Management of hip fractures in older people in Beijing: a retrospective audit and comparison with evidence-based guidelines and practice in the UK.

UNLABELLED: Despite the high burden of hip fracture in China, there is limited information on its management. This study investigated the management of hip fractures in a Beijing tertiary hospital and compared practice with that in 180 hospitals in the UK. The findings show a significant gap exists between the countries. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine if the management of older people with hip fractures in a Beijing tertiary hospital is comparable with the UK best practice guidelines for hip fracture management and the UK National Hip Fracture Database 2012, obtained from 180 hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective audit was undertaken in a large tertiary care hospital in Beijing. Data were compared with the National Hip Fracture Database 2012 collected in 180 hospitals in the UK on the proportion of patients managed according to the UK Blue Book standards. RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of patients were admitted to an orthopaedic ward within 24 h of fracture, while 100 % of patients in the UK were admitted to an orthopaedic ward within 24 h of arrival to an accident and emergency department. Only 8 % of patients received surgery within 48 h of admission compared with 83 % in the UK; 10 % received no surgery compared with 2.5 % in the UK; and 27 % received orthogeriatrician assessment compared with 70 % in the UK. New pressure ulcers developed in 2 % of patients compared with 3.7 % of those in the UK; whereas, 0.3 % of patients were assessed for osteoporosis treatment and 3.8 % received falls assessment, and comparable figures for the UK were 94 and 92 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gaps exist in hip fracture management in the Beijing hospital compared with the best practice achieved in 180 UK hospitals, highlighting the need to implement and evaluate proactive strategies to increase the uptake of best practice hip fracture care in China.

The relationship between aortic stiffness and changes in retinal microvessels among Asian ischemic stroke patients.

Large-artery stiffness is a risk factor for stroke, including cerebral small-vessel disease. Retinal microvascular changes are thought to mirror those in cerebral microvessels. We investigated the relationship between aortic stiffness and retinal microvascular changes in Asian ischemic stroke patients. We studied 145 acute ischemic stroke patients in Singapore who had aortic stiffness measurements using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cPWV). Retinal photographs were assessed for retinal microvessel caliber and qualitative signs of focal arteriolar narrowing, arteriovenous nicking and enhanced arteriolar light reflex. Aortic stiffening was associated with retinal arteriolar changes. Retinal arteriolar caliber decreased with increasing cPWV (r=-0.207, P=0.014). After adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, mean arterial pressure and small-vessel stroke subtype, patients within the highest cPWV quartile were more likely to have generalized retinal arteriolar narrowing defined as lowest caliber tertile (odds ratio (OR) 6.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-32.30), focal arteriolar narrowing (OR 13.85, CI 1.82-105.67), arteriovenous nicking (OR 5.08, CI 1.12-23.00) and enhanced arteriolar light reflex (OR 3.83, CI 0.89-16.48), compared with those within the lowest quartile. In ischemic stroke patients, aortic stiffening is associated with retinal arteriolar luminal narrowing as well as features of retinal arteriolosclerosis.

Retinal microvascular changes and subsequent vascular events after ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: Retinal microvasculature changes are associated with vascular events including stroke in healthy populations. It is not known whether retinal microvascular changes predict recurrent vascular events after ischemic stroke. We examined the relationship between retinal microvascular signs and subsequent vascular events in a prospective cohort of 652 acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Singapore from 2005 to 2007. METHODS: Retinal photographs taken within 1 week of stroke onset were assessed in a masked manner for quantitative and qualitative measures. Follow-up data over 2-4 years were obtained by standardized telephone interview and then were verified from medical records. Predictors of recurrent vascular events (cerebrovascular, coronary, vascular death, and composite vascular events) were determined using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Follow-up data over a median of 29 months were obtained for 89% (652 patients) of the cohort. After adjustment for covariates including traditional risk factors and index stroke etiology, patients with severe arteriovenous nicking (AVN) were more likely to have a recurrent cerebrovascular event (hazard ratio [HR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-4.33) compared with those without AVN. Patients with severe focal arteriolar narrowing (FAN) were more likely to have a recurrent cerebrovascular event (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.14-6.63) or subsequent composite vascular event (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.31-5.86) compared to those without FAN. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal microvascular changes predicted subsequent vascular events after ischemic stroke, independent of traditional risk factors and stroke subtype. Thus, retinal imaging has a potential role in predicting the risk of recurrent vascular events after ischemic stroke and in understanding novel vascular risk factors.

