresis). Interviews took place between July 2018 and October 2018 and continued until saturation was reached. The results were transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to Giorgi's strategy of phenomenological data analysis. RESULTS: Nine parents of children, aged 5-12 years old, were interviewed, revealing "(Experienced) Health," Self-management," and "Social Impact" as the main themes that influenced parental expectations. All parents wanted to know if there was a medical explanation for UI, some were satisfied when diagnostics revealed no underlying condition, and others wanted treatment. Parents expressed no preferences about diagnostics or the content and duration of treatment, but they hoped that any previously attempted ineffective steps would not be repeated. Some parents defined treatment success as their child becoming completely dry, but most stated that learning coping strategies was more important. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to explore the expectations of parents when attending outpatient care for children with daytime UI. We employed a strong theoretical framework with a clear interview guide. The main limitations are that we only interviewed parents and that this was a qualitative study, precluding the drawing of firm conclusions. Nevertheless, our results point to the need for quantitative evaluation. CONCLUSION: Expectations seem to be influenced by (experienced) health, efforts at self-management, and the social impact of UI, making it critical that these themes are addressed. It was interesting to note that parents do not always attend outpatient departments with the goal of completely resolving daytime UI. Instead, some only want to know if there is an underlying medical condition or want to reduce the social impact by learning coping mechanisms. Excluding underlying medical conditions may therefore stimulate acceptance of watchful waiting without the need to start treatment.

Urinary incontinence in the Netherlands: Prevalence and associated risk factors in adults.

AIMS: To determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with urinary incontinence (UI) among adults in the Netherlands. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 1257 respondents aged ≥ 18 years, who completed the validated Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence Checklist. UI was defined as any involuntary leakage of urine during the past 6 months. RESULTS: The prevalence of UI in the total group was 36.8%. Women experienced UI significantly more often than men (49.0% versus 22.6%, respectively, P < 0.001). We found that in both men and women, the prevalence of UI increased with aging (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Remarkably, multivariate analysis revealed that age did not influence UI in men. Men and women aged 18-39 also experienced UI (17.0% and 36.1%, respectively). We established that diabetes mellitus, fecal incontinence, and constipation were risk factors for UI. In women, obesity, vaginal hysterectomies, and vaginal parturition were also risk factors for UI, as was prostate surgery in men. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of UI in the Netherlands is high. Medical practitioners should therefore not underestimate this problem, especially among young people. Because the multivariate analysis revealed that in men age did not correlate significantly with UI, we believe that the risk of experiencing UI increases with age because of diseases that are known to lead to UI and not because of aging as a single factor itself. Finally, this study can be used as a reference for patients living in Western-Europe.