Difficulties in recruiting older people in clinical trials: an examination of barriers and solutions.

Limited information exists regarding optimal methods for the recruitment and retention of older people in clinical trials. The aim of this review is to identify common barriers to the recruitment of older people in clinical trials and to propose solutions to overcome these barriers. A review of literature was performed to identify common difficulties in recruiting older people. This in combination with our experience during recruitment for a randomized control trial, have highlighted numerous barriers. Population-specific recruitment strategies, simple informed-consent processes, and effective communication between the researcher and subject are effective strategies to overcome these barriers.

A qualitative study to assess the perceived benefits and barriers to the pneumococcal vaccine in hospitalised older people.

UNLABELLED: Pneumococcal vaccine is now recommended for all people aged 65 years and over in Australia, yet many in this age group remain unvaccinated, especially those from Non-English Speaking Backgrounds (NESB). AIM: Our aim was to assess some of the perceived beliefs, benefits and barriers to pneumococcal immunisation in older people. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted qualitative open-ended interviews among elderly hospital inpatients aged receiving care in the geriatric, cardiology, and orthopaedic departments of a large, 800-bed tertiary referral hospital. METHODS: 24 participants who had not received pneumococcal immunisation, and who were aged 60 years and over, were mentally competent and well enough to be interviewed were selected for our study. RESULTS: Three topics were addressed: patient attitudes towards vaccination, knowledge of vaccines and their purpose, and accessibility of patient education materials about vaccines and their purpose. Patients who accepted pneumococcal immunisation (acceptors) generally were unaware of the vaccine or did not know it was recommended for them. Patients who refused the pneumococcal vaccine (refusers) either would not consider it without the recommendation of their general practitioner or they maintained the belief that the vaccination would cause illness or symptoms. Knowledge about the availability and purpose of the pneumococcal vaccine was poor amongst our group. CONCLUSION: Poor knowledge of the availability and purpose of pneumococcal immunisation was prevalent in our subjects. Appropriate education campaigns and trusting and positive relationships with the general practitioners are likely to improve immunisation uptake.

MR diffusion-weighted imaging and outcome prediction after ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) shows acute ischemic lesions early after stroke so it might improve outcome prediction and reduce sample sizes in stroke treatment trials. Previous studies of DWI and outcome produced conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether DWI lesion characteristics independently predict outcome in a broad range of patients with acute stroke. METHODS: The authors recruited hospital-admitted patients with all severities of suspected stroke, assessed stroke severity on the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), performed early brain DWI, and assessed outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale). Clinical data and DWI lesion parameters were evaluated in a logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of outcome at 3 months and a previously described "Three-Item Scale" (including DWI) was tested for outcome prediction. RESULTS: Among 82 patients (mean NIHSS 7.1 [+/-6.3 SD]), the only independent outcome predictors were age and stroke severity. Neither DWI lesion volume nor apparent diffusion coefficient nor the previously described Three-Item Scale predicted outcome independently. Comparison with previous studies suggested that DWI may predict outcome only in patients with more severe cortical ischemic strokes. CONCLUSIONS: Across a broad range of stroke severities, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) did not predict outcome beyond that of key clinical variables. Thus, DWI is unlikely to reduce sample sizes in acute stroke trials assessing functional outcome, especially where estimated treatment effects are modest.

Magnetic resonance brain imaging in patients with acute stroke: feasibility and patient related difficulties.

OBJECTIVES: To assess organisational and patient specific limitations and safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the first line investigation for hospital admitted stroke patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted with acute stroke were assessed and an attempt was made to perform MRI in all patients. Oxygen saturation and interventions required during scanning were recorded. RESULTS: Among 136 patients recruited over 34 weeks, 85 (62%) underwent MRI. The patients' medical instability (15 of the 53 not scanned), contraindications to MRI (six of the 53 not scanned), and rapid symptom resolution (10 of the 53 not scanned) were the main reasons for not performing MRI. Of the 85 patients who underwent MRI, 26 required physical intervention, 17 did not complete scanning, and 11 of the 61 who had successful oxygen saturation monitoring were hypoxic during MRI. Organisational limitations accounted for only 13% of failures to scan. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 85% of hospital admitted acute stroke patients could have MRI as first line imaging investigation, but medical instability is the major limitation. Hypoxia is frequent in MRI. Patients should be monitored carefully, possibly by an experienced clinician, during scanning.

Medical management of ischaemic stroke.

Stroke is a medical emergency as it is the third commonest cause of death and the most important cause of acquired severe disability in adults. Stroke services, funding and research have lagged behind cardiac medicine but evidence is now available to support a much more interventional approach to the assessment and management of patients with ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of the most important interventions are the main sources of evidence for this review. This evidence supports the immediate assessment of patients with suspected stroke, including access to brain imaging, and consideration of urgent revascularisation strategies such as intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Patients not eligible for thrombolysis should receive aspirin and specialised care in a stroke unit. Many other treatments have been evaluated for acute ischaemic stroke of which some have been shown to be ineffective such as haemodilution or anticoagulation, whilst other interventions have not been adequately investigated such as neuroprotection and blood pressure lowering strategies. There is now good evidence to support a much more active assessment and treatment of patients with stroke but it is recognised that stroke services still need substantial development to maximise the benefits from the current proven interventions.

Trials of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: does the choice of primary outcome measure really matter?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Controversy regarding the risks and benefits of thrombolysis has not been helped by the perception that some trials were "positive" and others "negative" on their primary outcome measure of either "good" or "poor" functional outcome. We wondered whether the definition of good or poor functional outcome might have contributed to this perception, and what effect altering the definition might have on the individual trials and on the systematic review of all the trials combined. METHODS: We analyzed data on functional outcome, extracted from the randomized trials of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke, according to good (modified Rankin scale scores of 0 to 1 versus 2 to 6) and poor (modified Rankin 0 to 2 versus 3 to 6) functional outcome, to determine the effects of thrombolysis. RESULTS: Twelve trials (4342 patients, treated up to 6 hours after stroke) contributed to this analysis. Overall, there was no difference in the estimate of treatment effect between the 2 definitions (modified Rankin 0 to 2 versus 3 to 6, and 0 to 1 versus 2 to 6 [ORs 0.83 and 0.79, respectively]). However, the apparent "success" of several individual trials did alter. CONCLUSIONS: We should not place undue emphasis on the results of individual trials, when a change of a single point on the Rankin scale can make the difference between "success" and "failure." Overall, by either analysis, there was a significant benefit in patients treated with thrombolysis up to 6 hours after stroke.

Delays in stroke referrals.

Assessment of acute stroke by hospital physicians will have to speed up if we are to expect referral to hospital and computed tomography (both previously targets of criticism) to improve.

Drug therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: risks versus benefits.

Stroke is a very common medical emergency that, until recently, had no specific treatment. Following the results of several major trials (including 2 'mega-trials'), aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) can be recommended for the majority of patients with acute ischaemic stroke. While the benefit of aspirin is only modest, i.e. an increase of 11 per 1000 long term independent survivors, the public health benefit in the world will be substantial as this treatment could be given to millions of patients with acute ischaemic stroke each year. Heparin is associated with a reduction in early recurrent ischaemic stroke, but there is no net benefit because of a similar sized excess of recurrent haemorrhagic stroke (even for those in atrial fibrillation). Thrombolytic therapy has not been so widely tested and the results of the small trials to date have yielded conflicting results. The only positive publication to date (comprised of 2 related trials) evaluated the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alteplase, but such treatment is probably only indicated for highly selected patients. Further trials are almost certainly required and it would be unwise to change clinical practice based on the current evidence. No other stroke treatments have been shown to be beneficial, and much larger trials will be required to confirm or refute possible moderate benefits of treatment. A well organised stroke service and participation in clinical trials will improve the future care of patients with acute ischaemic stroke.

The validity of a simple clinical classification of acute ischaemic stroke.

The aim of the study reported here was to test the validity of a simple clinical classification of acute ischaemic stroke (Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project, OCSP) in predicting the site and size of cerebral infarction on computed tomography (CT). Consecutive patients admitted to hospital with acute ischaemic stroke were prospectively identified and classified into one of four clinical syndromes according to the OCSP classification, blind to the result of CT. The CT brain scans were classified blind to the clinical features into those demonstrating: small, medium or large cortical infarcts; small or large subcortical infarcts in the anterior circulation territory; and posterior cerebral circulation territory infarcts. A total of 108 patients were included. A recent infarct was seen on the CT scan in 91 patients (84%), and the clinical classification correctly predicted the site and size of the cerebral infarct in 80 of these (88%; 95% confidence interval 77-92%). The positive predictive value was best for large cortical infarcts (0.94) and worst for small subcortical infarcts (0.63). The OCSP clinical classification is a reasonably valid way of predicting the site and size of cerebral infarction on CT and can, therefore, be used very early after stroke onset before the infarct appears on the scan.